Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular structures and functional exploration of NDA family genes respond tolerant to alkaline stress in Gossypium hirsutum L.

Biological Research volume 55, Article number: 4 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The internal NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (NDA) gene family was a member of the NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (ND) gene family, mainly involved in the non-phosphorylated respiratory pathways in mitochondria and played crucial roles in response to abiotic stress.

Methods

The whole genome identification, structure analysis and expression pattern of NDA gene family were conducted to analyze the NDA gene family.

Results

There were 51, 52, 26, and 24 NDA genes identified in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii, respectively. According to the structural characteristics of genes and traits of phylogenetic tree, we divided the NDA gene family into 8 clades. Gene structure analysis showed that the NDA gene family was relatively conservative. The four Gossypium species had good collinearity, and segmental duplication played an important role in the evolution of the NDA gene family. Analysis of cis-elements showed that most GhNDA genes contained cis-elements related to light response and plant hormones (ABA, MeJA and GA). The analysis of the expression patterns of GhNDA genes under different alkaline stress showed that GhNDA genes were actively involved in the response to alkaline stress, possibly through different molecular mechanisms. By analyzing the existing RNA-Seq data after alkaline stress, it was found that an NDA family gene GhNDA32 was expressed, and then theGhNDA32 was silenced by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). By observing the phenotype, we found that the wilting degree of silenced plants was much higher than that of the control plant after alkaline treatment, suggesting that GhNDA32 gene was involved in the response to alkaline stress.

Conclusions

In this study, GhNDAs participated in response to alkaline stress, especially NaHCO3 stress. It was of great significance for the future research on the molecular mechanism of NDA gene family in responding to abiotic stresses.

Introduction

With the continuous increase in the area of salt-alkaline land worldwide, salt-alkaline stress had become an important abiotic stress that restricted plant growth and development. Salt-alkaline stress was divided into salt stress and alkaline stress. Salt stress was mainly caused by neutral salts such as NaCl and Na2SO4, and alkaline stress was usually caused by Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 [1]. Previous studies found that alkaline stress was more harmful than salt stress [2]. At present, little was known about the mechanism of crop tolerance to alkaline stress. Therefore, it was very important to explore the mechanism of alkaline stress.

Mitochondria were an important place for energy production in plants, previous research found that plant mitochondria contained a complex electron transport chain, in which there was an alternative respiratory pathway (AP), and the difference of the AP was that it was not linked to energy conservation [3]. It was well known that most of the energy produced by plants come from mitochondria, at the meantime, plant mitochondria were also a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS), studies showed that the presence of the AP could prevent over-reduction of the electron transport chain (ETC), thereby minimizing the generation of ROS and protecting plants from oxidative damage [4, 5, 6]. In addition, AP actively participated in the response to abiotic stress, such as temperature, nutrients, heavy metals, high light, drought and oxidative stress [7].

AP contained two important components, the alternative oxidase (AOX) and type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases (NDs). Expression of the AOX genes was highly responsive to abiotic and biotic stress, as well as dysfunctions in respiratory metabolism [8], and ROS may be an important signal controlling AOX expression [9]. In plants, fungi and some certain bacteria, there were many type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases (NDs), which were small single proteins attached to either side of the inner membrane [10]. In potato, St-nda1 gene was shown to be tightly bound to the inner surface of the mitochondrial inner membrane, while St-ndb1 was loosely bound to the outer mitochondrial membrane [11, 12]. In Arabidopsis, the NDs could be divided into three subgroups, AtNDA (1, 2), AtNDB (1-4), and AtNDC1, AtNDA1, 2 and AtNDC1 were identified as encoding internal NAD(P)H dehydrogenases, whereas AtNDB1-4 encode external NAD(P)H dehydrogenases [13, 14].

