Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Oocyte quality assessment in marine invertebrates: a novel approach by fluorescence spectroscopy

Biological Research volume 55, Article number: 34 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The assessment of oocyte quality is, nowadays, a major challenge in aquaculture, oocyte cryopreservation, and environmental science. Oocyte quality is a determining factor in fertilization and embryo development; however, there is still a lack of rapid and sensitive cellular markers for its assessment. Currently, its estimation is predominantly based on morphological analysis, which is subjective and does not consistently reflect the developmental competence of the oocytes. Despite several recent studies investigating molecular markers related to oocyte quality, methods currently available for their determination pose various technical challenges and limitations. In this study, we developed a novel approach based on fluorescence spectroscopy to assess different intrinsic physiological parameters that can be employed to evaluate egg quality in marine invertebrates that are widely used as animal models such as sea urchins and mussels.

Results

Different physiological parameters, such as viability, mitochondrial activity, intracellular ROS levels, plasma membrane lipid peroxidation, and intracellular pH, for egg quality evaluation have been successfully assessed in sea urchins and mussels by using specific fluorescent dyes and detecting the fluorescent signals in eggs through fluorescence spectroscopy.

Conclusions

Based on our findings, we propose these physiological markers as useful predictors of egg quality in marine invertebrates; they can be estimated rapidly, selectively, and sensitively by employing this novel approach, which, due to the speed of analysis, the low cost, and easy use can be considered a powerful analytical tool for the egg quality assessment.

Background

Oocytes are highly specialized cells that undergo the unique processes of meiosis and fertilization and execute a molecular program for development [1].

Oocyte quality has been defined as the ability of oocytes to be fertilized and produce viable progeny. In marine species, the evaluation of oocyte quality is commonly based on morphological criteria, such as size, shape, transparency, chorion aspects, distribution and volume of lipid droplets, lipid content and floatability rate, as well as fertilization and developmental success assessment [2, 3]. However, the morphological classification of oocytes is subjective and does not consistently reflect their ability to grow and develop [4]. Moreover, the assessment of fertilization and developmental success is time-consuming and, depending on the species, technically difficult to be estimated [2]. Hence, to date, an effective and simple proxy of oocyte quality parameters has not been established yet making difficult for an accurate assessment of the female gamete quality before fertilization. To overcome this issue, different predictive markers of oocyte quality have been proposed [5, 6]. Many investigations have been designed to gain new insights into the mechanisms underlying oocyte quality based on a differential analysis applied to molecular, biochemical, transcriptomic, or proteomic data. Biochemical content determinations have been exploited for oocyte quality evaluation [7,8,9], and, recently, the oocyte proteomic profile has been proposed as quality estimator [10, 11]. Nevertheless, the complexity of the techniques applied to assess gene expression and protein profile is a major bottleneck for the use of molecular markers in the oocyte quality assessment [12].

Several physiological parameters, such as viability, mitochondrial activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels have been also reported as useful markers of oocyte quality in marine invertebrates.

Viability is surely a fundamental requirement of oocyte quality; however, it is not per se sufficient to assure oocyte developmental competence [13].

On the other side, mitochondrial functionality is one of the main used indicators for estimating oocyte quality [14]. In the oocyte, mitochondria play a central role in cellular metabolism providing energy for successful cytoplasm and nucleus maturation, fertilization, embryo development, calcium homeostasis, and apoptosis initiation. They are synthesized and accumulated in high numbers during oogenesis so that mature oocytes contain thousands of these organelles localized according to a gradient, which, after fertilization, are distributed into the daughter cells supporting the development up to the larval stage [15,16,17]. Mitochondria number, distribution, and activity are narrowly tied with oocyte quality [18, 19]. High-polarized mitochondria have been associated with many metabolic activities including ATP production and calcium homeostasis as well as with fertilization and developmental competence [20]. On the other hand, low-polarized mitochondria have been correlated to low ATP production and low levels of metabolic activity in meiotic arrest oocytes, which are in a quiescent state [21], but also to oocyte maturation arrest, fertilization, and embryo development failures. In light of this, mitochondria activity is considered a determinant factor of oocyte quality [22]; indeed any stressor affecting mitochondrial functionality might impair the oocyte competence.

In the oocyte, the production of ROS occurs during the metabolic processes at a controlled rate. ROS act as signalling molecules in oocyte physiology regulating nuclear maturation, meiotic arrest as well as resumption, fertilization, and embryo development [23]. The generation and the clearance of ROS are involved in the maintenance of oocyte quality and thereby, female reproductive health. Several studies have drawn a compelling link between oxidative stress (OS) and the decline in oocyte quality. Indeed, increased levels of ROS beyond the physiological range may induce OS, which deteriorates oocyte quality by arresting the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis [24, 25].

