Skip to main content

Exploration of silicon functions to integrate with biotic stress tolerance and crop improvement

Abstract

In the era of climate change, due to increased incidences of a wide range of various environmental stresses, especially biotic and abiotic stresses around the globe, the performance of plants can be affected by these stresses. After oxygen, silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in the earth’s crust. It is not considered as an important element, but can be thought of as a multi-beneficial quasi-essential element for plants. This review on silicon presents an overview of the versatile role of this element in a variety of plants. Plants absorb silicon through roots from the rhizospheric soil in the form of silicic or monosilicic acid. Silicon plays a key metabolic function in living organisms due to its relative abundance in the atmosphere. Plants with higher content of silicon in shoot or root are very few prone to attack by pests, and exhibit increased stress resistance. However, the more remarkable impact of silicon is the decrease in the number of seed intensities/soil-borne and foliar diseases of major plant varieties that are infected by biotrophic, hemi-biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The amelioration in disease symptoms are due to the effect of silicon on a some factors involved in providing host resistance namely, duration of incubation, size, shape and number of lesions. The formation of a mechanical barrier beneath the cuticle and in the cell walls by the polymerization of silicon was first proposed as to how this element decreases plant disease severity. The current understanding of how this element enhances resistance in plants subjected to biotic stress, the exact functions and mechanisms by which it modulates plant biology by potentiating the host defence mechanism needs to be studied using genomics, metabolomics and proteomics. The role of silicon in helping the plants in adaption to biotic stress has been discussed which will help to plan in a systematic way the development of more sustainable agriculture for food security and safety in the future.

Background

The earth’s surface is covered with 28.8% (dry wt. basis) of silicon (Si) after oxygen, but the existence of Si in its pure form is extremely rare [1,2,3]. Silicon is found as quartz, feldspar, mica and clay minerals in the earth’s crust [2, 4, 5]. In biological systems, Si occurs in various forms of amorphous silica (SiO2nH2O) namely, as phytoliths and in silica rich plants [6, 7]. The biogenic share of silicon is about 1–3% of the total Si pool in the soil [8].

The numerous advantages of Si to crops are now widely acknowledged [3, 9,10,11,12]. The plant-available forms of Si may be limited [1, 13]. The plant biologists/physiologists recognized the significance of Si as early as the nineteenth century [14,15,16]. Silicon is now widely considered as a beneficial element [2, 17], but it is still considered non-essential for plant growth and development [18]. Lewin and Reimann [19] demonstrated that the Si played a major metabolic role in living organisms due to its relatively abundance in nature. According to Epstein [20], silicon is essential for plant growth, acts as a mechanical barrier and provides resistance against plant pathogens and herbivores, and as such drawn the more attention of its role in plant biology. Furthermore, [9] found that the majority of crops contain significant quantity of Si, implying that this is unlikely to be a result of stochastic element absorption, similar to how evolutionary mechanisms have evolved for uptake and accumulation of other nutritional elements.

Furthermore, Si uptake by plant roots can be adaptive in response to changing atmospheric variables namely, stress, whether abiotic or biotic [2, 3, 21, 22], and thus is not always necessary, but arguably important. While the importance of this feature to plants is still argued, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of Si uptake and accumulation in plants. Plants can be classified as hyper-accumulators, accumulators, passive accumulators and non-accumulating varieties. Furthermore, the benefits of application of liquid forms of Si have been demonstrated, especially during plant stress tolerance. Limited studies have been carried out whether Si plays a significant role in plant metabolic activities [2, 10, 22, 23].

The experiments showing the impact of Si on plant tolerance to environmental stresses [3, 24,25,26,27,28] have been carried out at physiological, molecular and ecological levels [12, 29,30,31]. The current research articles published on the mitigation of plant stress by Si demonstrates the interest in this area [3, 11, 22, 32, 33]. However, none of the researchers took into account the possibility of Si interacting with fundamental plant omics. Indeed, most studies have concentrated on species-specific and narrow aspects of Si–plant stress interactions. Some studies have contributed to our understanding of the larger effects of Si on plant growth and defence, including interactions with plant diseases, but the mechanisms underlying these effects are still unknown. The present review, briefly discusses the physiological and molecular basis of amelioration of biotic stress conditions in plants by silicon and the mechanisms involved.

Biotic stress

In natural conditions, plants suffer from various types of stresses caused by living organisms like bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, significant and non-significant insects. Like livestock, plants also have a defence system, which provides tolerance against environmental stresses. On invasion by pathogens and herbivorous pests, plants make use of pre-existing physical, chemical and mechanical barriers to protect themselves. The plant defence functions are also activated upon attack by pest; plant protection functions as a unit to decrease negative responses of biotic stress (Table 1). The stress induced defence system is associated with complex interconnected pathways of signal transduction in which phytohormones namely, abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ETH), jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) plays an important role [2, 13, 34,35,36]. The biotic stress may enhance in the coming years because of climate change. The costs linked with stress are potentially enormous, and the effects of the stress may have a great impact on sustainable agriculture and environmental systems [3].

Table 1 The adaptive mechanisms of silicon in crop plants against biotic stress

Silicon mitigates biotic stress in plants: physical and mechanical barriers

Plants grown under normal conditions are exposed to environmental stresses such as biotic (caused by viral and bacterial pathogens or fungi and herbivores) and abiotic stresses (saline, high and low temperature, flooding, UV, wind, drought, metal toxicity, light and mineral deficiency or excess). Supplementing plants with Si have been shown to enhance plant tolerance to mammalian, arthropod, and molluscan herbivores, fungal and bacterial pathogens, viruses and nematodes [2, 21, 22, 26, 37, 38]. The physical defence induced by Si deposition in plant parts in the form of phytoliths (largely composed of SiO2) was one of the first theories proposed for studying stress tolerance to pests [39, 40]. Silicon translocated from the soil solution as monosilicic acid into plants. Monosilicic acid polymerizes to form phytoliths, which are accumulated within the plant in an irreversible manner [20, 29]. Deposition of phytoliths enhances plant immunity and physical resilience, and serves as a physical barrier to fungal penetration [41, 42]. Silicon deposition may also wear away the feeding mouthparts, or mandibles of insects [43], decrease plant digestibility for both insect and mammalian herbivores [21, 44, 45], and have an adverse effect on herbivores [46]. Importantly, plant tissue silicification may be induced more in those plants which are highly attacked by various organisms [42, 47]. Silicon also affects the plant metabolites associated with plant defence [10, 48, 49], such as chitinase (CHT), β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), in a number of plant–pathogens such as necrotrophic, biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens [37, 50, 51]. Silicon-induced increased production of flavonoids, peroxidases (PODs) and chitinase (CHT) in some necrotrophic pathogens have been reported [37, 52].

