Open Access

The effects of cadmium chloride on secondary metabolite production in Vitis vinifera cv. cell suspension cultures

  • Emine Sema Cetin1Email author,
  • Zehra Babalik2,
  • Filiz Hallac-Turk3 and
  • Nilgun Gokturk-Baydar4
Biological Research201447:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-47

Received: 23 June 2014

Accepted: 16 August 2014

Published: 23 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Plant secondary metabolites are possess several biological activities such as anti-mutagenic, anti-carcinogenic, anti-aging, etc. Cell suspension culture is one of the most effective systems to produce secondary metabolites. It is possible to increase the phenolic compounds and tocopherols by using cell suspensions. Studies on tocopherols production by cell suspension cultures are seldom and generally focused on seed oil plants. Although fresh grape, grape seed, pomace and grape seed oil had tocopherols, with our best knowledge, there is no research on tocopherol accumulation in the grape cell suspension cultures. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of cadmium chloride treatments on secondary metabolite production in cell suspension cultures of grapevine. Cell suspensions initiated from callus belonging to petiole tissue was used as a plant material. Cadmium chloride was applied to cell suspension cultures in different concentration (1.0 mM and 1.5 mM) to enhance secondary metabolite (total phenolics, total flavanols, total flavonols, trans-resveratrol, and α-, β-, γ- δ-tocopherols) production. Cells were harvested at two days intervals until the 6th day of cultures. Amounts of total phenolics, total flavanols and total flavonols; trans-resveratrol and tocopherols (α-, β-, γ- and δ-tocopherols) and dry cell weights were determined in the harvested cells.

Results

Phenolic contents were significantly affected by the sampling time and cadmium concentrations. The highest values of total phenolic (168.82 mg/100 g), total flavanol (15.94 mg/100 g), total flavonol (14.73 mg/100 g) and trans-resveratrol (490.76 μg/100 g) were found in cells treated with 1.0 mM CdCl2 and harvested at day 2. Contents of tocopherols in the cells cultured in the presence of 1.0 mM CdCl2 gradually increased during the culture period and the highest values of α, β and γ tocopherols (145.61, 25.52 and 18.56 μg/100 g) were detected in the cell cultures collected at day 6.

Conclusions

As a conclusion, secondary metabolite contents were increased by cadmium chloride application and sampling time, while dry cell weights was reduced by cadmium chloride treatments.

Keywords

Cadmium chlorideCellSecondary metabolite

Background

Plant cell suspension culture is one of the most effective systems to produce secondary metabolites with high amount and purity. Using this system could ensure a continuous supply of uniform quality, specialized, natural components [1, 2] compared to traditional extraction methods. Unfortunately, the yield of the desired end-product is often too low to make this a commercially viable alternative to extraction from field grown plants. It is possible to increase the secondary metabolite accumulation in the cell culture by using some treatments such as light irradiation, UV, jasmonic acid, ozon, heavy metal, ethylene and sucrose [3, 4].

Plant cell culture is considered to be a potential means of producing valuable plant products in a factory setting. Among these products, food additives such as anthocyanins, shikonin compounds, safflower yellow, saffron and colorants are of high interest [5]. With the help of this technique, the presence of anthocyanins and trans-resveratrol were shown in Vitis vinifera suspension culture [6].

The phenolic compound family is huge and comprises a complex group of compounds varying from simple phenols to highly polymerised compounds. Polyphenols have been extensively studied and are reported to possess several biological activities. Numerous studies have focused on their anti-mutagenic chemopreventive and anti-carcinogenic activities [79].

Resveratrol (3, 4, 5-trihydroxystilbene), a natural polyphenol, is found in some plants that are used in human nutrition. Grape is the major source of resveratrol, and a significant amount can also be found in red wine. Several experimental studies have demonstrated biological properties of resveratrol, especially its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-platelet and antitumor effects [10]. Many reports have shown that resveratrol can prevent or slow the progression of a wide variety of illnesses, including cancer, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic injuries as well as enhance stress resistance and extend the lifespans of various organisms [11, 12]. Interest in this compound has been renewed in recent years, first from its identification as a chemopreventive agent for skin cancer, and subsequently from reports that it activates sirtuin deacetylases and extends the lifespans of lower organisms [13].