In marine invertebrates, the aforementioned oocyte quality parameters have been determined using fluorescent dyes combined with the epifluorescence microscopy [26,27,28] or flow cytometry [29, 30]. The former has the advantage of identifying the fluorescent signals in individual cells; nevertheless, only few cells of the same sample can be evaluated. The latter allows for the assessment of several parameters on small samples in a very short time providing rapid and accurate results. However, the flow cytometry is an expensive technique that also requires skilled and highly trained operators to perform it. Thereby, there is an urgent need to develop new approaches allowing the rapid assessment of oocyte quality by employing simple, economic, and feasible protocols. To address this issue, this study developed a novel approach based on fluorescence spectroscopy to evaluate different physiological parameters related to oocyte quality, such as viability, mitochondrial activity, intracellular ROS levels, plasma membrane lipid peroxidation (LPO), and the intracellular pH (pHi) in marine invertebrates. To date, a similar approach has been well‐developed to estimate several quality parameters in marine invertebrate spermatozoa; however, up to date, it has not been applied to oocytes.

Besides viability, mitochondrial activity, and intracellular ROS levels, in this study, new potential markers of oocyte quality in marine invertebrates, such as LPO and the pHi, have been investigated. The regulation of pHi is a fundamental homeostatic process that is essential for oocyte function and viability. Small pHi shifts are involved in the critical transitions of the oocyte status, as during meiotic maturation and following oocyte activation and fertilization [31, 32], and trigger a cascade of cellular events that initiate embryo development [33]. On the other hand, major alterations in pHi have been demonstrated to affect cellular events regulating embryo development in sea urchins [34,35,36].

It is well known that ROS affect gamete integrity also through LPO [37, 38], which is an oxidative process that modifies the structure and the properties of plasma membrane lipids affecting the oocyte quality [39].

Overall, the objective of this study is to develop a rapid and sensitive approach to assess different physiological parameters that can be used as markers of the egg quality in sea urchins and mussels. These play important ecological roles in marine ecosystems, but also hold high commercial interest and are widely employed in biomonitoring programs and ecotoxicological studies; thereby, they are among the most harvested species. Oocyte cryopreservation may provide a great contribution to their availability increasing the accessibility of gamete supplies out-of-season and enhance efficiency in selective breeding. These may allow access to genetic resources all the year regardless of the seasonal reproductive cycle for fundamental research, ecotoxicology studies, aquaculture and conservation.

Results

Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis

Before the spectrofluorometric analysis, all the fluorochromes employed in this study have been evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The microscopic examination revealed their localization within the specific egg compartment in all analysed species (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative fluorescence images of sea urchin eggs stained with: SYBR-14/Propidium iodide (PI) for viability assessment; JC-1 for mitochondrial membrane potential determination; H2DCFDA for intracellular ROS level evaluation; and C11-BODIPY581/591 for plasma membrane lipid peroxidation estimation. For each fluorochrome, eggs have been divided in untreated (first row) and treated (second row) with: glutaraldehyde for SYBR14/PI; peroxidation promoters (ferrous sulfate and vitamin C) for C11-BODIPY581/591; hydrogen peroxide for intracellular ROS; carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) for JC-1 (positive controls). For all dyes, the merge image includes the green and the red channels, except for H2DCFDA dye, for which only the green channel has been showed. Scale bars 50 μm

Full size image

Viability

The egg viability has been evaluated by the SYBR-14/PI fluorescence intensity ratio and the results are reported in Table 1. Egg death induction treatment induced a significant increase in PI and a reduction in SYBR14 fluorescence intensities in all analysed species. This resulted in a significant reduction in the estimated viability value (88.0 ± 3.6 vs. 9.5 ± 1.0 in M. galloprovincialis, 85.2 ± 7.5 vs. 5.5 ± 0.8 FI in P. lividus, and 86.5 ± 3.5 vs. 5.9 ± 0.4 FI in A. lixula: P < 0.01) (Fig. 2).

Table 1 Viability, MMP, ROS, LPO, and pHi values recorded in mussel and sea urchin eggs
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Egg quality assessment in mussel and sea urchin. In the left and middle columns, there are representative fluorescence emission spectra recorded by spectrofluorimetry in the Mytilus galloprovincialis and Paracentrotus lividus eggs stained with: SYBR-14/Propidium iodide (PI) for viability assessment; JC-1 for mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) determination; H2DCFDA and hydrogen peroxide for intracellular ROS level evaluation; and C11 BODIPY.581/591 for plasma membrane lipid peroxidation (LPO) estimation. For each fluorochrome, eggs have been divided in untreated and treated with: glutaraldehyde for SYBR14/PI; peroxidation promoters (ferrous sulfate and vitamin C) for C11-BODIPY581/591; hydrogen peroxide for intracellular ROS; carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) for JC-1 (positive controls). In the right column, mean values (± SD) of viability, MMP, intracellular ROS levels, and LPO recorded in untreated and treated eggs of the mussel (M. galloprovincialis) and the sea urchin (P. lividus and A. lixula) were compared. * indicates statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.05)

