- Review
- Open access
- Published:
Galectins in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: roles and mechanisms contributing to tissue repair, fibrosis and cancer metastasis
Biological Research volume 57, Article number: 14 (2024)
Abstract
Galectins are soluble glycan-binding proteins that interact with a wide range of glycoproteins and glycolipids and modulate a broad spectrum of physiological and pathological processes. The expression and subcellular localization of different galectins vary among tissues and cell types and change during processes of tissue repair, fibrosis and cancer where epithelial cells loss differentiation while acquiring migratory mesenchymal phenotypes. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) that occurs in the context of these processes can include modifications of glycosylation patterns of glycolipids and glycoproteins affecting their interactions with galectins. Moreover, overexpression of certain galectins has been involved in the development and different outcomes of EMT. This review focuses on the roles and mechanisms of Galectin-1 (Gal-1), Gal-3, Gal-4, Gal-7 and Gal-8, which have been involved in physiologic and pathogenic EMT contexts.
Background
Galectins are carbohydrate-binding proteins that regulate a variety of cellular processes by interacting with β-galactoside moieties present in glycoproteins and glycolipids [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Galectins are found in the cytosolic compartment and extracellularly after unconventional secretion [3, 6]. In contrast with the regulation systems mediated by ligand binding to a specific cell surface receptor, galectins globally contribute to modulate these regulation systems through their simultaneous interaction with different signaling receptors [1, 3,4,5,6]. As the structures conformed by glycans entail enormous versatility and are considered to constitute a “sugar code” susceptible to changes under physiological or pathological conditions [1, 2], galectin functions also display variations accordingly with the glycan modifications [4, 7,8,9]. Physiological processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, phenotypic plasticity, apoptosis, angiogenesis and immune responses, as well as pathogenic conditions such as cancer, tissue fibrosis, chronic inflammation and autoimmune disorders, usually engage distinct members of the galectin family with complementary or redundant roles, acting across various tissues and cell types, such as endothelium, epithelium and immune cells [3,4,5,6, 10, 11].
This review is not only complementary but also extends the analysis of previous reviews to cover concepts related to mechanisms, regulation systems and cell biology processes known to be involved in the EMT, which have not usually been addressed at the same time or with this conceptual framework [12]. We also call the attention on works where the effect of galectins can be attributed to intracellular or extracellular actions, which is not explicitly addressed by other reviews. Also, we covered a more widely spectra of galectins compared with other reviews that focused on particular sets of galectins. After a general description of glycosylation, galectin secretion, and EMT processes, we organized the literature in separate sections devoted to tissue repair, fibrosis or cancer, emphasizing the role attributed to EMT and the possible contribution of different galectins. This systematic approach illustrates most of the examples where galectins directly or indirectly regulate EMT, including the phenotypic changes and the signaling pathways involved. We hope this approach will provide a more comprehensive understanding of how galectins impact the cell biology of epithelial cells.
Galectins: structural features as carbohydrate-binding proteins
The members of the galectin family have one or two carbohydrate-binding domains (CRDs) of approximately 130 amino acids conforming a β-sandwich binding groove for β-galactosides [4, 13, 14]. β-galactosides are formed by Galβ (1–4)GlcNAc moieties, also known as N-Acetyllactosamine (LacNac), found with variable configurations in glycoconjugates of N- and O-glycosylated proteins and glycolipids as part of the glycome or glycan code [2, 4, 15]. Sixteen galectins have been described in animals and are classified into three groups based on the number and organization of their CDRs and other structural features [16]. The prototypical galectins (Gal-1, -2, -5, -7, -10, -11, -13, -14, -15, and -16) contain a single CRD and a short N-terminal sequence that allows for dimerization. The tandem-repeat galectins (Gal-4, -6, -8, -9 and -12) contain two different CRDs separated by a linker peptide within a single polypeptide molecule. The chimeric galectin type is only represented by Gal-3 that has a single CRD and a large amino-terminal non-lectin domain that contributes to self-aggregation [3, 16] (Fig. 1).
Although all galectins have affinity for LacNac they show different preferences for LacNac variants displayed by N- and O-glycans or glycolipids [2, 4, 10, 15, 17,18,19,20]. Variations of LacNac of N-glycosylated proteins affecting the affinity and function of galectins include differences in N-glycan tree ramifications, LacNac extensions, sialylations or fucosylations, depending on the expression levels and activities of specific Golgi-resident glycosyl-transferases [4, 7, 21, 22]. Another source of LacNac variations that switch the preferential binding of particular galectins is the removal of sialic acid from cell surface glycans mediated by secreted neuraminidases [23,24,25] (Fig. 2). All these changes have an impact on glycome and are sensitive to a variety of physiological and pathogenic conditions, including inflammation and cancer [4, 7, 21, 22, 25].
Galectins lack a signal peptide and therefore are synthesized in the cytosol and reach the extracellular space after non-conventional secretion [3, 26,27,28,29,30,31]. In the cytosol, galectins recognize host glycans in damaged endolysosomes and promote their reparation or removal and replacement in response to diverse stimuli [24, 32,33,34,35,36]. Galectins can establish direct protein-protein interactions through their CRD [37], thus also playing carbohydrate-independent functions in diverse cellular processes, including mRNA splicing and stabilization, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression [38,39,40,41]. Once secreted, galectins interact with glycosylated proteins and lipids at the cell surface, thus modulating the activity of signaling elements or modifying membrane properties with consequences over cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions and endocytosis [3, 7, 42].
Numerous proteins, including galectins [43], which lack a signal peptide for the classical exocytic pathway, are nevertheless found in the extracellular media reflecting their sorting towards one or several unconventional secretion pathways [44,45,46,47]. In general, unconventional secretion of proteins proceeds through direct translocation across the plasma membrane or through their loading into diverse vesicular vehicles [44]. One of the most studied direct pathways involves a translocation pore conformed by the protein gasdermin after its inflammasome-depending processing [48]. On the other hand, vesicles involved in unconventional secretion either bud from the cell surface or are intracellularly generated at different compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), autophagosomes and multivesicular bodies, which then fuse with the plasma membrane and release their contents to the media [44, 45, 47, 49]. The ERGIC pathway includes a heat-shock protein 90-mediated unfolding step occurring at the cytosol followed by a TMED10 translocation system into the ERGIC lumen and the generation of transporting vesicles that then may eventually fuse directly with the plasma membrane or use the autophagosome or the multivesicular body secretion pathways [45, 47]. The evidence suggests that galectins can follow any of these pathways depending on the cell type and particular conditions. For instance, Gal-3 has been found secreted in exosomes corresponding to the intraluminal vesicles of multivesicular bodies from cancer cells, dendritic cells and macrophages [46], as well as from apical-basolateral polarized epithelial cells, being mainly secreted in apical exosomes from MDCK cells [46]. An exosomal independent pathway involving direct gasdermin-mediated plasma membrane translocation has been described in the Gal-3 secretion pathway of primary bone marrow–derived macrophages and dendritic cells [50]. Other galectins found in secreted exosomes include Gal-1 and Gal-9 [31, 46, 51]. Gal-1 can be also secreted through an autophagic secretion pathway [52] and together with Gal-3 have been found secreted through ERGIC-derived vesicles [47]. Furthermore, O-GlcNAcylation (O-linked-betaN-Acetylglucosamine), a post-translational modification, affects the secretion levels of several galectins relating this process to metabolism [53, 54]. All this suggests variations in the mechanisms of galectin unconventional secretion, which may be sensitive to different cellular conditions, with physiologic and pathogenic consequences remaining to be elucidated.
The expression and subcellular localization of galectins depend on individual cell types and are modified in response to physiological conditions, such as tissue repair [55], or pathological conditions such as fibrosis and cancer [1, 4], in which EMT plays an important role [15, 56, 57]. Galectins involved in EMT so far include Gal-1, -2, -3, -4, -7, and Gal-8 (Fig. 1). The roles of these galectins complement or overlap each other depending on the preferences for β-galactoside contexts and their capacity to oligomerize or multimerize [4, 58] (Figs. 1 and 2).