Current research has looked into the interactions between Si and plant defence signaling transduction pathways, specifically the main plant hormone signaling pathways. Plants develop a complex and unique blend of SA (generally linked with pathogens of (hemi)biotrophic), JA (generally linked with pathogens of necrotrophic and insect herbivores), and ETH (which is usually regarded as ‘fine-tuning' the JA defence action) in response to attack or infection [53, 54]. Plant hormone signaling has been shown to be important for Si-mediated plant tolerance to disease stress [50]. Ye et al. [55] demonstrated that the JA pathway needed for Si- induced insect herbivore tolerance uses JA-deficient rice mutants. Several other researchers demonstrated that the capacity of Si to induce JA-dependent defence functions, such as indirect insect herbivore attraction by changing the composition of herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) generated during herbivore attack [56, 57]. Silicon increased SA-dependent defence genes in response to infection from biotrophic fungal pathogen, but induction of the SA pathway was not needed by Si to increase stress tolerance [58]. Van Bockhaven et al. [59] noted that the role of Si in increasing tolerance against necrotrophic fungal pathogen (Cochliobolus miyabeanus) was not dependent on the JA and SA pathways. Rather, they proposed that Si deactivated pathogen ethylene production by preventing the pathogen from hijacking the plant’s ETH mechanism. These findings indicated that the Si plays a significant role in multiple phytohormone signaling pathways to mitigate plant biotic stress [21, 28, 60].

Silicon can also help to overcome certain (hemi)biotrophic pathogens and the ability of some insects to suppress plant-induced defenses. When a plant detects a biotic threat, it triggers the defence phytohormone signaling pathway. Pathogen-associated (PAMPs), damage-associated (DAMPs) and herbivore-associated molecular patterns (HAMPs) are examples of conserved molecular patterns that differ depending on the plant disease [61, 62]. The identification of these molecules by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), often in conjunction with identification of other pathogens/insects effector proteins, may activate a plant defense response (known as PAMP-triggered immunity [PTI] or effector-triggered immunity [ETI]) that is sufficient to induce plant stress [62, 63]. Though necrotrophic pathogens do not develop effector proteins [53], (hemi)biotrophic pathogens and herbivores do, effectively suppressing the plant immune response by suppressing PTI and ETI [64, 65]. Silicon accumulation in the plant apoplast is likely to prevent pathogen effectors from reaching their target sites, preventing the pathogen from inhibiting the plant defence response [58]. Silicon may be able to help in overcoming plant defence suppression, by enabling a complete defence response to be initiated when a biotic threat is present. One of the first cellular responses following identification of PAMPs or HAMPs is formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which helps in assessing biotic stress.

A common mechanism by which Si is proposed to function and mitigate biotic stress is ROS and enhanced antioxidant metabolism (a similar mechanism is involved in abiotic stress) [66]. Generation of ROS and increasing oxidative metabolism help to reduce oxidative damage to the plants [67, 68]. ROS generation and increased antioxidant metabolism have been linked to stress due to pathogen (bacterial and fungal) infection, as well as damage to the plant from chewing and sucking insects [67,68,69]. ROS may have a negative and direct effect on biotic stress [70]. However, ROS play a number of signaling actions in different defence signaling pathways with plant hormones, such as JA and SA [53, 70,71,72]. Additionally, ROS may stimulate plant defence genes, resulting in the accumulation of defence metabolic compounds such as phytoalexins and allelochemicals in the plants [73]. Van Bockhaven et al. [59] demonstrated that the primary plant metabolism, i.e. photorespiration and the development of ROS, play a significant role in the broad-spectrum impact of Si on disease mitigation. Silicon is needed for sustenance of life processes in diatoms (algal phytoplankton), including replication of DNA [74], and evaluating how Si affects the cellular metabolism in algae and other primitive plants could provide valuable insights into how Si functions and its mechanisms of action in angiosperms. The production of ROS as a by-product of fundamental life processes, as well as the implications of an association of Si with oxidation/antioxidant metabolism in numerous plant stress studies, indicate that this is a promising research avenue for determining fundamental role of Si in lower and higher plants.

In order to better understand how Si affects plant gene expression, researchers must combine transcriptomic approaches, i.e. microarrays with more focused assays, like real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Fauteux et al. [75] observed that the defence genes of infected plants are upregulated and primary metabolism genes are downregulated. After the application of Si, the defence genes were less affected, and that there was no evidence to indicate that Si had an effect without pathogenic stress condition. Similarly, Chain et al. [76] and Van Bockhaven et al. [59] noticed that applying Si to plants almost completely eliminated the pathogen stress effects at the transcriptomics level (Tables 2, 3). In numerous studies, a higher Si content in the rhizospheric soil and growth medium has been shown to improve crop resistance to pest infection. With Si supplementation, white backed plant hoppers (Sogatella frucifera) have shown decreased feeding, decreased growth durability, decreased fecundity, and reduced population growth [77]. Furthermore, the foliar application of Si as calcium silicate (Ca2SiO4) to wheat (Triticum spp.), cotton (Gossypium spp.), sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), and cucumber (Cucumis spp.) enhanced white fly nymph mortality, resulting in substantial loss of crop production against normal plants [78]. The Oryza sativa plant roots with high Si content are resistant to rootknot nematode infection [79]. Silicon supplementation can also help rice plants resist attacks from green leaf hoppers, plant hoppers, and stem maggots [80]. Furthermore, leaf-eating caterpillars have been found to have a low preference for silicified plant parts [80]. Different approaches could be used to move Si-transporters from higher accumulator plants to plants lacking Si-transporters, thus providing protection against diseases.

Table 2 The role of defense-related enzymes regulated by silicon in biotic stress
Table 3 The role of genes upon the application of Si subjected to biotic stress/disease

In Arabidopsis, it has recently been demonstrated that Si may protect plants from diseases through the SA-independent pathway. As a result, it was suggested that further work needs to be done on the SA-independent plant protection mechanisms, so that hybrid crops may be developed to cope with the changing environmental conditions [81]. Few studies have been conducted on the effect of Si on increased plant tolerance to insect herbivores. As a result, further research into the interactions of Si with the transcriptome of various varieties of plants whose Si uptake and accumulation ability varies (e.g. accumulators, non-accumulators) during attack by various types of insect herbivores (e.g. chewers, suckers) can provide useful insights into how Si alters plant gene expression in relation to insect stress.