Tocopherols are another group of secondary metabolites produced in plant cell suspension cultures. Tocopherols as liposoluble, naturally occurring non-polar antioxidants comprising α (5, 7, 8-trimethyltocol), β (5, 8-dimethyltocol), γ (7, 8-dimethyltocol) and δ (8-methyltocol) tocopherols. Tocopherols appear to possess high antioxidant activity by donating the hydrogen of the hydroxyl group to the lipid peroxyl radical [14] and α-tocopherol is considered to be extremely important because of its vitamin E activity [15]. Tocopherols are ubiquitous, even if at different concentrations, in oil seeds, leaves and other green parts of higher plants [16].

Studies conducted on the production of tocopherols by cell suspension cultures are seldom and generally focused on seed oil plants [2, 17]. Although fresh grape [18], grape seed, pomace [19] and grape seed oil [2022] had tocopherols in different amounts, with our best knowledge, there is no research on tocopherol accumulation in the grape cell suspension cultures.

Within this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of cadmium chloride (CdCl2) treatments on secondary metabolite production in the grape cell suspension cultures to be able to provide a preliminary reference for researchers who study or willing to study on this topic.

Results and discussion

In the CdCl2 treatments, cell suspension cultures were exposed to increasing concentrations of CdCl2 for up to 6 days. Changes in the dry cell weights were determined as g/L and data are showed in Figure 1. Dry cell weights varied depending on the CdCl2 concentrations and sampling time. It was determined that when the CdCl2 concentration increased and the sampling time extended, regular decreases were observed in the dry cell weights. 1.0 and 1.5 mM CdCl2 inhibited the growth of cells after 4 days and more dramatically after 6 days.
Figure 1

Effects of cadmium chloride on the dry cell weight on cell suspension culture.

The data about the effects of cadmium chloride treatments on the phenolic contents of cell suspensions are presented in Table 1. Phenolic contents were significantly affected by the sampling time and cadmium concentrations (p ≤ 0.05). The highest values of total phenolic (168.80 mg/100 g), total flavanol (15.90 mg/100 g) and total flavonol (14.70 mg/100 g) were found in cells treated with 1.0 mM CdCl2 and harvested at day 2. Cell suspension cultures treated with 1.5 mM CdCl2 and sampled at days 4 and 6 gave the lowest amounts of total phenolics, total flavanols and total flavonols.
Table 1

The effects of CdCl 2 treatments on phenolic contents in Öküzgözü cell suspension cultures

CdCl2concentrations

Sampling time (day)

Total phenolics (mg/100 g)

Total flavanols (mg/100 g)

Total flavonols (mg/100 g)

trans-resveratrol (μg/100 g)

Control

0.

102.84 e*

7.14 d

10.16 bc

138.12 e

2.

128.32c

5.48 e

7.78 d

139.24 e

4.

133.00 c

7.96 d

6.56 d

210.65 d

6.

146.8 1b

9.42 c

6.65 d

216.42 d

1.0 mM

0.

100.64 ef

5.45 e

10.87 b

251.74 c

2.

168.82 a

15.94 a

14.73 a

490.76 a

4.

146.24 b

12.51 b

7.82 d

344.62 b

6.

105.66 de

9.82 c

4.54 e

215.14 d

1.5 mM

0.

112.00 d

5.43 e

9.17 c

119.46 f

2.

108.67 de

5.85 e

4.00 e

137.16 e

4.

93.11 f

3.92 f

1.86 f

250.82 c

6.

77.27 g

4.00 f

2.23 f

100.62 f

*Differences between means indicated by the same letters are not statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).