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
EMT is a dynamic and reversible process whereby epithelial cells acquire variable grades of a mesenchymal phenotype [59]. The diversity of epithelial changes is illustrated by a consensus list of core events as indicators of EMT [59]. This includes cytoskeleton remodeling, loss of apico-basal polarity, acquisition of a front-back polarity, weakening of cell-cell adhesion, remodeling of cell-matrix interactions, cell individualization and acquisition of cell motility [59,60,61]. EMT involves gene expression changes mainly controlled by Snail, Slug, ZEB and Twist as typical EMT transcription factors [62]. The EMT program most frequently leads to intermediate phenotypes known as “partial EMT” and rarely progresses to a fully mesenchymal state [59, 61, 63]. Partial EMT is characterized by epithelial markers such as E-cadherin, claudin, occludin, and ZO-1, commonly coexisting with mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, α-SMA, N-cadherin and fibronectin [59, 61, 63]. EMT can occur in physiological and pathological processes and has been classified into type 1, type 2 and type 3 EMT.
Type 1 EMT occurs during embryonic development and is important for organ formation, reverting through a mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) process to generate secondary epithelia. Type 2 EMT is observed in tissue repair, wound healing, tissue regeneration, fibrosis, and inflammation, where transition back to the original epithelial state normally occurs once the tissue repair is completed or the associated inflammation is reduced [60]. Tissue repair is a multistage dynamic process that includes an inflammatory response, increased cell proliferation, migration, and remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, with variations in different tissues and pathogenic conditions. For instance, in the skin, epidermal keratinocytes undergo partial EMT, detach, proliferate and move across a provisional matrix in the wound [64,65,66,67], which is then replaced by a novel matrix of collagen fibers, proteoglycans, and fibronectin, while keratinocytes re-epithelialize the damaged tissue [68]. EMT-transformed keratinocytes also differentiate to contractile myofibroblasts that physically contract the wound by bringing the injured edges closer [66]. In the kidney, after an acute injury, the remaining tubular epithelial cells participate in the repair process undergoing partial EMT, losing their polarized phenotype and acquiring mesenchymal traits associated with cell proliferation and migration into the damaged zone [69, 70]. A reverse process of MET completes the repair process restoring the original epithelial phenotype [71]. An intriguing aspect is that after damage, renal epithelial cells undergo epithelial dedifferentiation without engaging in the processes of delamination or invasion, but instead remaining attached within the tubules. This distinct behavior of the epithelial cells in the injured kidney highlights the complexity and specificity that repair mechanisms acquire in different organs [69, 70].
Prolonged or uncontrolled type 2 EMT is associated with the activation of fibroblasts towards the production of ECM proteins and the consequential progression to tissue fibrosis [66, 72, 73]. During normal tissue repair, myofibroblasts appear transiently and are then lost by apoptosis, whereas in pathological wound healing myofibroblast activity persists driving tissue alterations and promoting fibrosis [66, 73,74,75]. The origin of myofibroblasts is still unclear. In different organs, myofibroblasts have been proposed to originate from the activation of resident fibroblasts, differentiation from bone marrow precursors or transformation of epithelial cells through EMT [60]. In the kidney, recent studies in the context of fibrosis reveal that EMT does not directly generate myofibroblasts but rather promotes an arrest of the tubular epithelial cell cycle at the G2/M phase, which triggers a pro-inflammatory secretome, thereby activating neighbor cells and enhancing an immune infiltration that contributes to fibrosis progression [72, 76, 77]. The specific molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways that associate EMT to normal tissue repair or pathogenic fibrosis remain unknown and indeed are important to elucidate to find therapeutic targets for the prevention or treatment of fibrotic diseases [78].
Type 3 EMT occurs in cancer, where transformed epithelial cells lose their epithelial attachments and invade the basement membrane and the surrounding tissue, thus promoting cancer dissemination and metastasis [60, 66]. Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-associated deaths and includes cell dissemination from the primary tumor and formation of a distal secondary tumor [79]. Loss of E-cadherin and cytokeratin, as well as acquisition of vimentin, N-cadherin and α-SMA, have been found in different types of cancer associated with metastasis [80, 81].
A similar outcome of all three EMT types is that epithelial cells lose differentiation markers, such as the apical-basolateral polarity typical of transporting and secreting epithelia, and in general adopt a mesenchymal phenotype with migratory properties [60]. However, the discovery of new features in a continuous range of hybrid EMT phenotypes, rather than a simple binary epithelial-mesenchymal model, has broadened the definition of EMT by introducing the term epithelial-to-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) [59]. Cells can migrate individually or collectively depending on the degree of cell-cell adhesion loosening. During collective migration, as in partial EMT, cells retain cell-cell interactions and move coordinately in the same direction with higher efficiency compared with individual migration [82, 83]. Collective cell migration occurs in all types of EMT and therefore can be observed during processes of wound healing, fibrosis and cancer metastasis [82, 84, 85]. In cancer-associated collective migration, cells remain attached due to weakened junctions and achieve a coordinated movement that enhances the efficiency of dissemination and metastasis formation [83, 86,87,88].
Inducers and modulators of the EMT program are intensively studied in non-tumoral and carcinoma cells in different contexts. Secreted factors within the cell microenvironment, such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and Wnt play important roles in EMT acting as paracrine or autocrine stimuli of specific cell surface receptors and signaling pathways [89, 90]. ECM elements can also induce EMT by triggering integrin-mediated signaling [91, 92]. Activation of signaling pathways converges upon the activation of EMT-transcription factors, which downregulate epithelial and upregulate mesenchymal markers [90, 93]. The extent of EMT depends on the cooperation between signaling pathways emerging from different receptors [90, 93].
EMT and glycosylation changes that affect galectin binding and function
EMT includes changes in the glycosylation patterns characterized by hyper- or hypo-glycosylation of proteins and lipids, or N-glycan remodeling of glycoproteins along the exocytic pathway [12]. As the affinity of different galectins varies depending on glycan modifications, the glycosylation patterns associated with EMT are expected to improve or reduce the binding and function of galectins. Galectins studied in EMT include Gal-1, -2, -3, -4, -7, and -8 (Fig. 1), playing complementing or overlapping roles based on their preferences for β-galactoside-containing structures [4, 58] (Fig. 2). For instance, cell surface sialylation mediated by ST3Gal α2,3-sialyltransferases, a modification that can improve the binding of certain galectins such as Gal-8 [19], while decreasing the binding of other galectins, such as Gal-2, Gal-3, Gal-4 N, and Gal-7 [94], increases cellular migration and metastasis formation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines [95]. The enzyme ST6Gal-I mediates LacNac terminal α2,6-sialylation, which decreases the binding of several galectins with less effect on Gal-3, presumably because this galectin also recognizes internal LacNac [96, 97]. Overexpression of ST6Gal has been found promoting tumor cell survival in many human cancers [96, 97], and has been described to promote EMT in pancreatic cancer cells [98]. Human retinal pigment epithelial cells respond to damage undergoing EMT associated with an increase of acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5) activity, which promotes N-glycan ramifications and facilitates the attachment of certain galectins, including Gal-3, to the cell surface [99] (Fig. 2).
Galectins in tissue repair
Several studies indicate that galectins promote tissue repair suggesting their involvement in the EMT process required for effective repair mechanisms. The role of galectins in tissue repair has been reviewed by Čoma et al. (2023) [100]. However, the direct participation of galectins in EMT-induced tissue repair has not been assessed. Therefore, the specific contribution of galectins to EMT during tissue repair needs to be clarified by dedicated studies. In general, evidence suggests their role may be related to cell migration and re-epithelization facilitating the effects of well-known EMT inducers such as TGF-β or EGF (Table 1).
Galectin-2 and Galectin-4 in tissue repair
Gal-2 and Gal-4 are specifically expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and both ameliorate experimental colitis when exogenously added [101, 102]. In vitro, Gal-2 and Gal-4 promote wound healing of Caco-2 cell line increasing cell migration. This involves cell surface carbohydrate binding and TGF-β signaling, as their effects are counteracted by lactose-mediated blockage and TGF-β neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 3a) [103]. Even though not directly assessed, these observations suggest that Gal-2 and Gal-4 very likely induce an EMT process in Caco-2 cells. Inflammatory bowel disease and other intestinal disorders that weaken the integrity of the epithelial barrier in conditions such as peptic ulcers, intestinal infections, bowel perforation and many other diseases [104] may involve the function of these galectins.
