Skip to main content

Genetic regulation of the ompX porin of Salmonella Typhimurium in response to hydrogen peroxide stress

Abstract

Background

Salmonella Typhimurium is a Gram-negative pathogen that causes a systemic disease in mice resembling typhoid fever. During its infective cycle, S. Typhimurium is phagocytized by macrophages and proliferates inside a Salmonella-containing vacuole where Salmonella is exposed and survives oxidative stress induced by H2O2 through modulation of gene expression. After exposure of Salmonella to H2O2, the expression of the porin-encoding gene ompX increases, as previously shown by microarray analysis. Expression of ompX mRNA is regulated at a post-transcriptional level by MicA and CyaR sRNAs in aerobiosis. In addition, sequence analysis predicts a site for OxyS sRNA in ompX mRNA.

Results

In this work we sought to evaluate the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of ompX under H2O2 stress. We demonstrate that ompX expression is induced at the transcriptional level in S. Typhimurium under such conditions. Unexpectedly, an increase in ompX gene transcript and promoter activity after challenges with H2O2 does not translate into increased protein levels in the wild-type strain, suggesting that ompX mRNA is also regulated at a post-transcriptional level, at least under oxidative stress. In silico gene sequence analysis predicted that sRNAs CyaR, MicA, and OxyS could regulate ompX mRNA levels. Using rifampicin to inhibit mRNA expression, we show that the sRNAs (MicA, CyaR and OxyS) and the sRNA:mRNA chaperone Hfq positively modulate ompX mRNA levels under H2O2-induced stress in Salmonella during the exponential growth phase in Lennox broth.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that ompX mRNA is regulated in response to H2O2 by the sRNAs CyaR, MicA and OxyS is Salmonella Typhimurium.

Introduction

Every year, Salmonella enterica causes around 1800 food-borne illness cases in the United States, resulting in about 200 hospitalizations. Most people develop diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain 12 to 72 h after infection (CDC, Salmonella). During infection, Salmonella survives within innate immune host cells, including macrophages [37], where bacteria are exposed to adverse conditions that limit its survival. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are the most harmful of these conditions [20]. ROS generated by phagocytic cells, particularly superoxide anions (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), target bacterial components such as proteins, membranes, and nucleic acids [21].

During its infective cycle, internalized Salmonella faces H2O2 and other toxic molecules that enter the bacterium through the outer membrane ([40], Faucher et al. 2006). Studies in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae show that H2O2 cannot freely diffuse across membranes [41, 43]. Evidence from Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) indicates that ROS are channeled through porins such as OmpW and OmpD, which are down-regulated under oxidative stress in-vitro, highlighting their importance for survival [7, 31]. To survive the microenvironment inside the phagosome, Salmonella must finely-tune gene expression [16, 35, 36], including the expression of those genes that encode outer membrane proteins, which results in minimizing the influx of ROS [7, 10, 31]. However, a microarray analysis of the transcriptomic profile of S. Typhimurium has shown that the expression of the gene that codifies the porin ompX was 3.65 times greater under stress conditions compared to control settings [32], suggesting a role for higher level regulation during H2O2-induced stress for the modulation of the permeability of the outer membrane (Calderon et al. 2011, [32]).

OmpX is a small porin composed of eight antiparallel strands in a barrel conformation [47], that is involved in the responses to H2O2 stress, host invasion, iron homeostasis, and recognition of bacteria by the host’s adaptive immune response [9, 24, 25, 28, 29]. ompX gene expression is regulated at various levels; transcription is increased by overexpression of MarA in Enterobacter aerogenes [3, 14] and by H2O2 exposure in uropathogenic Escherichia coli [6].

Mecsas et al. [30] identified two promoters and a rho-terminator in the ompX gene in Escherichia coli. One of the promoters is bona fide, with sigma 70 boxes (50 bp upstream of the ATG of ompX gene). However the authors proposed that the other promoter (221 bp upstream of the ATG of ompX) is not activated by sigma 70 under the experimental conditions tested, and could require a supercoiled template, another form of the RNA polymerase or additional transcription factors to promote transcription. The authors suggest that expression of the ompX gene is induced under basic pH conditions via the second promoter (221 bp upstream of the ATG), but did not show in vivo evidence to demonstrate promoter activity.

