Skip to main content
Download PDF

Distinct properties of putative trophoblast stem cells established from somatic cell nuclear-transferred pig blastocysts

Biological Research volume 57, Article number: 35 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Genetically modified pigs are considered ideal models for studying human diseases and potential sources for xenotransplantation research. However, the somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technique utilized to generate these cloned pig models has low efficiency, and fetal development is limited due to placental abnormalities.

Results

In this study, we unprecedentedly established putative porcine trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) using SCNT and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) blastocysts through the activation of Wing-less/Integrated (Wnt) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathways, inhibition of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) and Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) pathways, and supplementation with ascorbic acid. We also compared the transcripts of putative TSCs originating from SCNT and IVF embryos and their differentiated lineages. A total of 19 porcine TSCs exhibiting typical characteristics were established from SCNT and IVF blastocysts (TSCsNT and TSCsIVF). Compared with the TSCsIVF, TSCsNT showed distinct expression patterns suggesting unique TSCsNT characteristics, including decreased mRNA expression of genes related to apposition, steroid hormone biosynthesis, angiopoiesis, and RNA stability.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable information and a powerful model for studying the abnormal development and dysfunction of trophoblasts and placentas in cloned pigs.

Background

The placenta is a unique transient organ that develops during pregnancy. It regulates maternal-fetal interactions, facilitates oxygen, nutrients, and waste exchange [1], provides immune protection against various infections, and supports fetal growth [2, 3]. However, placental abnormalities frequently occur in cloned fetuses produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), a technique successfully applied in agriculture, biomedicine, and translational research in regenerative medicine [4, 5]. Although pigs are considered ideal large animal models for human diseases [6,7,8], most implanted SCNT-derived porcine fetuses fail to develop to term [9, 10] owing to placental insufficiency [11, 12], stillbirth [13], and neonatal mortality [14]. However, the causes of placental abnormalities in cloned porcine fetuses remain unclear.

The development of early pre-implantation embryos differs among species [15]. In pigs, placental development begins at the morula stage, with the formation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and surrounding trophectoderm (TE) precursors [16, 17]. Porcine blastocysts expand into spherical, tubular, and filamentous structures before implantation. TE precursors differentiate into trophoblasts that initially support nutrient transfer and then form the diffuse epitheliochorial placenta [18, 19]. TE precursors in porcine blastocysts can proliferate without immortalization, and stem cells from TE precursors can be isolated and maintained in vitro as trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). Several putative porcine TSCs have been established from pre-implanted or implantation blastocysts [20,21,22]. Although in vitro-derived porcine trophoblast cells have been reported using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and parthenogenetic activation (PA) [23], porcine SCNT embryo-derived TSCs remain unreported.

Herein, we established and characterized putative TSCs from porcine blastocysts produced by IVF and SCNT. These TSCs retained their capacity to grow in culture without any immortalization procedure. We cultured them in a novel, optimized porcine-defined medium (pTS-medium), which supports the long-term self-renewal of independent TSCs derived from porcine blastocysts. Furthermore, we compared the characteristics of SCNT- and IVF-derived TSCs.

Results

Derivation of porcine TSCs from IVF and nuclear transfer (NT) blastocysts in a modified TS medium

Porcine TSCs were derived from day 7 porcine blastocysts using a modified porcine TS medium (Fig. 1A). To induce TSCs (Fig. 1B), we screened several growth factors and inhibitors required for the proliferation and culture of various epithelial stem cells [24] and TSCs in other species (Fig. 1C, Additional file 1.) [25, 26]. We found that C5, C6, and C8 were optimal for the attachment, cell survival, subculture, and cryopreservation/thawing of our porcine TSCs. A total of 19 TSCs were established from porcine NT and IVF blastocysts (TSCsNT and TSCsIVF; Table 1). Based on the order of the development, the 9 TSC primary colonies derived from NT blastocysts were named porcine TSCNT1-9, and the 10 TSC primary colonies grown from IVF blastocysts were named porcine TSCIVF1-10. During derivation, 2 days after seeding of porcine SCNT, IVF, and PA blastocysts, TS-like clones formed containing two cell morphologies: small round cells and giant cells originating from the trophectoderm (Fig. 1D). After 7 days of culture, primary cell colonies of TSCsNT, TSCsIVF, and TSCsPA were formed. After 10–12 d of culture, the TS-like primary colonies were mechanically detached and dissociated. In porcine TS medium, subcultured colonies of the TSCsNT, TSCsIVF, and TSCsPA showed the typical morphology of TSCs (Fig. 2A), including the formation of a tight epithelial cell-like morphology with bright boundaries. During TSC derivation, the attachment and outgrowth rates of porcine TSCs were significantly higher in the treatment group (porcine novel TS medium) than in the control group (conventional porcine TS medium reported by Hou et al. [23]) in both TSCsNT and TSCsIVF (Table 2). The efficiency of establishing porcine TSCs in the novel porcine TS medium was also higher than that of the control in both NT and IVF embryos (Table 2). These results suggest that putative porcine TSCs can be efficiently derived from porcine NT and IVF blastocysts using the porcine TS medium. In general, the calculated population doubling time (PD time) of porcine TSCs was longer than that of porcine embryonic stem cells (ESCs) reported previously [27], regardless of their origin (NT and IVF blastocysts) (Fig. 2B). The ESCNT and ESCIVF lines grew with a PD time of approximately 15.4 h and 21.9 h, respectively. In contrast, TSCsNT and TSCsIVF duplicated their population approximately once in 47.1 h and 26.5 h, respectively. All TSCsNT and TSCsIVF derived from porcine blastocysts exhibited similar morphology during maintenance. However, interestingly, the TSCsPA showed different morphologies during maintenance, retaining a higher accumulation of lipid droplets (observed using Oil Red O staining) making it difficult to culture on a long-term, distinct from the TSCsNT and TSCsIVF (Fig. 2C). In this study, we focused on features of abnormal development and dysfunction of trophoblasts and placentas in cloned pigs produced using the SCNT technique, and thus comparatively analyzed SCNT-derived TSCs (TSCsNT) with IVF-derived TSCs (TSCsIVF) as a control. Therefore, subsequent experiments focused on the TSCsNT and TSCsIVF, excluding the TSCsPA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Derivation and maintenance of putative porcine trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) from various embryonic origins in pigs. (A) Schematic of porcine TSCs derivation from porcine embryos (B) Protocol from day 7 to day 12 for inducing porcine TSCs. (C) Screening of growth factors and inhibitors for deriving porcine TSCs. Table outlining tested media conditions with and without specific growth factors and inhibitors (top), and features observed from each condition (bottom). Ticks and crosses indicate included and excluded factors, respectively. NA, not applicable. CHIR, CHIR99021; SB, SB431542; A83, A83-01; VPA, valproic acid. (D) Morphological changes during TSC induction from porcine NT, IVF, and PA blastocysts (Scale bars = 100 μm). Representative morphologies of attached porcine NT/IVF/PA blastocysts 2 days after seeding (Scale bars = 50 μm) and expanded outgrowth 7 d after seeding (Scale bars = 200 μm) in novel pTS-medium. (E) Representative image of a typical colony of porcine TSCs derived from SCNT, IVF, and PA blastocysts. (Scale bars = 200 μm). (F) Population doubling (PD) time analysis of embryonic stem cell (ESC) and TSC colonies derived from porcine NT and IVF blastocysts. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. **P < 0.01 (G) Maintenance of TSCsPA. Detached clumps derived from primary TSC colony derived from PA blastocysts (a) were attached 2 d after subculture (b). Accumulation of lipid droplet (c) in TSCsPA was confirmed using oil red O staining (d). Scale bars = 200 μm