Impact of silicon on plants during favorable environmental conditions

It was earlier thought that Si had little or no impact on plant metabolism under controlled conditions [82]. In contrast, at present the effects of silicon on alleviation of biotic stresses are now well understood. Silicon has a profound effect on more basic metabolic processes [21, 22]. Recently, pot-based studies on the effect of Si on Saccharum spp. hybrid growth and its protection against an insect herbivore, showed substantial enhancement in plant growth and productivity [45]. Chain et al. [76] observed that the application of silicon to control plants of Triticum aestivum changed the regulation of 47 genes, while Brunings et al. [83] demonstrated that application of silicon to normal rice plants, changed the regulation of 221 genes, 28 of which were linked with defence and stress, and the rest were linked with primary metabolic mechanisms or whose functions were unknown. Van Bockhaven et al. [59] reported that Si changed the expression of genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis and glycolysis, as well as those of nitrogen and amino acid metabolism, and also affected the metabolism of defence hormones, namely ETH, JA and SA in rice plants.

Detmann et al. [84] showed the beneficial effects of silicon in rice plants. They concluded that the element enhanced photosynthetic capacity and, as a result, altered metabolism by stimulating amino acid remobilization, based on photosynthesis responses and transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling in paddy. According to Fleck et al. [85], Si significantly changed the root anatomy of normal grown crop plants, as well as the regulation of 265 genes, including a 25-fold increase of a particular protein-encoding gene that can play a key role in the perception of an unknown Si signal. Furthermore, Si has been shown to delay leaf senescence in both Si-accumulating and non-accumulating plant cultivars by activating the cytokinin pathway [86].

Silicon mediated defense-related enzymes

Stress-related enzymes are strongly associated with disease tolerance, and Si has been observed to stimulate the activity of enzymes subjected to biotic stress [28, 72]. Many studies have assessed the impact of Si in disease tolerance by activating the activities of defence-related enzymes namely, chitinase (CHT), peroxidases (PODs), polyphenol oxidases (PPOs), β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT), lipoxygenase and glucanase [28, 72, 87] (Table 2). Application of Si could enhance the activity of POD and CHT, which play a significant role in biotic stress. POD is involved in cell-wall reinforcement, in the final stages of lignin biosynthesis, and in the cross-linking of cell wall proteins [88]. Defence-related enzymatic responses induced by Si can be associated with expression of genes related to enzyme synthesis [49]. The upregulated activities of antioxidative enzymes were monitored in cucumber, turfgrass and pea plants which were infected with powdery mildew, sheath blight and rust diseases, respectively [89,90,91,92,93]. Previous findings indicated that Si enhances SOD, CAT, APX, GR and POD content thereby, protecting the antioxidative metabolic processes [72, 94,95,96].

Silicon modulated expression of genes

Housekeeping genes are essential for the proper functioning of cells and are expressed constitutively in all cells, regardless of the patho-physiological responses of these genes. Despite the fact that the expression of housekeeping genes is stable, some studies have found that they lose their stability when they are subjected to stress [22, 28, 83, 97]. According to Brunings et al. [83], Si application decreased the expression of essential housekeeping genes in rice under control conditions, but increased the expression of housekeeping genes to preserve cellular functions throughout pathogen infection. Silicon-mediated up-regulation of housekeeping genes such as actin (ACT), alpha-tubulin (TUB), and phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) in Ralstonia solanacearum-infected in tomatoes [98]. According to Jarosch et al. [99], the actin cytoskeleton provided the basal resistance during infection in R. solanacearum. As a result, the host resistance was induced by the Si-dependent upregulation of actin in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants [98]. Due to lack of a high-density Si transporter, tomato is classified as a low-level Si accumulator (about 0.2% dry weight) [100]. Furthermore, the application of Si in low-accumulating plants, i.e. Solanum lycopersicum [101], Capsicum annuum [102], and Rosa spp. [103] has resulted in overcoming stress resistance. Despite the fact that housekeeping genes have a constant expression level, variation in expression levels in response to Si treatment and pathogen infection can trigger the host plant's basal defence mechanism to protect it from the pathogen (Table 3).

Silicon is associated with the metabolic mechanisms of plant–pathogen interactions, triggering host plant defence genes via a sequence of physiological and biochemical reactions and signal transductions, as well as inducing disease resistance in plants [24, 58]. Silicon could play a role in the primary response, modulating the behavior of post-elicitation intracellular signaling pathways that control the expression of defence genes involved in cell wall structural modifications, hypersensitivity responses, synthesis of hormones, antimicrobial compound synthesis, and in formation of PR proteins [24]. To demonstrate the mechanism of protection of Si in various pathological systems, transcriptomic and proteomic experiments have been carried out [2, 21,22,23, 28, 98, 104].

The expression of genes encoding a novel proline-rich protein (PRP1) was increased under the induction of system acquired resistance in Cucumis sativus mediated by Si, which led to cell-wall reinforcement at the site of penetration of fungi into epidermal cells [105]. The expressions of CHI-II, GLU, PGIP, and POD, which are due to virulence factors released by the pathogen to inhibit host resistance and promote host invasion, were reduced by treatment with Si during pathogen interactions in tomato plants (R. solanacearum) [98]. Twenty six proteins were significantly altered by Si treatment in tomato plants, implying that Si-mediated disease resistance is linked to protein changes [106]. For example, Arabidopsis infected with the fungus, Erysiphe cichoracearum showed changes in the expression of about 4000 genes. The number and/or expression level of defence related genes enhanced in Si treated plants [75]. The expression of around 900 genes reacting to pathogen infection were modified in wheat plant leaves infected with Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, while the pathogen modified a few genes in silicon treated plants, implying that Si almost removed the stress due to pathogen invasion [76]. Brunings et al. [83] inoculated in the rice transcriptome, Magnaporthe oryzae, and riceblast fungus. Treatment of the plant with silicon appears to eradicate the effect of pathogen invasion on the transcriptome of host plants, rather than inducing resistance through transcriptional reprogramming of defence-related genes.

Silicon as a sustainable alternative

Silicon has been shown to enhance crop resistance to a variety of biotic stresses and can be seen as an alternative to adaptive strategies [3, 10, 21, 22, 32]. Due to the special physical and chemical properties of Si have useful application in various sectors, including promising applications in the agri-sectors, they can easily enter into plant cells and affect the plant development by affecting their metabolism through diverse interactions, thereby triggering the potential to combat stress conditions. Thus, Si has the potential to be used as a fertilizer alone for specific crops and can be used to deliver herbicides and fertilizers in plants. The application of Si in agriculture may also lead to worldwide food security and safety by helping in the development of advanced varieties of crops with maximum yield. Silicon can provide green and eco-environment friendly alternatives to different synthetic fertilizers without environmental pollution. Simultaneously, the well-known positive impact on crop productivity and quality has a tremendous potential to enhance farmers’ profit margin through the utilization of the alternative approach.

