Skip to main content
Download PDF

Maintenance of chronicity signatures in fibroblasts isolated from recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa chronic wound dressings under culture conditions

Biological Research volume 56, Article number: 23 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) is a rare inherited skin disease caused by variants in the COL7A1 gene, coding for type VII collagen (C7), an important component of anchoring fibrils in the basement membrane of the epidermis. RDEB patients suffer from skin fragility starting with blister formation and evolving into chronic wounds, inflammation and skin fibrosis, with a high risk of developing aggressive skin carcinomas. Restricted therapeutic options are limited by the lack of in vitro models of defective wound healing in RDEB patients.

Results

In order to explore a more efficient, non-invasive in vitro model for RDEB studies, we obtained patient fibroblasts derived from discarded dressings) and examined their phenotypic features compared with fibroblasts derived from non-injured skin of RDEB and healthy-donor skin biopsies. Our results demonstrate that fibroblasts derived from RDEB chronic wounds (RDEB-CW) displayed characteristics of senescent cells, increased myofibroblast differentiation, and augmented levels of TGF-β1 signaling components compared to fibroblasts derived from RDEB acute wounds and unaffected RDEB skin as well as skin from healthy-donors. Furthermore, RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibited an increased pattern of inflammatory cytokine secretion (IL-1β and IL-6) when compared with RDEB and control fibroblasts. Interestingly, these aberrant patterns were found specifically in RDEB-CW fibroblasts independent of the culturing method, since fibroblasts obtained from dressing of acute wounds displayed a phenotype more similar to fibroblasts obtained from RDEB normal skin biopsies.

Conclusions

Our results show that in vitro cultured RDEB-CW fibroblasts maintain distinctive cellular and molecular characteristics resembling the inflammatory and fibrotic microenvironment observed in RDEB patients’ chronic wounds. This work describes a novel, non-invasive and painless strategy to obtain human fibroblasts chronically subjected to an inflammatory and fibrotic environment, supporting their use as an accessible model for in vitro studies of RDEB wound healing pathogenesis. As such, this approach is well suited to testing new therapeutic strategies under controlled laboratory conditions.

Background

Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is a group of genodermatoses characterized by skin and mucosa fragility and the formation of blisters due to mechanical stress [1]. EB, while varied in presentation and severity, is caused by mutations in genes coding for proteins that maintain the normal structural integrity of skin. Patients with EB are classified into four general types based on the genetic defects and the area of the skin where fragility is most evident: EB simplex (EBS); Junctional EB (JEB); Dystrophic EB (DEB); and Kindler EB (KEB) [2, 3].

The four general types of EB are further divided into specific sub-types which have their own clinical characteristics and disease severity, some being more incapacitating than others [3]. One of the more debilitating sub-types of EB is Recessive Dystrophic EB (RDEB), which itself can be sub-classified into RDEB intermediate and RDEB severe. Each RDEB subtypes is caused by recessive variants in the COL7A1 gene and have a highly impaired or null accumulation of type VII collagen protein (C7) [4]. As a consequence of this genetic defect, patients have fragile skin and minimal trauma can trigger painful blisters and wounds that are often very slow to heal. Moreover, patients with RDEB have poor clinical prognosis and a high risk of developing aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) early in life [4,5,6].

The cancer-prone stromal microenvironment observed in RDEB is influenced by chronic inflammation as well as fibrosis [7,8,9,10]. A major factor contributing to fibrosis in RDEB are isoforms of Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), primarily TGF-β1. In a normal wound healing process, this factor participates in the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, characterized by the increased production of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and the formation of stress fibers, which help to mechanically close wounds by contraction [11]. However, in the context of impaired healing in RDEB, wounds and skin experience chronic fibrosis which leads to stiffening of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and release of latent TGF-β1. The latter generates a positive feedback loop of fibrosis and inflammation, as TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation is not only associated with altered ECM deposition, but also to increased production of multiple inflammatory cytokines [4].

Blisters and wounds in RDEB have been characterized as being highly inflamed, with several inflammatory cytokines identified as increased in the scar tissue and serum of patients [12,13,14]. Of interest among these inflammatory cytokines is interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine that normally plays a role in proper wound closure but has also been associated with more severe manifestations of RDEB [15]. IL-6 accumulation induces interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production in macrophages, which in turn induces keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) production in fibroblasts. This allows the proliferation and migration of keratinocytes, thus stimulating wound re-epithelization and closure [15, 16]. Moreover, IL-6 also induces VEGF expression in macrophages, fibroblasts, and keratinocytes, which allows for the vascularization of the repaired tissue [14, 17]. However, a prolonged inflammatory microenvironment in a wound, increases leukocyte and matrix metalloproteinase activity, hence, impairing the healing process. The transition from an inflammatory state to a proliferative state plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of wound closure, and chronic wounds are associated with an inability to overcome the inflammatory phase of wound healing [18,19,20].

Most researchers studying EB physiopathology utilize patient’s serum [14, 21] or cells grown from tissue biopsies [13]. Although many articles have shown that these samples successfully recreate some of the molecular and physiological parameters observed in RDEB [22,23,24,25,26], there are currently no efficient models to study this disease in vitro in the context of chronic wounds. The latter is a consequence of RDEB patients suffering from extreme skin fragility and neuropathic pain [27,28,29], restricting the availability of skin or wound biopsies for research purposes. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify models that allow a more accurate representation of RDEB wound healing in vitro.

Recent work of ours has shown that RDEB wound dressings contain viable host cells that can be utilized for in vitro studies [30]. Understanding whether this method of sample collection can differentiate primary cells derived from a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic microenvironment during repeated cycles of wounding and healing will provide a non-invasive and relatively simple approach to study RDEB. In this report, we characterize and further explore the use of adherent cells isolated from RDEB chronic wound dressings as an in vitro model of wound chronicity.

Results

General characterization of cells isolated from RDEB patient’s chronic wound dressings

In this study, we used adherent cells with fibroblast-like morphology isolated from discarded dressings coming from chronic RDEB patients’ wounds, previously described in [30] and referred here as to RDEB-CW hereon (see Materials and Methods). Chronic wounds were defined as wounds that were open for more than 1 year at the time of dressing sampling, and remained open for at least 3 months after the sampling date. In order to characterize these cells and evaluate their potential to become an in vitro model of RDEB wound healing, we compared them with fibroblasts derived from skin biopsies, either from RDEB patients or from healthy donors. These fibroblasts were used as controls and are referred as to RDEB fibroblasts or normal human fibroblasts (NHF), respectively. Altogether, there were 6 samples from RDEB-CW from 3 patients, 3 samples of RDEB-AW from 2 patients, 4 skin biopsies from unaffected RDEB skin, and 7 samples from normal skin (Table 1). We did not obtain paired samples between the RDEB, RDEB-AW, and RDEB-CW groups. Western blot analysis (WB) confirmed the strong reduction of C7 protein in all RDEB samples (Fig. 1a, b), either coming from biopsies or wounds, as expected for samples derived from RDEB patients.