NDA genes, belonged to the subclass of NDs, played a vital role in response to abiotic stress. Studies found that they were involved in the response to light, cold and Pi stress. The expression of nda1 in Arabidopsis was dependent on light and circadian regulation, which played an important role in the photosynthesis and other respiratory NADH oxidation [14]. In potato, the immunodetectable NDA1 protein abundance and the internal rotenone insensitive NADH dehydrogenase activity were all affected by light, suggesting that the nda1 gene was involved in photosynthetically associated processes, most likely photorespiration [15]. After cold treatment, potato leaves could induce the production of oxidase and ROS, and the expression of NDA1 gene decreased, which may be related to the redox function of NDA expression [16]. Previous research found that low-level expression of NDAs could lead to the delayed growth and restrict citric acid cycle reactions but apparently had no effect on photosynthesis [17]. In Arabidopsis, a non-phosphorylating mitochondrial electron transport chain consisting of NDA2, NDB2 and AOX was synthesized to maintain respiratory electron flow through the mitochondrial electron transport chain during Pi stress [18]. However, whether NDA family genes responded to alkaline stress in cotton had not been reported, so it was meaningful to study it.

Cotton is an important fiber crop and a model crop for studying polyploidy and evolution [19]. Gossypium hirsutum (G. hirsutum) and Gossypium barbadense (G. barbadense) are the two most widely cultivated allotetraploid cotton species in the world, which are formed by inter-genomic hybridization of Gossypium arboreum (G. arboreum) and Gossypium raimondii (G. raimondii) [20]. Cotton is also a pioneer crop in salt-alkaline land, with a certain degree of salt-alkali tolerance, and is a common crop for us to study salt-alkaline stress [21]. Exploring the alkaline stress response genes will help promote the cotton’s tolerance to alkaline stress. From the RNA-Seq data, an NDA gene GhNDA32 was found to respond to alkaline stress, so it is necessary to analyze its phylogenetic relationship and study the alkaline stress tolerance of the family. This study aimed to explore gene structure, evolutionary relationship, expression pattern, and cis-acting elements of NDA family. An NDA gene belonged to clade a, GhNDA32, was isolated and characterized, and we performed a preliminary analysis of the expression pattern of GhNDA32. This study provided potential candidate genes for cotton gene functional verification.

Results

Identification of NDA proteins

To identify the NDA gene family in cotton, a local blast on the proteome of the G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii was performed, and genome with the hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of PF07992 was used as a query condition. Redundant sequences were detected and deleted by manual, 51, 52, 26, 24 genes were identified in G. hirsutum (GhNDAs), G. barbadense (GbNDAs), G. arboreum (GaNDAs), and G. raimondii (GrNDAs), respectively (Fig. 1). Statistical analysis of the number of genes in four Gossypium species showed that the number of NDA genes in two tetraploid cotton species (G. hirsutum and G. barbadense) were almost double of diploid cotton species (G. arboreum and G. raimondii). To understand the genes of NDA family more conveniently, genes were renamed according to the position of genes on chromosomes. GhNDA1-GhNDA51 was assigned for G. hirsutum, GbNDA1-GbNDA52 for G. barbadense, GaNDA1-GaNDA26 for G. arboreum and GrNDA1-GrNDA24 for G. raimondii, other species were also renamed according to this rule (Additional file 2: Table S2). Subsequently, the physical properties of the GhNDAs genes were analyzed and predicted, including protein length, protein molecular weight (MWs), isoelectric point(pI), protein hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity analysis and subcellular location (Additional file 3: Table S3). For G. hirsutum, all of the 51 genes encoded proteins ranging from 357 (GhNDA35) to 2209 (GhNDA48) amino acids, with an average of 603.922 amino acids. The MWs varied from 38.742 (GhNDA35) kDa to 242.628 (GhNDA22) kDa with an average of 66.107 kDa and pI varied from 5.553 (GhNDA36) to 10.024 (GhNDA35) with a mean of 7.909. The values of the grand average of hydropathy were all negative, which proved that the proteins of NDA family were hydrophilic. The prediction of subcellular localization showed that there were 20 genes located in the mitochondria, 17 in cytoplasmic and 14 in chloroplast.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of NDA genes among twelve plant species