Galectin-3 in tissue repair
Gal-3 has been shown to promote re-epithelialization of corneal wounds in mice by interacting with N-glycans present on α3β1 integrin and activating the downstream Focal adhesion Kinase (FAK)/Rac1 pathway (Fig. 3b) [105, 106]. In the absence of Gal-3, corneal re-epithelialization is less efficient due to a reduced secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and impaired cell migration [105, 107]. As re-epithelialization of corneal wounds is not restored by recombinant Gal-3 treatment in Gal-3-KO mice, it is possible that an intracellular function of Gal-3 promotes the healing of corneal wounds [105].
Keratinocytes derived from Gal-3-KO mice (Lgals3−/−) show reduced cell migration together with lower surface levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) most probably due to intracellular trafficking defects, considering that cytosolic Gal-3 mediates the association of EGFR with Alix, a component of the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport Machinery (ESCRT) [108]. Alix has been involved in a recycling pathway of EGFR [109, 110]. Additionally, extracellular Gal-3 interaction with EGFR contributes to the formation of a cluster with β4 integrin/laminin332 resulting in Extra Cellular Signal Kinase (ERK) activation (Fig. 3c), decreased cell adhesion, enhanced cell migration and wound healing in vitro [111]. These observations suggest that Gal-3 may influence the role of keratinocytes in wound healing modulating the role of EGFR in this process.
In retinal pigment cells, cell migration is promoted by Gal-3 through a glycan-dependent interaction with CD147 (Fig. 3d), a type I transmembrane protein [112]. This interaction with CD147 triggers the secretion of MMP-9, disrupts occludin localization in intercellular junctions and leads to the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, resulting in destabilization of cell-cell interactions and detachment of retinal pigment epithelial cells [112]. This effect very likely reflects the role of Gal-3 in the EMT of these cells.
Gal-3 also enhances wound closure in colon cancer epithelial cells involving cell surface carbohydrate interactions (Fig. 3e) [113]. This effect is impaired by recombinant MMP-7 that cleaves endogenously secreted Gal-3 [113], suggesting a relationship with the observation that patients with chronic intestinal diseases have increased levels of MMP-7 [114], and decreased expression of Gal-3 [115]. Cleavage of endogenous Gal-3 by MMP-7 might hinder the process of tissue repair in colon epithelial cells.
Galectin-7 in tissue repair
Gal-7 overexpression or deficiency has been shown to delay wound healing in mice [116, 117]. Gal-7 overexpression in skin is associated with increased apoptosis and decreased levels of E-cadherin, which also mislocalizes together with β-catenin, resulting in disrupted cohesion of keratinocytes after damage [117]. Gal-7 interacts with the extracellular domain of E-cadherin in keratinocyte cell lines, thus stabilizing its location on the plasma membrane in a carbohydrate-independent manner (Fig. 3f) [117, 118]. Mice lacking Gal-7 expression have an impaired regenerative response due to enhanced apoptosis and decreased migration of keratinocytes [116]. Gal-7-depleted cells show defective collective cell migration [118]. Therefore, Gal-7 role in tissue repair may be exerted through a mechanism involving E-cadherin retention at the plasma membrane and collective cell migration in keratinocytes.
Galectins and EMT in fibrosis
Fibrosis is characterized by an excess of proteins of the ECM leading to scar tissue development, organ dysfunction and failure [15]. Studies regarding the role of galectins in fibrosis by promoting EMT have mainly been focused on Gal-1 [119,120,121] and Gal-3 [122,123,124,125] (Table 2).
Galectin-1 in EMT of fibrosis
In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a progressive and chronic disease, lung tissues overexpress Gal-1 [126]. Mouse models and cell line experiments also support a pro-fibrotic role of Gal-1 in lung fibrosis [119]. When mice are exposed to hypoxia, Gal-1 and α-SMA levels increase associated with lung damage and collagen deposition, effects that are reduced by the Gal-1 inhibitor OTX008 [119]. Hypoxic lung epithelial cell lines show increased cell proliferation and migration, together with expression of pro-fibrotic genes and extracellular matrix proteins. In addition, Gal-1 expression increases under the influence of a FAK/TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway and recombinant Gal-1 treatment promotes FAK activation, which can be blocked with OTX008 to attenuate fibrosis progression (Fig. 4a) [119]. Intracellular Gal-1 binds to and activates FAK1 in these cells, indicating that Gal-1 can activate FAK1 both intracellularly and extracellularly [127].
In subretinal fibrosis induced by choroidal neovascularization through EMT, studies using Gal-1 knockout mice (Lgals1−/−) demonstrate that Gal-1 participates in this pathogenic condition by reducing the activation of ERK1/2 pathway, possibly decreasing vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) signaling (Fig. 4b). In human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, Gal-1 does not induce EMT but enhances the upregulation of EMT markers induced by TGF-β1/Smad/Snail signaling [120] (Fig. 4c). Although in this model Gal-1 alone may not be sufficient to induce EMT, its silencing prevents the EMT induced by TGF-β1 [120].
Gal-1 has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy, a common complication of diabetes that affects blood vessels in the retina [128]. Exposure of RPE cells to high glucose, emulating the intraocular conditions of patients with diabetic retinopathy, increases the expression of Gal-1 together with mesenchymal markers [121]. In these cells, Gal-1 inhibitor OTX008 not only enhances cell viability but also reduces Gal-1, α-SMA and fibronectin protein levels, ROS production, TGF-β1 mRNA, and the expression of its receptors, TGF-βR1 and TGF-βR2 (Fig. 4d). The evidence suggests that Gal-1 inhibition impairs EMT, preventing its pro-fibrotic effects [121]. Given that Gal-1 is highly expressed in the microenvironment within the eyes of patients suffering from retinopathies [129, 130], its inhibition may offer a therapeutic approach for preventing the visual impairment caused by retinopathies [129,130,131,132].
Galectin-3 in EMT of fibrosis
Gal-3 has emerged as an important player in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis [122, 133]. Human biopsies and serum from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have elevated Gal-3 levels [122, 133]. Mackinnon et al. studies [122] show that inhibition of Gal-3 with TD139 or its deletion in mice reduces lung fibrosis induced by TGF-β1 (Fig. 4e). Primary cultures of WT epithelial alveolar cells (AECs) incubated with TGF-β1 acquire classical mesenchymal traits concomitant with an increased Gal-3 secretion. In contrast, AECs derived from Gal-3−/− mice do not respond to TGF-β1 and maintain their epithelial phenotype. In the same study, Gal-3 silencing in A549 lung cancer epithelial cells reduced the TGFR-β levels at the cell surface and the TGF-β1-mediated activation of β-catenin is restored by Gal-3 treatment (Fig. 4e) [122]. Therefore, Gal-3 is crucial for TGF-β1-triggered EMT involving β-catenin activation [122]. In addition, recent clinical trials show that suppressing Gal-3 expression with TD139 decreases the plasma levels of biomarkers associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis progression [134, 135], suggesting Gal-3 as a promising therapeutic target.
Silica fibrosis, also known as silicosis, is a lung disease caused by inhaling crystalline silica particles, a common mineral found in rocks, sand, and soil [136]. Mice exposed to silica show increased Gal-3 expression, EMT, and the development of lung fibrosis through the activation of the GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway. Knocking down Gal-3 in lung epithelial cell lines or blocking Gal-3 with the inhibitor TD139 (Fig. 4e) in mice prevents EMT and reduces GSK-3β activation and β-catenin translocation to the nucleus, indicating that Gal-3 plays a crucial role in silica-induced EMT [123].
Gal-3 expression is also increased in a rat model of renal damage by spontaneous hypertension [124]. Treatment with modified citrus pectin (MCP) (Fig. 4f), a Gal-3 CRD selective inhibitor that also hinders the expression of Gal-3, reduces renal injury markers such as NGAL and Kim-1, as well as fibrotic markers [124]. Gal-3 treatment reduces E-cadherin and β-catenin levels in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells associated with increased mesenchymal markers [124]. Moreover, Gal-3 overexpression enhances the induction of EMT by TGF-β1, suggesting that extracellular Gal-3 contributes to TGF-β1-induced renal fibrosis through EMT [125].