Table 1 General information of RDEB patients and healthy donors participating in this study
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

General phenotypic characterization of RDEB-CW cells. (a) Western blot of protein lysates derived from fibroblast cultures confirms the C7 deficiency in all samples coming from RDEB patients used in this study, with its respective densitometric analysis in (b). (c) Representative IIF images showing molecular markers for fibroblasts (FAP, vimentin) and white blood cells (CD45). Nuclei were co-stained with DAPI. Bar: 100 μm. (d-f) Representative bright field images of NHFs, RDEBs, RDEB-CWs and RDEB-AWs fibroblast cultures used for morphological evaluation. Black arrows indicate cell protrusions. The morphological parameters analyzed were cell area (e) and the mean protrusions per cell (f). For the quantitative analysis in (e-f), a total of 75 cells were used for each condition (225 cells per experimental group). Bar: 100 μm. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. All these experiments were performed with n = 3–4 per condition. Asterisks indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc (p < 0.05)

Full size image

The isolation of cells from discarded wound dressings allows the enrichment of adherent cells in culture. Different populations of both adherent and non-adherent cells can be extracted from these dressings, such as fibroblasts, corneocytes, immune cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), fibrocytes, among others [30]. To characterize the cell lineage from which RDEB-CW adherent cells were derived, we utilized different cell markers [31,32,33] and analyzed their expression profiles by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). All six separate RDEB-CW samples were composed of adherent cells showing a positive signal for fibroblast activating protein (FAP, a type II serine protease expressed in fibroblasts and not detected on fibrocytes) [31] and vimentin, both being common markers distinguishing fibroblasts (Fig. 1c) [34]. On the other hand, these cells show no expression of CD45 protein, a common antigen expressed in white blood cells, as well as fibrocytes [31, 32] (Fig. 1c). Positive controls for CD45 (THP-1 cells) and negative controls for all the used markers are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1a and b. Taken together, all these analyses indicate that RDEB-CW adherent cells correspond to a cell lineage consistent primarily with being fibroblasts, thus, from now on these cells will be referred in the text as RDEB-CW fibroblasts.

In culture, RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibited an enlarged cell area when compared to NHF and RDEB fibroblasts isolated from uninvolved skin (Fig. 1d, e). Also, in contrast to the normal spindle-like morphology of fibroblasts, RDEB-CW displayed an increased number of cell protrusions (Fig. 1f), suggesting an activated state of these fibroblasts [35]. The latter indicates that RDEB-CW fibroblasts maintain a chronicity-associated phenotype even when cultured in vitro under controlled conditions.

In order to determine whether the distinct RDEB-CW phenotype observed in culture results from the method of isolation, we compared RDEB-CW fibroblasts with fibroblasts derived from acute wounds (RDEB-AW, wounds than were opened for less than 8 weeks, see Materials and Methods). We showed that RDEB-AW fibroblasts displayed a phenotype similar to fibroblasts derived from RDEB patients skin biopsies (Fig. 1, d-f), suggesting that the cell morphology differences observed in RDEB-CW fibroblasts are not due to the cell harvesting method.

Functional analyses in RDEB-CW fibroblasts

Flat and enlarged cell morphology, and an increased number of cell protrusions are well described features of senescent fibroblasts [35, 36]. Thus, we assessed whether RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibit features of a senescent phenotype. β-galactosidase staining is a widely used marker for measuring cellular senescence both in vitro and in vivo [36, 37]. Our results indicate that NHF and RDEB fibroblasts displayed senescent populations of around 10%, which is in agreement with previous observations (Fig. 2a, b) [36,37,38]. In contrast, RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibited a 2-fold increase in senescent cells compared to NHF and RDEB fibroblasts. In line with the previous results, we observed that senescent fibroblasts (β-gal+ cells) exhibited an increased cell area compared to β-gal- cells, independent of the fibroblast culture condition analyzed (Fig. 2c). We did not observe significant differences between groups when we compared the β-gal+ cells or the β-gal- cells, suggesting that the morphology differences associated to RDEB-CW fibroblasts is likely due to an increased senescent population.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functional characterization in RDEB-CW fibroblasts. (a-c) Representative bright field images of fibroblast cultures stained with the senescence associated β-galactosidase marker. β-Gal + cells were delimited with a dashed blue line. The quantification of β-Gal + cell population and the measurement of the cell area for β-Gal + and β-Gal- cells are depicted in (b) and (c), respectively. For the quantitative analysis in (b), a total of ~ 4000 cells were used per condition. For the quantitative analysis in (c), a total of 50 cells were used for each condition (150 cells per experimental group). Bar: 100 μm. (d) Representative fluorescence images of fibroblast cultures stained with Lamin B1 (red), and counterstained with DAPI (blue). Bar: 100 μm.  (e) Fluorescence-based proliferation assay (Cell Titer Blue ®) assessed every 24 h during 72 h.  (f) Representative brightfield images of 2D migration assay. Bar: 100 μm. (g) Quantification of migration rate, expressed as percentage of the initial wound area. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. All these experiments were performed with n = 3–4 per condition. Asterisks indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Lamin B1 protein has also been studied as a marker for cell senescence, where the loss of its nuclear localization is correlated with cells entering a senescent phase [39]. Interestingly, we found a loss of the nuclear localization of LaminB1 in RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 2). Taken together, these results suggest that repeated cycles of wounding and healing associated to chronic wounds could affect the senescent status of fibroblast populations isolated from these wounds, and that this phenotype can be further maintained under in vitro culture conditions.

Population doublings is an important factor contributing to cell senescence under in vitro conditions [40, 41]. Thus, an obvious consideration when comparing cell morphologies from different sources is the number of doublings in culture. In our study, all cells investigated were coming from low culture passages. However, to exclude the possibility that RDEB-CW fibroblasts became senescent during cell isolation and culturing, we compared the number of viable cells initially obtained from chronic and acute wound dressings. No difference in number of cells (adjusted to wound size) were observed between RDEB-AW and RDEB-CW cells (Supplementary Fig. 3), suggesting that the senescent phenotype of RDEB-CW fibroblasts is not a consequence of the isolation and cell culture procedure.

After wounding, dermal fibroblasts actively start proliferating and migrating into the wound bed, constituting a key event in wound healing [42]. Thus, we investigated whether these processes were affected in RDEB-CW fibroblasts in vitro. Our results indicated that RDEB-CW fibroblasts displayed a reduced proliferative rate compared to NHF by a Cell Titer-Blue® assay, meanwhile RDEB fibroblasts showed no significant differences compared to the control group (Fig. 2e). These results were complemented by an IIF analysis, using the proliferation marker Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), where we found similar results to those obtained by the fluorometric technique (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Furthermore, RDEB-CW fibroblasts displayed slower wound closure compared to NHF (Fig. 2f-g). RDEB fibroblasts also exhibited a mild, but significant, decrease in migration potential. Similar results were obtained when this assay was carried out in low-serum condition (0.5% fetal bovine serum) and using an anti-proliferative agent (5 µM Cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside, ARAC), indicating that these defects are not affected by the different proliferative rates observed between the three experimental groups (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Fibrotic marker assessment of RDEB-CW fibroblasts

A decrease or complete absence of C7 is the primary deficit of RDEB patients and it has been associated with an impaired remodeling and deposition of ECM proteins, triggering the development of a profibrotic environment on RDEB patient skin and wounds. Furthermore, increased levels of ECM proteins have been related to disease severity and a high risk for developing cSCCs, the primary cause of death in this patient population [5, 43,44,45,46,47,48]. With this information in mind and our previous results, we hypothesized that RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibit a unique phenotype under in vitro culturing conditions whichx| could be used as a model to study the development of fibrosis and resulting pathologies.