At the post-transcriptional level, ompX is regulated by a group of non-coding small RNAs (sRNAs) which modulate the production of the protein and are implicated in a broad array of pathways, including carbon metabolism, iron homeostasis, quorum sensing, biofilm biosynthesis, and stress responses, among other functions [39]. Previous studies suggest that in Escherichia coli grown in rich media (Lennox broth), ompX mRNA is targeted by the sRNAs MicA and CyaR [22]. During oxidative stress conditions produced by H2O2, only OxyS sRNA was implicated in the post-transcriptional response, and the main mRNAs regulated by this OxyS encode for proteins required for oxidative stress resistance in Escherichia coli [1]. Additionally, the sRNAs CyaR, MicA and OxyS are regulated by the action of Hfq, a sRNA:mRNA chaperone, which stabilizes this interaction, promoting the degradation by RNAses or the translation of the transcript [22, 51], which is also required for regulation under diverse stress conditions [42].

In this work, we investigated ompX expression under hydrogen peroxide stress at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level in S. Typhimurium 14028 s. Our results show that ompX transcript levels increase under peroxide stress, yet there are no changes at the protein level under the same conditions. Therefore, we hypothesize that MicA, CyaR and OxyS could play relevant roles in the regulation of the translation of ompX mRNA under peroxide stress.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids included in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Bacteria were routinely grown in Lennox Broth (LB) at 37ºC supplemented, when necessary, with ampicillin (0.1 mg/ml), chloramphenicol (0.02 mg/ml), or kanamycin (0.05 mg/ml). Cells grown to OD600 ≈ 0.4 were treated with 2 mM H2O2 in LB.

Construction of chromosomal gene fusions with pSUB11 plasmid

The ompX::3xflag strain was constructed as described by Uzzau et al. [45] by fusing the 3xflag epitope with the ompX gene. The primers were designed with 40 homology bases corresponding to the coding regions of the gene and a region immediately downstream to amplify the pSUB11 plasmid (Additional file 2: Table S2). The PCR products were used to transform electrocompetent 14028 s cells carrying plasmid pKD46. Fusion was confirmed by PCR. The 3xFlag-fusion protein was detected by immunoblotting using an anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) and peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma). Proteins were purified and detected as described elsewhere [18].

Construction of a GFP-transcriptional fusion of ompX

ompX promoter activity was evaluated by cloning the ompX promoter into the pGLO vector (Biorad). For this purpose, 375 bp of the ompX promoter were amplified by PCR (primers Prom_ompX_-1R and Prom_ompX_-375F, Additional file 2: Table S2), and the amplicon and pGLO plasmid were digested using the restriction enzymes BmtI and AgeI for 1 h at 37 °C. Products were purified using the High Pure PCR Template Kit (Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR products were ligated to the digested pGLO plasmid using T4 ligase at 4 °C overnight. Electrocompetent E. coli TOP10 cells were then transformed with the resulting plasmid, denominated pGLO_ompX. The presence and orientation of the ompX promoter was verified by PCR, then the pGLO_ompX plasmid was purified using the High Pure Plasmid Isolation Kit (Roche) and transformed into electrocompetent S. Typhimurium 14028 s cells. Finally, strains carrying the pGLO_ompX and the pGLO plasmids were used to measure GFP fluorescence under peroxide stress after 20 min of treatment.

Reporter activity

Strains carrying the plasmids pGLO and pGLO_ompX, were grown to OD600 ≈ 0.4, centrifuged at 4400 rpm for 10 min to concentrate the cells, and suspended in 1 ml 20 mM 1X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). One tube was treated with H2O2 to a final concentration of 2 mM, and a second tube received no treatment (control). Finally, after 20 min of treatment, 300 μl of each sample were used to measure fluorescence (GFP activity) employing a TECAN Infinite 200 PRO Nanoquant (excitation, 395 nm; emission, 509 nm) microplate reader. Emission values were normalized using the optical densities of treated and untreated strains; the measurement time for each was 3 min, for a total time of 45 min. Fluorescence and OD values were measured in triplicate. The specific fluorescence intensity was calculated using the methods of Eiamphungporn et al. [15], where the corresponding OD of the culture was used to normalize the initial and final fluorescence values of the construct and the empty vector. Specific fluorescence was calculated using the equation: (Δfluorescence/ΔOD)construct—(Δfluorescence/ΔOD)empty vector for all strains subjected to treatments. All measurements were normalized using the values obtained from the wild-type strain grown under control conditions (no treatment).