Full size image

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP)

The MMP has been calculated as a ratio of the red (J-aggregates) and green fluorescence (J-monomers) reflecting high and low mitochondrial potential, respectively. In the eggs of all analysed species, low MMP values have been measured (Table 1). The treatment with the mitochondrial uncoupler carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) resulted in a significant decrease in JC-1 fluorescence ratio indicating the MMP collapse: 2.7 ± 0.3 vs. 1.0 ± 0.08 a.u. in M. galloprovincialis, 2.5 ± 0.6 vs. 0.5 ± 0.06 a.u. in P. lividus, and 2.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.8 ± 0.09 a.u. in A. lixula (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Intracellular ROS levels

The oocyte ROS production has been detected by using the probe H2DCFDA, whose fluorescence signal upon oxidation by hydrogen peroxide allows the quantification of ROS levels (Table 1). After egg exposure to H2O2, a significant increase in the intracellular ROS levels has been recorded in all analysed species (181.9 ± 24.5 vs. 632.5 ± 77.91 in M. galloprovincialis; 142.1 ± 28.3 vs. 372.4 ± 34.7 in P. lividus; and 146.8 ± 34.7 vs. 346.0 ± 17.44 in A. lixula; P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Plasma membrane lipid peroxidation

The LPO has been estimated by using the fluorochrome C11 BODIPY581/591, which shifts its fluorescence from red to green upon oxidation. The ratio between red and green fluorescence provides a measure of LPO in the eggs of all analysed species (Table 1). After the egg treatment with peroxidation promoters, the emission peak at 595 nm (red fluorescence) decreased whereas that at 520 nm increased; consequently, the ratio significantly increased (32.9 ± 2.1 vs. 67.3 ± 4.8 FI in M. galloprovincialis; 34.8 ± 1.2 vs. 92.4 ± 5.9 in P. lividus; and 31.5 ± 2.2 vs. 90.2 ± 4.8 in A. lixula; P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Intracellular pH

Table 1 showed the average values of the pHi measured in the mussel and sea urchin eggs by employing the fluorochrome 2′-7′-bis (carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) and determining the pH-dependent ratio of emission fluorescence intensity at 535 nm when the dye is excited at 490 and 440 nm.

Discussion

The assessment of gamete quality in marine species has become an important issue in aquaculture and for the development of cryopreservation protocols as well as environmental science. However, the egg quality evaluation is more challenging since, to date, the assessment methods are very limited. In this study, we developed a novel approach using fluorescence staining in combination with spectrofluorimetric analysis for the assessment of egg quality in marine invertebrates. Nowadays, this method is commonly used to evaluate sperm quality in different marine species [40,41,42,43,44]; whereas, this study represents the first report on the development and validation of this approach for the evaluation of different egg quality parameters, such as viability, mitochondrial membrane potential, intracellular ROS level, plasma membrane lipid peroxidation, and the pHi in mussels and sea urchins.

Herein, the egg viability has been estimated using the dual DNA staining, employing the fluorochrome SYBR-14 and PI. We demonstrated that this staining results effectively in assessing viability in mussel and sea urchin eggs as confirmed by the positive control. Previously, this dual fluorescent staining was successfully employed to evaluate oocyte viability only in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas [29].

The MMP is a key indicator of mitochondrial activity because it correlates to cell capacity to generate ATP by oxidative phosphorylation. Several fluorescent lipophilic cationic dyes are used for measuring MMP, such as TMRM (tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester), TMRE (tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester), Rhodamine 123, and JC-1. Among these, JC-1 has been demonstrated the most accurate and specific probe to estimate MMP [45, 46]. To date, JC-1 has been used to assess mitochondrial activity in the oocyte of a few marine invertebrates species such as the ascidian Styela plicata [19] and the corals Junceella sp [47]. In this study, we validated the use of JC-1 for measuring MMP changes in the eggs of sea urchins and mussels as confirmed by CCCP treatment. Indeed, in CCCP treated eggs, we observed a reduction of the red-to-green fluorescence intensities ratio, which indicates both the inhibition of JC-1 aggregate formation due to the MMP decrease and the exclusive localization of JC-1 in the mitochondria. The low MMP values detected in the oocytes of the three analyzed species may be due to the presence in the eggs of mitochondria, which are more transcriptionally and bioenergetically silent.