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis of NDA genes

To understand the evolutionary relationship of NDA genes among four Gossypium species and other plant species, multiple sequence alignment of 247 protein sequences (including 51 in G. hirsutum, 52 in G. barbadense, 26 in G. arboreum, 24 in G. raimondii, 23 in Arabidopsis thaliana (A. thaliana), 12 in Solanum tuberosum (S. tubersum), 19 in Glycine max (G. max), 11 in Oryza sativa (O. sativa), 8 in Populus trichocarpa (P. trichocarpa), 5 in Theobroma cacao (T. cacao), 9 in Vitisvinifera Genoscope (V. vinifera) and 7 in Zea mays (Z. mays)) was performed and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7 software based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. The phylogenetic tree was subsequently decorated using EvolView (https://www.evolgenius.info/evolview) (Fig. 2B). According to previous method of dividing the phylogenetic tree [22], we divided NDA genes into 8 clades based on the sequence similarity, tree topology and structural characteristics in each sequence. The clade a had the most extensive genes, of which 14 were G. hirsutum, 14 were G. barbadense, 7 were G. arboreum, and 6 were G. raimondii, 7 were A. thaliana, 3 were S. tubersum, 2 were O. sativa, 2 were G. max, 1 was Z. mays, 1 was V. vinifera, 1 was T. cacao and 1 was P. trichocarpa, respectively. All species had gene pairs derived from the same node, demonstrating that the NDA genes in all species had experienced gene duplication events that causing the expansion of the NDA gene family. The number of genes in G. barbadense and G. hirsutum was much higher than that of other species, indicating that the NDA gene family in two allotetraploid species showed a large-scale expansion during the evolution process. These results indicated that gene duplication was the main reason for the expansion of the NDA gene family in cotton.

In addition, to study the relationship between the common ancestors of diploid cotton (G. arboreum and G. raimondii) and allotetraploid cotton (G. hirsutum and G. barbadense), NJ tree of four Gossypium species was constructed (Fig. 2A). With reference to the classification of subgroups, we found that the NDA genes of the four Gossypium species were distributed in each subgroup, and each branch contained proteins from diploid and allotetraploid Gossypium species and the NDA genes in tetraploid cotton were almost twice as many as diploid cotton in each subgroup.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic trees of NDA genes in four Gossypium species and other eight species using MEGA 7 by the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method. A Phylogenetic relationship of the 153 identified NDA genes from four Gossypium species, B Phylogenetic relationship of the 247 identified NDA genes from four Gossypium species and other eight species. The 8 major phylogenetic subgroups, designated as a to g, are marked with different colored backgrounds

Full size image

Chromosomal location of four Gossypium species

To study the chromosomal distribution of NDA genes in four Gossypium species, the physical location of these genes on chromosomes was drew. 149 out of 153 NDA genes were distributed to their specific chromosomes, while the remaining only 4 NDA genes, GhNDA20, GhNDA23, GhNDA49 and GaNDA26, were not located on any one chromosome because they were located on scaffold (Fig. 3). This result showed that the genetic evolution process of NDA genes was mature and stable. There was no GhNDA gene on Chr8 of G. hirsutum At sub-genome (GhAt), Chr5 of G. hirsutum Dt sub-genome (GhAt), Chr1, 5, 8 of G. arboreum, Chr4 of G. raimondii, Chr5 of G. barbadense (Fig. 3A, B, E, F), which may be related to the chromosome deletion of G. hirsutum or the translocation of large fragments during the evolution. The distribution of NDA genes on 13 chromosomes of different cotton species was uneven, and the number of each chromosome did not show a significant positive correlation with its length.

Among 52 identified NDA genes of G. hirsutum, 3 genes were located on scaffold (Fig. 3A, B). Chr9 in GhAt had most NDA genes, with a total of 4 genes, and Chr9 in GhDt had most NDA genes, with a total of 5 genes (Fig. 4). In G. barbadense, Chr9 in GbAt and GbDt had most NDA genes, with a total of 5 genes, which was similar to the situation of G. hirsutum (Fig. 4). Among 26 identified NDA genes of G. arboreum, 25 genes were distributed on 13 chromosomes while one gene was found at scaffold (Fig. 3E). In G. arboreum, Chr9 had most NDA genes with a total of 5 genes while 5 genes in Chr6 in G. raimondii (Fig. 3E, F).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Chromosomal location of NDA genes from four Gossypium species. A Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. hirsutum At sub-genome (GhAt), B Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. hirsutum Dt sub-genome (GhDt), C Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. barbadense At sub-genome (GbAt), D Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. barbadense Dt sub-genome (GbDt), E Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. arboreum (Ga), F Chromosomal location of NDA genes on chromosomes in G. raimondii (Gr) genes. The gene ID on the right side of each chromosome correspond to the approximate locations of each NDA gene. The scale of the genome size was given on the left. Red lines represented tandem gene duplications

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Number of NDA genes in each chromosome