Fibrotic fibroblasts have an increased capacity to secrete and interact with ECM proteins, and are known to have an enhanced contractile phenotype in a three-dimensional fibrous collagen network [25, 27]. Hence, we decided to study the fibrotic potential of RDEB-CW fibroblasts. We carried out a collagen disc contraction assay, where we demonstrated the increased contractile behavior of RDEB-CW cells (Fig. 3a, b). As control, we included RDEB fibroblasts which have been shown to possess an enhanced ability to contract collagen lattices under in vitro conditions compared to NHF [49, 50]. Interestingly, RDEB-CW fibroblasts contractility was greater than RDEB fibroblasts at all evaluated times.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Functional and molecular markers of fibrosis in RDEB-CW fibroblasts. (a) Representative images of contracted collagen discs after 24 h of in vitro culture. The size decreased as the contractile capability of the fibroblasts increased. Bar: 1 cm. (b) Quantification of contractile assay based on collagen lattices (n = 3). We carried out a statistical analysis to compare the disc contraction between the different experimental groups at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences versus NHF. Hashtags (#) indicate significant differences versus the RDEB group (p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc). (c-d) Western blot analysis of protein lysates derived from fibroblast cultures to detect the fibrotic markers α-SMA, C1 and YKL-40. (e-g) Densitometric analysis of western blots displayed in (c-d). Asterisks indicate significant differences (n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc). (h) IIF analysis of Collagen I (green) and α-SMA (red). Nuclei were co-stained with DAPI (blue). Bar: 100 μm. (i) Quantification of α-SMA+ cells, expressed as percentage. Fibroblasts were considered as positives for α-SMA specifically when this protein was localized to stress fibers (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc). All data are expressed as mean ± SD.

Full size image

Next, we studied the expression of fibrotic biomarkers previously shown to be increased in RDEB skin, such as alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and type I collagen (C1) [47]. α-SMA, a protein associated with fibroblast-myofibroblast transition and fibroblast activation [51], was increased at protein level (Fig. 3c, e) and enriched in stress fibers in RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 3h, i), where it is associated with actin filaments to exert its contractile functions [52].

Interestingly, no differences were observed in C1 protein abundance in RDEB-CW fibroblasts when studied by western blot analysis (Fig. 3d, f). However, a noticeable increase in cytoplasmatic accumulation of this protein was seen by indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 3h). We also assessed the expression of YKL-40 (Also known as CHI3L1), a collagen-binding glycoprotein mainly produced by cells of immune system as macrophages, neutrophils and cancer cells [53]. Fibroblasts can sense this protein and use it as a growth factor improving cell proliferation, survival, cell-matrix interactions and deposition of ECM during wound healing [54,55,56]. Recently, Scotece et al. demonstrated that YKL-40 exhibited a sharp increase in skin in response to bleomycin treatment [57], and it has also been previously related to the progression of several inflammatory and fibrotic skin diseases, including systemic sclerosis, dermatitis and pyoderma gangrenosum [58,59,60]. Additionally, Ho et al. (2014) demonstrated that a reduced population of primary dermal cells in culture (5–10% of total population) expresses YKL-40, but the expression was more widespread when the cells were treated with oncostatin M, a cytokine related to IL-6 family [61]. Our results showed a significant increase in YKL-40 protein level in RDEB-CW fibroblasts compared with RDEB fibroblasts, which supports the advanced fibrotic state of the cells derived from chronic wounds (Fig. 3d, g).

TGF-β pathway signaling assessment in RDEB-CW fibroblasts

As mentioned previously, there is a positive feedback loop between fibrosis and inflammation, which is especially deleterious in RDEB. Several studies have shown the dysregulation of TGF-β1 expression and downstream related proteins in cells derived from RDEB patients [47, 49, 62]. Moreover, the activation of this TGF- β1 pathway has been related to correlate with disease severity [63]. Due to this, we decided to further explore TGF-β1 and the downstream signaling pathway in cells directly derived from patients’ wounds.

First, we analyzed the expression of proteins related to the TGF-β1 pathway in NHF, RDEB and RDEB-CW fibroblasts, including TGF-β1 and its receptor TGFBR-II, the TGF-β1 downstream effectors SMAD2/3, and the protein activator of TGF-β1, thrombospondin 1 (TSP1) [64]. Our western blot analysis showed an increased abundance of the TGF-β1 precursor protein in RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 4a, d), which results in the functional growth factor once it has been properly processed [65]. We did not detect significant changes in the TGFBR-II receptor levels (Fig. 4a, d). We next analyzed the abundance and phosphorylation status of SMAD2/SMAD3 proteins (Fig. 4b). We detected a significant increase in the abundance of p-SMAD2/p-SMAD3 proteins in RDEB-CW fibroblasts compared to NHF and RDEB fibroblasts (Fig. 4d), but the levels of total SMAD2/SMAD3 showed no significant differences (Fig. 4b, d), which is consistent with that described for canonical activation of the TGF-β1 pathway [66]. Furthermore, the TGF-β1 activator TSP1 was increased exclusively in RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 4c, d). Taken together, all these results indicate that the TGF-β1 pathway is highly activated in RDEB-CW fibroblasts, meanwhile RDEB fibroblasts, in our laboratory conditions, showed TGF-β1 activity levels similar to NHF cultures. Interestingly, no differences were observed between protein abundance and patient disease severity, suggesting that fibroblasts isolated from RDEB chronic wounds have common molecular characteristics surpassing the overall patient disease burden.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analysis of TGF-β signaling in RDEB-CW fibroblasts. (a-c) Western blot analysis of protein lysates derived from fibroblast cultures to detect the immature form of TGF-β1 and its receptor, TGFβRII (a), the SMAD2/SMAD3 proteins and their phosphorylated forms (p- SMAD2/p-SMAD3) (b), and the TGF-β1 activator molecule, TSP1 (c). (d) Densitometric analysis of all western blots displayed in (a-c). All data are expressed as mean ± SD. The experiments were performed with n = 3–4 per condition. Asterisks indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Expression of inflammatory cytokines in RDEB-CW fibroblasts

We analyzed the abundance of two pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IL-1β by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis and flow cytometry assays simultaneously. We observed a significant increase on IL-6 gene expression in RDEB-CW fibroblasts but also a high degree of variability between samples from different patients (Fig. 5a). This variability was also observed in IL-1β (Fig. 5b); however, no significant increase was found for this cytokine. Next, using a flow cytometry assay, we assessed RDEB-CW cells ability to secrete these cytokines, utilizing lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1ug/ml) as a positive stimulus for secretion. Similar to our findings by RT-qPCR analysis, IL-6 secretion trended to increase in LPS-activated RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 5c), although no significant differences were observed between groups. On the other hand, IL-1β secretion was increased in basal and LPS-induced conditions in RDEB-CW fibroblasts compared to NHF fibroblasts (Fig. 5d), meanwhile RDEB fibroblasts showed no significant differences compared to the others groups with or without LPS treatment. Interestingly, our results indicate that RDEB-CW fibroblasts did not show an increase in IL-1β secretion followed LPS treatment, which could indicate the pre-existence of an inflammatory state in these cells (mean of 16.17 ± 2.1pg/ml in control condition, mean of 15.57 ± 1,6pg/ml in LPS treatment; p: 0.83 by Student T-test) (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of inflammatory cytokines and cancer-related proteins in RDEB-CW fibroblasts. (a-b) Reverse Transcription (RT) qPCR analysis of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. Asterisks indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc (p < 0.05, n = 4–5). (c-d) Cytokine analysis in supernatants of fibroblast cultures by flow cytometry, using the CBA cytokine kit for detecting IL-1β (c) and IL-6 (d). Disease severity is indicated for RDEB-derived patient samples (n = 2–3). Asterisks indicate significant differences by Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05). (e-f) RT-qPCR analysis of two cancer-related genes APOBEC3B (e) and APOBEC3H (f). Asterisks indicate significant differences by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc (p < 0.05, n = 4–5). All data are expressed as mean ± SD, except for data shown in Figures (c) and (d)

Full size image

We also evaluated the expression of three genes of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide like type 3 (APOBEC3) family: APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B and APOBEC3H. APOBEC3 proteins are cytosine deaminases known to play a role in viral infection and inflammation [67,68,69], and these proteins have been shown to drive mutation acquisition in RDEB-associated SCC [69]. Moreover, it has also been associated to the activity of IL-6 [70]. Of these three genes, only APOBEC3B was found to have increased expression in RDEB-CW fibroblasts (Fig. 5e). We did not observe significant differences in APOBEC3H levels between the experimental groups (Fig. 5f), and no detectable expression of APOBEC3A was found in any of the analyzed samples.