RNA isolation and real-time quantitative PCR

Overnight bacterial cultures grown in LB were diluted (1:100). Cells were then grown to OD600≈0.4 and subjected to H2O2 treatment directly in the medium; one tube remained as an untreated control. After 20 min of incubation with H2O2, RNA was extracted using the acid–phenol method and the purified RNA was suspended in 30 μl of nuclease-free water. Finally, RNA integrity, quality, and quantity were verified using 1% agarose electrophoresis and A260/280 ratio. Total RNA was treated with DNase I, and cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV RT (Promega) and random primers following the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was quantified by qRT-PCR using the primers shown in Additional file 2: Table S2. Relative quantification was performed using the Brilliant II SYBR Green qPCR Master Reagent Kit and the Mx3000P detection system (Stratagene); talB gene was used for normalization [5, 35]. Amplification efficiency was calculated using a standard curve constructed by amplifying serial dilutions of RT-PCR products for each gene. These values were used to obtain the fold-change in the expression of the gene of interest.

Rifampicin assay

To evaluate the influence of the sRNA on ompX mRNA, we performed a rifampicin assay over time. Briefly, the strains (wild-type, ΔmicA, ΔcyaR, ΔoxyS and Δhfq) were grown in LB broth at 37ºC with constant agitation. Once the cultures reached OD600 ≈ 0.4 they were divided into two equal batches, one being the control whilst the other was treated with 2 mM H2O2. Then, at the predetermined time points (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 min), 10 ml of culture were subjected to RNA extraction, cDNA preparation and the determination of ompX and talB expression by qRT-PCR, as described above. We performed two approaches: a rifampicin absent (–RIF) and rifampicin present (+ RIF) assay. For the rifampicin present assay, we added rifampicin (20 µg/ml) when the cells originally reached an OD600 ≈ 0.4.

Colony-forming units

To determine the colony-forming units (CFUs), S. Typhimurium 14028 s strains (wild-type, ΔmicA, ΔcyaR, ΔoxyS, ΔryhB and Δhfq) were grown to OD600 ≈ 0.4 in LB using the corresponding antibiotic selection. Except in controls, H2O2 was added to a final concentration of 2 mM, and incubation took place with agitation at 37 °C for 20 min. After incubation, all strains were serially-diluted in PBS and spotted on LB agar. CFU were counted the following day, and the assay was replicated 5 times. We calculated percentage of survival using arbitrarily the wild-type strain grown under control conditions as 100% of survival.

Total intracellular ROS determination

To determine total intracellular ROS, the H2DCFDA (Sigma-Aldrich) probe was used. Briefly, S. Typhimurium 14028 s strains (wild-type, ΔmicA, ΔcyaR, ΔoxyS, ΔryhB and Δhfq) were grown to OD600 ≈ 0.4. Except in controls, H2O2 was added to a final concentration of 2 mM, and incubation took place with agitation at 37 °C for 20 min. After incubation, 300 µl of bacterial cultures were withdrawn in triplicate and placed in a 96-well microplate. Fluorescence was measured every 5 min, for a total of 45 min (excitation, 480 nm; emission, 520 nm). Total intracellular ROS were calculated as: (Δfluorescence/time)/ΔOD600. The final concentration of the probe was 10 µM in DMSO.

In silico gene sequence evaluation

To evaluate whether OxyS has binding sites on the ompX mRNA, we performed an in-silico analysis using the tool IntaRNA [4, 49] and the nucleotide sequences of the ompX mRNA and OxyS sRNA.

Statistical analysis

Gene-by-gene comparisons were performed as individual experiments for each time point using one-way ANOVAs with α = 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with the Bonferroni correction comparing individual mutant strains with the wild-type strain. We used the Prism 7 software to perform all the data analysis.

Results

H2O2 stress increases levels of ompX mRNA but not of OmpX protein.

Previously, our group reported that ompX transcript levels increased under peroxide stress [32]. To further evaluate the mechanism of ompX regulation under these conditions, we determined ompX transcript levels as well as promoter activity under H2O2-induced stress. Promoter activity was measured using the two putative promoters identified by Mecsas et al. [30]. As shown previously, ompX transcript levels increased eight-times after exposure to hydrogen peroxide (Fig. 1A), while promoter activity increased almost three-fold (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Analysis of ompX expression. A mRNA level of ompX in the wild-type strain of S. Typhimurium 14028 s. B Fluorescence activity of GFP under the control of the ompX promoter (-353 to -1) in the wild-type S. Typhimurium background. C Immunodetection of the OmpX::3xFlag protein, measured after exposure of the strain to 2 mM H2O2 for 20, 45 and 60 min. The control received no treatment. Ten µg of total proteins were loaded. White bars represent the control (no treatment), and red bars represent cells treated with 2 mM H2O2. The graph represents the average of 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD or SE?)