Full size image

Gene structure and motif composition analysis

To further examine the structural characteristics of the NDA genes in G. hirsutum, the conserved motifs of NDA proteins were predicted by using the online website MEME (http://meme-suite.org/). 10 conserved motifs were found (named motif 1 to motif 10) and the results were represented in schematic diagrams (Fig. 5B). The number of motifs was different in each protein, varying from 3 to 9. NDA members within the same clade were found to have a similar motif composition, which was conspicuous in class a, b, c, h, f. All the proteins belonged to the h and f subgroups contained motif 8, but the other clades did not had motif 8. Each clade had motif 1, and only clade a had the motif 4, while the other clade did not have, which may be the reason that clade a had obtained the special motif 4 through evolution or other clade had lacked specific conserved motifs during evolution. The different compositions of the motifs may represent the diversity of function. The clade a, b, c, h, f, h showed the similar motif arrangements, indicating that the protein was conserved within a specific subgroup. However, the functions of these conserved motifs remained to be further verified.

The diversity of gene structure was mainly influenced by the evolution of multigene families [23]. To further explore the diversity of NDA gene’s structure, the characteristics of exon-intron structures were analyzed. As can be seen from Fig. 5C, NDA genes of the same subfamilies had similar intron-exon arrangement, and different subfamilies displayed variation in exon-intron structures. The structures of NDA genes can be divided into two types, with intron less and multiple-exon. In G. hirsutum, the number of exons of all NDA genes varied from 1 to 22. Clade b had the least exon number (4), while Clade d had the most exon number (22). It was noting that one gene GhNDA24 belonged to clade h had only one exon, no intron.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phylogenetic analysis, conserved motifs, and gene structures of GhNDA genes. A Phylogenetic tree of GhNDA genes, the 8 major phylogenetic subgroups, designated as a to g, are marked with different colored backgrounds, B Conserved motifs of GhNDA genes, C Gene structures of GhNDA genes. Green boxes indicated exons; black lines indicated introns

Full size image

Gene duplication and collinearity analysis

In general, plants had a higher rate of gene replication than other eukaryotes. Whole genome duplication, segmental duplication, and tandem duplication were considered to be the main causes of expansion in plant gene family [24]. Segmental duplications in the genome region may result in the expansion of the gene family [25]. To investigate the evolutionary process of NDA genes, the gene duplication pattern of four Gossypium species was performed using MCScanX. In this study, a total of 361 gene pairs were identified as whole genome duplication, 2 gene pairs were the tandem duplication and 102 were the segmental duplication (Fig. 6). Among the 2 tandem repeat gene pairs, one was GaNDA6/7, the other was GrNDA17/18 (Fig. 3E, F). The collinearity gene pairs between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense were the most among the 10 groups, with 80 gene pairs, while G. raimondii and G. raimondii had the least, with only 3 gene pairs, which was in line with the comparison of the number of diploid and tetraploid genes. From these results, we presumed that whole genome duplication and segmental duplication played an important role in the evolution of NDA gene family.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Syntenic relationship of duplicated NDA gene pairs from four Gossypium species (G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii). Chromosomal lines represented by various colors indicates the syntenic regions around the NDA genes, the duplication pairs were connected by lines. The heat map in the circle represented the density of genes on chromosome

Full size image

Calculation of non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitution rates during evolution

To study the selection pressure of duplicated gene pairs in the evolutionary process, Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks of 416 homologous gene pairs from 10 combinations of four Gossypium species were determined, including Ga-Ga, Ga-Gb, Ga-Gr, Gb-Gb, Gb-Gr, Gh-Ga, Gh-Gb, Gh-Gh, Gh-Gr and Gr-Gr (Additional file 4: Table S4). Among them, 2 (0.48%) duplicated gene pairs with Ka/Ks ratio > 1, which occurred in Gh-Ga and Gh-Gb, respectively, indicating that these genes may experience relatively rapid evolution and undergo the positive selection pressure. 414 (99.52%) duplicated gene pairs with Ka/Ks ratio < 1, exhibiting pure selection (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Analysis of non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) ratio. A Prediction of number of duplicated gene pairs involved in different combinations from four Gossypium species, B Ka and Ks divergence values for (Gh-Gh), (Gb-Gb), (Ga-Ga), (Gr–Gr), (Gh-Gb), (Ga-Gr), (Ga-Gh), (Ga-Gb), (Gr-Gh) and (Gr-Gb) are shown in circular chart. Different colors represent Ka/Ks gene pairs of 10 groups