Galectins in cancer and EMT
EMT has been associated with cancer progression promoting malignant traits such as stemness [137], chemo-resistance [138, 139], mortality [140] and metastasis [60]. Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-associated deaths and includes cell dissemination from the primary tumor and formation of a distal secondary tumor [79]. Numerous studies describe the function of certain galectins in cancer [15, 141,142,143], acting upon cell proliferation, attachment to extracellular-matrix and angiogenesis [11, 15, 42]. Beyond their role in angiogenesis, which has been recently reviewed [11, 15, 42], it is possible that galectins also enhances the permeability of the endothelium, a crucial phenomenon in tumor microenvironment, as suggested by studies on Gal-8 [144]. However, the role of galectins in EMT promotion is less understood and has largely been restricted to Gal-1 [145,146,147,148], Gal-3 [149,150,151], Gal-4 [152], and Gal-8 [153] (Tables 3 and 4).
Galectin-1 in EMT associated with cancer
In gastric cancer, increased levels of Gal-1 have been associated with lower overall and disease-free survival, as well as with an increased incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients [154,155,156]. Gastric cancer tumors have been described to express high levels of Gal-1 associated with low E-cadherin/high vimentin expression [155], indicators of EMT. Gastric cancer cell lines produce Gal-1, which promotes EMT and increases proliferation, invasion and metastatic potential of these cells [155, 157]. Gal-1 overexpression in gastric cancer cells activates the EMT-related TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway (Fig. 5a). This effect is counteracted with the TGF-β inhibitor ITD1, while in turn Gal-1 suppression inhibits TGF-β1-stimulated EMT. These results involve the TGF-β pathway as mediator of Gal-1-induced EMT and indicate that Gal-1 is required for TGF-β1-mediated induction of EMT [155]. Additionally, treatment with recombinant Gal-1 induces Gli-1 expression through a non-canonical hedgehog pathway, which compromises β1-integrin and contributes to EMT independently of the Smoothened receptor (Fig. 5b) [157, 158]. A similar Gli-1-dependent pathway towards EMT is induced by overexpression of Gal-1, which is partially inhibited by lactose treatment indicating dependency of Gal-1 interactions with glycans at the cell surface [157]. Other studies involve the sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor-1 (S1PR1) in EMT associated with cell invasion and metastasis induced by Gal-1 in gastric cancer cells [159]. Overexpression of Gal-1 increases the expression of S1PR1 and enhances cell invasion and metastasis through EMT, while in contrast Gal-1 silencing leads to decreased invasion [159]. The simultaneous knockdown of Gal-1 and overexpression of S1PR1 rescues the invasive ability of cells, demonstrating that Gal-1 promotes EMT via an S1PR1-dependent mechanism (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, overexpression of Gal-1 and S1PR1 is correlated in gastric cancer tumors [159]. All this suggests that both Gal-1 and S1PR1 may contribute to the invasive properties of gastric cancer cells.
In ovarian cancer, serum samples show that Gal-1 levels are increased and correlate with a higher histological grade and lymph node metastasis [146, 160]. The expression of Gal-1 is inversely correlated with E-cadherin levels in ovarian cancer tissues, suggesting an association between Gal-1 and EMT in this cancer. In ovarian cancer cell lines, Gal-1 overexpression promotes EMT and increases cell migration and invasion through the activation of the MAPK-JNK/p38 signaling pathway, while silencing of Gal-1 has opposite effects (Fig. 5d). Gal-1 overexpression also promotes tumor growth and liver metastasis in mice, favoring the development of tumors with a mesenchymal phenotype [146].
Another receptor that plays a role in EMT is the Toll-like Receptor-4 (TLR-4), which has been associated with metastasis [161,162,163,164,165]. In ovarian and colorectal cancer cell lines, the activation of TLR-4 by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) upregulates Gal-1 expression through the PI3K/AKT pathway, consequently promoting EMT (Fig. 5e) [166, 167]. On the other hand, Gal-1 treatment induces EMT and increases cell invasion involving PI3K and TLR-4 [166], while Gal-1 silencing decreases EMT-related cytokines and suppresses mesenchymal characteristics of LPS-activated colorectal cancer cell lines [167]. Inhibition of ERK phosphorylation downstream TLR4 also reduces Gal-1 expression and prevents EMT [167] (Fig. 5e). All this highlights a critical role of Gal-1 in TLR4-mediated EMT [167].
Gal-1 also promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and upper urinary urothelial carcinoma [127, 168]. Poor recurrence-free and overall survival correlates with Gal-1 expression in HCC patients [127, 168]. Gal-1 overexpression induces EMT in HCC cell lines through the integrin/FAK/PI3K/AKT pathway (Fig. 5f) [127, 148], whereas Gal-1 inhibition suppresses EMT [127]. In urothelial cancer cell lines, Gal-1 enhances invasion by increasing the expression of MMP-9 via the Ras/Rac1/MEKK4/JNK/AP1 pathway (Fig. 5g) [169]. Gal-1 also stimulates the FAK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway (Fig. 5h), which additionally enhances the metastatic behavior of these carcinoma cells [168].
In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells, where EMT has been induced by Snail overexpression, the levels of Gal-1 have been found increased by transcriptional mechanisms involving NF-κB [145]. Gal-1 activates c-Jun and increases the expression of α2 and β5 integrin, enhancing collective cell migration in an autocrine manner [145]. Exogenously added Gal-1 enhances cell invasion together with higher expression of EMT markers only in SNAIL-expressing SCC cells. SNAIL seems to be required for Gal-1 overexpression to potentiate the increment of EMT markers.
Studies conducted with stromal cells, regarding the relevance of the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression and metastasis, reveal an additional Gal-1-mediated EMT [155, 158, 170, 171]. High levels of Gal-1 are detected in stromal cells from gastric cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumors in correlation with an EMT phenotype of carcinoma cells [155, 158, 170]. Conditioned media from cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) promotes EMT via Gli-1 in gastric cancer cell lines, involving a Gal-1-mediated β1-integrin activation (Fig. 5b) [157, 158]. Gal-1-overexpression in pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) induces EMT in co-cultured pancreatic carcinoma cells, enhancing their proliferation and invasion through the NF-κB pathway (Fig. 5i) [170]. Orthotopic implantation of PANC-1 cells mixed with Gal-1-expressing PSCs promotes tumor growth and liver metastasis in mice [170]. In mouse models of colorectal cancer, both CAF-secreted Gal-1 and recombinant Gal-1 have been shown to activate SOX9 and β-catenin leading to the expression of the EMT inducers Twist and Slug, promoting metastasis (Fig. 5j) [171]. All these studies reveal a crucial role of Gal-1 produced by tumor stromal cells in cancer progression. Indeed, Gal-1 has been considered an interesting therapeutic target in cancer [172].
Galectin-3 in EMT associated with cancer
Gal-3 overexpression has been associated with poor prognosis and lower patient survival rates in different types of cancer [150, 173,174,175,176,177,178].
In colon cancer, increased levels of Gal-3 coincide with decreased E-cadherin expression [150] and treatment of colon cancer cell lines with recombinant Gal-3 promotes EMT characterized by increased cell migration and invasion [150, 179]. The metastatic behavior of colon cancer cell lines is enhanced by Gal-3 in a carbohydrate-dependent manner through the EGFR/K-Ras–Raf–ERK pathway and is blocked by the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab (Fig. 6a) [179, 180]. Downregulation of Gal-3 expression reduces tumor growth in xenograft colon cancer models whereas its overexpression enhances the metastatic potential of cancer cells [180].
In gastrointestinal cancer, inhibition of Gal-3 with low-molecular-weight citrus pectin (LCP), a complex polysaccharide with abundant galactosyl residues, suppresses in vitro cell growth and EMT and inhibits tumor growth through apoptosis and EMT reversion in nude mice xenografts [181].