To investigate whether the observed increase in ompX mRNA and promoter activity levels correlated with higher protein levels, we measured the OmpX protein by immunoblot. Unexpectedly, OmpX protein levels were not affected by the peroxide treatment (Fig. 1C). These results suggest that OmpX production may be subjected to post-transcriptional regulation under these stress conditions. Previous evidence suggests that sRNAs such as MicA, RybB, CyaR and Hfq regulate this porin post-transcriptionally under standard growth conditions. For instance, CyaR contains a C‐rich apical loop that sequesters the Shine–Dalgarno sequence of ompX mRNA and inhibits translation initiation [11, 17, 23, 34]. However, to our knowledge, the specific mechanism that occurs under ROS-enriched conditions has not been elucidated and should take into consideration the role of molecules that are targeted by hydrogen peroxide and that can potentially lose function as a consequence of oxidative damage.

ompX is regulated at the post-transcriptional level in response to H2O2

In Escherichia coli, ompX mRNA is regulated at the post-transcriptional level by CyaR and MicA [22]. In silico analysis revealed the presence of a putative interaction domain between OxyS and ompX mRNA (Fig. 2), suggesting that OxyS could participate in some way in the regulation of ompX mRNA under oxidative stress.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Regulation model of ompX mRNA under H2O2 stress. A Binding sites of the oxyS, micA and cyaR sRNAs in the 325 bp-regulatory region of ompX mRNA (the whole transcript is 836 bp long) under oxidative stress (oxyS in light blue, cyaR in orange, and micA in purple, translation start site in pink). B Schematic representation of the proposed interaction of oxyS sRNA with the ompX mRNA. The prediction was made using IntaRNA [4, 49],numbers indicate positions in the ompX mRNA and the oxyS sRNA sequence, respectively

Given their previously described roles in model bacteria such as Escherichia coli, we determined whether CyaR, MicA, or OxyS play relevant roles during peroxide stress in S. Typhimurium by examining bacterial survival and intracellular ROS accumulation. Bacterial strains with the deletion of each sRNA show decreased survival in comparison to the wild-type control, especially after deletion of micA (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, intracellular ROS accumulation is also greater in mutant strains (Fig. 3B), suggesting that this stressor has an even more detrimental effect on the overall survival of the bacteria when the function of these sRNAs is absent.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Role of cyaR, micA and oxyS sRNAs in oxidative stress. A Percentage of survival based on Colony Forming Units (CFU) of the sRNA-mutants under peroxide stress compared to S. Typhimurium 14028 s under control conditions. B ROS accumulation of the single sRNA mutants under peroxide stress. C ompX mRNA levels in wild-type, ΔcyaR, ΔmicA, ΔoxyS, Δhfq and ΔryhB strains of S. Typhimurium 14028 s were measured by qRT-PCR. Strains were exposed to 2 mM H2O2 for 20 min (red bars); the control had no treatment (white bars). The graph represents the average of 5 independent experiments (mean ± SD or SE?)

Moreover, the amount of ompX transcript significantly increases in the wild-type strain after ROS-induced stress, but not in the isogenic mutant strains for each sRNA (Fig. 3C), suggesting a role in the regulation of the porin during ROS-resistance. The results suggest that CyaR, MicA, and OxyS are required to maintain ompX levels under oxidative stress 20 min post-treatment, indicating that at least partially, this mechanism of survival to ROS-induced stress is MicA-, CyaR- and OxyS-dependent.

To evaluate the post-transcriptional regulation of the ompX mRNA in response to peroxide stress, we assessed ompX expression after treating bacteria with rifampicin during 20 min and measured expression at 5 min intervals. Rifampicin is an antibiotic that affects the RNA polymerase, specifically the elongation process; therefore, changes in mRNA content after inhibiting mRNA production are due to post-transcriptional processes [48]. This approach enabled us to generate more evidence regarding the post-transcriptional regulation of OmpX under ROS-related stress, by using an antibiotic that inhibits RNA polymerase and observing changes in mRNA production associated with post-transcriptional processes. Also, as controls we measured the effect of rifampicin on the wild-type strain and found that there is a significant decrease in the stability and amount of ompX expression (Additional file 3: Fig. S1). Moreover, we found that adding 5 µg/mL rifampicin reduced the levels of transcripts (Additional file 4: Fig. S2), validating the use of this approach to measure ompX expression under ROS stress. The results indicate that there is no difference regarding stability and amount of ompX in the control conditions with (Fig. 4A) or without (Fig. 4B) the antibiotic treatment. However, once bacteria were under ROS-induced stress, we found a statistically significant decrease in the amount of ompX transcripts in all mutant strains compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 4C). Using the rifampicin treatment, we determined that the decreased amount of transcript of the mutant strains compared to the wild-type is a consequence of the activity of the sRNA during post-transcriptional regulation, as the levels detected in the wild-type strains are significantly higher than those in the strains that lack the genes for the different sRNA tested.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of rifampicin on ompX mRNA under H2O2-induced stress. ompX mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR in the following strains: wild-type, ΔmicA, ΔcyaR, ΔoxyS and Δhfq. When cultures reached an OD600 ≈ 0.4, a pulse of rifampicin (20 µg/ml) was added or not (+ RIF red circles or –RIF inverted blue triangles) to the culture at time 0 min. At each time point, RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods. Post-test Bonferroni: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001, (mean ± SD or SE?)