Full size image
Table 1 Information of established putative porcine trophoblast stem cells
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Characterization of putative porcine trophoblast stem cells (TSCs). (A) Protocol from day 12 to day 20 for establishing and characterizing porcine TSCs. (B) Relative mRNA expression levels of genes (NANOG, GATA6, and TEAD4) in TSCIVF and TSCNT. Mean ± SEM; n = 3 for each group. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. (C) The expression of trophoblast stem cell markers such as CDX2, KRT7, and E-cadherin (CDH1) in putative porcine TSCs was assessed by immunofluorescence. Scale bars = 100 μm. (D) Karyotyping of porcine TSCs. Normal chromosomes were observed in TSCsIVF (36 XX) and TSCsNT (36 XX). 4 N-like metaphase was also observed in TSCsNT. (E) Relative quantities of gene expression profiling data using real-time qPCR analysis of TSCsNT. Relative mRNA expression levels of genes (ITGB6, YBX2, VEGFA, CYP11A1, CYP19A1, HSD3B1, HSD11B2, SFMBT2, SLC38A4, BAX, BCL2,) were examined in TSCIVF and TSCNT. Mean ± SEM; n = 3 for each group. Data were analyzed by t-tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001

Full size image
Table 2 Efficiency of putative porcine trophoblast stem cells derived from blastocysts
Full size table

Characterization of the established porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF derived from blastocysts

Next, we investigated and identified the characteristics of the porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF (Fig. 3A) during passages 15–17. We used qRT-PCR to examine the mRNA expression levels of important markers involved in early lineage specification during porcine embryogenesis (Fig. 3B) in porcine putative TSCs compared to those of porcine ESCs previously established by our group [27]. The expression of a core transcription factor of porcine pluripotent epiblast, Nanog [17, 29], decreased in both TSCs and increased in the ESC lines. Both TSCs displayed significantly increased mRNA expression of the TEAD4 gene, which is a TSC marker [28] and involved in TE specification [17, 29], compared to the ESC lines. Additionally, the expression level of the earliest marker of the primitive endoderm (PrE), GATA6 [30], was rarely detected in either TSCs compared to ESC lines. These results indicate that the TSCs do not contain porcine ICM or PrE lineage cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differentiation capacity of putative porcine TSCs from IVF and NT blastocysts. (A) Differentiation step of porcine TSCs. (B) Morphological changes of TSCs during differentiation (Day 0, Day 3, and Day 7). Scale bars = 100 μm. (C) E-cadherin (CDH1) expression in differentiated putative porcine TSCsNT assessed by immunofluorescence showing limited multinucleated trophoblasts containing three (white dotted line) or two (yellow dotted line) nuclei. Scale bars = 100 μm. (D) Relative mRNA expression levels of genes (TEAD4 and GCM1) in differentiated TSCNT. Mean ± SEM; n = 3 for each group. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. (E) CDX2 and E-cadherin (CDH1) expression in TSCsIVF and TSCsNT during differentiation (Day 0, Day 3, and Day 7). Scale bars = 200 μm. (F) Quantified frequency of CDX2+ cells in TSCsIVF and TSCsNT during differentiation

Full size image

To validate these results and identify TSC characteristics at the protein level, immunofluorescence analysis was performed. We observed significant expression of intracellular CDX2, a TSC-specific marker [31], in both the TSCsNT and TSCsIVF (Fig. 3C). Additionally, cytokeratin 7 (KRT7), a representative pan-trophoblast marker [32], was distinctly expressed in the cytoplasm of both porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF. The intercellular junctions were characterized by the expression of the E-cadherin CDH1, a transcription factor in epithelial cells [33]. Karyotyping of the TSCsNT revealed that the representative cell line contained the normal number of 38 chromosomes after 30 passages (Fig. 3D). One of the three TSCsNT had a 4 N-like metaphase with 76 chromosomes. Together, these experiments demonstrate that porcine TSCs from NT and IVF embryos in porcine TS medium have typical TSC characteristics similar to those of other species.