In this study, the production of the trans-resveratrol in the cell cultures was significantly changed depending on the CdCl2 concentrations and sampling time (p ≤ 0.05). In the control group, trans-resveratrol showed a gradual increase during the sampling times and the highest value was detected in cell cultures harvested at day 6. In the cell cultures treated with 1.5 mM CdCl2, trans--resveratrol significantly increased from day 0 to day 4, but it showed a sharp decrease at day 6. On the other hand the greatest trans-resveratrol content (490.76 μg/100 g) was detected in cell cultures treated with 1.0 mM CdCl2 and collected at the 2nd day of the application followed by the cells cultured in the media containing 1.0 mM CdCl2 and harvested at day 4. But it subsequently exhibited a strong decrease in the cells collected at the 6th day of the culture.

Tocopherol composition of the callus samples was affected significantly depending on the CdCl2 concentrations and the sampling times (P ≤ 0.05) as shown in Table 2. The effect was dose-dependent both in terms of time and CdCl2 concentration applied. In terms of tocopherols, α, β and γ-tocopherols were found at different concentrations depending on the treatments, while δ-tocopherol was not detected in the cell cultures of Öküzgözü. Contents of tocopherols in the cells cultured in the presence of 1.0 mM CdCl2 gradually increased during the culture period and the highest values of tocopherols were detected in the cell cultures collected at day 6. The analyses conducted in the present work revealed that these conditions are the most convenient conditions to stimulate the biochemical pathways leading to tocopherols. However, when the CdCl2 concentrations and the culture period increased, tocopherol contents of the cells decreased. Our data indicate that the lowest tocopherol concentrations were found in the cells treated 1.5 mM CdCl2 and sampled after 6 day.
Table 2

The effects of CdCl 2 treatments on tocopherol contents in Öküzgözü cell suspension cultures

CdCl2concentrations

Sampling time (day)

α- tocopherol (μg/100 g)

β- tocopherol (μg/100 g)

γ- tocopherol (μg/100 g)

Control

0.

118.52 c*

13.53 d

6.00 g

2.

83.00 f

12.50 de

6.54 fg

4.

82.41 f

17.00 c

12.46 b

6.

86.12 f

11.55 e

11.34 c

1.0 mM

0.

97.18 e

11.00 e

4.00 h

2.

113.00 cd

17.12 c

9.55 e

4.

125.54 b

17.24 c

10.53 cd

6.

145.61 a

25.52 a

18.56 a

1.5 mM

0.

102.58 e

17.00 c

7.14 f

2.

109.55 d

21.24b

11.00 c

4.

38.52 g

13.35 d

10.64 de

6.

37.58 g

5.57f

2.20 i

*Differences between means indicated by the same letters are not statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05).

CdCl2 application inhibited the growth of cells. Because it is well known that when cadmium is excess in plants, it inhibits and disturbs various biochemical and physiological processes such as respiration, photosynthesis, cell elongation, plant-water relationships, nitrogen metabolism and mineral nutrition, resulting in poor growth, low biomass, cell death and inhibition of growth [2325]. Similarly, treatment with Cd2+ at 0.05 mM appeared to inhibit cell division and induce either mitotic or total cell death in the sensitive tobacco cell subpopulation as reported by Kuthanova et al. [26].

Cell suspension cultures treated with 1.5 mM CdCl2 and sampled at days 4 and 6 gave the lowest amounts of total phenolics, total flavanols and total flavonols. These decreases can be resulted from the low cell weight in the presence of high CdCl2 concentrations and long exposure time. Our results confirmed that cytotoxic effects of cadmium in cells were concentration dependent and followed a distinct time course [27]. Similarly, Kuthanova et al. [26] found that treatment with Cd2+ in 1 mM concentration caused total and rapid cell death after 6 h, while application of 0.05 mM Cd2+ induced a marked decline of cell viability during the first 24 h of the cultivation in tobacco cells.