Conclusion and future prospects

Nowadays, there has been a lot of research which focuses on the role of Si in ameliorating plant tolerance to biotic stress, as well as in the regulation of signaling transduction pathways, and also in activating transcription factors in response to stress. Based on the present review, we concluded that Si increases plant resistance capacity to biotic stress, through a complex pathway associated with the plant defence system by activating transcription factors. In this review, we have discussed various aspects of Si and its regulatory functions during unfavorable conditions, and used key points from various relevant studies to explain how Si enhances stress resistance. While Si is associated with thousands of plant genes, it is not clear which other transcription factors and signaling proteins interact with Si to increase stress resistance. It will be very interesting to explore the role of Si signaling pathway, interactions with phytohormones, and crosstalk at the level of plant tissues, and at the cellular level to better understand how plants respond to environmental stresses, especially biotic stress. Overall, future research should concentrate on collecting more evidence to unravel the molecular mechanisms and the role of Si in plant tolerance to biotic stress, as well as the regulation of signal transduction pathways, and gene expressions associated in the biosynthesis of key compounds relevant to plant development.

Availability of data and materials

All the supporting data/findings are included in this article.

Abbreviations

ABA::

Abscisic acid

ACT:

Actin

APX:

Ascorbate peroxidase

CAT:

Catalase

CHT:

Chitinase

DAMPs:

Damage-associated molecular patterns

ETH:

Ethylene

ETI:

Effector-triggered immunity

GR:

Glutathione reducase

HAMPs:

Herbivore-associated molecular patterns

HIPVs:

Herbivore-induced plant volatiles

JA:

Jasmonic acid

PAL:

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

PAMP-PTI::

PAMP-triggered immunity

PAMPs:

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

PGK:

Phosphoglycerate kinase

POD:

Peroxidases

PPOs:

Polyphenol oxidases

PRP1:

Proline rich protein

PRRs:

Pattern recognition receptors

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SA:

Salicylic acid

Si:

Silicon

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TUB:

Alpha-tubulin

References

  1. 1.

    Epstein E. Silicon. Annual Rev Plant Biol. 1999;50:641–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Farooq MA, Dietz K-J. Silicon as versatile player in plant and human biology: overlooked and poorly understood. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Verma KK, Singh P, Song XP, Malviya MK, Singh RK, Chen GL, Solomon S, Li YR. Mitigating climate change for sugarcane improvement: role of silicon in alleviating abiotic stresses. Sugar Tech. 2020;22:741–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rezanka T, Sigler K. Biologically active compounds of semi metals. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 2008;35:835–921.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Redei GP. "Silicon (Si)," in Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics, and Informatics (Springer), 2008; pp. 1817.

  6. 6.

    Das S, Chattopadhyay UK. Role of silicon in modulating the internal morphology and growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ind J Tub. 2000;47:87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cornelis JT, Delvaux B, Georg RB, Lucas Y, Ranger J, Opfergelt S. Tracing the origin of dissolved silicon transferred from various soilplant systems towards rivers: a review. Biogeoscience. 2011;8:89–112.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Desplanques V, Cary L, Mouret JC, Trolard F, Bourrie G, Grauby O, Meunier JD. Silicon transfers in a rice field in Camargue (France). J Geochem Explor. 2006;88:190–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Epstein E. Silicon: its manifold roles in plants. Ann Appl Biol. 2009;155:155–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE. Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017;55:85–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Verma KK, Song XP, Verma CL, Malviya MK, Guo DJ, Rajput VD, Sharma A, Wei KJ, Chen GL, Solomon S, Li YR. Predication of photosynthetic leaf gas exchange of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) leaves in response to leaf positions to foliar spray of potassium salt of active phosphorus under limited water irrigation. ACS Omega. 2021;6:2396–409.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Verma KK, Song XP, Lin B, Guo DJ, Singh M, Rajput VD, Singh RK, Singh P, Sharma A, Malviya MK, Chen GL, Li YR. Silicon induced drought tolerance in crop plants: physiological adaptation strategies. SILICON. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-01071-x.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Savant NK, Synder GH, Datnoff LE. Silicon management and sustainable rice production. Adv Agron. 1997;58:151–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    de Saussure NT. Recherches chimiques sur la vegetation (Chemical Research on Vegetation). Paris: Nyon. 1804.

  15. 15.

    Hall AD, Morison CGT. On the function of silica in the nutrition of cereals. Part I. Proc Royal Soc London B. 1906;77:455–77.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guntzer F, Keller C, Meunier J-D. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: a review. Agron Sust Develop. 2012;2012(32):201–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    IPNI. Silicon. Nutri-facts, 2015; No. 14. http://www.ipni.net/publication/nutrifacts-na.nsf/0/A7B4AB4D35C153BF85257ECE006E0E34/$FILE/NutriFacts-NA-14.pdf. Accessed 05 Mar 2021.

  18. 18.