Discussion

RDEB-CW fibroblasts as an in vitro model of RDEB

Currently, there are limited cellular models that efficiently recreate the physiological and molecular parameters observed in RDEB wound healing in vitro. Nevertheless, primary fibroblasts derived from RDEB patient’s biopsies have been successfully cultured and studied showing the potential to model some of the physiological processes observed in these patients. However, reported data has shown that these cells exhibit a broad range of morphological, migratory and proliferative properties, possibly attributed to differences in laboratory conditions, techniques, patient variability, and others. For example, Beilin et al. revealed that RDEB patient derived fibroblasts displayed an increased area and a more spread-out morphology than NHF [25], and in our results we show that RDEB and NHF presented similar morphological features. Additionally, Chen et al. reported that RDEB patient derived fibroblasts displayed a reduced proliferative potential compared to NHF or to RDEB fibroblasts expressing recombinant C7 [26]. However, in relation to proliferation rates, other authors have shown that RDEB patient’s derived fibroblasts displayed no significant changes compared to NHF [27,28,29]. Similarly, Condorelli et al. reported that RDEB fibroblasts displayed no significant changes in migration assays in vitro, while Georgiadis et al. demonstrated that RDEB fibroblasts showed impaired migration potential compared to NHF or RDEB expressing recombinant C7 [27, 28]. In our study, we found that RDEB fibroblasts display no significant differences in proliferation nor migration compared to NHFs in vitro. On the other hand, our morphological and functional analysis revealed that RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibited an increase in cell area and protrusions number, and also an impaired proliferation and migratory rate in vitro, reminiscent of the senescent phenotype observed in chronic wound-derived fibroblasts obtained from patients with venous leg ulcers [71]. Furthermore, we observed that RDEB-CW fibroblasts exhibit an increase in senescence associated β-galactosidase population, and a change in the subcellular localization of the Lamin B1 marker, which have been previously associated to be increased in senescent cells [34, 36, 39]. Previous studies indicated that low-passages primary fibroblast cultures displayed a senescent cell population of about 10% [38], which is consistent with the results we obtained for NHF and RDEB fibroblasts assessed by the senescence associated β-galactosidase marker. A previous study demonstrated a clinical correlation between quantitative in vitro senescence and the time it takes the ulcerous tissue to heal, where populations of senescent fibroblasts over 15% were identified as the threshold beyond which a wound would become difficult to heal [72]. We found that RDEB-CW fibroblasts had a senescent population close to 20%; thus, increased senescence in the fibroblast population could explain some of the defects we observed at the level of proliferation and migration in vitro, and in wound healing in RDEB patients in vivo.

Interestingly, an increased senescent state has been described in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) [73,74,75]. CAFs are known to secrete factors contributing to cell viability and modulating cancer progression. Considering that these patients have an increased risk of developing cSCC early in life, this in vitro model could potentially be a valuable tool for diagnostic studies associated to wound microenvironment, and also for the identification of new, early cSCC markers in RDEB patients.

Advantages and limitations of studying RDEB-CW fibroblasts.

In this work, we showed that fibroblasts cultured from discarded wound dressings maintain several hallmarks of a chronic wound, which could make this model a valuable asset in both research and diagnostic studies. For example, we have shown that these fibroblasts produce more stress fibers and are capable of increased contraction of collagen matrices, which implies a higher fibrotic capability. This in turn could provide a manner to more accurately assess the severity of the wound, as fibrosis is an indicator of wound severity and cSCC risk [76]. The latter extends to several other markers as well, for example, here we studied the expression of three APOBEC3 family proteins, which are known to be implicated in the formation of several types of cancer, including cSCC in RDEB patients [69, 70, 77]. Of note, APOBEC3 expression is likely more in important in keratinocytes, the cell of origin for RDEB cSCC but increases in expression could well represent a surrogate for levels of APOBEC within wounds. In our study, we showed a significantly increased expression of one APOBEC3 subunit (APOBEC3B) in RDEB-CW fibroblasts. Our observation, although new requires further work in order to determine its relevance for cSCC development. As cSCC in RDEB patients is a highly aggressive form of cancer, being able to differentiate wounds that develop into SCC would greatly assist early detection and clinical management. In addition to measuring senescence, wound-derived fibroblasts could also be tested for skin age-associated markers, such as the production of reactive oxygen species, telomere length, among others [78]. More importantly, this particular method of culturing cells from wound dressings could not only be used to collect other cell types such as keratinocytes, but could also be expanded to study fibrocytes, macrophages and immune cells through the use of selective culturing and FACS [30]. In addition, this technology could also be beneficial to study wound microenvironment in other, non-EB related diseases, such as pyoderma gangrenosum, ischemic skin lesions, dermatitis, psoriasis, diabetic and venous ulcers, as well as age-related chronic wounds.

Despite the fact that our cell model has shown to have several interesting advantages for studying part of the RDEB physiopathology in vitro, it is necessary to be cautious when comparing cell populations obtained with different culturing strategies. In this study, we morphologically and functionally compared RDEB-CW fibroblasts obtained from discarded wound dressings with fibroblast cultures obtained from skin biopsies from RDEB patients and healthy controls. One limitation of this study is the fact that skin fibroblast populations are heterogeneous. Previous findings have revealed the existence of different fibroblast lineages, each having specific functions according to their localization in the papillary or the reticular dermis [40, 79]. However, these studies have been limited because the lack of specific markers to differentiate between these two populations. Thus, the morphological, functional, and molecular analysis we carried out in this work represent an overview of processes that could be studied in greater detail in the future. Additionally, in this work we focused on characterizing the level of activation/differentiation in low-passage fibroblast cultures, though it would be interesting to analyze whether RDEB-CW fibroblasts can retain this phenotype over time, in the absence of the pro-inflammatory and fibrotic microenvironment from which they were harvested.

Finally, our approach has the potential to reconstruct the history of a particular wound, as cells isolated at different time-points during wound progression could be isolated, characterized and compared. If combined with high throughput methods, these cells could potentially be a powerful tool to study the evolution of a wound from an acute to a chronic status, comparing the molecular signatures, physiological responses, ECM or cytokine secretion, morphological patterns, and others. Such a well-defined, controlled in vitro culture environment could provide a platform for studying mechanisms of wound healing as well as cancer detection and treatment.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that primary fibroblasts isolated from discarded dressings of RDEB chronic wounds recapitulate multiple parameters of wound chronicity, and are a potentially useful research tool to study chronic wounds in vitro. Additional work with a larger sample size would be optimal to further confirm these findings in other RDEB populations with translation into clinical settings.