The intracellular ROS levels are considered a reliable predictor of oocyte developmental competence. To date, the best approach employed to detect ROS production is a fluorescence-based system because of its high sensitivity. The 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA)-based staining is the most commonly used fluorochrome for detecting intracellular ROS in the oocytes of different species [48,49,50,51]. In marine invertebrates, it has been applied for ROS detection only in oyster oocytes, and, to the best of our knowledge, currently, no literature is available on the assessment of intracellular ROS in oocytes of different marine invertebrate species. In this study, we demonstrated that DCFH-DA staining could be effectively used to measure intracellular ROS levels in mussel and sea urchin eggs. The efficacy of this method has been supported by using positive controls in which the eggs were exposed to an oxidative stimulus that caused a large increase in fluorescent intensity values.

ROS may affect egg quality primarily through LPO. Nowadays, different biochemical assays for LPO assessment have been developed; however, they are relatively insensitive and require a large number of cells. Recently, a new approach for evaluating LPO has been developed, involving the fluorochrome C11 BODIPY581/591. This probe has been demonstrated to be very suitable for sensitive quantitation of LPO providing a simple ratiometric method for detecting the oxidative degradation of cellular lipids. The ratio of red to green fluorescence provides a measure of lipid peroxidation, which is independent of factors such as lipid density that may influence measurement with single emission probes. Previous studies indicated that C11-BODIPY581/591 is a very effective probe for monitoring LPO in spermatozoa [52,53,54]; however, to our knowledge, it has never been used to assess LPO in eggs. In this study, we evaluated for the first time the applicability of this probe for the LPO assessment in marine invertebrate eggs. The obtained results indicate that C11-BODIPY581/591 is a valuable tool to quantify LPO in mussel and sea urchin eggs.

The pHi is an important physiological determinant of egg quality since it plays important roles in different processes, such as protein synthesis, oocyte activation, and cytoskeletal rearrangement [55, 56]. Different approaches employed to determine pHi include the use of pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes. The fluorescence assessment of pHi was commonly performed by using the pH indicator BCECF, which is considered suitable for measuring pHi since it is well retained in the cell and is not susceptible to leakage [57]. Up to date, BCECF has been employed to measure the pHi in oocytes and eggs of marine invertebrates such as surf clam [58], starfish [59], sea urchin [60], and polychaete [61]. Nevertheless, it has not been yet validated for pHi assessment in the eggs of the sea urchin P. lividus and A. lixula. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, no report is available on the assessment of pHi in mussel eggs based on BCECF staining. In this study, we demonstrated that BCECF is effective in assessing pHi in mussel eggs and confirmed that it is applicable to pHi measurements of sea urchin eggs.

Up to date, the fluorescent dye accumulation in eggs has been detected by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, which present different disadvantages. In this study, we have evaluated the suitability of fluorescence spectroscopy to analyse eggs labelled with a specific fluorophore demonstrating that this technique allows sensitive and accurate detection of the signal in stained eggs. Furthermore, the use of a microplate reader has several advantages. In fact, the microplate-based method allows the simultaneous analysis of the different egg physiological parameters within a few minutes; moreover, it requires a small sample volume (200 µL), which minimized the expenses required for the testing procedures, in particular those of the fluorophore used.

Based on our findings, we have validated different physiological parameters such as viability, mitochondrial activity, intracellular ROS levels, LPO, and pHi as useful indicators of healthy eggs in marine invertebrates; nevertheless, further investigations are still necessary to evaluate if these parameters are also predictive biomarker of a high developmental competence. Moreover, we demonstrated that, due to the speed of analysis, inexpensive, and easy use, combining fluorescent staining and fluorescence spectroscopy analysis is a powerful analytical tool for egg quality assessment allowing the rapid, selective, and sensitive measurements of different egg quality parameters in marine invertebrates.

Conclusions

In the present study, a novel approach has been developed for evaluating several physiological parameters in mussel and sea urchin eggs based on fluorescence staining and fluorescence spectroscopy. The developed method is easy-to-perform and allows a rapid and sensitive assessment of the viability, mitochondrial activity, intracellular ROS, LPO, and pHi in eggs of marine invertebrates providing markers of egg quality and, hence, an assessment of the reproductive potential of the eggs. This approach represents a suitable alternative to the methods used so far for the analysis of the eggs with fluorescent dyes and has some advantages over these as it is less time-consuming and allows the evaluation of a large number of cells. Finally, it may be a promising and valuable tool to investigate the toxicity and mechanism of action of environmental pollutants in the framework of reproductive risk assessment.

Methods

Animal collection and spawning

Mussel

Adult individuals of Mytilus galloprovincialis were collected from an aquaculture farm situated on the Bay of Naples (Italy) and transported in a cool box to the Marine Biological Resources service of Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn. Here, mussels were acclimated in glass tanks with running natural seawater (NSW, 38 g/L salinity, pH 8.2 ± 0.1, 18 °C) for at least 3 days until the experiments. Mussels were induced to spawn by thermal shock moving the animals from a tank containing seawater at 18 °C to one that contains seawater at 24 °C. Emitted eggs were collected in glass beakers and filtered with a 70 μm sieve. Finally, eggs were diluted to the desired concentration in filtered (Millipore 0.22 mm; MilliQ, Medford, MA) natural seawater (FNSW).