These findings indicate that MicA, CyaR, OxyS and Hfq exert their regulatory functions once the ROS-induced stress is signaled to the cell inducing the expression of this small porin. Our results allow us to suggest that these three sRNAs (MicA, CyaR and OxyS) are required to stabilize the ompX mRNA in an Hfq-dependent manner, when Salmonella faces hydrogen peroxide-induced stress.

Discussion

Previous studies showed that increased OmpX expression alters the levels of other outer membrane porins, such as OmpC and OmpF, and increases sigma E (σE)-containing RNA polymerase activity [30]. Our results show that under H2O2-induced stress, the levels of ompX transcript increased as well as its promoter activity (Fig. 1A, B), yet there was no increase in OmpX protein levels (Fig. 1C), suggesting that ompX is regulated post-transcriptionally. We found that ompX mRNA is regulated by MicA, OxyS, and CyaR in response to H2O2. Furthermore, we speculate that lower ompX mRNA levels, observed in response to ROS, result from inhibition in translation, given that mRNA stability decreases when translation initiation is halted [8, 13].

Supporting this view, MicA and OxyS affected OmpX protein levels (Additional file 5: Fig. S3). MicA expression, induced by various stresses (some of which can be found inside the phagosome), is regulated by σE, which plays a key role in the oxidative stress response [19, 20, 27, 46] inhibiting the expression of ompW and phoP [46]. Srikumar et al. [44] demonstrated that MicA and OxyS are upregulated in Salmonella during infection of murine macrophages. The former (MicA) can adopt various conformations, and dimerization inhibits its function [46]. OxyS regulates rpoS, encoding an alternative sigma factor required for responses to low temperatures, osmotic shock, and membrane stress [38] as well as fhlA, encoding a protein involved in metabolic stress adaptation [2]. cyaR expression is slightly induced in Yersenia pestis exposed to peroxide stress [50] and is regulated under nutrient deprivation, a condition that can be found in Salmonella-containing vacuoles (SCV; [11, 17, 20]). All this data supports our hypothesis that these sRNAs participate in ROS response and could function to modulate positively ompX transcripts.

Previous studies suggested that protein production depends on three factors: transcription rate, mRNA degradation and mRNA concentration, factors that depend on the cell status [12]. When mRNA levels increase as a function of increased transcription, mRNA stability is strongly affected. Thus, mRNA stability depends on mRNA concentration [33], among other factors. In the same study, the authors suggest that mRNA levels must reach an equilibrium imposed by the condition and energetic status of the cell, a way to control and reduce the energetic cost associated with the production of new proteins [33].

OmpX is essential for invasion of various bacterial species such as Enterobacter, Yersinia, and Cronobacter [9, 24, 25], and for iron homeostasis in E. coli [28]. Therefore, fine regulation of OmpX under oxidative stress could be an adaptation to the stress encountered inside macrophages, where the bacteria attempt to balance the influx of essential metabolites with the uptake of ROS through this porin. Recently, it has been found that the OmpX porin is involved in biofilm formation and curli production [26]. Thus, these critical roles require fine regulation in response to specific conditions that enable bacteria to adapt efficiently. Further studies are necessary to determine the specific role of this protein during the oxidative stress, including other strategies such as antisense RNA, proteomic and in silico analyses of the structural relationships among all molecules.

Conclusions

Our results show that ompX mRNA is regulated in response to H2O2 by the sRNAs CyaR, MicA and OxyS. These data represent a step forward in this area and provide additional insights into the complex regulation of ompX in response to H2O2-induced stress, a physiologically relevant condition encountered by S. Typhimurium during its infection cycle.

Availability of data and materials

All data is available upon request.