The accumulation of phenolic compounds represents a major key factor in the inducible defense mechanisms of plants through the phenylpropanoid pathway [28, 29]. The induction of the phenylpropanoid metabolism could also be achieved experimentally by treatments with elicitors or exposure to specific stress conditions [30, 31]. With respect to the high abundance of phenolic metabolites in plant tissues, regulation of phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity represents an important step in tolerance to stress factors [32]. Phenolic synthesis is recognized as a result of signalling processes initiated very quickly after injury, an attack of pathogens or elicitation [33, 34]. Kuthanova et al. [26] reported that 0.05 mM Cd2+ treated cells correlated with the stimulation of the activity of PAL, key enzyme in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. They also found that Cd2+ treatment significantly stimulated PAL activity during the whole culture period which was 25 times higher on day 3 when compared to the control cells.

Cadmium is not an essential nutrient for plants and it is normally toxic [35, 36]. Its toxicity can promote altered metabolism [37] which can include the formation of reactive oxygene species (ROS) in plants under stress situations. Evidence confirmed that Cd stress induced the production of ROS such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals (OH·) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in plants [36]. However the interaction of Cd and antioxidative systems such as catalase, superoxide dismutase and glutathion reductase only recently have been studied in plant species [38, 39]. The degree of plant antioxidant enzyme activities under Cd stress was found in several distinct patterns, which varied according to Cd concentration, duration, the species and tissues [36]. On the other hand, very little is known about the the responses of grapevine cell cultures in terms of stress defence mechanisms under Cd [40].

Conclusions

As a conclusion the results of our study showed that CdCl2 treatment can be used for enhancing phenolic compounds and tocopherols in grape cell cultures depending on the CdCl2 concentrations and exposure times. These increases might be explained by hypothesizing that Cd act as a stres factor on grape cell cultures which stimulate and alter the patways responsible for phenolics and tocopherol biyosynthesis. But high Cd concentrations and long exposure time had negative effects on cell viability and cell weight. When the treatment is used in high concentrations for long exposure durations, not only the cell division and cell viability but also the secondary metabolite accumulation decreases. To the best of our knowledge, this study reports the use of CdCl2 treatment to enhance phenolics and tocopherols in grape cell suspension culture for the first time. However, further investigations with various strategies for the phenolic and tocopherol contents should also be carried out in grape cell lines.

Methods

In this research, callus tissues obtained from leaf petioles of Öküzgözü grape cultivar were used. Petioles were surface sterilised with commercial bleach (15%) for 15 min and rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Petioles were then cut into 1 cm pieces and placed onto a solid B5 [41] culture medium with 30 g/L sucrose and 8 g/L bacto agar supplemented with 0.5 mg/L benzylaminopurine (BA), 0.5 mg/L indole acetic acid (IAA) and 2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). The pH was adjusted to 5.75. Explants were maintained at 25°C under dark conditions. Induced calli were subcultured on the same media in order to maintain sufficient stock cultures.

Cell suspension cultures

Cell suspensions were initiated by inoculating fresh friable fragments of calli (2.5 g each) into 50 mL of liquid media in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. Media were supplemented with macro elements (B5 medium), micro elements [42], vitamins [43], 0.1 mg/L naphtalen acetic acid, 0.2 mg/L kinetin, 250 mg/L casein hydrolizate and 20 g sucrose. Then, they were placed in a rotary shaker (100 rpm). The analyses were replicated three times.

Cadmium chloride (CdCl2) treatment

At day 7, cell cultures were supplied with 1.0 and 1.5 mM CdCl2 dissolved in water. Control treatment did not contain CdCl2. Cells were harvested every 2d by filtration, rapidly washed, weighed and stored until day 6.

Determination of dry cell weight

Growth kinetics were detrmined by obtaining the dry weight of the cell suspensions as g/L. Dry cell weights were determined after drying the biomass for 48 hours at 75°C.

Determination of phenolic compounds

Phenolic compound extraction were carried out as previously described by Caponio et al. [44]. Total phenolic, total flavanols and total flavonol contents of the samples were determined spectrophotometrically using a PG Instruments T70 Plus Dual Beam Spectrophotometer (Arlington, MA, USA). Total phenolic contents were determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method [45], calibrating against gallic acid standards and expressing the results as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) (mg/100 g). Total flavanol contents were determined according to the Arnous et al. [46], calibrating against catechin standards and expressing the results as mg catechin equivalents (CE) (mg/100 g). Total flavonol contents were determined according to Dai et al. [47], calibrating against rutin standards and expressing the results as mg rutin equivalents (RE) (mg/100 g). Data presented are average of three measurements.