Full size image

Gene ontology (GO) annotation analysis of GhNDAs

To further study the functions of GhNDAs, three major categories, including biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, were analyzed via CottonFGD (Fig. 8). According to GO analysis, we found that the molecular functions were mainly involved in oxidoreductase activity (51), flavin adenine dinucleotide binding (46) and NADP binding (6). Biological processes were mainly in the following three aspects, oxidation-reduction process (51), cell redox homeostasis (14) and glutathione metabolic process (5). The cellular components were mainly in cytoplasm (16).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Gene ontology (GO) analysis of GhNDA genes

Full size image

Analysis of promoters and expression profiles of GhNDA genes under alkaline stress

Cis-acting elements played vital roles in the response to abiotic stress [26]. Some plant hormones such as ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and gibberellin (GA) were necessary for plants to adapt to abiotic stress, and some transcription factors could combine with hormone-related cis-acting elements to regulate the expression of genes [27, 28]. To identify putative cis-acting elements in the NDA genes, the region of 2000 bp upstream of the start codon of the NDA genes was selected, and the promoter region related to stress and plant hormones was extracted. In this study, most GhNDA genes in G. hirsutum contained cis-acting elements related to plant hormones (ABA, MeJA, GA,) and various stresses (low temperature, light and wound stress) (Fig. 9B), the cis-acting elements of NDA genes in the same subfamily were different despite had similar motifs, and therefore their functions may differ. Most of NDA genes contained cis-acting elements related to plant hormones and various stresses. GhNDA5 had 11 cis-acting elements (3 were light responsiveness, 1 were abscisic acid responsiveness, 3 were MeJA responsiveness, 3 were wound responsiveness), whereas GhNDA33 and GhNDA11 had only one cis-acting element (light responsiveness). Almost all GhNDA genes were involved in MeJA cis-responsive elements except clade g.

It was found that gene expression levels were highly correlated with gene function [29]. We detected the expression pattern of GhNDA genes under different stresses (AS, SAS) by analyzing RNA-seq data. By analyzing the heat map, we found that only four genes, GhNDA8, GhNDA14, GhNDA32 and GhNDA40, only responded to SAS stress, GhNDA1, GhNDA22, GhNDA26 and GhNDA48 only responded to AS stress, GhNDA11, GhNDA19, GhNDA25, GhNDA35 and GhNDA51 responded to both AS and SAS stress in roots (Fig. 9C). In addition, we found that most of the gene expression levels in leaves were higher than those in roots (Fig. 9C). The expression patterns of NDA genes in roots and leaves were different, which required us to use qRT-PCR to further verify the differences in gene expression.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Analysis of promoters and differentially expressed genes of GhNDA. A Phylogenetic relationship of GhNDA genes, the 8 major phylogenetic subgroups, designated as a to g, are marked with different colored backgrounds, B Cis-acting elements in promoters of GhNDA genes, C Heatmap of DEGs of GhNDA genes under SAS and AS stress. SAS: 125 mM NaHCO3 (pH = 8.5); AS: pH = 8.5 NaOH

Full size image

Expression analysis of GhNDA genes under different alkaline stress

After being exposed to AS and SAS stress, qRT-PCR assays were conducted to explore the expression patterns of GhNDA genes in roots and leaves (Figs. 10, 11). 18 genes were picked up randomly from the NDA genes actively responding to SAS and AS stress for further analysis through qRT-PCR. We found that the GhNDA genes all responded to alkaline stress, although they showed different up-regulation relationships. In addition, GhNDA7, GhNDA8, GhNDA48 showed extremely significant up-regulation under AS stress in roots, GhNDA1, GhNDA22, GhNDA25, GhNDA35, GhNDA40, GhNDA50, GhNDA51 showed extremely significant up-regulation under AS stress in leaves. Almost all genes were responsive to SAS stress in roots except GhNDA1 and GhNDA50. At the same time, gene expression in leaves also showed a similar trend to that in roots, except GhNDA1, GhNDA25, GhNDA32, GhNDA40 and GhNDA50. Therefore, we believed that most GhNDA genes responded to both AS and SAS stress.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Expression analysis of GhNDA genes in response to different alkaline stress in roots using qRT-PCR assays. Cotton seedlings were treated with 125 mM NaHCO3 for 12 h. The mean values were from three independent biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed by Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01)