Abbreviations

ompX :

Outer membrane porin X

mRNA:

Messenger Ribonucleic Acid

sRNA:

Small Ribonucleic Acid

S.Typhimurium:

Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium

O2 :

Superoxide anion

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

RIF:

Rifampicin

LB:

Lennox Broth

OD:

Optical density

CFU:

Colony forming Units

GFP:

Green Fluorescence Protein

References

  1. Altuvia S, Weinstein-Fischer D, Zhang A, Postow L, Storz G. A small, stable RNA induced by oxidative stress: role as a pleiotropic regulator and antimutator. Cell. 1997;90:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80312-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altuvia S, Zhang A, Argaman L, Tiwari A, Storz G. The Escherichia coli OxyS regulatory RNA represses fhlA translation by blocking ribosome binding. EMBO J. 1998;17:6069–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.20.6069.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbosa TM, Levy SB. Differential expression of over 60 chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli by constitutive expression of MarA. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3467–74. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.12.3467-3474.2000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Busch A, Richter AS, Backofen R. IntaRNA: efficient prediction of bacterial sRNA targets incorporating target site accessibility and seed regions. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2849–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabezas CE, Briones AC, Aguirre C, Pardo-Esté C, Castro-Severyn J, Salinas CR, Baquedano MS, Hidalgo AA, Fuentes J, A., Morales, E. H., Meneses, C. A., Castro-Nallar, E., & Saavedra, C. P. The transcription factor SlyA from Salmonella Typhimurium regulates genes in response to hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite. Res Microbiol. 2018;169(6):263–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2018.04.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadieux PA, Burton J, Devillard E, Reid G. Lactobacillus by-products inhibit the growth and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60(Suppl 6):13–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Calderón IL, Morales E, Caro NJ, Chahúan CA, Collao B, Gil F, Villareal JM, Ipinza F, Mora G, Saavedra CP. Response regulator ArcA of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium downregulates expression of OmpD, a porin facilitating uptake of hydrogen peroxide. Res Microbiol. 2011;162:214–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2010.11.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpousis AJ, Luisi BF, McDowall KJ. Endonucleolytic initiation of mRNA decay in Escherichia coli. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009;85:91–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6603(08)00803-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Kort G, Bolton A, Martin G, Stephen J, van de Klundert JA. Invasion of rabbit ileal tissue by Enterobacter cloacae varies with the concentration of OmpX in the outer membrane. Infect Immunol. 1994;62:4722–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De la Cruz MÁ, Calva E. The complexities of porin genetic regulation. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;18:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000274309.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Lay N, Gottesman S. The Crp-activated small noncoding regulatory RNA CyaR (RyeE) links nutritional status to group behavior. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:461–76. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01157-08.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dressaire C, Picard F, Redon E, Loubière P, Queinnec I, Girbal L, Cocaign-Bousquet M. Role of mRNA stability during bacterial adaptation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3): e59059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059059.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dreyfus M. Killer and protective ribosomes. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009;85(1):423–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6603(08)00811-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dupont M, Dé E, Chollet R, Chevalier J, Pagès J-M. Enterobacter aerogenes OmpX, a cation-selective channel mar - and osmo-regulated. FEBS Lett. 2004;569:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.047.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eiamphungporn W, Prachayasittikul S, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. Development of bacterial cell-based system for intracellular antioxidant activity screening assay using green fluorescence protein (GFP) reporter. Afr J Biotech. 2012;11:6934–45. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3790.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson S, Lucchini S, Thompson A, Rhen M, Hinton JC. Unravelling the biology of macrophage infection by gene expression profiling of intracellular Salmonella enterica. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47(1):103–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03313.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Lay N, Gottesman S. The Crp-activated small noncoding regulatory RNA CyaR (RyeE) links nutritional status to group behavior. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(2):461–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gil F, Ipinza F, Fuentes J, Fumeron R, Villarreal JM, Aspée A, Mora G, Vásquez CC, Saavedra CP. The ompW (porin) gene mediates methyl viologen (paraquat) efflux in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Res Microbiol. 2007;158:529–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2007.05.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gogol EB, Rhodius VA, Papenfort K, Vogel J, Gross CA. Small RNAs endow a transcriptional activator with essential repressor functions for single-tier control of a global stress regulon. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:12875–80. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109379108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hébrard M, Viala JPM, Meresse S, Barras F, Aussel L. Redundant hydrogen peroxide scavengers contribute to Salmonella virulence and oxidative stress resistance. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:4605–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00144-09.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Imlay JA. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:443. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansen J, Eriksen M, Kallipolitis B, Valentin-Hansen P. Down-regulation of outer membrane proteins by noncoding RNAs: unraveling the cAMP–CRP- and σE-dependent CyaR–ompX regulatory case. J Mol Biol. 2008;383:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kakoschke TK, Kakoschke SC, Zeuzem C, Bouabe H, Adler K, Heesemann J, Rossier O. The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for virulence and modulates the expression of four adhesins in Yersinia enterocolitica. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim KP, Choi J, Lim JA, Lee J, Hwang S, Ryu S. Outer membrane proteins A (OmpA) and X (OmpX) are essential for basolateral invasion of Cronobacter sakazakii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:5188–98. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02498-09.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolodziejek AM, Sinclair DJ, Seo KS, Schnider DR, Deobald CF, Rohde HN, Viall AK, Minnich SS, Hovde CJ, Minnich SA, Bohach GA. Phenotypic characterization of OmpX, an Ail homologue of Yersinia pestis KIM. Microbiology. 2007;153:2941–51. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2006/005694-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li B, Huang Q, Cui A, Liu X, Hou B, Zhang L, Liu M, Meng X, Li S. Overexpression of outer membrane protein X (OmpX) compensates for the effect of TolC inactivation on biofilm formation and curli production in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00208.