HPLC analyses were performed on the HPLC system, Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan. The HPLC system was equipped with a pump (LC 10 AD), auto-sampler (SIL 10 AD), column oven (CTO 10A) and diode-array UV/VIS detector (DAD-λmax = 278). The separation was executed on a Agilent Eclipse XB C-18 (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, Wallborn, Germany). The mobile phase was composed of acetic acid (2%) and methanol with the gradient elution system at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. For gradient elution, mobile phase A contained 3% acetic acid in water; solvent B contained methanol. The following gradient was used: 0–3 min, from 100% A to 95% A, 5% B; 3–20 min, from 95% A, 5% B to 80% A, 20% B; 20–30 min, from 80% A, 20% B to 75% A, 25% B; 30–40 min, from 75% A, 25% B to 70% A, 30% B; 40–50 min 70% A, 30% B to 60% A, 40% B; 50–55 min, 60% A, 40% B to 50% A, 50% B; 55–65 min, 50% A, 50% B to 100% B. The injection volume was 20 μL. Samples, standard solution of trans-resveratrol and mobile phases were filtered by a 0.45 μm pore size membrane filter (Millipore Co. Bedford, MA). The detection UV wavelength was set at 280 nm. The column temperature was set at 30°C. The compounds were quantified using Shimadzu CLASS-VP software. The contents of trans-resveratrol were determined on HPLC and expressing the results as μg/100 g. Data presented are average of three measurements.

Determination of tocopherols

The extraction of tocopherols (α, β, γ and δ-tocopherol) were carried out as previously described by Caretto et al. [2]. Briefly, the method consisted of an alkaline hydrolysis (potassium hydroxide 60%) followed by extraction with n-hexane-ethyl acetate (9:1). Chromatography separation was performed by using a Beckman HPLC Analytical System. Luna Silica (250 × 4.6 mm) 5 μ column was used with heptane/tetrahydrofuran (95:5) as the mobile phase. RF-10AXL Floresan dedector was used to determine tocopherols. The tocopherol content was calculated as μg/100 g Fresh Cell Weight (FCW). Each experiment was carried out with at least three replicates.

Statistical analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance with mean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences were considered statistically significant at the p ≤ 0.05 levels. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Science, Bozok University
(2)
Fruit Research Station, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock
(3)
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Suleyman Demirel University
(4)
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Suleyman Demirel University