Comparative analysis of relative mRNA expression in the established porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF

The distinct properties of cloned piglet placentas could be explained by comparing the characteristics of porcine TSCsNT against those of TSCsIVF. The placentas of cloned piglets showed severe trophoblast hypoplasia [34,35,36], which is related to nutrient transport, blastocyst apposition, RNA stability, angiopoiesis, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and apoptosis during implantation stages. Thus, we examined the related gene expressions between the TSCNT and TSCIVF groups. The mRNA expression of the nutrient transport-related genes SFMBT2 and SLC38A4 [37] was significantly higher in the porcine TSCsNT group than in the TSCsIVF group (Fig. 3E). Critical genes involved in opposing porcine blastocysts during implantation, such as ITGB6 [38], were significantly downregulated only in the TSCsNT group. Additionally, the expression of YBX2, a transcriptional regulator of RNA stability [39], was significantly lower in the porcine TSCsNT group than in the TSCsIVF group. Placental abnormalities in cloned animals include reduced vascularization [40, 41]. The key transcription factor for vasculogenesis and angiopoiesis during placental development, VEGFA [42], was downregulated in TSCsNT compared to TSCsIVF. The CYP11A1, HSD3B1, and HSD11B2 mRNA expression levels were significantly lower in the TSCsNT than in the TSCsIVF (Fig. 3E), suggesting that the TSCsNT group had a diminished steroid hormone biosynthesis capacity than the TSCIVF group. No significant differences existed in the expression of the apoptosis-related genes BAX and BCL2 between the TSCNT and TSCIVF groups.

Differentiation of the established porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF

Next, we investigated the differentiation capacity of the established porcine TSCs (Fig. 4A). When the undifferentiated TSCs grown in feeder cells were removed from the coculture conditions and grown without porcine novel TS medium, they spontaneously differentiated. Under these conditions, both the TSCNT and TSCsIVF showed dramatic morphological changes (Fig. 4B). By the third day of differentiation, the porcine TSCsNT displayed a fused trophoblast giant cell (TGC)-like morphology (Fig. 4B, white dotted line). On day 7, TGC-like morphology was observed in the marginal area of the TSCIVF group. These fused forms of the TGC-like morphology in the differentiated group were also observed using CDH1 immunostaining and showed limited multinucleated trophoblasts containing up to three nuclei (Fig. 4C, Additional file 2). We found that the mRNA expression of TEAD4, critical for trophoblast progenitor self-renewal [43], was significantly lower on day 7 after differentiation induction than that in the undifferentiated TSCNT and day 3-differentiated groups (Fig. 4D). More importantly, the mRNA expression of GCM1, a TSC differentiation-associated transcript [44], was greater on day 7 after differentiation induction than those in undifferentiated TSCNT and day 3-differentiated groups. In addition, we observed a localization change in CDX2 expression after differentiation using immunofluorescence (Fig. 4E). Although some cells maintained CDX2 expression in the nucleus on day 3, almost all of this enrichment was evenly distributed within the cytoplasm and was absent in the nucleus on day 7 (Fig. 4F). This result likely indicates compromised expression of representative TE-specific markers for porcine TSC differentiation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative quantities of mRNA expression profiling data using real-time qPCR analysis of differentiated TSCIVF versus TSCNT. Heat map comparing the expression of transcription factors of RNA stability, apposition, angiopoiesis, steroid hormone biosynthesis, nutrient transport, and apoptosis in TSCs. Red and blue represent genes with high and low expression levels, respectively. TSC rep1, rep2, and rep3 are three biological replicates of TSC RNA samples

Full size image

Finally, we sought to characterize the changes in the relative mRNA expression level after the porcine TSCsNT and TSCsIVF differentiated using real-time qPCR analysis. Compared to the undifferentiated group, YBX2 and ITGB were upregulated in the differentiated TSCIVF group, as illustrated in the heat map (Fig. 5). Interestingly, steroid hormone biosynthesis-related mRNAs (CYP11A1, HSD3B1, and HSD11B2) were upregulated in the TSCIVF group compared to the TSCNT group under both undifferentiated and differentiated conditions. The upregulation of nutrient transport-related genes (SFM and SLC38) in undifferentiated TSCNT was abrogated in differentiated TSCNT. The differentiated TSCIVF group showed upregulated BCL2 expression compared to the other groups. Overall, compared with the TSCIVF groups, the distinct expression patterns of the undifferentiated and differentiated TSCNT groups suggested unique characteristics of the TSCs derived from porcine SCNT embryos.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Schematic view of porcine TSCIVF and TSCNT. Porcine TSCNT retain the distinct properties related to apposition, steroid hormone biosynthesis, angiopoiesis, and RNA stability compared to porcine TSCIVF, potentially leading to placental hypoplasia and hypovascularity and further abnormal development and dysfunction in cloned piglets

Full size image

Discussion

Herein, we developed putative porcine TSCs from porcine SCNT blastocysts cultured in our novel medium, creating an in vitro model for trophoblast differentiation. We further revealed that porcine TSCsNT and TSCIVF share similar features, including morphological characteristics and capacity for differentiation, but showed distinct gene expression profiles possibly associated with placental abnormalities in cloned piglets (Fig. 5).

Placental hyperplasia, known as placentomegaly, is the most prominent characteristic of cloned mice [45, 46]. The placentas of cloned mouse conceptuses are two- to five-fold larger than control conceptuses. These abnormalities are thought to be associated with the upregulation of nutrient transport-related genes such as SFMBT2 and SLC38A4 in SCNT mice [47]. In contrast, the placentas of cloned piglets possessed low villus density and exhibited severe trophoblast hypoplasia [34,35,36]. Therefore, we expected these genes to be downregulated in the TSCsNT of the cloned pigs with placental hypoplasia. Unexpectedly, the mRNA expression of SFMBT2 and SLC38A4 was significantly higher in the TSCsNT group than in the TSCsIVF group, similar to other mice TSCs with placentomegaly [37]. These results suggest that other factors may be more critical than nutrient transport, causing abnormalities in the implantation and development of the cloned porcine placenta.