Sea urchin

Adult sea urchins Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula were collected from the Gulf of Naples. After collection, the animals were acclimated in glass tanks filled with circulating natural seawater (NSW, 38 g/L salinity, pH 8.2 ± 0.1, 18 °C) for at least seven days until use. Eggs were obtained from mature animals by injecting 0.5 M KCl solution into the coelom. After injection, females were inverted over a beaker containing FNSW and left to release eggs. Egg morphology and concentration were evaluated by a light microscope using a counting chamber. Finally, eggs were diluted to the desired concentration in FNSW.

Egg quality parameters

Viability

Egg viability was estimated by employing the fluorochrome SYBR-14 in combination with propidium iodide (PI). The former penetrates living eggs emitting a bright green fluorescence, whereas PI penetrates only cells that have lost membrane integrity, and emits in the red fluorescence range. Aliquots of egg suspension (1000 oocytes/mL) were stained by adding 100 µM SYBR-14 and incubating for 15 min in the dark at 18 ± 1 °C. After that, 12 μM PI was added and samples were further incubated for 15 min at 18 ± 1 °C in the dark. To validate the SYBR-14 and PI staining, eggs were killed by incubating for 1 h in glutaraldehyde 4% in FNSW. Finally, SYBR 14 and PI fluorescence intensity peaks were measured with the microplate reader setting the excitation wavelengths at 488 nm and at 545 nm recording the emission spectra in the range of 500–560 nm and 570–700 nm, respectively.

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP)

MMP was measured using the potential-dependent fluorochrome 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide dye (JC-1; Life Technologies, Milan, Italy). JC-1 enters selectively into mitochondria where it can exist in two forms, monomeric or aggregate, depending upon mitochondrial membrane potential. The monomeric form predominates in mitochondria with low membrane potential and emits in the green wavelength (525–530 nm), whereas the aggregate form accumulates in mitochondria with high MMP and emits in the orange/red wavelength (~ 595 nm). The JC-1 aggregate/monomer ratio is assumed to be proportional to MMP. Aliquots of 1000 eggs/mL were incubated with 5 μM JC-1 for 30 min in the dark at 18 °C, then were washed, re-suspended in FNSW, and analysed to the microplate reader. The fluorescence spectra were recorded by setting the excitation wavelength at 488 nm and the emission spectrum in the range of 500–650 nm. The MMP was calculated as a ratio of the fluorescence peak values at ~ 595 nm and ~ 530 nm. Positive control samples were prepared by incubating JC-1-loaded eggs with 5 µM CCCP.

Intracellular ROS levels

The intracellular ROS levels were determined by using the 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, Life technologies, ThermoFisher Scientific, Milan, Italy). This is a membrane-permeable, non-fluorescent dye that, inside cells, is hydrolysed by intracellular esterase into DCFH, which can be oxidized by the intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to the fluorescent compound DCF, whose fluorescence is proportional to ROS production. Aliquots of 1000 eggs/mL were incubated with 10 μM DCFH-DA for 30 min in the dark at 18 °C. After that, samples were washed and further incubated for 30 min in FNSW. After incubation, eggs were washed, suspended in FNSW, and transferred to a 96-well plate for spectrofluorometric analysis. The intracellular H2O2 levels were evaluated in arbitrary units (a.u.) on peak fluorescence intensity of emission spectra recorded from 500 to 560 nm wavelengths (peak at ~ 525 nm) setting the excitation wavelength at 488 nm. Positive control was prepared by incubating aliquots of egg suspension with 2.5 µM hydrogen peroxide.

Plasma membrane lipid peroxidation (LPO)

LPO of the egg plasma membrane was quantified using the fluorescent probe C11-BODIPY581/591 (4,4-difluoro-5-(4-phenyl-1,3-butadienyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-undecanoic acid; Life Technology, Milan, Italy). This is a lipophilic probe and a fatty acid analogue, which is easily incorporated into membranes and is sensitive to fatty acid oxidation changing from red (590 nm) to green (520 nm) fluorescence upon oxidation. Aliquots of eggs (1000 eggs/mL) were incubated with 5 µM C11-BODIPY581/591 in DMSO for 30 min in the dark at 18 °C. Then, eggs were washed and suspended in FNSW. Positive control was prepared by incubating egg aliquots with two peroxidation promoters (150 µM ferrous sulfate and 750 µM vitamin C). The spectrofluorometric analysis was performed recording the fluorescence intensity spectra at 500–650 nm emission wavelengths, after excitation at 488 nm. Lipid peroxidation value was determined as a ratio between fluorescence emission peak value at  ~ 520 nm and the sum of fluorescence emission peak values at  ~ 520 and  ~ 590 nm.