HCC cell lines, Gal-3 overexpression induces EMT through the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway and promotes metastatic potential in (Fig. 6b), whereas Gal-3 knockdown suppresses metastasis in mice models [175]. Gal-3 silencing also increases the sensitivity of HCC cells to sorafenib, suggesting a therapeutic potential in patients who develop resistance to this drug [175]. Other studies suggest that Gal-3 mediates the effects of the transcription factor Runx2 [182], which enhances migration and invasion inducing EMT in HCC cell lines [183, 184]. Upregulation of Runx2 increases whereas its knock-down decreases Gal-3 expression [182]. Silencing of Runx2 or inhibition of its DNA binding domain with CADD522 prevents the expression of Gal-3 and EMT, suggesting that Runx2 activation regulates EMT through Gal-3 (Fig. 6c) [185]. Human lung epithelial cancer cells exposed to cigarette smoke extracts, a condition that promotes EMT leading to an enhanced cell invasive migration, also have increased levels of Runx2 and Gal-3 [185]. Epithelial lung cancer cells treated with recombinant Gal-3 shows increased cell invasion, migration, and colony formation reflecting EMT [185].
In oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, Gal-3 overexpression promotes EMT whereas its silencing has the opposite effect [149]. Increased Gal-3 levels enhance cell proliferation, migration and invasion through the activation of cannonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, whereas the Wnt signaling antagonist DKK1 counteracts these Gal-3 effects, thus involving a Gal-3-Wnt-signaling pathway in the promotion of EMT [149].
The role of Gal-3 in breast cancer is controversial. While some publications demonstrate that Gal-3 participates in the promotion of EMT [186, 187], others suggest a protective role [151]. In triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, elevated levels of endogenous Gal-3 correlate with a mesenchymal phenotype, while Gal-3 silencing promotes the reversal process MET together with decreased cell migration [187]. In breast, colon, and prostate cancer cell lines exogenously added Gal-3 promotes EMT by its interaction with Trop-2, a highly-glycosylated membrane protein involved in cancer progression (Fig. 6d) [186]. The mechanism involves phosphorylation and cleavage of Trop-2, nuclear translocation of β-catenin and activation of Zeb1 expression, in a carbohydrate-dependent manner (Fig. 6d) [186].
In contrast with publications from Iwamoto (2023) [186] and Jeethy Ram (2023) [187], Gal-3 seems to play a protective role against breast cancer malignancy [151]. Advanced locoregional invasion and decreased overall survival of patients with breast cancer correlates with lower expression levels of Gal-3, and Gal-3 silencing in breast cancer cell lines reduces Wnt and Akt signaling, decreases anoikis, promotes EMT, enhances drug resistance and stimulates their tumor growth in mice [151]. The mechanisms of contrasting roles of Gal-3 in different breast cancer cell lines remain unknown.
Galectin-4 in EMT associated with cancer
Gal-4 has been reported in human prostate cancer tissues with expression levels correlating with metastasis and poor patient survival [152]. In metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, Gal-4 has been shown to bind different receptor tyrosine kinases, such as EGFR, HER2, HER3 and IGF1R, promoting their activation and downstream ERK and AKT signaling promoting EMT in a carbohydrate-dependent manner (Fig. 6e) [152]. Gal-4 seems to be required for cancer progression, as its downregulation decreases tumor growth and lung metastasis in mice [152].
Galectin-8 in EMT associated with cancer
Gal-8 is a widely expressed galectin in human tissues and carcinomas [28] and has been associated with an unfavorable prognosis in various types of cancer [188, 189]. Gal-8 contributes to cancer progression and metastasis by regulating the production of immunoregulatory cytokines, thereby facilitating the recruitment of cancer cells to metastatic sites [190]. A role of Gal-8 in metastasis has been described in prostate cancer cells, in which Gal-8 silencing decreases E-cadherin levels, migration capabilities and lymph node invasion [189].
In the non-tumoral MDCK cell line, Gal-8 overexpression triggers EMT associated with enhanced cell migration and invasion (Fig. 6f) [153]. The mechanism involves extracellular glycan-dependent interactions with α5β1 integrin followed by FAK activation and EGFR transactivation, as well as proteasomal overactivity characteristic of cancer cells [153]. Gal-8-overexpressing transfected MDCK cells show increased levels of α5β1 integrin, extracellular matrix-degrading MMP13 and urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA/uPAR) protease systems, which very likely contribute to their tumorigenic properties in xenografts experiments in immunodeficient mice [153]. Therefore, Gal-8 has the potential to transform normal epithelial cells into tumoral cells involving EMT [153].
These observations suggest that Gal-8 expression may contribute to carcinoma malignancy [28, 188, 189] by promoting a pro-invasive and metastatic EMT phenotype.
Concluding remarks
Galectins have the potential to promote EMT in different contexts by modulating intracellular signaling pathways through their glycan-mediated interactions with plasma membrane receptors. In tissue repair, galectins can stimulate cell migration and re-epithelization with the consequential acceleration of wound healing after injury, as shown for Gal-2, Gal-3, Gal-4 and Gal-7 in different model systems. Evidence suggests that these galectins may induce tissue repair-associated EMT. In fibrosis, the evidence mainly derived by studies on Gal-1 and Gal-3 strongly suggests a pathogenic influence of overexpression of these galectins in a type of EMT considered to perpetuate a chronic stimulation of ECM depositing cells. The mechanisms include a mutual cooperation with known EMT-promoting factors, such as TGF-β1. In cancer, galectin overexpression has been found in different carcinomas and many studies combining experiments in a variety of cell lines and xenografts models, together with the analysis of human tissues and survival data, support a role of galectins promoting an EMT that enhances cell proliferation, invasive migration and metastasis, thus contributing to worsen the prognostics. Most studies refer to Gal-1, Gal-3, Gal-4, and Gal-8 involving different cell surface receptors and signaling pathways depending on the cell types. An exception is the protecting role of Gal-3 in breast cancer. Gal-8 provides a unique example of how a galectin overexpression can lead to pro-tumorigenic EMT in otherwise non-tumoral epithelial cells. The evidence involves Gal-8 in pro-invasive and metastatic EMT.
Many aspects regarding the mechanisms by which galectins promote EMT require further definition. Their interaction with extracellular components post-secretion is usually tested, but an intracellular role cannot be ruled out as this possibility is currently not experimentally evaluated. The signaling receptors and intracellular pathways and the EMT-TFs induced by galectins in different physiologic and pathogenic contexts, as well as the role of modifications of the sugar code, remain to be elucidated. Potential interrelations between different galectins, including whether one galectin influences the expression of other galectins and how they might synergistically contribute or counteract the induction of EMT needs to be clarified. A more comprehensive understanding of all these aspects is crucial for defining the potential therapeutic use of galectins or galectin inhibitors in processes of EMT associated with tissue repair, fibrosis and cancer.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Rabinovich GA, Croci DO. Regulatory circuits mediated by lectin-glycan interactions in autoimmunity and cancer. Immunity. 2012;36(3):322–35.
Kaltner H, et al. The sugar code: letters and vocabulary, writers, editors and readers and biosignificance of functional glycan-lectin pairing. Biochem J. 2019;476(18):2623–55.
Johannes L, Jacob R, Leffler H. Galectins at a glance. J Cell Sci, 2018. 131(9).
Cerliani JP, et al. Translating the ‘Sugar Code’ into Immune and Vascular Signaling Programs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(4):255–73.
Nabi IR, Shankar J, Dennis JW. The galectin lattice at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(13):2213–9.
Barake F, Soza A, Gonzalez A. Galectins in the brain: advances in neuroinflammation, neuroprotection and therapeutic opportunities. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33(3):381–90.
Dennis JW, Nabi IR, Demetriou M. Metabolism, cell surface organization, and disease. Cell. 2009;139(7):1229–41.
Andre S, et al. Lectins: getting familiar with translators of the sugar code. Molecules. 2015;20(2):1788–823.
Hesketh GG, Dennis JW. N-acetylglucosamine: more than a silent partner in insulin resistance. Glycobiology. 2017;27(7):595–8.
Troncoso MF, et al. The universe of galectin-binding partners and their functions in health and disease. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(12):105400.
Thijssen VL. Galectins in Endothelial Cell Biology and Angiogenesis: the basics. Biomolecules, 2021. 11(9).