    Richmond KE, Sussman M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr Opinion Plant Biol. 2003;6:268–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lewin J, Reimann BEF. Silicon and plant growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1969;20:289–304.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Epstein E. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:11–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Frew A, Weston LA, Reynolds OL, Gurr GM. The role of silicon in plant biology: a paradigm shift in research approach. Ann Bot. 2018;121:1265–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Coskun D, Deshmukh R, Sonah H, Menzies JG, Reynolds O, Ma JF, Kronzucker HJ, Belanger RR. The controversies of silicon’s role in plant Biology. New Phytol. 2019;221:67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chen D, Wang S, Yin L, Deng X. How does silicon mediate plant water uptake and loss under water deficiency? Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00281.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fauteux F, Remus-Borel W, Menzies JG, Belanger RR. Silicon and plant disease resistance against pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;249:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Reynolds OL, Keeping MG, Meyer JH. Silicon-augmented resistance of plants to herbivorous insects: a review. Ann Appl Biol. 2009;155:171–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Reynolds OL, Padula MP, Zeng R, Gurr GM. Silicon: potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cooke J, Leishman MR. Consistent alleviation of abiotic stress with silicon addition: a meta-analysis. Funct Ecol. 2016;30:1340–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Manivannan A, Ahn Y-K. Silicon regulates potential genes involved in major physiological processes in plants to combat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ma JF, Yamaji N. A cooperative system of silicon transport in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:435–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cooke J, DeGabriel JL, Hartley SE. The functional ecology of plant silicon: geoscience to genes. Funct Ecol. 2016;30:1270–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Verma KK, Wu KC, Verma CL, Li DM, Malviya MK, Singh RK, Singh P, Chen GL, Song XP, Li YR. Developing mathematical model for diurnal dynamics of photosynthesis in Saccharum officinarum responsive to different irrigation and silicon application. Peer J. 2020;8: e10154. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Luyckx M, Hausman J-F, Lutts S, Guerriero G. Silicon and plants: current knowledge and technological perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sakr N. The role of silicon (Si) in increasing plant resistance against insect pests review article. Acta Phytopathol Entomolog Hungarica. 2017;52:1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hu S, Wang C, Sanchez DL, Lipka AE, Liu P, Yin Y, Blanco M, Lübberstedt T. Gibberellins promote Brassinosteroids action and both increase heterosis for plant height in maize (Zea mays L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1039. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu W, Zhang Q, Ervin EH, Yang Z, Zhang X. Physiological mechanism of enhancing salt stress tolerance of perennial ryegrass by 24-epibrassinolide. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1017.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Anwar A, Liu Y, Dong R, Bai L, Yu X, Li Y. The physiological and molecular mechanism of brassinosteroid in response to stress: a review. Biol Res. 2018;51:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-018-0195-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chérif M, Asselin A, Bélanger RR. Defense responses induced by soluble silicon in cucumber roots infected by Pythium spp. Phytopathology. 1994;84:236–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rodrigues FA, Dallagnol LJ, Duarte HSS, Datnoff LE. Silicon control of foliar diseases in monocots and dicots. In: Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE, editors. Silicon and plant diseases. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 67–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    McNaughton SJ, Tarrants JL. Grass leaf silicification: natural selection for an inducible defense against herbivores. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:790–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Katz O. Silica phytoliths in angiosperms: phylogeny and early evolutionary history. New Phytol. 2015;208:642–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kim SG, Kim KW, Park EW, Choi D. Silicon-induced cell wall fortification of rice leaves: a possible cellular mechanism of enhanced host resistance to blast. Phytopathology. 2002;92:1095–103.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Massey FP, Ennos AR, Hartley SE. Grasses and the resource availability hypothesis: the importance of silica-based defences. J Ecol. 2007;95:414–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jeer M, Telugu UM, Voleti SR, Padmakumari AP. Soil application of silicon reduces yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) damage in rice. J Appl Entomol. 2017;141:189–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Massey FP, Hartley SE. Experimental demonstration of the antiherbivore effects of silica in grasses: impacts on foliage digestibility and vole growth rates. Proc Royal Soc London B: Biol Sci. 2006;273:2299–304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Frew A, Powell JR, Sallam N, Allsopp PG, Johnson SN. Trade-offs between silicon and phenolic defenses may explain enhanced performance of root herbivores on phenolic-rich plants. J Chem Ecol. 2016;42:768–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ryalls JMW, Hartley SE, Johnson SN. Impacts of silicon-based grass defences across trophic levels under both current and future atmospheric CO2 scenarios. Biol Let. 2017;13:20160912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hartley SE, DeGabriel JL. The ecology of herbivore-induced silicon defences in grasses. Funct Ecol. 2016;30:1311–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chérif M, Benhamou N, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. Silicon induced resistance in cucumber plants against Pythium ultimum. Physiol Mol Plant Path. 1992;41:411–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rahman A, Wallis CM, Uddin W. Silicon-induced systemic defense responses in perennial ryegrass against infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathology. 2015;105:748–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liang X, Wang H, Hu Y, Mao L, Sun L, Dong T, Nan W, Bi Y. Silicon does not mitigate cell death in cultured tobacco BY-2 cells subjected to salinity without ethylene emission. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34:331–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Cai K, Gao D, Luo S, Zeng R, Yang J, Zhu X. Physiological and cytological mechanisms of silicon-induced resistance in rice against blast disease. Physiol Plant. 2008;134:324–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Fortunato AA, da Silva WL, Rodrigues FÁ. Phenylpropanoid pathway is potentiated by silicon in the roots of banana plants during the infection process of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Phytopathology. 2013;104:597–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Rev Phytopathol. 2005;2005(43):205–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wu J, Baldwin IT. New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annual Rev Genetics. 2010;44:1–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ye M, Song Y, Long J, Wang R, Baerson SR, Pan Z, Zhu-Salzman K, Xie J, Cai K, Luo S, Zeng R. Priming of jasmonate-mediated antiherbivore defense responses in rice by silicon. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E3631–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kvedaras OL, An M, Choi YS, Gurr GM. Silicon enhances natural enemy attraction and biological control through induced plant defences. Bull Entomol Res. 2010;2010(100):367–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liu J, Zhu J, Zhang P, Han L, Reynolds OL, Zeng R, Wu J, Shao Y, You M, Gurr GM. Silicon supplementation alters the composition of herbivore induced plant volatiles and enhances attraction of parasitoids to infested rice plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Vivancos J, Labbe C, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. Silicon-mediated resistance of Arabidopsis against powdery mildew involves mechanisms other than the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defence pathway. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16:572–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Van Bockhaven J, Spíchal L, Novák O, Strnad M, Asano T, Kikuchi S, Hofte M, Vleesschauwer DD. Silicon induces resistance to the brown spot fungus Cochliobolus miyabeanus by preventing the pathogen from hijacking the rice ethylene pathway. New Phytol. 2015;206:761–73.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Coskun D, Britto DT, Huynh WQ, Kronzucker HJ. The role of silicon in higher plants under salinity and drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:539–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Erb M, Meldau S, Howe GA. Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions. Trends in Plant Sci. 2012;17:250–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbeassociated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:379–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Musser RO, Hum-Musser SM, Eichenseer H, Peiffer M, Ervin G, Murphy JB, Felton GW. Herbivory: caterpillar saliva beats plant defences. Nature. 2002;2002(416):599–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Giraldo MC, Valent B. Filamentous plant pathogen effectors in action. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:800–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Van Bockhaven J, De Vleesschauwer D, Hofte M. Towards establishing broad-spectrum disease resistance in plants: silicon leads the way. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:1281–93.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Domiciano GP, Cacique IS, Chagas Freitas C, de Filippi MCC, DaMatta FM, do Vale FXR, Rodrigues FA. Alterations in gas exchange and oxidative metabolism in rice leaves infected by Pyricularia oryzae are attenuated by silicon. Phytopathology. 2015;105:738–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yang L, Han Y, Li P, Li F, Ali S, Hou M. Silicon amendment is involved in the induction of plant defense responses to a phloem feeder. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:4232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04571-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Rios JA, Nascimento KJT, Silva LC. The effect of silicon on antioxidant metabolism of wheat leaves infected by Pyricularia oryzae. Plant Pathol. 2014;63:581–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ramputh AI, Arnason JT, Cass L, Simmonds JA. Reduced herbivory of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) on corn transformed with germin, a wheat oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Sci. 2002;162:431–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Torres MA. ROS in biotic interactions. Physiol Plant. 2010;138:414–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gulzar N, Ali S, Shah MA, Kamili AN. Silicon supplementation improves early blight resistance in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. by modulating the expression of defense-related genes and antioxidant enzymes. 3Biotech. 2021;11:232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02789-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Thoma I, Loeffler C, Sinha AK, Gupta M, Krischke M, Steffan B, Roitsch T, Mueller MJ. Cyclopentenone isoprostanes induced by reactive oxygen species trigger defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation in plants. Plant J. 2003;34:363–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Martin-Jézéquel V, Hildebrand M, Brzezinski MA. Silicon metabolism in diatoms: implications for growth. J Phycol. 2000;36:821–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Fauteux F, Chain F, Belzile F, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. The protective role of silicon in the Arabidopsis-powdery mildew pathosystem. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17554–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Chain F, Côté-Beaulieu C, Belzile F, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. A comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of the effect of silicon on wheat plants under control and pathogen stress conditions. Mol Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2009;22:1323–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Salim M, Saxena RC. Iron, silica, and aluminum stresses and varietal resistance in rice: effects on white backed plant hopper. Crop Sci. 1992;32:212–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Correa RS, Moraes JC, Auad AM, Carvalho GA. Silicon and acibenzolar-S-methyl as resistance inducers in cucumber, against the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B. Neotrop Entomol. 2005;34:429–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Swain BN, Prasad JS. Influence of silica content in the roots of rice varieties on the resistance to root-knot nematodes. Ind J Nematol. 1988;18:360–1.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Malhotra CH, Kapoor R, Ganjewala D. Alleviation of abiotic and biotic stresses in plants by silicon supplementation. Scientia. 2016;13:59–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Vivancos J, Deshmukh R, Grégoire C, Rémus-Borel W, Belzile F, Bélanger RR. Identification and characterization of silicon efflux transporters in horsetail (Equisetum arvense). J Plant Physiol. 2016;200:82–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ma JF. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2004;50:11–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Brunings AM, Datnoff LE, Ma JF, Mitani N, Nagamura Y, Rathinasabapathi B, Kirst M. Differential gene expression of rice in response to silicon and rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Ann Appl Biol. 2009;2009(155):161–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Detmann KC, Araújo WL, Martins SCV, Sanglard LMVP, Reis JV, Detmann E, Rodrigues FA, Nunes-Nesi A, Fernie AR, DaMatta FM. Silicon nutrition increases grain yield, which, in turn, exerts a feed-forward stimulation of photosynthetic rates via enhanced mesophyll conductance and alters primary metabolism in rice. New Phytol. 2012;196:752–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Fleck AT, Nye T, Repenning C, Stahl F, Zahn M, Schenk MK. Silicon enhances suberization and lignification in roots of rice (Oryza sativa). J Exp Bot. 2011;62:2001–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Markovich O, Steiner E, Kouril S, Tarkowski P, Aharoni A, Elbaum R. Silicon promotes cytokinin biosynthesis and delays senescence in Arabidopsis and Sorghum. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:1189–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Waewthongrak W, Pisuchpen S, Leelasuphakul W. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and chitosan applications on green mold (Penicillium digitatum Sacc.) decay in citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2015;99:44–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Brisson LF, Tenhaken R, Lamb C. Function of oxidative crosslinking of cell wall structural proteins in plant disease resistance. Plant Cell. 1994;6:1703–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Guoqiang W. Effects of silicon supply and Sphaerotheca fuliginea inoculation on resistance of cucumber seedlings against powdery mildew. J Appl Ecol. 2004;15:2147–51.