The initial stage of placentation during the adhesion cascade for implantation differs across species [48]. The key events during porcine conceptus implantation include (1) hatching from the zona pellucida and rapid elongation, (2) pre-contact with the uterine luminal epithelium (LE) and orientation of the blastocyst, (3) apposition of the trophectoderm to the endometrial LE followed by unstable adhesion, and (4) development of interdigitating microvilli between the trophectoderm and uterine LE [49]. After the rapid elongation step, porcine conceptuses secrete estrogen, a steroid hormone primarily incorporated into the mammalian conceptus implantation [50]. In the placental transcriptome data of Ao et al. [51], steroid hormone biosynthesis enzymes were downregulated in porcine SCNT placentas compared to their artificially inseminated counterparts. We found the mRNA expression of steroid hormone biosynthesis enzymes, including CYP11A1, HSD3B1, and HSD11B2 to be downregulated in the TSCsNT compared to that in the TSCsIVF. Therefore, downregulated steroid hormone-related levels in SCNT TSCs may cause low viability of SCNT pig fetuses. Furthermore, the secreted estrogen induces the synthesis and secretion of osteopontin (OPN) in the uterine LE of pigs [38]. OPN then binds integrin heterodimers αv (ITGAV) and β6 (ITGB6) on the trophectoderm and αv and β3 (IGTB3) on the uterine LE [52] to bridge conceptus apposition to the uterine LE for implantation. In the present study, the expression of ITGB6, an integrin subunit in the trophectoderm, was downregulated in porcine TSCsNT relative to that in TSCsIVF, and this pattern was retained even in differentiated TSCsNT. Therefore, decreased ITGB6 expression may impair the development of cloned porcine conceptuses during the peri-implantation period.

In mammals, the placenta is a highly vascularized transient organ with diverse placentation types [53]. Pigs have a diffuse epitheliochorial placenta, which is less invasive; therefore, they have layers of maternal tissue separating the fetus from the maternal blood [54, 55]. Although placental vascularization is critical for nutrient transport from the mother to the fetus [56], cloned porcine fetuses display villous hypovascularity [36]. We found that the mRNA of the vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF-A, the most critical factor for placental vascularization [42], was poorly expressed in porcine TSCsNT compared to that in TSCsIVF. This suggests that reduced placental vascularization and abnormalities in cloned pigs might be due to a lack of VEGF-A expression.

Standardized media are crucial in stem cell research [57, 58]. Herein, we determined the minimum requirements for porcine TSCs. Thus, porcine TSCs derived from SCNT and IVF embryos can be efficiently maintained without FBS in media supplemented with GSK3, TGFβ, ROCK inhibitors, EGF, and L-ascorbic acid without losing their stemness, self-renewal, and differentiation capabilities. The novel culture conditions for porcine TSCs in this study are substantially different from those reported by Hou et al. [23], the only common ingredient being the ROCK inhibitor, Y27632. This novel media significantly increased attachment, primary outgrowth rate, and TS cell line establishment compared to conventional media [23]. A specific culturing system, containing Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), reinforcing the WNT pathway, and inhibiting the TGFβ signaling, was successfully used to derive human TSCs from embryos [59]; however, its effects on in vitro cultured porcine trophoblast stem cells have not been investigated so far. Our study demonstrated that the porcine TSC lines could be obtained from SCNT embryos by controlling WNT/TGFb signaling. However, A83-01, another TGFβ receptor inhibitor [60] like SB431542, and valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, which is known to enhance the proliferation of human villous cytotrophoblast cells [25], were not essential for culture and maintenance of porcine TSCs.

The dynamic transition of epithelial cells to motile mesenchymal cells, known as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), occurs in diverse developmental processes [61, 62]. Trophectoderm differentiation for initiating placental formation is the first developmental EMT [63]. One of the molecular events involved in the initiation and completion of EMT is the loss of the adhesive cell-surface protein E-cadherin (CDH1), required to form intercellular junctions in polarized cells [64]. Despite prolonged culture, our porcine TSC lines maintained apical-basal polarity with E-cadherin expression, a hallmark of epithelial cells [64]. After 7 days of differentiation, CDH1 expression receded from the periphery of TSC lines, transitioning epithelial cells into CDH1-lacking mesenchymal cells. This indicates the initial EMT event for placental development, consistent with other reports on human TSCs [65]. However, unlike human TSCs, porcine-differentiated TSCs in our study showed limited multinucleated trophoblasts containing up to three nuclei. This aligns with the fact that animals with epitheliochorial placentation, such as pigs and horses, do not form a syncytiotrophoblast layer; however, binucleate or trinucleate cells are present in the placenta [66]. The expression of GCM1, a key transcription factor classically associated with syncytiotrophoblast formation [44], was increased on day 7. Furthermore, in our study, we found that nuclear CDX2 expression in porcine TSCs disappeared during differentiation. This is most likely due to the result of the loss of CDX2 expression during the differentiation of TSCs into more committed trophoblast lineages in extraembryonic tissues [67]. However, a limitation of this study is that analysis of the in vivo differentiation capacity of porcine TSCs remains insufficient. Although conducting a further study like blastocyst injection-mediated placental chimerism or comparative RNA sequencing might provide stronger data to demonstrate its applicability as an in vitro model of TSCs, the current study provides preliminary insights into the fundamental studies of comparative cellular physiology of porcine TSCs derived from NT blastocyst compared to IVF blastocysts.

Conclusion

Overall, compared with the TSCIVF groups, the distinct expression patterns of the undifferentiated and differentiated TSCNT groups suggested unique characteristics of TSCNT, which might provide insights into the specific molecular and cellular features of abnormal development and dysfunction of trophoblasts and placentas in cloned pigs. In addition, we believe that the putative porcine TSCs established in this study might provide cell sources for the molecular and functional analyses of porcine trophoblast lineages and the generation of porcine blastoids.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study followed the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Veterinary and Quarantine Services. The study protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Chungbuk National University (Permit Number: CBNUA-1460-20-02).