Methods

Cell samples

Adherent cells used in this work are part of the DEBRA Chile cell bank. Skin biopsies, either from healthy individual donors or RDEB patients, were utilized to isolate and culture dermal fibroblasts. Adherent cells isolated from chronic wounds were obtained from discarded wound dressings and cultured as described in [30]. Wounds included in this study were part of a larger longitudinal follow-up study previously published [71]. Chronic wounds were defined as wounds that were opened for more than 1 year at the time of dressing sampling, and remained opened for at least 3 months after. Acute wounds were sampled if present for > 14 days and all 3 acute wounds included in this study closed within 6 weeks of dressing collection. Cells used for the experiments are indicated on Table 1. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to sample collection. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo #2013 − 145.

THP-1 cells are a monocyte-like line derived from a leukemia patient (ATCC#TIB-202). Cells were growth in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, USA) containing 10% FBS and 2mM L-glutamine (Gibco, USA).

Cell morphology analysis

Five brightfield images, at a 40–60% confluency, were taken for each cell line. For each image, 15 cells were randomly selected and the area and the protrusions number were measured using the Image J software (NIH, USA). Protrusions were considered to be any cell elongation larger than one third of the cell size, excluding the spindle-like shape commonly seen in fibroblasts. A total of 225 cells per experimental group were used for the quantitative analyses.

RNA extraction, complimentary DNA synthesis and quantitative PCR

RNA extraction was performed with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer’s guidelines. RNA integrity was confirmed through electrophoresis using a MOPS/Formaldehyde gel. DNA contaminations were eliminated with DNAse I (Thermo Scientific) and complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems), according to manufacturer’s protocols.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed utilizing either the Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR® Green QPCR Master Mix (Agilent Technologies, USA) and the SYBR Select Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), according to the protocol specified by the manufacturers. The qPCR reactions were carried out in a Stratagene Mx3005P (Agilent Technologies, USA). Data was processed through the 2-ΔΔCt method [80]. Primers used in this study are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Indirect Immunofluorescence

Cells were plated on 10 mm coverslips in 24-well plates until they reached ~ 80% confluence. Cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution, and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X100. Next, cells were blocked using a 3% BSA solution. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C, and secondary antibodies were incubated by 2 h at room temperature. Coverslips were mounted into glass slides with Fluoromount G with DAPI (Invitrogen, USA), and then sealed with commercial transparent nail polish. All the antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Pictures were taken with the EVOS FL Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) or the Fluoview FV10i confocal microscope (Olympus, Japan). Images were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, USA).

Western Blot

Cell lysates were prepared on ice with radio immunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA, Cell Signaling Tech., USA) with proteinase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, USA) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (SCBT, USA). Protein quantification was performed using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher, USA). Cell lysates were separated on 7–10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE) and transferred into nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, USA) via a semi-dry transfer (using Thermo Fisher’s PowerBlotter XL kit). Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight with the primary antibodies at 4 °C. Fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were revealed using the Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA). Images were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, USA). All antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Rabbit polyclonal collagen VII antibody raised against the NC1 domain was used thanks to M. Peter Marinkovich, MD, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA [81].

Cell proliferation assay

Fibroblasts were seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 density in black, polystyrene 96-well plates in quadruplicate, and a fluorescence-based proliferation assay (CellTiter-Blue® Assay, Promega, USA) was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions every 24 h over 3 days. Cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, and 2 h prior to obtaining fluorescence readings, culture medium was replaced by phenol red-free, FBS-free DMEM, and CellTiter-Blue® Reagent was added. Fluorescence was analyzed at 580 nm in a Modulus™ Microplate Multimode Reader (Turner Biosystems, USA).

2D migration assay

Fibroblasts were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS until reaching a confluent monolayer. To register the same fields for each image acquisition, we traced reference lines in the plates with a tip marker. Cell cultures were scratched with a 200 µl sterile pipette tip, and then the plates were washed with PBS to discard detached cells. Transmitted light camera images were obtained immediately after scratch induction, and then after 8 and 24 h in culture. We determined the wound area using the method and Image J plugin developed by Suarez-Arnedo et al. [82]. Results were expressed as mean wound area (% of initial wound area).

Collagen disc contraction assay

Cell contractility assays were carried out according to protocol described by Ngo et al. [83], as floating matrices [84]. Briefly, 100,000 fibroblasts were seeded in a type-I collagen solution (rat tail Collagen I, sc-136,157, SCBT, USA) diluted in DMEM (collagen-I in a final concentration of 1 mg/ml) supplemented with 10% FBS, and collagen matrix was allowed to polymerize by adding 2 µl NaOH 1 M (500 µl of cell suspension per well in 24-well plates). Then, 400 µl of complete culture medium was added to each well, and the gel was gently dissociated from the plate using a 200 µl pipette tip. The gel contraction was documented through capturing daily digital images for 3 days, and results were expressed as mean disc area (% of initial disc area).

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining kit (Cell signaling, USA) was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, fibroblasts were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS until reaching a confluence of 80–90%. Then, plates were rinsed with PBS and fixed, and the β-Galactosidase Staining Solution (pH 6,0) was added. Plates were sealed and incubated overnight in a dry incubator (37° C). Transmitted light camera images were obtained immediately after incubation. We determined the percentage of β-galactosidase positive cells (~ 4000 cells per condition) and the cell area (50 cells per condition) from 20 random fields per condition (4X objective).

Quantification of subcellular distribution of lamin B1

In order to quantify the subcellular distribution of LaminB1, we obtained fluorescence images of fibroblast cultures stained with LaminB1 and co-stained with DAPI (~ 150 cells per experimental group were analyzed). The cells were classified into four different conditions for further analysis: nuclear distribution, nuclear and cytoplasmatic distribution, cytoplasmatic distribution or none detected. A χ2 analysis was carried out to compare the distribution of Lamin B1 subcellular localization between the different experimental groups.

Cytokine analysis in supernatant by flow cytometry

Fifty thousand fibroblasts were seeded in DMEM with 10% FBS and incubated for 24 h. Afterwards, the media was replaced by phenol red-free and FBS-free DMEM with or without LPS 1 ug/ml and incubated for 24 h before collecting the supernatants. IL-6 and IL-1β levels in the supernatant were measured by the BD™ FACSCanto Flow Cytometer and BD™ Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Human Inflammatory Cytokines Kit (BD Biosciences, USA). The detailed experiment procedure was conducted according to the instruction manuals of the kit and the flow cytometer. The sensitivity for IL-6 and IL-1β measurement were 3.6 pg/ml and 7.1 pg/ml in this assay, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were presented as mean ± S.D. Comparisons between groups, plot design and statistical analysis were performed with GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). Significant differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post-hoc, unless another analysis has been indicated for a specific assay. A p value < 0.05 was considered significantly different.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

α-SMA:

alpha-smooth muscle actin

APOBEC3:

apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide like type 3

C1:

type I collagen

C7:

type VII collagen

CAF:

cancer-associated fibroblasts

cSCC:

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

ECM:

extracellular matrix

DEB:

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

EB:

Epidermolysis Bullosa

EBS:

Epidermolysis Bullosa simplex

FAP:

fibroblast activating protein

IIF:

indirect immunofluorescence

IL-1:

interleukin-1

IL-6:

interleukin-6

JEB:

Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa

KEB:

Kindler Epidermolysis Bullosa

KGF:

keratinocyte growth factor

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem cells

NHF:

normal human fibroblasts

RDEB:

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

RDEB-AW:

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa acute wounds

RDEB-CW:

Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa chronic wounds

TGF-:

Transforming Growth Factor-

TSP1:

thrombospondin 1

WB:

western blot

References

  1. Bardhan A, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Chapple ILC, Fine JD, Harper N, Has C, …, Heagerty AH. Epidermolysis bullosa. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2020;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0210-0.