Pucci M, Malagolini N, Dall’Olio F. Glycobiology of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Biomedicines, 2021. 9(7).
Modenutti CP, et al. The Structural Biology of galectin-ligand recognition: current advances in modeling tools, protein Engineering, and inhibitor design. Front Chem. 2019;7:823.
Chan YC et al. Dissecting the structure-activity relationship of galectin-ligand interactions. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(2).
Marino KV, et al. Targeting galectin-driven regulatory circuits in cancer and fibrosis. Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2023.
Cummings RD, et al. In: Varki A, et al. editors. Galectins, in essentials of glycobiology [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2022.
Vasta GR. Galectins as pattern recognition receptors: structure, function, and evolution. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:21–36.
Hirabayashi J, et al. Oligosaccharide specificity of galectins: a search by frontal affinity chromatography. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1572(2–3):232–54.
Ideo H, et al. The N-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-8 recognizes specific glycosphingolipids with high affinity. Glycobiology. 2003;13(10):713–23.
Cederfur C, et al. Different affinity of galectins for human serum glycoproteins: galectin-3 binds many protease inhibitors and acute phase proteins. Glycobiology. 2008;18(5):384–94.
Toscano MA, et al. Untangling galectin-driven Regulatory circuits in Autoimmune inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24(4):348–63.
Lau KS, et al. Complex N-glycan number and degree of branching cooperate to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell. 2007;129(1):123–34.
Hong MH, et al. Intracellular galectins control cellular responses commensurate with cell surface carbohydrate composition. Glycobiology. 2019;30(1):49–57.
Hong MH, et al. Intracellular galectins sense cytosolically exposed glycans as danger and mediate cellular responses. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):16.
Nomura K, et al. Activated Microglia Desialylate and Phagocytose cells via neuraminidase, Galectin-3, and Mer Tyrosine Kinase. J Immunol. 2017;198(12):4792–801.
Cummings RD, Liu FT et al. Galectins, in Essentials of Glycobiology, nd, Editors. 2009: Cold Spring Harbor (NY).
Bhat R, et al. Nuclear repartitioning of galectin-1 by an extracellular glycan switch regulates mammary morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(33):E4820–7.
Elola MT, et al. Expression, localization and function of galectin-8, a tandem-repeat lectin, in human tumors. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(9):1093–105.
Gao Y, et al. Nuclear galectin-1-FOXP3 interaction dampens the tumor-suppressive properties of FOXP3 in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(4):416.
Haudek KC, et al. Dynamics of galectin-3 in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800(2):181–9.
Popa SJ, Stewart SE, Moreau K. Unconventional secretion of annexins and galectins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;83:42–50.
Thurston TL, et al. Galectin 8 targets damaged vesicles for autophagy to defend cells against bacterial invasion. Nature. 2012;482(7385):414–8.
Jia J, et al. Galectins Control mTOR in response to endomembrane damage. Mol Cell. 2018;70(1):120–e1358.
Jia J, et al. Galectins control MTOR and AMPK in response to lysosomal damage to induce autophagy. Autophagy. 2019;15(1):169–71.
Jia J, et al. Galectin-3 coordinates a Cellular System for Lysosomal Repair and removal. Dev Cell. 2020;52(1):69–e878.
Hoyer MJ, Swarup S, Harper JW. Mechanisms Controlling Selective Elimination of Damaged lysosomes. Curr Opin Physiol; 2022. p. 29.
Vladoiu MC, Labrie M, St-Pierre Y. Intracellular galectins in cancer cells: potential new targets for therapy (review). Int J Oncol. 2014;44(4):1001–14.
Coppin L, et al. Galectin-3 is a non-classic RNA binding protein that stabilizes the mucin MUC4 mRNA in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43927.
Fritsch K, et al. Galectin-3 interacts with components of the nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:502.
Nakahara S, Oka N, Raz A. On the role of galectin-3 in cancer apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2005;10(2):267–75.
Liu F-TT, Patterson RJ, Wang JL. Intracellular functions of galectins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1572(2–3):263–73.
Zick Y. Galectin-8, cytokines, and the storm. Biochem Soc Trans. 2022;50(1):135–49.
Hughes RC. Secretion of the galectin family of mammalian carbohydrate-binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1473(1):172–85.
Rabouille C. Pathways of unconventional protein secretion. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27(3):230–40.
Nguyen TA, Debnath J. Unconventional secretion: cargo channeling by TMED10. Cell Res. 2020;30(9):713–4.
Banfer S, Jacob R. Galectins in intra- and Extracellular vesicles. Biomolecules, 2020. 10(9).
Zhang M, et al. A translocation pathway for vesicle-mediated unconventional protein secretion. Cell. 2020;181(3):637–e65215.
Broz P. Unconventional protein secretion by gasdermin pores. Semin Immunol. 2023;69:101811.
Noh SH, Kim YJ, Lee MG. Autophagy-related pathways in vesicular unconventional protein secretion. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:892450.
Chen Y, et al. Gasdermin D drives the nonexosomal secretion of Galectin-3, an insulin Signal Antagonist. J Immunol. 2019;203(10):2712–23.
Ayechu-Muruzabal V, et al. Epithelial-derived galectin-9 containing exosomes contribute to the immunomodulatory effects promoted by 2’-fucosyllactose and short-chain galacto- and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1026031.
Davuluri GVN, et al. Autophagy drives Galectin-1 Secretion from Tumor-Associated macrophages Facilitating Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:741820.
Mathew MP, et al. Nutrient-responsive O-GlcNAcylation dynamically modulates the secretion of glycan-binding protein galectin 3. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(3):101743.
McTague A, Tazhitdinova R, Timoshenko AV. O-GlcNAc-Mediated regulation of galectin expression and secretion in human promyelocytic HL-60 cells undergoing neutrophilic differentiation. Biomolecules, 2022. 12(12).
Hermenean A et al. Galectin 1-A key player between tissue repair and fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci, 2022. 23(10).
Slack RJ, Mills R, Mackinnon AC. The therapeutic potential of galectin-3 inhibition in fibrotic disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;130:105881.
Thijssen VL, et al. Galectin expression in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1855(2):235–47.
Rabinovich GA, Toscano MA. Turning ‘sweet’ on immunity: galectin-glycan interactions in immune tolerance and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):338–52.
Yang J et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2020.
Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–8.
Thiery JP, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139(5):871–90.
Nieto MA, et al. Emt: 2016. Cell. 2016;166(1):21–45.
Dongre A, Weinberg RA. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(2):69–84.
Yan C, et al. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human skin wound healing is induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha through bone morphogenic protein-2. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(5):2247–58.
Marconi GD et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT): the Type-2 EMT in Wound Healing, tissue regeneration and Organ Fibrosis. Cells, 2021. 10(7).
Stone RC, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tissue repair and fibrosis. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365(3):495–506.
Arnoux V, et al. Cutaneous wound reepithelialization. Rise and fall of epithelial phenotype: concepts of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2005. pp. 111–34.
Xu XF, Dai HP. Type 2 epithelial mesenchymal transition in vivo: truth or pitfalls? Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(18):3312–7.
Anglani F, et al. The renal stem cell system in kidney repair and regeneration. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6395–405.
Chang-Panesso M, Humphreys BD. Cellular plasticity in kidney injury and repair. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(1):39–46.
Bonventre JV, Yang L. Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(11):4210–21.
Lovisa S. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in fibrosis: concepts and targeting strategies. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:737570.
Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol. 2003;200(4):500–3.
Darby IA, et al. The myofibroblast, a key cell in normal and pathological tissue repair. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(6):1145–57.
Hinz B. The role of myofibroblasts in wound healing. Curr Res Transl Med. 2016;64(4):171–7.
Lin X, et al. Cellular senescence and acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2022;37(12):3009–18.
Zhou D, et al. Sonic hedgehog is a novel tubule-derived growth factor for interstitial fibroblasts after kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(10):2187–200.
Di Gregorio J, et al. The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition as a possible therapeutic target in Fibrotic disorders. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:607483.
Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. Perspective cancer cell Metastasis Sci. 2011;331(6024):1559–64.