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Overall CC, Johnson RC, Jones MB, McDermott JE, Heffron F, Cambronne ED, Adkins JN. ChIP-seq analysis of the σE regulon of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium reveals new genes implicated in heat shock and oxidative stress response. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0138466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138466.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin X, Wu L, Li H, Wang S, Peng X. Downregulation of Tsx and OmpW and upregulation of OmpX are required for iron homeostasis in Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1235–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr7005928.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maisnier-Patin K, Malissard M, Jeannin P, Haeuw JF, Corbière JC, Hoeffel G, Gauchat JF, Nguyen T, Saez JM, Delneste Y. The outer membrane protein X from Escherichia coli exhibits immune properties. Vaccine. 2003;21:3765–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00316-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mecsas J, Welch R, Erickson JW, Gross CA. Identification and characterization of an outer membrane protein, OmpX, in Escherichia coli that is homologous to a family of outer membrane proteins including Ail of Yersinia enterocolitica. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:799–804. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.3.799-804.1995.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morales EH, Calderón IL, Collao B, Gil F, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Saavedra CP. Hypochlorous acid and hydrogen peroxide-induced negative regulation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ompW by the response regulator ArcA. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morales EH, Collao B, Desai PT, Calderón IL, Gil F, Luraschi R, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Saavedra CP. Probing the ArcA regulon under aerobic/ROS conditions in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:626. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-626.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nouaille S, Mondeil S, Finoux AL, Moulis C, Girbal L, Cocaign-Bousquet M. The stability of an mRNA is influenced by its concentration: a potential physical mechanism to regulate gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(20):11711–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx781.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Papenfort K, Pfeiffer V, Lucchini S, Sonawane A, Hinton JC, Vogel J. Systematic deletion of Salmonella small RNA genes identifies CyaR, a conserved CRP-dependent riboregulator of OmpX synthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68(4):890–906.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pardo-Esté C, Hidalgo AA, Aguirre C, Briones AC, Cabezas CE, Castro-Severyn J, Fuentes JA, Opazo CM, Riedel CA, Otero C, Pacheco R, Valvano MA, Saavedra CP. The ArcAB two-component regulatory system promotes resistance to reactive oxygen species and systemic infection by Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9): e0203497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203497.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pardo-Esté C, Castro-Severyn J, Krüger GI, Cabezas CE, Briones AC, Aguirre C, Saavedra CP. The transcription factor ArcA modulates Salmonella’s metabolism in response to neutrophil hypochlorous acid-mediated stress. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pham OH, McSorley SJ. Protective host immune responses to Salmonella infection. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:101–10. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.98.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Repoila F, Majdalani N, Gottesman S. Small non-coding RNAs, co-ordinators of adaptation processes in Escherichia coli: the RpoS paradigm. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48:855–61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03454.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Richards GR, Vanderpool CK. Molecular call and response: the physiology of bacterial small RNAs. Biochimica Biophysica Acta Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2011;1809:525–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.07.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenberger CM, Gallo RL, Finlay BB. Interplay between antibacterial effectors: a macrophage antimicrobial peptide impairs intracellular Salmonella replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101:2422–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0304455101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Seaver LC, Imlay J. Hydrogen peroxide fluxes and compartmentalization inside growing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7182–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.24.7182-7189.2001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sittka A, Pfeiffer V, Tedin K, Vogel J. The RNA chaperone Hfq is essential for the virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63(1):193–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05489.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sousa-Lopes A, Antunes F, Cyrne L, Marinho HS. Decreased cellular permeability to H2O2 protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in stationary phase against oxidative stress. FEBS Lett. 2004;578:152–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.10.090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Srikumar S, Kröger C, Hébrard M, Colgan A, Owen SV, Sivasankaran SK, Cameron ADS, Hokamp K, Hinton JC. RNA-seq brings new insights to the intra-macrophage transcriptome of Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(11): e1005262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005262.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Uzzau S, Figueroa-Bossi N, Rubino S, Bossi L. Epitope tagging of chromosomal genes in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(26):15264–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261348198.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Puyvelde S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. Experimental approaches to identify small RNAs and their diverse roles in bacteria - what we have learnt in one decade of MicA research. Microbiology Open. 2015;4:699–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.263.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Vogt J, Schulz GE. The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence. Structure. 1999;7:1301–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(00)80063-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wehrli W, Knüsel F, Schmid K, Staehelin M. Interaction of rifamycin with bacterial RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968;61(2):667–73. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.61.2.667.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wright PR, Georg J, Mann M, Sorescu DA, Richter AS, Lott S, Kleinkauf R, Hess WR, Backofen R. CopraRNA and IntaRNA: predicting small RNA targets, networks and interaction domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W119–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku359.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Yan Y, Su S, Meng X, Ji X, Qu Y, Liu Z, Wang X, Cui Y, Deng Z, Zhou D, Jiang W, Yang R, Han Y. Determination of sRNA expressions by RNA-seq in Yersinia pestis grown in vitro and during infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9): e74495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074495.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang A, Wassarman KM, Rosenow C, Tjaden BC, Storz G, Gottesman S. Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50(4):1111–24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03734.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Miguel Valvano and Linda Kenney for special contributions during manuscript revision. We also thank Michael McClelland who kindly provided the strains used.