References

  1. Dörnenburg H, Knorr D: Challenges and opportunities for metabolite production from plant cell and tissue cultures. Food Technol. 1997, 51: 47-53.Google Scholar
  2. Caretto S, Speth B, Fachechi C, Gala R, Zacheo G, Giovinazzo G: Enhancement of vitamin E production in sunflower cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 23: 174-179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rakwal R, Tamogami S, Kodama O: Role of jasmonic acid as a signaling molecule in copper chloride elicited rice phytoalexin production. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 1996, 60: 1046-1048. 10.1271/bbb.60.1046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Qu JG, Zhang W, Jin MF, Yu XJ: Effect of homogeneity on cell growth and anthocyanin biosynthesis in suspension cultures of Vitis vinifera. Chinese J Biotechnol. 2006, 22: 805-810. 10.1016/S1872-2075(06)60057-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Misawa M: Plant tissue culture: an alternative for production of useful metabolites. FAO Agric Serv Bull. 1994, 108: 89-Google Scholar
  6. Waffo Teguo P, Hawthorne ME, Cuendet M, Merillon JM, Kinghorn AD, Pezzuto JM, Mehta RG: Potential cancer-chemopreventive activities of wine stilbenoid and flavans extracted from grape (Vitis vinifera) cell cultures. Nutr Cancer. 2001, 40: 173-179. 10.1207/S15327914NC402_14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JP: A review of the genetic effects of naturally occurring flavonoids, anthraquinones and related compounds. Mutat Res. 1980, 75: 243-277. 10.1016/0165-1110(80)90029-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stich HF, Ohshima H, Pignatelli B, Michelon J, Bartsch H: Inhibitory effect of betel nut extracts on endogenous nitrosation in humans. J Natl Cancer I. 1983, 70: 1047-1050.Google Scholar
  9. Steel VE, Kelloff GJ, Balentine D, Boone CW, Mehta R, Bagheri D, Sigman CC, Zhu S, Sharma SVE: Comparative chemopreventive mechanisms of green tea, black tea and selected polyphenol extracts measured by in vitro bioassays. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21: 63-67. 10.1093/carcin/21.1.63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Olas B, Wachowicz B, Saluk Juszczak J, Zielinski T: Effect of resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound, on platelet activation induced by endotoxin or thrombin. Thromb Res. 2002, 107: 141-145. 10.1016/S0049-3848(02)00273-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsieh TC, Wu JM: Resveratrol: Biological and pharmaceutical properties as anticancer molecule. Biofactors. 2010, 36: 360-369. 10.1002/biof.105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu JM: Resveratrol alleviates some cardiac dysfunction indexes in an SHR model of essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2010, 23: 115-10.1038/ajh.2009.209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baur JA, Sinclair DA: Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: The in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006, 5 (6): 493-506. 10.1038/nrd2060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomeo AC, Geller M, Watkins TR: Antioxidant effects of tocotrienols in patients with hyperlipidemia and carotid stress. Lipids. 1995, 30: 1179-1183. 10.1007/BF02536621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diplock AT: The role of antioxidant nutritions in disease: Healt and nutrition. Inform. 1992, 3: 1214-1217.Google Scholar
  16. Kamal Eldin A, Appelqvist LA: The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids. 1996, 31: 671-701. 10.1007/BF02522884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fachechi C, Nisi R, Gala R, Leone A, Caretto S: Tocopherol biosynthesis is enhanced in photomixotrophic sunflower cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26: 525-530. 10.1007/s00299-006-0268-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Göktürk Baydar N: Organic acids, tocopherols and phenolic compositions of some Turkish grape cultivars. Chem Nat Compd. 2006, 42: 156-159. 10.1007/s10600-006-0066-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Göktürk Baydar N, Özkan G: Tocopherol contents of some Turkish wine by-products. Eur Food Res Technol. 2001, 223: 290-293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Oomah DB, Liang J, Godfrey D, Mazza G: Microwave heating of grape seed: Effect on oil quality. J Agric Food Chem. 1998, 46: 4017-4021. 10.1021/jf980412f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Göktürk Baydar N, Akkurt M: Oil content and oil quality properties of some grape seeds. Turk J Agric For. 2001, 25: 163-168.Google Scholar
  22. Gliszcynska Swiglo A, Sikorska E: Simple reversed phase liquid chromatography method for determination of tocopherols in edible plant oils. J Chromatogr A. 2004, 1048: 195-198. 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.07.051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sanitá-diToppi L, Gabbrielli R: Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ Exp Bot. 1999, 41: 105-130. 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00058-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Popova LP, Maslenkova LT, Yordanova RY, Ivanova AP, Krantev AP, Szalai G, Janda T: Exogenous treatment with salicylic acid attenuates cadmium toxicity in pea seedlings. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2009, 47: 224-231. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.11.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu J, Yin HX, Li X: Protective effects of proline against cadmium toxicity in micropropagated hyperaccumulator, Solanum nigrum L. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28: 325-333. 