  2. Fine JD, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Eady RAJ, Bauer EA, Bauer JW, Has C, …, Zambruno G. Inherited epidermolysis bullosa: updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(6):1103–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Has C, Bauer JW, Bodemer C, Bolling MC, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Diem A, …, Mellerio JE. Consensus reclassification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa and other disorders with skin fragility. Br J Dermatol. 2020;1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18921.

  4. Guerra L, Odorisio T, Zambruno G, Castiglia D. Stromal microenvironment in type VII collagen-deficient skin: the ground for squamous cell carcinoma development. Matrix Biol. 2017;63:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2017.01.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Condorelli AG, Dellambra E, Logli E, Zambruno G, Castiglia D. Epidermolysis bullosa-associated squamous cell carcinoma: from pathogenesis to therapeutic perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinkuma S. (2015). Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 26;8: 275–284. https://doi.org/10.2147%2FCCID.S54681.

  7. Ng Y-Z, Pourreyron C, Salas-Alanis JC, Dayal JHS, Cepeda-Valdes R, Yan W, et al. Fibroblast-derived dermal matrix drives development of aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3522–34. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittapalli VR, Madl J, Löffek S, Kiritsi D, Kern JS, Römer W, et al. Injury-driven stiffening of the dermis expedites skin carcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 2016;76:940–51. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexeev V, Salas-Alanis JC, Palisson F, Mukhtarzada L, Fortuna G, Uitto J, South A, Igoucheva O. Pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines dominate the blister fluid molecular signature in patients with epidermolysis bullosa and affect leukocyte and stem cell migration. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2298–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernasconi R, Thriene K, Romero-Fernández E, Gretzmeier C, Kühl T, Maler M, Nauroy P, Kleiser S, Rühl-Muth A-C, Stumpe M, et al. Pro-inflammatory immunity supports fibrosis advancement in epidermolysis bullosa: intervention with Ang-(1–7). EMBO Mol Med. 2021;13:e14392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dugina V, Fontao L, Chaponnier C, Vasiliev J, Gabbiani G. Focal adhesion features during myofibroblastic differentiation are controlled by intracellular and extracellular factors. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(18):3285–96. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.114.18.3285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cianfarani F, Zambruno G, Castiglia D, Odorisio T. Pathomechanisms of altered Wound Healing in recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(7):1445–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boltzmann L, Gruber C, Klausegger A, Trost A, Bogner B, Reitsamer H, Bauer JW. Pseudosyndactyly-an inflammatory and fibrotic wound healing disorder in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. JDDG - Journal of the German Society of Dermatology. 2015;13(12):1257–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Annicchiarico, G., Morgese, M. G., Esposito, S., Lopalco, G., Lattarulo, M., Tampoia,M., … Iannone, F. (2015). Proinflammatory cytokines and anti skin autoantibodies in patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Medicine (United States), 94(42), e1528.https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001528.

  15. Tampoia M, Abbracciavento L, Morrone M, Fumarulo R. IL-6/IL-10 ratio as a prognostic and predictive marker of the severity of inherited epidermolysis Bullosa. Iran J Immunol. 2017;14(4):340–9. https://doi.org/IJIv14i4A8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson BZ, Stevenson AW, Prêle CM, Fear MW, Wood FM. The role of IL-6 in skin fibrosis and cutaneous wound healing. Biomedicines. 2020;8(5):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMEDICINES8050101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang A, Gilchrest BA. Regulation of keratinocyte growth factor gene expression in human skin fibroblasts. J Dermatol Sci. 1996;11(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-1811(95)00418-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laddha AP, Kulkarni YA. VEGF and FGF-2: promising targets for the treatment of respiratory disorders. Respir Med. 2019;156(December 2018):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pang C, Ibrahim A, Bulstrode NW, Ferretti P. An overview of the therapeutic potential of regenerative medicine in cutaneous wound healing. Int Wound J. 2017;14(3):450–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Esposito, S., Guez, S., Orenti, A., Tadini, G., Scuvera, G., Corti, L., … Principi,N. (2016). Autoimmunity and cytokine imbalance in inherited epidermolysis bullosa.International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17101625.

  21. Nguyen, H. H., Shinkuma, S., Hayashi, R., Katsumi, T., Nishiguchi, T., Natsuga, K.,… Abe, R. (2022). New insight of itch mediators and proinflammatory cytokines in epidermolysis bullosa. Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy, (January), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/cia2.12230.

  22. Beilin, A.K., Evtushenko, A.N., Lukyanov, K.D., Murashkin, N.N., Ambarchian, E.T.,Pushkov, A. … Gurskaya, N.G. (2021). Signatures of Dermal Fibroblasts from RDEB Pediatric Patients. Int J Mol Sci. 22(4): 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijms22041792.

  23. Chen, M., Kasahara, N., Keene, D.R., Chan, L., Hoeffler, W.K., Finlay, D., Barcova,M., Cannon, P.M., … Woodley, D.T. (2002). Restoration of type VII collagen expression and function in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Nat Genet. 32(4): 670–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1041.

  24. Condorelli A, Logli E, Cianfarani F, Teson M, Diociaiuti A, Hachem E, Zambruno M, Castiglia G, D., Odorisio T. MicroRNA-145-5p regulates fibrotic features of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa skin fibroblasts. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:1017–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Georgiadis, C., Syed, F., Petrova, A., Abdul-Wahab, A., Lwin, S.M., Farzaneh, F.,Chan, L., Ghani, S., Fleck, R.A., … Wei-Li, D. (2016). Lentiviral Engineered Fibroblasts Expressing Codon-Optimized COL7A1 Restore Anchoring Fibrils in RDEB. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 136(1): 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.364.

  26. Ng, Y.Z., Pourreyron, C., Salas-Alanis, J.C., Dayal, J.H., Cepeda-Valdes, R., Yan,W., Wright, S., Chen, M., Fine, J.D., … South, A.P. (2012). Fibroblast-derived dermal matrix drives development of aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Cancer Res. 72(14): 3522–3534. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2996.

  27. Von Bischhoffshausen, S., Ivulic, D., Alvarez, P., Schuffeneger, V. C., Idiaquez,J., Fuentes, C., … Calvo, M. (2017). Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa results in painful small fibre neuropathy. Brain, 140(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx069.

  28. Thomas J. Epidermolysis bullosa in children: pathophysiology, anaesthesia and analgesia. South Afr J Anaesth Analgesia. 2010;16(1):12–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/22201173.2010.10872625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krane E. (2002). Guidelines for the Anesthetic Management of Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). Retrieved from https://ether.stanford.edu/library/pediatric_anesthesia/anesthetictechniques/guideline-eb.pdf.

  30. Fuentes I, Guttmann-Gruber C, Tockner B et al. (2020). Cells from discarded dressings differentiate chronic from acute wounds in patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa. Sci Rep 10, 15064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71794-1.

  31. Pilling D, Fan T, Huang D, Kaul B, Gomer RH. Identificación of markers that distinguish monocyte-derived fibrocytes from Monocytes, Macrophages, and fibroblasts. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(10):e7475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reikoff R, Bucala R, Herzog E. Fibrocytes: the emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(6):427–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2990. PMID: 21597472; PMCID: PMC3599774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Altin JG, Sloan EK. The role of CD45 and CD45-associated molecules in T cell activation. Immunol Cell Biol Oct. 1997;75(5):430–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.1997.68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Waldera-Lupa, D.M., Kalfalah, F., Safferling, K., Boukamp, P., Poschmann, G., Volpi,E., Götz-Rösch, C., … Krutmann, J. (2015). Characterization of Skin Aging-Associated Secreted Proteins (SAASP) Produced by Dermal Fibroblasts Isolated from Intrinsically Aged Human Skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 135(8): 1954–1968. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.120.