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Zhang GL, Dai QG, Zhang HC. Silicon application enhances resistance to sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) in rice. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol. 2006;32:600–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Zhu Z, Wei G, Li J, Qian Q, Yu J. Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci. 2004;167:527–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    He Y, Xiao H, Wang H, Chen Y, Yu M. Effect of silicon on chilling-induced changes of solutes, antioxidants, and membrane stability in seashore Paspalum turfgrass. Acta Physiol Plant. 2010;32:487–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK. Silicon nanoparticles (SiNp) alleviate chromium (VI) phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;96:189–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Shi Y, Zhang Y, Yao H, Wu J, Sun H, Gong H. Silicon improves seed germination and alleviates oxidative stress of bud seedlings in tomato under water deficit stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;78:27–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Shi Y, Zhang Y, Han W, Feng R, Hu Y, Guo J, Gong H. Silicon enhances water stress tolerance by improving root hydraulic conductance in Solanum lycopersicum L. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:196.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Al-Huqail AA, Alqarawi AA, Hashem A, Ahmad MJ. Silicon supplementation modulates antioxidant system and osmolyte accumulation to balance salt stress in Acacia gerrardii Benth. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26:1856–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;345:646–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Ghareeb H, Bozsó Z, Ott PG, Repenning C, Stahl F, Wydra K. Transcriptome of silicon-induced resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum in the silicon non-accumulator tomato implicates priming effect. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;75:83–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Jarosch B, Collins NC, Zellerhoff N, Schaffrath U. RAR1, ROR1, and the actin cytoskeleton contribute to basal resistance to Magnaporthe grisea in barley. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005;18:397–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Ma JF, Yamaji N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:392–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Romero-Aranda MR, Jurado O, Cuartero J. Silicon alleviates the deleterious salt effect on tomato plant growth by improving plant water status. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:847–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Jayawardana HARK, Weeahewa HLD, Saparamadu MDJS. Enhanced resistance to anthracnose disease in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by amendment of the nutrient solution with silicon. J Horticult Sci Biotechnol. 2015;90:557–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Soundararajan P, Manivannan A, Ko CH, Jeong BR. Silicon enhanced redox homeostasis and protein expression to mitigate the salinity stress in rosa hybrida ‘Rock Fire.’ J Plant Growth Regul. 2017;37:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Nwugo CC, Huerta AJ. The effect of silicon on the leaf proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants under cadmium-stress. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:518–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Kauss H, Kai S, Franke R, Gilbert S, Dietrich RA, Kröger N. Silica deposition by a strongly cationic proline-rich protein from systemically resistant cucumber plants. Plant J. 2003;33:87–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Chen Y, Liu M, Wang L, Lin W, Fan X, Cai K. Proteomic characterization of silicon-mediated resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato. Plant Soil. 2014;387:425–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Somapala K, Weerahewa D, Thrikawala S. Silicon rich rice hull amended soil enhances anthracnose resistance in tomato. Proc Food Sci. 2016;6:190–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Huang C-H, Roberts PD, Datnoff LE. Silicon suppresses Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato. J Phytopathol. 2011;159:546–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Andrade CCL, Resende RS, Rodrigues F, Ferraz HGM, Moreira WR, Oliveira JR, Mariano RLR. Silicon reduces bacterial speck development on tomato leaves. Trop Plant Pathol. 2013;38:436–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Han Y, Li P, Gong S, Yang L, Wen L, Hou M. Defense responses in rice induced by silicon amendment against infestation by the leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. PLoS ONE. 2015;11:e0153918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    He W, Yang M, Li Z, Qiu J, Liu F, Qu X, Qiu Y, Li R. High levels of silicon provided as a nutrient in hydroponic culture enhances rice plant resistance to brown plant hopper. Crop Prot. 2015;67:20–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Nascimento AM, Assis FA, Moraes JC, Sakomura R. Naopreferencia a Spodopterafrugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) induzi daemarrozpelaaplicaçao de silício. Braz J Agric Sci Rev Brasil Ciencias Agrarias. 2014;9:215–8.

    Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Sidhu JK, Stout MJ, Blouin DC, Datnoff LE. Effect of silicon soil amendment on performance of sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on rice. Bull Entomol Res. 2013;103:656–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Rodrigues F, Benhamou N, Datnoff LE, Jones JB, Bélanger RR. Ultrastructural and cytochemical aspects of silicon-mediated rice blast resistance. Phytopathology. 2003;93:535–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Hayasaka T, Fujii H, Ishiguro K. The role of silicon in preventing appressorial penetration by the rice blast fungus. Phytopathology. 2008;98:1038–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Dallagnol LJ, Rodrigues FA, Damatta FM, Mielli MV, Pereira SC. Deficiency in silicon uptake affects cytological, physiological, and biochemical events in the rice–Bipolaris oryzae interaction. Phytopathology. 2011;101:92–104.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Dallagnol LJ, Rodrigues FA, Mielli MV. Silicon improves the emergence and sanity of rice seedlings obtained from seeds infected with Bipolaris oryzae. Trop Plant Pathol. 2013;38:478–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Tatagiba SD, Damatta FM, Rodrigues FA. Silicon partially preserves the photosynthetic performance of rice plants infected by Monographella albescens. Ann Appl Biol. 2016;168:111–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Araujo L, Paschoalino RS, Rodrigues F. Microscopic aspects of silicon-mediated rice resistance to leaf scald. Phytopathology. 2015;106:132–41.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Schurt DA, Cruz MF, Nascimento KJ, Filippi MC, Rodrigues FA. Silicon potentiates the activities of defense enzymes in the leaf sheaths of rice plants infected by Rhizoctonia solani. Trop Plant Pathol. 2014;39:457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Vilela M, Moraes JC, Alves E, Santos-Cividanes TM, Santos FA. Induced resistance to Diatraeasaccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) via silicon application in sugarcane. Rev Colomb Entomol. 2014;40:44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Keeping MG, Meyer JH, Sewpersad C. Soil silicon amendments increase resistance of sugarcane to stalk borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) under field conditions. Plant Soil. 2013;363:297–318.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Ramouthar PV, Caldwell PM, Mcfarlane SA. Effect of silicon on the severity of brown rust of sugarcane in South Africa. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2015;145:53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    de Souza PV, Machado BR, Zanuncio JC, Araújo MS, Alves GCS, de Jesus FG. Cultivation of resistant soybean varieties and application of silicon (Si) on biology of ‘Euschistus heros’ (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Aust J Crop Sci. 2016;10:1404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Ghanmi D, Mcnally DJ, Benhamou N, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. Powdery mildew of Arabidopsis thaliana: a pathosystem for exploring the role of silicon in plant–microbe interactions. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2004;64:189–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Kablan L, Lagauche A, Delvaux B, Legrève A. Silicon reduces black sigatoka development in banana. Plant Dis. 2012;96:273–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Fortunato AA, Rodrigues F, Baroni JCP, Soares GCB, Rodriguez MAD, Pereira OL. Silicon suppresses Fusarium wilt development in banana plants. J Phytopathol. 2012;160:674–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Vermeire ML, Kablan L, Dorel M, Delvaux B, Risède JM, Legrève A. Protective role of silicon in the banana-Cylindrocladium spathiphylli pathosystem. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2011;131:621–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Mburu K, Oduor R, Mgutu A, Tripathi L. Silicon application enhances resistance to xanthomonas wilt disease in banana. Plant Pathol. 2015;2015(65):807–18.

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Wiese J, Wiese H, Schwartz J, Schubert S. Osmotic stress and silicon act additively in enhancing pathogen resistance in barley against barley powdery mildew. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2005;168:269–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Rodrigues F, Duarte HSS, Rezende DC, Filho JAW, Korndörfer GH, Zambolim L. Foliar spray of potassium silicate on the control of angular leaf spot on beans. J Plant Nutr. 2010;33:2082–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Parthasarathy S, Jaiganesh V. Plant activator and silicon nutrient mediated resistance against powdery mildew of Black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Glob J Res Anal. 2016;4:48–9.

    Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Uriarte RF, Shew HD, Bowman DC. Effect of soluble silica on brown patch and dollar spot of creeping bentgrass. J Plant Nutr. 2004;27:325–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Ratnayake RMRNK, Daundasekera WAM, Ariyarathne HM, Ganehenege MY. Some biochemical defense responses enhanced by soluble silicon in bitter gourd-powdery mildew pathosystem. Australas Plant Pathol. 2016;45:425–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Jayawardana HARK, Weerahewa HLD, Saparamadu MDJS. The mechanisms underlying the Anthracnose disease reduction by rice hull as a silicon source in capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown in simplified hydroponics. Proc Food Sci. 2016;6:147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Qin GZ, Tian SP. Enhancement of biocontrol activity of Cryptococcus laurentii by silicon and the possible mechanisms involved. Phytopathology. 2005;95:69–75.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Liu L, Guo Y, Bi Y, Li M, Zhao J, Zhao H. Inhabited mechanisms of silicon compounds against Fusarium rot (Fusarium spp.) of postharvest Chinese cantaloupe. J Food Process Preserv. 2009;33:187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Guo Y, Liu L, Zhao J, Bi Y. Use of silicon oxide and sodium silicate for controlling Trichothecium roseum postharvest rot in Chinese cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.). Int J Food Sci Techol. 2007;42:1012–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Carré-Missio V, Rodrigues FA, Schurt DA, Resende RS, Souza NFA, Rezende DC, Moreira WR, Zambolim L. Effect of foliar-applied potassium silicate on coffee leaf infection by Hemileia vastatrix. Ann Appl Biol. 2014;164:396–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Silva R, Oliveira R, Nascimento K, Rodrigues F. Biochemical responses of coffee resistance against Meloidogyne exigua mediated by silicon. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:586–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Polanco LR, Rodrigues FA, Nascimento KJ, Cruz MF, Curvelo CR, Damatta FM, Vale FX. Photosynthetic gas exchange and antioxidative system in common bean plants infected by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum and supplied with silicon. Trop Plant Pathol. 2014;39:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Rodrigues FA, Polanco LR, Duarte HSS, Resende RS, Do Vale FXR. Photosynthetic gas exchange in common bean submitted to foliar sprays of potassium silicate, sodium molybdate and fungicide and infected with Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. J Phytopathol. 2015;163:554–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Whan JA, Dann EK, Aitken EA. Effects of silicon treatment and inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum on cellular defences in root tissues of two cotton cultivars. Ann Bot. 2016;118:219–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Miyake Y, Takahashi E. Effect of silicon on the growth of solution-cultured cucumber plant. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 1983;29:71–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Menzies J, Ehret D, Glass A, Samuels A. The influence of silicon on cytological interactions between Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Cucumis sativus. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1991;39:403–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Menzies J, Bowen P, Ehret D, Glass AD. Foliar applications of potassium silicate reduce severity of powdery mildew on cucumber, muskmelon, and zucchini squash. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1992;117:902–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Fawe A, Abou-Zaid M, Menzies J, Bélanger R. Silicon-mediated accumulation of flavonoid phytoalexins in cucumber. Phytopathol. 1998;88:396–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Liang YC, Sun WC, Si J, Römheld V. Effects of foliar- and root-applied silicon on the enhancement of induced resistance to powdery mildew in Cucumis sativus. Plant Pathol. 2005;54:678–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Bi Y, Tian SP, Guo YR, Ge YH, Qin GZ. Sodium silicate reduces postharvest decay on Hami melons: induced resistance and fungistatic effects. Plant Dis. 2015;90:279–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Garibaldi A, Gilardi G, Cogliati EE, Gullino ML. Silicon and increased electrical conductivity reduce downy mildew of soilless grown lettuce. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2011;132:123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Conceicao CS, Felix KCS, Mariano RLR, Medeiros EV, Souza EB. Combined effect of yeast and silicon on the control of bacterial fruit blotch in melon. Sci Hortic. 2014;174:164–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Dallagnol L, Rodrigues F, Pascholati S, Fortunato A, Camargo L. Comparison of root and foliar applications of potassium silicate in potentiating post-infection defences of melon against powdery mildew. Plant Pathol. 2015;64:1085–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Li W, Bi Y, Ge Y, Li Y, Wang J, Wang Y. Effects of postharvest sodium silicate treatment on pink rot disease and oxidative stress-antioxidative system in muskmelon fruit. Eur Food Res Technol. 2011;234:137–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Najihah NI, Hanafi MM, Idris AS, Hakim MA. Silicon treatment in oil palms confers resistance to basal stem rot disease caused by Ganoderma boninense. Crop Prot. 2015;67:151–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Dann EK, Muir S. Peas grown in media with elevated plant-available silicon levels have higher activities of chitinase and b-1, 3-glucanase, are less susceptible to a fungal leaf spot pathogen and accumulate more foliar silicon. Australas Plant Pathol. 2002;31:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Deepak S, Manjunath G, Manjula S, Niranjan-Raj S, Geetha N, Shetty HS. Involvement of silicon in pearl millet resistance to downy mildew disease and its interplay with cell wall proline/hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. Australas Plant Pathol. 2008;37:498–504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    McDonagh D, Hunter A. Effect of silicon application on Lolium perenne development and Fusarium control. Acta Hortic. 2011;917:195-201. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.917.25

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Lepolu Torlon J, Heckman J, Simon J, Wyenandt C. Silicon soil amendments for suppressing powdery mildew on pumpkin. Sustainability. 2016;8:293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040293.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Guevel MH, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR. Effect of root and foliar applications of soluble silicon on powdery mildew control and growth of wheat plants. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2007;119:429–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Moldes CA, De Lima Filho OF, Merini LJ, Tsai SM, Camina JM. Occurrence of powdery mildew disease in wheat fertilized with increasing silicon doses: a chemometric analysis of antioxidant response. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38:206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2217-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Silva WLD, Cruz MFA, Fortunato AA, Rodrigues F. Histochemical aspects of wheat resistance to leaf blast mediated by silicon. Sci Agric. 2015;72:322–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Filha MSX, Rodrigues FA, Domiciano GP, Oliveira HV, Silveira PR, Moreira WR. Wheat resistance to leaf blast mediated by silicon. Australas Plant Pathol. 2011;40:28–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Rodrigues FA, Jurick WM, Datnoff LE, Jones JB, Rollins JA. Silicon influences cytological and molecular events in compatible and incompatible rice–Magnaporthe grisea interactions. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;66:144–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Souza ACA, Sousa TP, Cortes MVB, Rodrigues F, Silva GB, Filippi MCC. Enzyme-induced defense response in the suppression of rice leaf blast (Magnaporthe oryzae) by silicon fertilization and bioagents. Int J Res Stud Biosci. 2015;3:22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Fortunato AA, Debona D, Bernardeli AMA, Rodrigues FA. Defence-related enzymes in soybean resistance to target spot. J Phytopathol. 2015;163:731–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Kurabachew H, Stahl F, Wydra K. Global gene expression of rhizobacteria-silicon mediated induced systemic resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Ralstonia solanacearum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;84:44–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China for providing the necessary facilities.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901594), Fund of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2021YT011) and Guangxi R and D Program Fund (GK17195100).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XPS, KK and YRL design the article. XPS, KKV, DT, XQZ, YJL, XH and CNL performed the literature search and data analysis. The original draft wrote by XPS and KKV. YRL critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang-Rui Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any financial or other relationships that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, XP., Verma, K.K., Tian, DD. et al. Exploration of silicon functions to integrate with biotic stress tolerance and crop improvement. Biol Res 54, 19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-021-00344-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antioxidants
  • Biotic stress
  • Crop improvement
  • Physiology
  • Sustainable agriculture
  • Silicon