Funding

FONDECYT Grants 1160315 and 1210633; UNAB DI-3-17/N; ECOS 170023; ACB CONICYT Scholarship #21160858; CCM CONICYT Scholarship #21180743; JCS ANID Postdoctoral Fellowship 3210156; CPE CONICYT Scholarship #21150592.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CPS and EHM conceived and designed the study. ACB, DL, AC, CEC, GIK, MSB, CRS, ME carried out all experiments and procedures. CPS, JCS, CPE contributed to analyses and the writing of the manuscript. CPS, RF, AAH provided materials, critical advice, and analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. P. Saavedra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Does not apply.

Consent for publication

All authors have consent for the publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Primers used in this work.

Additional file 3: Figure S1.

Effect of rifampicin on ompX mRNA under H2O2-induced stress in the wild-type strain. ompX mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR. When cultures reached an OD600 ≈ 0.4, a pulse of rifampicin (20 µg/ml) was added or not (+ RIF red line or –RIF blue line) to the culture at time 0 min. At each time point, RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR as described in “Materials and Methods”. Post-test Bonferroni: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.0001, (mean ± SD or SE?).

Additional file 4: Figure S2.

Effect of rifampicin concentration on ompX. The ompX mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR. When cultures reached an OD600 ≈ 0.4, a pulse of rifampicin (0, 2.5, 5 and 10 µg/mL), was added. At each time point, RNA was isolated and subjected to qRT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods.

Additional file 5:

Figure S3. Production of OmpX::Flag protein in S. Typhimurium after exposure to H2O2. Outer-membrane fractions of each strain were isolated after culture under control or 2 mM H2O2 treatment (20 min in Lennox broth at 37 ºC). Lanes 1 and 2: ompX::3xflag control and H2O2-treated. Lanes 3 and 4: ΔcyaR ompX::3xflag control and H2O2-treated. Lanes 5 and 6: ΔmicA ompX::3xflag control and H2O2-treated. Lanes 7 and 8: ΔoxyS ompX::3xflag control and H2O2-treated. Lanes 9 and 10: Δhfq ompX::3xflag control and H2O2-treated. Total protein extracts (100 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The assay shown is representative of three biological replicates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briones, A.C., Lorca, D., Cofre, A. et al. Genetic regulation of the ompX porin of Salmonella Typhimurium in response to hydrogen peroxide stress. Biol Res 55, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00377-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00377-3

Keywords

  • ompX
  • Translational regulation
  • Transcriptional regulation
  • H2O2 stress