Chemicals

Unless otherwise indicated, all chemicals and reagents used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Oocyte collection and in vitro maturation (IVM)

Ovaries of prepubertal gilts were collected in 0.9% (w/v) saline solution supplemented with 100 IU/L penicillin G and 100 mg/mL streptomycin sulfate, maintained at a temperature range from 32 to 35 ˚C at a local abattoir, and transported to the laboratory within 2 h after collection. Cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from superficial follicles with an 18-gauge needle, allowed to sediment in 15 mL conical tubes at 37 ˚C for 5 min, and resuspended and washed several times with HEPES-buffered Tyrode’s medium (TLH) containing 0.05% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (TLH-PVA). Using a stereomicroscope, we selected only COCs having ≥ 3 uniform layers of compact cumulus cells and a homogenous cytoplasm. In each well of a four-well plate (Nunc Thermo Scientific, Leicestershire, UK), we cultured approximately 60 COCs in 500 µL of IVM medium (TCM199; Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 0.6 mM cysteine, 0.91 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 75 µg/mL kanamycin, 1 µg/mL insulin, 10% (vol/vol) porcine follicular fluid, 10 IU/mL equine chronic gonadotropin, and 10 IU/mL human chorionic gonadotropin (Intervet, Boxmeer, Netherland). Subsequently, the selected COCs were incubated at 39 ˚C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. After 21–22 h of hormone-induced maturation, the COCs were washed twice and cultured in fresh hormone-free IVM medium for an additional 21–22 h.

Nuclear transfer (NT), fusion, and activation

After IVM, the COCs were denuded by gentle pipetting with 0.1% hyaluronidase, washed three times with TLH-PVA, incubated for 5 min in manipulation medium (calcium-free HEPES-buffered Tyrode’s medium containing 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin) with 5 mg/mL Hoechst 33,342, rinsed twice with fresh manipulation medium, transferred into a drop of manipulation medium containing 5 mg/mL cytochalasin B, and enucleated by aspirating the polar body and MII chromosomes using a 16-mm glass pipette (Humagen, Charlottesville, VA, USA). After enucleation, trypsinized donor cells with smooth cell surfaces were transferred into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocytes using a fine injection pipette. The couplets were placed in a fusion/activation medium (280 mM mannitol, 1.0 mM CaCl2, and 0.05 mM MgCl2, and pH 7.0–7.4), and electrical fusion/activation was performed using a cell fusion generator and two 60 µs electrical pulses of 160 V/mm (LF101; NepaGene, Chiba, Japan). After 30 min, the fusion rate was evaluated, and oocytes were treated for 4 h with 2 mM 6-dimethylamino purine and 0.4 mg/mL demecolcine in the IVC medium at 39 ˚C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2.

In vitro fertilization (IVF) and parthenogenetic activation (PA) of oocytes

For IVF, 15 denuded oocytes at the MII stage were transferred in 40 µL modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM) [68] in a 35 × 10 mm Petri dish (Falcon; Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) covered with pre-warmed mineral oil. Fresh liquid porcine semen supplied weekly from the Veterinary Service Laboratory (Department of Livestock Research, Yong-in City, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) was kept at 17 ˚C for 3 d before use. Semen was added to 10 mL warmed Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.1% BSA, and the mixture was centrifuged at 2000 × g for 2 min. After washing twice, the sperm pellet was suspended in mTBM pre-equilibrated for 18 h at 39 ˚C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After an appropriate dilution, 5 µL of the sperm suspension was added to the 40-µL oocyte drops at a final concentration of 1 × 106 sperm/mL, and incubated for 20 min at 39˚C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air. After removing the loosely attached sperm from the zona pellucida by gentle pipetting, the oocytes were washed and incubated in mTBM without sperm for 5 h at 39 ˚C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air. For PA, experiments were performed as previously described [69]. In brief, denuded oocytes at the MII stage were rinsed twice with the activation medium and placed between electrodes covered with the activation medium in a chamber connected to an electrical pulsing machine (LF101; NepaGene, Chiba, Japan). The oocytes were then activated with two direct-current pulses of 120 V/mm for 60 µs and immediately placed in porcine zygote medium 3 (PZM3) supplemented with 5 µg/mL cytochalasin B for 6 h. The embryos were cultured in 25 µL micro-drops (10 gametes/drop) of PZM3 [70] at 39 ˚C for 168 h under a humidified atmosphere containing 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. In all experiments, the embryo culture media were replaced at 48 h (Day 2) and 96 h (Day 4).

Feeder cell preparation

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were used as feeders. To prepare feeder cells, fetal heads, internal organs, and legs were removed from embryonic day 13.5 ICR mouse fetuses. The remaining tissues were minced in PBS and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 3 min at least twice. The resulting MEFs were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% FBS (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% glutamine (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (growth medium) at 37 ˚C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. MEFs at passages 2–3 were inactivated with 10 µg/mL mitomycin C (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for 2–2.5 h, plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL in a 4-well dish coated with 0.5% gelatin in growth medium, and used to seed porcine TSCs.

Derivation, culture, and differentiation of putative porcine trophoblast stem cells (TSCs)

To remove the zona pellucida, porcine NT, IVF, and PA blastocysts were incubated with 0.5% protease for 1 min. For plating, intact blastocysts on day 7 were washed, plated directly onto mitomycin C-inactivated MEF feeder layers under a microscope, and cultured in a novel pTS-medium. This medium consisted of DMEM/F12 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 1% non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic and 20% KOSR (Gibco) supplemented with 2 µM CHIR99021 (GSK3i; CT99021, Selleck Chemicals, Houston TX), 2 µM transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) receptor inhibitor SB431542 (Sigma, S4317), 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 µM Y27632, and 250 µM L-ascorbic acid. After 48 h, the attachment efficiency of primary cultures was determined by scoring the number of attached colonies. Following 5–7 d of culture, TS-like primary colonies were derived and designated as passage zero (P0). Primary TS-like cell colonies were mechanically dissociated into several clumps using pulled glass pipettes under a stereomicroscope. The clumps were re-seeded onto fresh inactivated MEFs. Subsequent TSCs were passaged mechanically every 6–8 d, and the medium was changed daily. All TSCs were cultured at 37˚C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2 and controlled humidity. To investigate the differentiation capacity of the putative TSCs, we induced spontaneous differentiation by removing the feeder cells and porcine novel TSC medium condition. All differentiated TSCs were cultured at 37 ˚C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2 and controlled humidity.