Wheelock MJ, et al. Cadherin Switching J Cell Sci. 2008;121(Pt 6):727–35.
Huang RY, Chung VY, Thiery JP. Targeting pathways contributing to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2012;13(13):1649–53.
Mayor R, Etienne-Manneville S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(2):97–109.
Yang Y, Levine H. Leader-cell-driven epithelial sheet fingering. Phys Biol. 2020;17(4):046003.
Grada A, et al. Research Techniques made simple: analysis of collective cell Migration using the Wound Healing Assay. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(2):e11–6.
Friedl P, Gilmour D. Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(7):445–57.
Cheung KJ, et al. Polyclonal breast cancer metastases arise from collective dissemination of keratin 14-expressing tumor cell clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(7):E854–63.
Yang Y, et al. An emerging tumor invasion mechanism about the collective cell migration. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(9):5301–12.
Luond F, et al. Distinct contributions of partial and full EMT to breast cancer malignancy. Dev Cell. 2021;56(23):3203–e322111.
Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(2):131–42.
Nieto MA. The ins and outs of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in health and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:347–76.
Grande MT, et al. Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease. Nat Med. 2015;21(9):989–97.
Lovisa S, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induces cell cycle arrest and parenchymal damage in renal fibrosis. Nat Med. 2015;21(9):998–1009.
Zeisberg M, Neilson EG. Biomarkers for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1429–37.
Nielsen MI, et al. Galectin binding to cells and glycoproteins with genetically modified glycosylation reveals galectin-glycan specificities in a natural context. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(52):20249–62.
Perez-Garay M et al. alpha2,3-sialyltransferase ST3Gal III modulates pancreatic cancer cell motility and adhesion in vitro and enhances its metastatic potential in vivo. PLoS ONE, 2010. 5(9).
Garnham R, et al. ST6GAL1: a key player in cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(2):983–9.
Zhuo Y, Bellis SL. Emerging role of alpha2,6-sialic acid as a negative regulator of galectin binding and function. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(8):5935–41.
Britain CM, et al. Glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I promotes the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100034.
Priglinger CS, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of RPE cells in Vitro confers increased beta1,6-N-Glycosylation and increased susceptibility to Galectin-3 binding. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146887.
Coma M, et al. The sweet side of wound healing: galectins as promising therapeutic targets in hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and maturation/remodeling. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2023;27(1):41–53.
Paclik D, et al. Galectin-2 induces apoptosis of lamina propria T lymphocytes and ameliorates acute and chronic experimental colitis in mice. J Mol Med. 2008;86(12):1395–406.
Paclik D, et al. Galectin-4 controls intestinal inflammation by selective regulation of peripheral and mucosal T cell apoptosis and cell cycle. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(7):e2629.
Paclik D, et al. Galectin-2 and – 4, but not galectin-1, promote intestinal epithelial wound healing in vitro through a TGF-beta-independent mechanism. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(10):1366–72.
Lechuga S, Ivanov AI. Disruption of the epithelial barrier during intestinal inflammation: Quest for new molecules and mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(7):1183–94.
Cao Z, et al. Galectins-3 and – 7, but not galectin-1, play a role in re-epithelialization of wounds. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):42299–305.
Saravanan C, et al. Galectin-3 promotes lamellipodia formation in epithelial cells by interacting with complex N-glycans on alpha3beta1 integrin. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 20):3684–93.
Kyriakides TR, et al. Mice that lack matrix metalloproteinase-9 display delayed wound healing associated with delayed reepithelization and disordered collagen fibrillogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2009;28(2):65–73.
Liu W, et al. Galectin-3 regulates intracellular trafficking of EGFR through Alix and promotes keratinocyte migration. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(12):2828–37.
Tomas A, et al. Stress-specific p38 MAPK activation is sufficient to drive EGFR endocytosis but not its nuclear translocation. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(15):2481–90.
Metz C, et al. Phosphatidic acid-PKA signaling regulates p38 and ERK1/2 functions in ligand-independent EGFR endocytosis. Traffic. 2021;22(10):345–61.
Kariya Y, et al. Bisecting GlcNAc residues on laminin-332 down-regulate galectin-3-dependent keratinocyte motility. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(5):3330–40.
Mauris J, et al. Molecular basis for MMP9 induction and disruption of epithelial cell-cell contacts by galectin-3. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 14):3141–8.
Puthenedam M, et al. Matrilysin-1 (MMP7) cleaves galectin-3 and inhibits wound healing in intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17(1):260–7.
Matsuno K, et al. The expression of matrix metalloproteinase matrilysin indicates the degree of inflammation in ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(4):348–54.
Muller S, et al. Galectin-3 modulates T cell activity and is reduced in the inflamed intestinal epithelium in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12(7):588–97.
Gendronneau G, et al. Galectin-7 in the control of epidermal homeostasis after injury. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(12):5541–9.
Gendronneau G, et al. Overexpression of galectin-7 in mouse epidermis leads to loss of cell junctions and defective skin repair. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119031.
Advedissian T, et al. E-cadherin dynamics is regulated by galectin-7 at epithelial cell surface. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17086.
Kathiriya JJ, et al. Galectin-1 inhibition attenuates profibrotic signaling in hypoxia-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17010.
Wu D, et al. Galectin-1 promotes choroidal neovascularization and subretinal fibrosis mediated via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. FASEB J. 2019;33(2):2498–513.
Trotta MC et al. Effects of the Calix[4]arene derivative compound OTX008 on high glucose-stimulated ARPE-19 cells: focus on Galectin-1/TGF-beta/EMT pathway. Molecules, 2022. 27(15).
Mackinnon AC, et al. Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta1-driven lung fibrosis by galectin-3. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(5):537–46.
Wang T, et al. Inhibition of Galectin-3 attenuates silica particles-induced silicosis via regulating the GSK-3beta/beta-catenin signal pathway-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Chem Biol Interact. 2022;368:110218.
Martinez-Martinez E, et al. Galectin-3 pharmacological inhibition attenuates early renal damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 2018;36(2):368–76.
Zhao Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate fibrosis by enhancing Autophagy via inhibiting Galectin-3/Akt/mTOR pathway and by alleviating the EMT via inhibiting Galectin-3/Akt/GSK3beta/Snail pathway in NRK-52E Fibrosis. Int J Stem Cells. 2023;16(1):52–65.
d’Alessandro M, et al. Galactin-1, 3 and 9: potential biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other interstitial lung diseases. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;282:103546.
Zhang PF, et al. Galectin-1 induces hepatocellular carcinoma EMT and sorafenib resistance by activating FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(4):e2201.
Hase K, et al. Increased plasma galectin-1 correlates with advanced glycation end products and interleukin-1beta in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(4):692–4.
Abu El-Asrar AM, et al. Galectin-1 studies in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(1):e1–12.
Kanda A, et al. Aflibercept traps Galectin-1, an Angiogenic Factor Associated with Diabetic Retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17946.
Ridano ME, et al. Galectin-1 expression imprints a neurovascular phenotype in proliferative retinopathies and delineates responses to anti-VEGF. Oncotarget. 2017;8(20):32505–22.
Kanda A, et al. Advanced glycation endproducts link inflammatory cues to upregulation of galectin-1 in diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16168.
Saito S, et al. Pharmacotherapy and adjunctive treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 14):S1740–54.
Hirani N et al. Target inhibition of galectin-3 by inhaled TD139 in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J, 2021. 57(5).
Girard A, Magnani JL. Clinical trials and applications of galectin antagonists. Trends Glycoscience Glycotechnology. 2018;30(172):SE211–20.
Barnes H, et al. Silica-associated lung disease: an old-world exposure in modern industries. Respirology. 2019;24(12):1165–75.
Ye X, et al. Distinct EMT programs control normal mammary stem cells and tumour-initiating cells. Nature. 2015;525(7568):256–60.
Zheng X, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2015;527(7579):525–30.
Fischer KR, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature. 2015;527(7579):472–6.
van Staalduinen J, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal-transition-inducing transcription factors: new targets for tackling chemoresistance in cancer? Oncogene. 2018;37(48):6195–211.
Li CH et al. Galectins in Cancer and the Microenvironment: functional roles, therapeutic developments, and perspectives. Biomedicines, 2021. 9(9).