Intracellular pH (pHi)

The pHi was evaluated using the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye 2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6) carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM; Life Technology, Milan, Italy). This dye is able to freely diffuse through the plasma membrane and, in the cell, it is hydrolyzed by esterases resulting in the cytoplasmic indicator BCECF whose fluorescence intensity depends on the pHi. The ester form of BCECF (5 µM BCECF-AM) was loaded to the egg suspensions (1000 cell/mL) and incubated in the dark at 18 °C for 30 min. Then, eggs were washed, resuspended in FNSW, and transferred to a 96-well plate for spectrofluorometric analysis. The pHi value was measured by alternately exciting the samples at 440 nm and 490 nm and calculating the ratio of the fluorescence emission peak values at 535 nm. This ratio was converted in pHi by using a calibration curve, which was constructed on each experiment by incubating aliquots of the eggs in a calibration buffer solution (135 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, 290 mOsm) set at pH 6.5, 7.2, and 8.0, in presence of 5 µM nigericin (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Nigericin equilibrates intracellular and extracellular pH acting as an antiporter, promoting K+/H+ exchange. As consequence, the fluorescence intensity is linearly associated with the internal/external pH. By using the calibration curve equation, the ratios between the emission peak values obtained following excitation at 440 and 490 nm wavelength were transformed into pHi values.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

Confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510) was employed for each dye in loaded eggs mounted on a microscope slide to assess the correct fluorophore localization within a specific cell compartment.

Spectrofluorometric analysis

The fluorescence of eggs was quantified on the microplate reader (Tecan Infinite® m1000 pro). For each parameter, three replicate measurements were made by transferring aliquots of loaded eggs into three wells of a black polystyrene 96-well plate with a clear bottom. The plate reader is set to fluorescence-intensity mode to record the emission spectrum of each fluorochrome.