10.1007/s00299-008-0643-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuthanova A, Gemperlova L, Zelenkova S, Eder J, Machackovai Opatrny Z, Cvikrova M: Cytological changes and alterations in polyamine contents induced by cadmium in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004, 42: 149-156. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2003.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fojtova M, Kovarik A: Genotoxic effect of cadmium is associated with apoptotic changes in tobacco cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23 (5): 531-537. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00573.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Matern U, Grimmig B: Natural Phenols as Stress Metabolites. Natural Phenols in Plant Resistance. Acta Hort. Edited by: Geibel M, Treutter D, Feucht W. 1994, 381: 448-462.Google Scholar
  29. Dangl JL, Dietrich RA, Thomas H: Senescence and Programmed Cell Death. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Edited by: Buchanan B, Gruissem W, Jones R. 2000, Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1044-1100.Google Scholar
  30. Saltveit ME: Wound induced changes in phenolic metabolism and tissue browning are altered by heat shock. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2000, 21: 61-69. 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00165-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Cisneros Zevallos L: The use of controlled postharvest abiotic stresses as a tool for enhancing the nutraceutical content and adding-value of fresh fruits and vegetables. J Food Sci. 2003, 68: 1560-1565. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb12291.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kacperska A: Water Potential Alteration: A Prerequisite or a Triggering Stimulus for the Development of Freezing Tolerance in Overwintering Herbaceous Plants. Advances in Plant Cold Hardiness. Edited by: Li PH, Christerson L. 1993, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 73-91.Google Scholar
  33. Bais HP, Walker TS, Schweizer HP, Vivanco JM: Root specific elicitation and antimicrobial activity of rosmarinic acid in hairy root cultures of Ocimum basilicum. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2002, 40: 983-995. 10.1016/S0981-9428(02)01460-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Li W, Koike K, Asada Y, Yoshikawa T, Nikaido T: Rosmarinic acid production by Coleus forskohlii hairy root cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2005, 80: 151-155. 10.1007/s11240-004-9541-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Leita L, Contin M, Maggioni A: Distribution of Cd and induced Cd-binding proteins in roots, stems and leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Sci. 1991, 77: 139-147. 10.1016/0168-9452(91)90081-I.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang H, Zhao SC, Liu RC, Zhou W, Jin JY: Changes of photosynthetic activities of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings in response to cadmium stress. Photosynthetica. 2009, 47: 277-283. 10.1007/s11099-009-0043-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bergmann H, Machelett B, Lippmann B, Friedrich Y: Influnce of heavy metals on the accumulation of trimethylglycine, putrescine and spermine in food plants. Amino Acids. 2001, 20: 325-329. 10.1007/s007260170048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferreira RR, Fornaizer RF, Vitöria AP, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA: Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities in soybean under cadmium stress. J Plant Nutr. 2002, 25: 327-342. 10.1081/PLN-100108839.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pereira GJG, Molina SMG, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA: Activity of antioxidant enzymes in response to cadmium in Crotalaria juncea. Plant Soil. 2002, 239: 123-132. 10.1023/A:1014951524286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Fornazier RF, Ferreira RR, Pereira GJG, Molina SMG, John Smith R, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA: Cadmium stres in sugar cane callus cultures: Effect on antioxidant ezymes. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2002, 71: 25-131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Okajima K: Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res. 1968, 50: 151-156. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum. 1962, 15: 472-497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Morel G: Le probleme de la transformation tumorale chez les végétaux. Physiol Veg. 1970, 8: 189-191.Google Scholar
  44. Caponio F, Alloggio V, Gomes T: Phenolic compounds of virgin olive oil: Influence of paste preparation techniques. Food Chem. 1999, 64: 203-209. 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00146-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Singleton VL, Rossi JR: Colorimetry of total phenolics with phospho molybdic phosphotungstic acid. Am J Enol Viticult. 1965, 16: 144-158.Google Scholar
  46. Arnous A, Makris DP, Kefalas P: Effect of principal polyphenolic components in relation to antioxidant characteristics of aged red wines. J Agr Food Chem. 2001, 49 (12): 5736-5742. 10.1021/jf010827s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Dai GH, Andary C, Mondolot L, Boubals D: Involment of phenolic compounds in the resistance of grapevine callus to downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola). Eur J Plant Pathol. 1995, 101: 541-547. 10.1007/BF01874479.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cetin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.