  35. Berberich, B., Thriene, K., Gretzmeir, C., Kühl, T., Bayer, H., Athanasiou, I., Rafei-Shamsabadi,D.A., … Dengjel, J. (2020). Proteomic Profiling of Fibroblasts Isolated from Chronic Wounds Identifies Disease-Relevant Signaling Pathways. Journal of Investigative Dermatology.140(11): 2280–2290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.040.

  36. Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, Roskelley C, Medrano EE, Linskens M, Rubelj I, Pereira-Smith O. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cell lines in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(20):9363–7. https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.92.20.9363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Itahana K, Campisi J, Dimri P. Methods to detect biomarkers of cellular senescence: the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;371:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-361-5_3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wall I, Moseley R, Baird D, Kipling D, Giles P, Laffafian I, Price PE, Thomas WD, Stephens P. Fibroblast dysfunction is a key factor in the non-healing of chronic venous Leg Ulcers. J Invest Dermatology. 2008;128(10):2526–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shimi T, Butin-Israeli V, Adam SA, Hamanaka RB, Goldman AE, Lucas CA, Shumaker DK, Kosak ST, Chandel NS, Goldman RD. The role of nuclear lamin B1 in cell proliferation and senescence. Genes Dev. 2011;25(24):2579–93. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.179515.111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hayflick L. The cell biology of aging. J Invest Dermatol. 1979 Jul;73(1):8–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12532752. PMID: 448179.

  41. Magalhães S, Almeida I, Pereira CD, Rebelo S, Goodfellow BJ, Nunes A. The Long-Term Culture of Human Fibroblasts Reveals a Spectroscopic Signature of Senescence. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 May 23;23(10):5830. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105830. PMID: 35628639; PMCID: PMC9146002.

  42. Driskell R, Watt F. Understanding fibroblasts heterogeneity in the skin. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25(2):92–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chacón-Solano, E., León, C., Díaz, F., García-García, F., García, M., Escámez, M.J.,Guerrero-Aspizua, S., … del Río, M. (2019). Fibroblast activation and abnormal extracellular matrix remodelling as common hallmarks in three cancer-prone genodermatoses. British Journal of Dermatology. 181(3): 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17698.

  44. Küttner V, Mack C, Gretzmeier C, Bruckner-Tuderman L. Loss of collagen VII is Associated with reduced transglutaminase 2 abundance and activity. J Invest Dermatology. 2014;134(9):2381–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fine J-D, Johnson L, Weiner M, Li K-P, Suchindran C. Epidermolysis bullosa and the risk of life-threatening cancers: the National EB Registry experience, 1986–2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(2):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.09.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Föll CM, Fahrner M, Gretzmeier C, Thoma K, Biniossek ML, Kiritsi D, Meiss F, Schilling O, Nÿstrom A, Kern JS. Identification of tissue damage, extracellular matrix remodeling and bacterial challenge as common mechanisms associated with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Matrix Biol. 2018;66:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Aguado T, García M, García A, Ferrer-Mayorga G, Martínez-Santamaría L, Río D, Botella M, L.M., Sánchez-Puelles JM. Raloxifene and n-Acetylcysteine ameliorate TGF-Signalling in fibroblasts from patients with recessive Dominant Epidermolysis Bullosa. Cells. 2020;9(9):2108. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fcells9092108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Shi X, Young C, Zhou H, Wang X-Y. Transforming growth Factor-β signaling in Fibrotic Diseases and Cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Biomolecules. 2020;10(12):1666. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10121666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Akasaka E, Kleiser S, Sengle G, Brucker-Tuderman L, Nÿstrom A. Diversity of Mechanisms underlying latent TGF-B activation in recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. J Invest Dermatology. 2021;141(6):1450–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.10.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chacón-Solano E, León C, Carretero M, García M, Sánchez-Domínguez R, Quero F, Méndez-Jiménez E, Bonafont J, Ruiz-Mezcua B, Escámez MJ, Larcher F, Del Río M. Mechanistic interrogation of mutation-independent disease modulators of RDEB identifies the small leucine-rich proteoglycan PRELP as a TGF-β antagonist and inhibitor of fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2022 Aug;111:189–206. Epub 2022 Jun 30. PMID: 35779740.

  51. Prunotto, M., Bruschi, M., Gunning, P., Gabbiani, G., Weibel, F., Ghiggeri, G. M.,… Chaponnier, C. (2015). Stable incorporation of α-smooth muscle actin into stress fibers is dependent on specific tropomyosin isoforms.Cytoskeleton, 72(6), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21230.

  52. Nÿstrom A, Velati D, Mittapalli VR, Fritsch A, Kern JS, Bruckner-Tuderman L. Collagen VII plays a dual role in wound healing. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3498–509. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci68127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Harutyunyan M, Christiansen M, Johansen J, Køber L, Torp-Petersen C, Kastrup J. The inflammatory biomarker YKL-40 as a new prognostic marker for all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Immunobiology. 2012;217(6):652–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2011.11.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Johansen J, Vittrup B, Roslind A, Nielsen D, Price P. Serum YKL-40, a new prognostic biomarker in cancer patients? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Johansen J, Schultz AN, Jensen BV. Plasma YKL-40: a potential new cancer biomarker? Future Oncol. 2009;5(7):1065–82. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.09.66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tao H, Yang JJ, Shi KH, Huang C, Zhang L, Lv XW, Li J. The significance of YKL-40 protein in liver fibrosis. Inflamm Res. 2014;63:249–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-013-0698-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Scotece M, Hämäläinen M, Leppänen T, Vuolteenaho K, Moilanen E. MKP-1 Deficiency exacerbates skin fibrosis in a mouse model of Scleroderma. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:4668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee YS, Yu JE, Kim MJ, Ham HJ, Jeon SH, Yun J, Song SG, Lee CK, Han SB, Son DJ, Hong JT. New therapeutic strategy for atopic dermatitis by targeting CHI3L1/ITGA5 axis. Clin translational Med. 2022;12(2):e739. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jankowska-Konsur A, Łyko M, Rubas K, Nowicka-Suszko D, Maj J, Szepietowski JC. (2022). Chitinase-3-like Protein 1 (YKL-40): A New Biomarker of Inflammation in Pyoderma Gangrenosum. Acta dermato-venereologica, 102, adv00646. https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v101.978.

  60. Nordenbæk C, Johansen JS, Halberg P, Wiik A, Garbarsch C, Ullman S, Price PA, Jacobsen S. High serum levels of YKL-40 in patients with systemic sclerosis are associated with pulmonary involvement. Scand J Rheumatol. 2005;34(4):293–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740510018598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ho YY, Baron M, Recklies AD, Roughley PJ, Mort JS. Cells from the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis secrete chitinase 3-like protein 1. BBA Clin. 2014;1:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbacli.2013.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Atanasova VS, Russell RJ, Webster TG, Cao Q, Agarwal P, Lim YZ, Krishnan S, Fuentes I, Guttmann-Gruber C, McGrath JA, Salas-Alanis JC, Fertala A, South AP. Thrombospondin-1 Is a Major Activator of TGF-β Signaling in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Fibroblasts. J Invest Dermatol 2019 Jul;139(7):1497–1505e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23. PMID: 30684555.

  63. Odorisio, T., Di Salvio, M., Orecchia, A., Di Zenzo, G., Piccini, E., Cianfarani,F., Travaglione, A., Uva, P. &, … Castiglia, D. (2014). Monozygotic twins discordant for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa phenotype highlight the role of TGF-B signalling in modifying disease severity. Human Molecular Genetics. 23(15): 3907–3922.https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu102.