Statistical analysis

Ten biological replicates have been performed for each egg physiological parameter and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The one-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher’s least significant difference test has been performed to test for significant differences between untreated and treated eggs. The significance level was set at P = 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gosden R, Lee B. Portrait of an oocyte: our obscure origin. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(4):973–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobe J, Labbé C. Egg and sperm quality in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;165(3):535–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Valdebenito II, Gallegos PC, Effer BR. Gamete quality in fish: evaluation parameters and determining factors. Zygote. 2015;23(2):177–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Migaud H, Bell G, Cabrita E, McAndrew B, Davie A, Bobe J, Herraez MP, Carrillo M. Gamete quality and broodstock management in temperate fish. Rev Aquac. 2013;5:S194–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrizio P, Fragouli E, Bianchi V, Borini A, Wells D. Molecular methods for selection of the ideal oocyte. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15(3):346–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Q, Sun Q-Y. Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;19(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Massapina C. Oocyte and embryo quality in Crassostrea gigas (Portuguese strain) during a spawning period in Algarve. South Portugal Aquatic Living Res. 1999;12(5):327–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Soudant P, Marty Y, Moal J, François SJ. Fatty acids and egg quality in great scallop. Aquacult Int. 1996;4(3):191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Valdez-Ramirez ME, Donval A, Le Pennec M. Ultrastructural and histochemical criteria for determining normality in mature oocytes of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. J Shellfish Res. 2002;21(2):707–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castets M-D, Schaerlinger B, Silvestre F, Gardeur J-N, Dieu M, Corbier C, Kestemont P, Fontaine P. Combined analysis of Perca fluviatilis reproductive performance and oocyte proteomic profile. Theriogenology. 2012;78(2):432-442.e413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corporeau C, Vanderplancke G, Boulais M, Suquet M, Quéré C, Boudry P, Huvet A, Madec S. Proteomic identification of quality factors for oocytes in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. J Proteomics. 2012;75(18):5554–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bobe J. Egg quality in fish: present and future challenges. Anim Front. 2015;5(1):66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beninger PG, Chérel D, Kessler L. Examining bivalve fecundity: oocyte viability revealed by neutral red vital staining. Aquacult Int. 2021;29(3):1219–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Qi L, Chen X, Wang J, Lv B, Zhang J, Ni B, Xue Z. Mitochondria: the panacea to improve oocyte quality? Annals of Translational Medicine. 2019;7(23):789–789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bresch H. Mitochondrial profile densities and areas in different developmental stages of the sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis. Exp Cell Res. 1978;111(1):205–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumollard R, Duchen M, Carroll J. The Role of Mitochondrial Function in the Oocyte and Embryo. In: John JC, editor. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 77. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto L, Kasamatsu H, Pikó L, Vinograd J. Mitochondrial dna replication in sea urchin oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1974;63(1):146–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Babayev E, Seli E. Oocyte mitochondrial function and reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(3):175–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bezzaouia A, Gallo A, Silvestre F, Tekaya S, Tosti E. Distribution pattern and activity of mitochondria during oocyte growth and maturation in the ascidian Styela plicata. Zygote. 2014;22(4):462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Blerkom J, Davis P. Mitochondrial signaling and fertilization. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(11):759–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodríguez-Nuevo A, Torres-Sanchez A, Duran JM, De Guirior C, Martínez-Zamora MA, Böke E. Oocytes maintain ROS-free mitochondrial metabolism by suppressing complex I. Biorxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.27.493392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catalá MG, Izquierdo D, Uzbekova S, Morató R, Roura M, Romaguera R, Papillier P, Paramio MT. Brilliant Cresyl Blue stain selects largest oocytes with highest mitochondrial activity, maturation-promoting factor activity and embryo developmental competence in prepubertal sheep. Reproduction. 2011;142(4):517–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tiwari M, Prasad S, Tripathi A, Pandey AN, Singh AK, Shrivastav TG, Chaube SK. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in meiotic cell cycle regulation and apoptosis in mammalian oocytes. Reac Oxyg Species. 2016;1(2):110–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kala M, Shaikh MV, Nivsarkar M. Equilibrium between anti-oxidants and reactive oxygen species: a requisite for oocyte development and maturation. Reproductive Med Biol. 2017;16(1):28–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Prasad S, Tiwari M, Pandey AN, Shrivastav TG, Chaube SK. Impact of stress on oocyte quality and reproductive outcome. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23(1):36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Paniagua-Chávez CG, Jenkins J, Segovia M, Tiersch TR. Assessment of gamete quality for the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) by use of fluorescent dyes. Cryobiology. 2006;53(1):128–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Valdez-Ramirez ME, Le Pennec M, Dorange G, Devauchelle N, Nonnotte GUY. Assessment of female gamete quality in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Invertebr Reprod Dev. 1999;36(1–3):73–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Agnello M, Roccheri MC, Morici G, Rinaldi AM. Mitochondria during sea urchin oogenesis. Zygote. 2017;25(2):205–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Goïc N, Hégaret H, Boulais M, Béguel J-P, Lambert C, Fabioux C, Soudant P. Flow cytometric assessment of morphology, viability, and production of reactive oxygen species of Crassostrea gigas oocytes. application to toxic dinoflagellate (Alexandrium minutum) exposure. Cytometry Part A. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vignier J, Volety AK, Rolton A, Le Goïc N, Chu F-LE, Robert R, Soudant P. Sensitivity of eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) spermatozoa and oocytes to dispersed oil cellular responses and impacts on fertilization and embryogenesis. Environ Pollut. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Epel D. The initiation of development at fertilization. Cell Differ Dev. 1990;29(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Neant I, Guerrier P, Meiosis reinitiation in the mollusc Patella vulgata. Regulation of MPF, CSF and chromosome condensation activity by intracellular pH, protein synthesis and phosphorylation. Development. 1988;102(3):505–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Squirrell JM, Lane M, Bavister BD. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos1. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(6):1845–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Begg DA, Wong GK, Hoyle DH, Baltz JM. Stimulation of cortical actin polymerization in the sea urchin egg cortex by NH4Cl procaine and urethane: elevation of cytoplasmic pH is not the common mechanism of action. Cell Motil Cytoskelet. 