Martinez-Bosch N, Navarro P. Galectins in the Tumor Microenvironment: focus on Galectin-1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1259:17–38.
Dings RPM et al. Galectins as molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Int J Mol Sci, 2018. 19(3).
Zamorano P, et al. Galectin-8 induces endothelial hyperpermeability through the eNOS pathway involving S-nitrosylation-mediated adherens junction disassembly. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40(2):313–23.
Rizqiawan A, et al. Autocrine galectin-1 promotes collective cell migration of squamous cell carcinoma cells through up-regulation of distinct integrins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;441(4):904–10.
Zhu J, et al. Galectin-1 induces metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human ovarian cancer cells via activation of the MAPK JNK/p38 signalling pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(6):3862–78.
You X, et al. Galectin-1 promotes vasculogenic mimicry in gastric Cancer by upregulating EMT signaling. J Cancer. 2019;10(25):6286–97.
Bacigalupo ML, et al. Galectin-1 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(6):1298–309.
Wang LP, et al. Galectin-3 accelerates the progression of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma via a Wnt/beta-catenin-dependent pathway. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(3):461–74.
Huang Z, et al. Over expression of galectin-3 associates with short-term poor prognosis in stage II colon cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2016;17(4):445–55.
Ilmer M, et al. Low expression of galectin-3 is associated with poor survival in node-positive breast cancers and mesenchymal phenotype in breast cancer stem cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):97.
Tsai CH, et al. Metastatic progression of prostate Cancer is mediated by Autonomous binding of galectin-4-O-Glycan to Cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2016;76(19):5756–67.
Oyanadel C, et al. Galectin-8 induces partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition with invasive tumorigenic capabilities involving a FAK/EGFR/proteasome pathway in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;29(5):557–74.
You X, et al. Prognostic significance of galectin-1 and vasculogenic mimicry in patients with gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:3237–44.
You X, et al. Fibroblastic galectin-1-fostered invasion and metastasis are mediated by TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Aging. 2021;13(14):18464–81.
Zhang Q et al. Galectin–1 binds GRP78 to promote the proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer. Int J Oncol, 2022. 61(5).
Chong Y, et al. Galectin-1 induces invasion and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human gastric cancer cells via non-canonical activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7(50):83611–26.
Chong Y, et al. Galectin-1 from cancer-associated fibroblasts induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through beta1 integrin-mediated upregulation of Gli1 in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35(1):175.
You X, et al. Galectin-1 promotes metastasis in gastric Cancer through a sphingosine-1-Phosphate receptor 1-Dependent mechanism. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51(1):11–30.
Masoodi M, et al. Galectin-1 as a predictive biomarker in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14(1):123.
Jin C, et al. Mir-145-5p inhibits tumor occurrence and metastasis through the NF-kappaB signaling pathway by targeting TLR4 in malignant melanoma. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(7):11115–26.
Jing YY, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma induced by lipopolysaccharide. BMC Med. 2012;10:98.
Kong Q, et al. Autophagy inhibits TLR4-mediated invasiveness of oral cancer cells via the NF-kappaB pathway. Oral Dis; 2020.
Yu LX, et al. Platelets promote tumour metastasis via interaction between TLR4 and tumour cell-released high-mobility group box1 protein. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5256.
Zhang JJ, et al. Expression and significance of TLR4 and HIF-1alpha in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(23):2881–8.
Park GB, Chung YH, Kim D. Induction of galectin-1 by TLR-dependent PI3K activation enhances epithelial-mesenchymal transition of metastatic ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(5):3137–45.
Park GB, Kim D. TLR4-mediated galectin-1 production triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer cells through ADAM10- and ADAM17-associated lactate production. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;425(1–2):191–202.
Su YL et al. Galectin-1 overexpression activates the FAK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and is correlated with Upper urinary urothelial carcinoma progression and survival. Cells, 2020. 9(4).
Shen KH, et al. Role of galectin-1 in urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma cell invasion through the JNK pathway. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(10):1390–8.
Tang D, et al. PSC-derived Galectin-1 inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells by activating the NF-kappaB pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):86488–502.
Peng KY, et al. Stromal Galectin-1 promotes colorectal Cancer Cancer-Initiating cell features and Disease Dissemination through SOX9 and beta-catenin: development of Niche-based biomarkers. Front Oncol. 2021;11:716055.
Leusmann S, et al. Glycomimetics for the inhibition and modulation of lectins. Chem Soc Rev. 2023;52(11):3663–740.
Wang HS, Wang LH. The expression and significance of Gal-3 and MUC1 in colorectal cancer and colon cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:1893–8.
Lu W, et al. Posttranscriptional regulation of Galectin-3 by miR-128 contributes to colorectal cancer progression. Oncotarget. 2017;8(9):15242–51.
Song M, et al. Galectin-3 favours tumour metastasis via the activation of beta-catenin signalling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(10):1521–34.
Jiang SS, et al. Galectin-3 is associated with a poor prognosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2014;12:273.
Chung LY, et al. Galectin-3 augments tumor initiating property and tumorigenicity of lung cancer through interaction with beta-catenin. Oncotarget. 2015;6(7):4936–52.
Kusuhara S, et al. Prognostic significance of galectin-3 expression in patients with resected NSCLC treated with platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12(10):1570–8.
Wu KL, et al. Overexpression of galectin-3 enhances migration of colon cancer cells related to activation of the K-Ras-Raf-Erk1/2 pathway. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(3):350–9.
Wu KL, et al. Extracellular galectin-3 facilitates colon cancer cell migration and is related to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(8):2402–12.
Wang S, et al. Chemoprevention of low-molecular-weight Citrus Pectin (LCP) in gastrointestinal Cancer cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(6):746–56.
Cao Z et al. The expression and functional significance of Runx2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: its role in Vasculogenic Mimicry and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Int J Mol Sci, 2017. 18(3).
Boregowda RK, et al. RUNX2 is overexpressed in melanoma cells and mediates their migration and invasion. Cancer Lett. 2014;348(1–2):61–70.
El-Gendi SM, Mostafa MF. Runx2 expression as a potential prognostic marker in invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2016;22(3):461–70.
Sharma JR, Agraval H, Yadav UCS. Cigarette smoke induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, stemness, and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma cells via upregulated RUNX-2/galectin-3 pathway. Life Sci. 2023;318:121480.
Iwamoto S, et al. Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 phosphorylation triggered by binding of galectin-3 drives metastasis through down-regulation of E-cadherin. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(8):104971.
Jeethy Ram T, et al. Co-expression of galectin-3 and vimentin in triple negative breast cancer cells promotes tumor progression, metastasis and survival. Tumour Biol. 2023;45(1):31–54.
Reticker-Flynn NE, et al. A combinatorial extracellular matrix platform identifies cell-extracellular matrix interactions that correlate with metastasis. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1122.
Gentilini LD et al. Stable and high expression of Galectin-8 tightly controls metastatic progression of prostate cancer. Oncotarget, 2017.
Shatz-Azoulay H, et al. The animal lectin Galectin-8 promotes cytokine expression and metastatic tumor growth in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7375.
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Centro de Biología Celular y Medicina for their constructive and lucid comments.
Funding
This work received financial support from the following grants: FONDECYT #1211829 (to A.S.) and # 1221796 (to A.G.); ANID Basal grant FB210008 “Centro Científico y Tecnológico de Excelencia Ciencia y Vida” (A.G. and A.S.). and ANID National Doctorate Scholarship # 21221618 (to AdlP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Elisa Perez-Moreno, Conceptualization, Schematization, Illustration, Writing; Claudia Oyanadel, Conceptualization, Schematization, Writing; Adely de la Peña, Writing; Ronny Hernandez, Schematization; Francisca Pérez-Molina, Schematization; Claudia Metz, Conceptualization, Schematization; Alfonso González, Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding, Writing; Andrea Soza, Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding, Writing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
There is no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Perez-Moreno, E., Oyanadel, C., de la Peña, A. et al. Galectins in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: roles and mechanisms contributing to tissue repair, fibrosis and cancer metastasis. Biol Res 57, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00490-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00490-5