  64. Bolivar, S., Espitia-Corredor, J.A., Olivares-Silva, F., Valenzuela, P., Humeres,C., Anfossi, R., Castro, E. … Díaz-Araya, G. (2021). In cardiac fibroblasts, interferon-beta attenuates differentiation, collagen synthesis, and TGF-β1-induced collagen gel contraction. Cytokine. 138, 155359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155359.

  65. Gentry LE, Lioubin MN, Purchio AF, Marquardt H. Molecular events in the processing of recombinant type 1 pre-pro-transforming growth factor beta to the mature polypeptide. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8(10):4162–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.8.10.4162-4168.1988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Clayton SW, Ban GI, Liu C, et al. Canonical and noncanonical TGF-β signaling regulate fibrous tissue differentiation in the axial skeleton. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78206-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Covino DA, Gauzzi MC, Fantuzzi L. Understanding the regulation of APOBEC3 expression: current evidence and much to learn. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;103(3):433–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.2MR0717-310R.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu W, Deng Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Zhu X, Tan X, Cao G. Cancer Evo–Dev: a theory of Inflammation-Induced Oncogenesis. Front Immunol. 2021;12(November):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.768098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Cho, R. J., Alexandrov, L. B., Den Breems, N. Y., Atanasova, V. S., Farshchian, M.,Purdom, E., … South, A. P. (2018). APOBEC mutation drives early-onset squamous cell carcinomas in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Science Translational Medicine, 10(455), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aas9668.

  70. Li, S., Bao, X., Wang, D., You, L., Li, X., Yang, H., … Yang, Y. (2017). APOBEC3B and IL-6 form a positive feedback loop in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Science China Life Sciences, 60(6), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-9058-6.

  71. Fuentes, I., Yubero, M. J., Morandé, P., Varela, C., Oróstica, K., Acevedo, F., …Palisson, F. (2022). Longitudinal study of wound healing status and bacterial colonisation of Staphylococcus aureus and Corynebacterium diphtheriae in epidermolysis bullosa patients. International Wound Journal, 2022(July), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13922.

  72. Stanley A, Osler T. Senescence and the healing rates of venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(6):1206–11. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.115379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Capparelli, C., Guido, C., Whitaker-Menezes, D., Bonuccelli, G., Balliet, R., Pestell,T. G., … Lisanti, M. P. (2012). Autophagy and senescence in cancer-associated fibroblasts metabolically supports tumor growth and metastasis, via glycolysis and ketone production.Cell Cycle, 11(12), 2285–2302. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.20718.

  74. Alimirah, F., Pulido, T., Valdovinos, A., Alptekin, S., Chang, E., Jones, E., … Campisi,J. (2020). Cellular senescence promotes skin carcinogenesis through p38MAPK and p44/42MAPK signaling. Cancer Research, 80(17), 3606–3619. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0108.

  75. Farsam, V., Basu, A., Gatzka, M., Treiber, N., Schneider, L. A., Mulaw, M. A., … Scharffetter-Kochanek,K. (2016). Senescent fibroblast-derived Chemerin promotes squamous cell carcinoma migration. Oncotarget, 7(50), 83554–83569. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13446.

  76. Tartaglia G, Cao Q, Padron ZM, South AP. Impaired wound healing, fibrosis, and cancer: the paradigm of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105104.

  77. Roberts, S. A., Lawrence, M. S., Klimczak, L. J., Grimm, S. A., Fargo, D., Stojanov,P., … Gordenin, D. A. (2013). An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers. Nature Genetics, 45(9), 970–976. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2702.

  78. Zhang S, Duan E. Fighting against skin aging: the way from Bench to Bedside. Cell Transplant. 2018;27(5):729–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689717725755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Sorrell JM, Caplan AI. Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep. J cell Sci 117(Pt. 2004;5:667–75. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 25(4), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

  81. Gorell ES, Nguyen N, Siprashvili Z, Marinkovich MP, Lane AT. Characterization 394 of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa for collagen VII therapy. Br J Dermatol Sep. 2015;173(3):821–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.13737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Suarez-Arnedo A, Figueroa FT, Clavijo C, Arbeláez P, Cruz JC, Muñoz-Camargo C. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7 July):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Ngo P, Ramalingam P, Phillips JA, Furuta GT, Clifton NJ.), 341, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-113-4:103.

  84. Grinnell F, Petroll WM. Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:335–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.11331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous patients with EB for participating in this study. We also thank DEBRA Chile for their constant support and encouragement of their team members to perform and participate in this research. Finally, we thank Dr. Alexander Nyström PhD, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany for kindly sharing the Rabbit polyclonal collagen VII antibody.

Funding

This work was funded by FONDECYT Regular number 1220704 (ANID, Chile), granted to IF, FONDECYT Regular number 1200308 (ANID, Chile), granted to ME and FONDECYT Postdoctoral 3200677 (ANID, Chile) and Proyecto Interno (UDD, Chile), granted to CD.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Cristian De Gregorio, Evelyng Catalán and Gabriel Garrido contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Medicina Regenerativa, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, 7610658, Chile

    Cristian De Gregorio, Ya-Lin Huang, Bárbara Cuadra & Marcelo Ezquer

  2. DEBRA Chile, Francisco de Villagra 392, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Chile

    Evelyng Catalán, Gabriel Garrido, Pilar Morandé, Jimena Castillo Bennett, Catalina Muñoz, Glenda Cofré, María Joao Yubero, Francis Palisson & Ignacia Fuentes

  3. Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile

    Paola Murgas

  4. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y División de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Margarita Calvo

  5. Núcleo milenio para el estudio del dolor MINUSPAIN, Santiago, Chile

    Margarita Calvo

  6. División de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Fernando Altermatt

  7. Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases of Clínica Alemana, Facultad de Medicina Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile

    María Joao Yubero

  8. Servicio de Dermatología, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile

    Francis Palisson

  9. Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA

    Andrew P. South

  10. Centro de Genética y Genómica, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, 7610658, Chile

    Ignacia Fuentes

  11. Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Ignacia Fuentes

Authors
  1. Cristian De Gregorio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evelyng Catalán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriel Garrido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pilar Morandé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jimena Castillo Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Catalina Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Glenda Cofré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ya-Lin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bárbara Cuadra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Paola Murgas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Margarita Calvo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fernando Altermatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. María Joao Yubero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Francis Palisson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Andrew P. South
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Marcelo Ezquer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ignacia Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Author Contribution

Conceptualization, I.F. and M.E.; Methodology, C.D.G., E.C., G.G., P.M., J.C.B., C.M., G.C., Y-L.H., B.C., P.M., M.C., F.A., M.J.Y, F.P., A.P.S., M.E., I.F.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, C.D.G., E.C., G.G., M.E. and I.F.; Writing – Review & Editing, C.D.G., E.C., G.G., P.M., J.C., C.M., G.C., Y.L.H., B.C., P.M., M.C., M.J.Y., F.P., A.P.S., M.E. and I.F.; Project Administration, I.F.; Funding Acquisition, I.F; M.E, and C.D.G.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marcelo Ezquer or Ignacia Fuentes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo #2013 − 145. Whereas, written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to sample collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Gregorio, C., Catalán, E., Garrido, G. et al. Maintenance of chronicity signatures in fibroblasts isolated from recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa chronic wound dressings under culture conditions. Biol Res 56, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-023-00437-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-023-00437-2

Keywords

Biological Research

ISSN: 0717-6287

Contact us