1996;35(3):210–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Suprenant KA, Marsh JC. Temperature and pH govern the self-assembly of microtubules from unfertilized sea-urchin egg extracts. J Cell Sci. 1987;87(1):71–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dubé F, Epel D. The relation between intracellular pH and rate of protein synthesis in sea urchin eggs and the existence of a pH-independent event triggered by ammonia. Exp Cell Res. 1986;162(1):191–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Almansa-Ordonez A, Bellido R, Vassena R, Barragan M, Zambelli F. Oxidative stress in reproduction: a mitochondrial perspective. Biology. 2020;9(9):269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sinha A, Gupta S. Lipid peroxidation and its impact on infertility. Womens Health Gynecol. 2018;4(1):082.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Da Broi MG, Navarro PA. Oxidative stress and oocyte quality: ethiopathogenic mechanisms of minimal/mild endometriosis-related infertility. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;364(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Esposito MC, Boni R, Cuccaro A, Tosti E, Gallo A. Sperm motility impairment in free spawning invertebrates under near-future level of ocean acidification: uncovering the mechanism. Front Marine Sci. 2020;6:794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gallo A, Boni R, Buia MC, Monfrecola V, Esposito MC, Tosti E. Ocean acidification impact on ascidian Ciona robusta spermatozoa: New evidence for stress resilience. Sci Total Environ. 2019;697: 134100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gallo A, Boni R, Tosti E. Sperm viability assessment in marine invertebrates by fluorescent staining and spectrofluorimetry: A promising tool for assessing marine pollution impact. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;147:407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gallo A, Manfra L, Boni R, Rotini A, Migliore L, Tosti E. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of CuO nanoparticles in sea urchin spermatozoa through oxidative stress. Environ Int. 2018;118:325–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Boni R, Gallo A, Montanino M, Macina A, Tosti E. Dynamic changes in the sperm quality of Mytilus galloprovincialis under continuous thermal stress. Mol Reprod Dev. 2016;83(2):162–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Marchetti C, Jouy N, Leroy-Martin B, Defossez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P. Comparison of four fluorochromes for the detection of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential in human spermatozoa and their correlation with sperm motility. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2267–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lugli E, Troiano L, Cossarizza A. Polychromatic analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential using JC-1. Curr Protoco Cytom. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0732s41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tsai S, Spikings E, Kuo FW, Lin NC, Lin C. Use of an adenosine triphosphate assay, and simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide, to evaluate the effects of cryoprotectants on hard coral (Echinopora spp.) oocytes. Theriogenology. 2010;73(5):605–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang L-L, Zhao Y, Luo S-M, Ma J-Y, Ge Z-J, Shen W, Yin S. Toxic effects and possible mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide and/or ammonia on porcine oocyte maturation in vitro. Toxicol Lett. 2018;285:20–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bae H-K, Hwang I-S, Kim J-Y, Lee S-Y, Park C-K, Yang B-K, Cheong H-T. Antioxidant treatment during manipulation procedures prevents mitochondrial and DNA damage and enhances nuclear reprogramming of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015;27(7):1088–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mihalas BP, De Iuliis GN, Redgrove KA, McLaughlin EA, Nixon B. The lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal contributes to oxidative stress-mediated deterioration of the ageing oocyte. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Song Z-Q, Li X, Wang Y-K, Du Z-Q, Yang C-X. DMBA acts on cumulus cells to desynchronize nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of pig oocytes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Aitken RJ, Wingate JK, De Iuliis GN, McLaughlin EA. Analysis of lipid peroxidation in human spermatozoa using BODIPY C11. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(4):203–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Partyka A, Łukaszewicz E, Niżański W, Twardoń J. Detection of lipid peroxidation in frozen-thawed avian spermatozoa using C11-BODIPY581/591. Theriogenology. 2011;75(9):1623–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thuwanut P, Axner E, Johanisson A, Chatdarong K. Detection of lipid peroxidation reaction in frozen-thawed epididymal cat spermatozoa using BODIPY581/591 C11. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44:373–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Johnson JD, Epel D, Paul M. Intracellular pH and activation of sea urchin eggs after fertilisation. Nature. 1976;262(5570):661–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rees BB, Patton C, Grainger JL, Epel D. Protein synthesis increases after fertilization of sea urchin eggs in the absence of an increase in intracellular pH. Dev Biol. 1995;169(2):683–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Loiselle FB, Casey JR. Measurement of intracellular pH. In: Yan Qing, editor. Membrane transporters in drug discovery and development. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 311–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Dubé F, Eckberg WR. Intracellular pH increase driven by an Na+/H+ exchanger upon activation of surf clam oocytes. Dev Biol. 1997;190(1):41–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hosoda E, Chiba K. Fluorescence measurement and calibration of intracellular pH in starfish oocytes. Bio-protoc. 2020;10(19):e3778–e3778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Mozingo NM, Chandler DE. The fluorescent probe BCECF has a heterogenous distribution in sea urchin eggs. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1990;14(8):689–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gould MC, Stephano JL. Nuclear and cytoplasmic pH increase at fertilization in Urechis caupo. Dev Biol. 1993;159(2):608–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Esposito MC has been supported by a PhD fellowship funded by the Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (Open University-Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn PhD Program). We wish to acknowledge Alberto Macina and Davide Caramiello for technical support in animal maintenance and gamete collection.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Naples, NA, Italy

    Alessandra Gallo, Maria Consiglia Esposito, Raffaele Boni & Elisabetta Tosti

  2. Department of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, PZ, Italy

    Raffaele Boni

Authors
  1. Alessandra Gallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Consiglia Esposito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raffaele Boni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elisabetta Tosti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RB, ET and AG designed the experiments, analysed and interpreted the data, AG, MCE and RB performed the experiments, AG wrote the manuscript with the input from all authors. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Gallo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not include endangered or protected species and has been conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki amended by the European Directive 2010/63 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, transposed into the Italian law by Legislative Decree 2014/26. Adults’ animals have been collected from a marine site, which is not privately owned or protected in any way, according to Italian legislation (DPR 1639/68, 19 September 1980, confirmed on 10 January 2000).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallo, A., Esposito, M.C., Boni, R. et al. Oocyte quality assessment in marine invertebrates: a novel approach by fluorescence spectroscopy. Biol Res 55, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00403-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00403-4

Keywords

Biological Research

ISSN: 0717-6287

Contact us