Gene expression analysis by real-time PCR

For gene expression analysis, all samples were washed in DPBS and stored at -80 ˚C. Total RNA from porcine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), TSCs, and MEFs was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was quantified and treated with a gDNA remover. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared from the extracted mRNA as previously described [71]. The synthesized cDNA was mixed with 2× SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Bio Inc.) for qRT-PCR (Mx3000P qRT-PCR; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using 10 pmol of each primer. The primer sequences used for qRT-PCR are listed in Additional file 3. PCR reactions were performed for 40 cycles under the following conditions: denaturation at 95 ˚C for 15 s, annealing at 57 ˚C for 15 s, and extension at 72 ˚C for 15 s. Gene expression fold change was determined using the following equation: R = 2−[ΔCt sample – ΔCt control]. The quantitative levels of all genes were normalized to endogenous GAPDH values. All experiments were performed at least three times.

Immunofluorescence (IF) analysis

IF was performed as follows: cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min, incubated with blocking buffer (5% goat serum, 0.5% BSA, 0.25% Triton-X 100 in PBS) for 1 h, and labeled with primary antibodies (shown in Additional file 4.) overnight at 4 ˚C. The following day, cells were washed thrice with washing buffer (0.2% Tween-20 and PBS) and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. For cytokeratin 7 (KRT7) imaging, after a 1-h incubation with biotinylated goat-anti-mouse F(ab’)2 IgG fragments (2.5 µg/mL), a TSA Green kit (Tyramide Signal Amplification; Perkin Elmer, www.perkinelmer.com, Waltham, MA) was used to enhance the immunostaining signal. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33,342 and mounted on Vectashield (Vector Labs, www.vectorlabs.com, Burlingame, CA). Stained cells were examined using a confocal microscope and the ZEN 2009 Light Edition software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining

To detect AP activity, porcine TSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature and stained with a solution containing nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate toluidine salt (BCIP) chromagen solution (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The stained cells were washed and analyzed under a microscope.

Oil red O staining

The accumulation of lipid droplets was evaluated by Oil Red O staining. Briefly, the TSCs were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% (w/v) PFA for 5 min at room temperature. The cells were then stained with 5 µg/mL Oil Red O (Sigma) for 10 min and examined by light microscopy.

Cell population doubling (PD) time

The population doubling (PD) time of the putative porcine TSCs was measured as previously described [27] and compared with the PD time of the porcine ESCs reported by our group in a study published in 2016 [27]. Briefly, colonies were evaluated 2 d after plating. Longitudinal and horizontal diameters were measured for each colony using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The approximate colony area was calculated using the surface area equation of an ellipse (π × a×b/4, where a and b are the horizontal and longitudinal diameters, respectively).

Karyotyping

To induce metaphase arrest, confluent monolayers of porcine TSCs were treated with 10 g/mL colcemid (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Karyotyping analysis was performed as previously described [72]. Chromosomes on the slides were counted and observed under a bright-field microscope to check for cytogenetic abnormalities.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Experiments were repeated at least three times unless otherwise stated in the legend. Statistical tests were performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test or ANOVA. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical methods, p-values, and sample numbers are indicated in the figure legends.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AP:

Alkaline phosphatase

BCIP:

5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate toluidine salt

cDNA:

Complementary DNA

COCs:

Cumulus oocyte complexes

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

EMT:

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

ESC:

Embryonic stem cell

ICM:

Inner cell mass

IF:

Immunofluorescence

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

IVM:

In vitro maturation

LE:

Luminal epithelium

MEF:

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts

mTBM:

Modified Tris-buffered medium

NBT:

Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride

NT:

Nuclear transfer

OPN:

Osteopontin

PA:

Parthenogenetic activation

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PD:

Population doubling

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

PrE:

Primitive endoderm

PZM3:

Porcine zygote medium 3

ROCK:

Rho-associated protein kinase

SCNT:

Somatic cell nuclear transfer

TE:

Trophectoderm

TGC:

Trophoblast giant cell

TGFβ:

Transforming growth factor-β

TLH-PVA:

Tyrode’s medium containing 0.05% w/v polyvinyl alcohol

TLH:

Tyrode’s medium

TSC:

Trophoblast stem cell

Wnt:

Wing-less/Integrated

References

  1. Bartels H, Moll W, Metcalfe J. Physiology of gas exchange in the human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;84:1714–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Capellini I. The evolutionary significance of placental interdigitation in mammalian reproduction: contributions from comparative studies. Placenta. 2012;33:763–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosseray N, Plommet M. Serum- and cell-mediated immune protection of mouse placenta and fetus against a Brucella abortus challenge: expression of barrier effect of placenta. Placenta. 1988;9:65–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang H, Wu Z. Genome editing of pigs for agriculture and biomedicine. Front Genet. 2018;9:360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagashima H, Matsunari H, Nakano K, Watanabe M, Umeyama K, Nagaya M. Advancing pig cloning technologies towards application in regenerative medicine. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(Suppl 4):120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jakobsen JE, Johansen MG, Schmidt M, Liu Y, Li R, Callesen H, et al. Expression of the Alzheimer’s disease mutations AβPP695sw and PSEN1M146I in double-transgenic Göttingen minipigs. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53:1617–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Mashhadi RH, Sørensen CB, Kragh PM, Christoffersen C, Mortensen MB, Tolbod LP, et al. Familial hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in cloned minipigs created by DNA transposition of a human PCSK9 gain-of-function mutant. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:166ra1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu XX, Zhong YZ, Ge YW, Lu KH, Lu SS. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated generation of Guangxi Bama minipigs harboring three mutations in α-synuclein causing Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan L, Wang A, Yao C, Huang Y, Duan F, Lv Q, et al. Aberrant expression of Xist in aborted porcine fetuses derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:21631–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng F, Huang Z, Yuan Y, Shi J, Cai G, Liu D, et al. Effects of RNAi-mediated knockdown of Xist on the developmental efficiency of cloned male porcine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2016;62:591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Benton SJ, McCowan LM, Heazell AE, Grynspan D, Hutcheon JA, Senger C, et al. Placental growth factor as a marker of fetal growth restriction caused by placental dysfunction. Placenta. 2016;42:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Estrada J, Sommer J, Collins B, Mir B, Martin A, York A, et al. Swine generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer have increased incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Cloning Stem Cells. 2007;9:229–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt M, Winter KD, Dantzer V, Li J, Kragh PM, Du Y, et al. Maternal endometrial oedema may increase perinatal mortality of cloned and transgenic piglets. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;23:645–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt M, Winther KD, Secher JO, Callesen H. Postmortem findings in cloned and transgenic piglets dead before weaning. Theriogenology. 2015;84:1014–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirchhof N, Carnwath JW, Lemme E, Anastassiadis K, Schöler H, Niemann H. Expression pattern of Oct-4 in preimplantation embryos of different species. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1698–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Papaioannou VE, Ebert KM. The preimplantation pig embryo: cell number and allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass of the blastocyst in vivo and in vitro. Development. 1988;102:793–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong Q, Yang X, Zhang H, Liu S, Zhao J, Zhang J, et al. Lineage specification and pluripotency revealed by transcriptome analysis from oocyte to blastocyst in pig. FASEB J. 2020;34:691–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen F, Wang T, Feng C, Lin G, Zhu Y, Wu G, et al. Proteome differences in placenta and endometrium between normal and intrauterine growth restricted pig fetuses. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0142396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Almeida FRCL, Dias ALNA. Pregnancy in pigs: the journey of an early life. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2022;78:106656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramsoondar J, Christopherson RJ, Guilbert LJ, Wegmann TG. A porcine trophoblast cell line that secretes growth factors which stimulate porcine macrophages. Biol Reprod. 1993;49:681–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. La Bonnardiere C, Flechon JE, Battegay S, Flechon B, Degrouard J, Lefevre F. Polarized porcine trophoblastic cell lines spontaneously secrete interferon-gamma. Placenta. 2002;23:716–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fléchon JE, Laurie S, Notarianni E. Isolation and characterization of a feeder-dependent, porcine trophectoderm cell line obtained from a 9-day blastocyst. Placenta. 1995;16:643–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hou D, Su M, Li X, Li Z, Yun T, Zhao Y, et al. The efficient derivation of trophoblast cells from porcine in vitro fertilized and parthenogenetic blastocysts and culture with ROCK inhibitor Y-27632. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0142442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fatehullah A, Tan SH, Barker N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(3):246–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Okae H, Toh H, Sato T, Hiura H, Takahashi S, Shirane K, et al. Derivation of human trophoblast stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(1):50–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soncin F, Natale D, Parast MM. Signaling pathways in mouse and human trophoblast differentiation: a comparative review. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:1291–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim E, Hwang SU, Yoo H, Yoon JD, Jeon Y, Kim H, et al. Putative embryonic stem cells derived from porcine cloned blastocysts using induced pluripotent stem cells as donors. Theriogenology. 2016;85:601–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dong C, Beltcheva M, Gontarz P, Zhang B, Popli P, Fischer LA, et al. Derivation of trophoblast stem cells from naïve human pluripotent stem cells. Elife. 2020;9:e52504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramos-Ibeas P, Sang F, Zhu Q, Tang WWC, Withey S, Klisch D, et al. Pluripotency and X chromosome dynamics revealed in pig pre-gastrulating embryos by single cell analysis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao S, Han J, Wu J, Li Q, Liu S, Zhang W, et al. Specific gene-regulation networks during the pre-implantation development of the pig embryo as revealed by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu S, Zhang R, Shen Q, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Wu X, et al. ESRRB facilitates the conversion of trophoblast-like stem cells from induced pluripotent stem cells by directly regulating CDX2. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:712224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kojima J, Fukuda A, Taira H, Kawasaki T, Ito H, Kuji N, et al. Efficient production of trophoblast lineage cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Lab Invest. 2017;97:1188–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee CQ, Gardner L, Turco M, Zhao N, Murray MJ, Coleman N, et al. What is trophoblast? A combination of criteria define human first-trimester trophoblast. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6:257–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ao Z, Wu X, Zhou J, Gu T, Wang X, Shi J, et al. Cloned pig fetuses exhibit fatty acid deficiency from impaired placental transport. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019;86:1569–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ao Z, Liu D, Zhao C, Yue Z, Shi J, Zhou R, et al. Birth weight, umbilical and placental traits in relation to neonatal loss in cloned pigs. Placenta. 2017;57:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park JY, Kim JH, Choi YJ, Hwang KC, Cho SK, Park HH, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of malformed umbilical cords from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived piglets: implications for early postnatal death. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hirose M, Hada M, Kamimura S, Matoba S, Honda A, Motomura K, et al. Aberrant imprinting in mouse trophoblast stem cells established from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived embryos. Epigenetics. 2018;13:693–703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Osteopontin: a leading candidate adhesion molecule for implantation in pigs and sheep. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014;5:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu J, Hecht NB, Schultz RM. RNA-binding properties and translation repression in vitro by germ cell-specific MSY2 protein. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1093–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loi P, Clinton M, Vackova I, Fulka J Jr, Feil R, Palmieri C, et al. Placental abnormalities associated with post-natal mortality in sheep somatic cell clones. Theriogenology. 2006;65(6):1110–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Palmieri C, Loi P, Ptak G, Della Salda L. A review of the pathology of abnormal placentae of somatic cell nuclear transfer clone pregnancies in cattle, sheep, and mice. Vet Pathol. 2008;45(6):865–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Burton GJ, Charnock-Jones DS, Jauniaux E. Regulation of vascular growth and function in the human placenta. Reproduction. 2009;138:895–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saha B, Ganguly A, Home P, Bhattacharya B, Ray S, Ghosh A, et al. TEAD4 ensures postimplantation development by promoting trophoblast self-renewal: an implication in early human pregnancy loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:17864–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang LJ, Chen CP, Lee YS, Ng PS, Chang GD, Pao YH, et al. Functional antagonism between ∆Np63α and GCM1 regulates human trophoblast stemness and differentiation. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1626.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tanaka S, Oda M, Toyoshima Y, Wakayama T, Tanaka M, Yoshida N, et al. Placentomegaly in cloned mouse concepti caused by expansion of the spongiotrophoblast layer. Biol Reprod. 2001;65:1813–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 1998;394:369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Kamimura S, Inoue H, Matoba S, Hirose M, et al. Loss of H3K27me3 imprinting in the Sfmbt2 miRNA cluster causes enlargement of cloned mouse placentas. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei Q, Li R, Zhong L, Mu H, Zhang S, Yue L, et al. Lineage specification revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis in porcine preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2018;99:283–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson GA, Seo H, Bazer FW, Wu G, Kramer AC, McLendon BA. Cain JW metabolic pathways utilized by the porcine conceptus, uterus, and placenta. Mol Reprod Dev. 2023;90(7):673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bagchi IC, Li Q, Cheon YP. Role of steroid hormone-regulated genes in implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;943:68–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ao Z, Li Z, Wang X, Zhao C, Gan Y, Wu X, et al. Identification of amniotic fluid metabolomic and placental transcriptomic changes associated with abnormal development of cloned pig fetuses. Mol Reprod Dev. 2019;86:278–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Erikson DW, Burghardt RC, Bayless KJ, Johnson GA. Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1, osteopontin) binds to integrin alpha v beta6 on porcine trophectoderm cells and integrin alpha v beta3 on uterine luminal epithelial cells, and promotes trophectoderm cell adhesion and migration. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:814–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chavatte-Palmer P, Tarrade A. Placentation in different mammalian species. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2016;77:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Leiser R, Pfarrer C, Abd-Elnaeim M, Dantzer V. Feto-maternal anchorage in epitheliochorial and endotheliochorial placental types studied by histology and microvascular corrosion casts. Placenta. 1998;19:21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Furukawa S, Kuroda Y, Sugiyama A. A comparison of the histological structure of the placenta in experimental animals. J Toxicol Pathol. 2014;27:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang S, Regnault TR, Barker PL, Botting KJ, McMillen IC, McMillan CM, et al. Placental adaptations in growth restriction. Nutrients. 2015;7:360–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lei Y, Schaffer DV. A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E5039–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Li X, Ma R, Gu Q, Liang L, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. A fully defined static suspension culture system for large-scale human embryonic stem cell production. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hemberger M, Hanna CW, Dean W. Mechanisms of early placental development in mouse and humans. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21:27–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wu Y, Tran T, Dwabe S, Sarkissyan M, Kim J, Nava M, et al. A83-01 inhibits TGF-β-induced upregulation of Wnt3 and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;163:449–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang J, Antin P, Berx G, Blanpain C, Brabletz T, Bronner M, et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:341–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Radisky DC, LaBarge MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the stem cell phenotype. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:511–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Abell AN, Jordan NV, Huang W, Prat A, Midland AA, Johnson NL, et al. MAP3K4/CBP-regulated H2B acetylation controls epithelial-mesenchymal transition in trophoblast stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:525–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Stephenson RO, Yamanaka Y, Rossant J. Disorganized epithelial polarity and excess trophectoderm cell fate in preimplantation embryos lacking E-cadherin. Development. 2010;137:3383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Renaud SJ, Chakraborty D, Mason CW, Rumi MA, Vivian JL, Soares MJ. OVO-like 1 regulates progenitor cell fate in human trophoblast development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E6175–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Imakawa K, Nakagawa S, Miyazawa T. Baton pass hypothesis: successive incorporation of unconserved endogenous retroviral genes for placentation during mammalian evolution. Genes Cells. 2015;20:771–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K, Beck F, et al. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development. 2005;132(9):2093–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Abeydeera LR, Day BN. In vitro penetration of pig oocytes in a modified tris-buffered medium: effect of BSA, caffeine and calcium. Theriogenology. 1997;48:537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim E, Jeon Y, Kim DY, Lee E, Hyun SH. Antioxidative effect of carboxyethylgermanium sesquioxide (Ge-132) on IVM of porcine oocytes and subsequent embryonic development after parthenogenetic activation and IVF. Theriogenology. 2015;84:226–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod. 2002;66:112–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kim E, Cai L, Hyun SH. Effects of stem cell factor/c-kit signaling on in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes and subsequent developmental competence after fertilization. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:745488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Kim E, Kim M, Hwang SU, Kim J, Lee G, Park YS, Hyun SH. Neural induction of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells and further differentiation using glioblastoma‐cultured medium. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:2052–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank all participants involved in this study.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, by grants from the “National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2021R1C1C2007132, 2020R1A2C2008276),” the Technology Innovation Program funded by the MOTIE (20023068), Republic of Korea, IPET in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries funded by MAFRA (RS-2024-00398561, RS-2024-00399475), Republic of Korea and the Research Promotion Program, Gyeongsang National University, 2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Cell Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, Republic of Korea

    Eunhye Kim

  2. Laboratory of Veterinary Embryology and Biotechnology, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea

    Lian Cai, Hyerin Choi, Mirae Kim & Sang-Hwan Hyun

  3. Graduate School of Veterinary Biosecurity and Protection, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea

    Lian Cai & Sang-Hwan Hyun

  4. Institute for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine (ISCRM), Lab. of Veterinary Embryology and Biotechnology (VETEMBIO), College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea

    Sang-Hwan Hyun

Authors
  1. Eunhye Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lian Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyerin Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mirae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sang-Hwan Hyun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. LC: Investigation, Resources. HC: Investigation, Resources. MK: Methodology, Formal analysis. SHH: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, and Writing – review & editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Hwan Hyun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study followed the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Veterinary and Quarantine Services. The study protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Chungbuk National University (Permit Number: CBNUA-1460-20-02). Euthanasia was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, E., Cai, L., Choi, H. et al. Distinct properties of putative trophoblast stem cells established from somatic cell nuclear-transferred pig blastocysts. Biol Res 57, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00516-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00516-y

Keywords

Biological Research

ISSN: 0717-6287

Contact us