Full size image
Fig. 11
figure 11

Expression analysis of GhNDA genes in response to different alkaline stress in leaves using qRT-PCR assays. Cotton seedlings were treated with 125 mM NaHCO3 for 12 h. The mean values were from three independent biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed by Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01)

Full size image

Cotton plants with GhNDA gene silenced by VIGS were sensitive to NaHCO3 alkaline stress

To verify whether the GhNDA genes responded to alkaline stress, a high-expressed gene GhD06G1340.1 (GhNDA32) from transcriptome data was selected for further study. First, we tested the tissue specificity of the GhNDA32 gene, and the results showed that the relative expression in roots was the highest, followed by leaves and stems (Fig. 12A). Then we analyzed the relative expression of GhNDA32 gene at different time periods treated with alkaline stress (125 mM NaHCO3) and it showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, while reached the peak at 6 h. After that, a VIGS silencing vector pYL156: GhNDA32 was constructed, when the seedlings carrying pYL156: PDS appeared albino phenotype, qRT-PCR was used to detect the expressions of GhNDA32 gene in the pYL156 plants and pYL156: GhNDA32 plants, the results showed that the expression level of GhNDA32 in the pYL156: GhNDA32 was significantly lower than that of the control pYL156 (Fig. 12D), indicating that gene silencing was successful. After treatment with 125 mM NaHCO3, the leaves of the seedlings all appear wilting, and we found that the pYL156: GhNDA32 cotton seedlings wilted more severely than the pYL156 (Fig. 12C). Therefore, GhNDA32 was also involved in the response to alkaline stress.

Fig. 12
figure 12

The phenotype of cotton leaves after virus infection and expression analysis of GhNDA32 under NaHCO3 stress. A Analysis of relative expression of GhNDA32 in roots, stems and leaves, B The relative expression of GhNDA32 in different time periods under SAS stress, C Phenotype of cotton leaves after virus infection, D qRT-PCR for GhNDA32 under SAS stress. CK: No infection, SAS: 125 mM NaHCO3

Full size image

Interaction network of GhNDA32 protein

According to the homologous gene in Arabidopsis, we used STRING database (https://string-db.org/) to construct an interaction network to analyze the function of GhNDA32 protein (Fig. 13). From the Fig. 9, we could conclude that NDA1 protein of Arabidopsis, which was homologous to GhNDA32 protein of G. hirsutum, could interact with AOX1A, AOX1C, AOX2, PUMP1, and CIB22 proteins. By analyzing KEGG pathway of GhNDA32 protein from the transcriptome data, we found that GhNDA32 protein was mainly involved in oxidative phosphorylation (ko00190), so we speculated that GhNDA32 protein interacted with AOX1A, AOX1C, AOX2, PUMP1 and CIB22 proteins, which could remove excess reducing energy and balance the redox poise of the cell, thereby improving the resistance of cotton seedlings to oxidative stress.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Interaction network of GhNDA32 protein. The NDA1 represented the protein AtNDA1 corresponding to the protein in Arabidopsis with the highest homology to GhNDA32

Full size image

Discussion

Cotton is a major cash crop in the world and is also a powerful model for studying genome polyploidization in plants [30]. With the completion of de-novo-assembled genome of G. hirsutum, G. barbadense [31] and G. arboreum [32], this undoubtedly provides us with an important basis for the whole genome analysis of cotton. In the past several years, studies found that the ND family was mainly involved in the response to abiotic stress, such as drought, elevated light treatments and oxidative stress [10, 33], and NDA family genes were mainly in the response to cold stress and photorespiration [15, 34]. However, no systematic study of NDA genes is conducted in cotton, especially under alkaline stress. In this work, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of cotton NDA family and their involvement in alkaline stress.

In this study, 51, 52, 26 and 24 candidate NDA genes were systematically identified in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii, respectively. The NDA genes of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense were almost twice the number of G. arboretum and G. raimondii, which may be the reason that allotetraploid cotton was formed by inter-genomic hybridization of At-genome diploids and Dt-genome diploids, and followed by chromosome doubling [35]. In G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, the number of homologous NDA genes in At and Dt subgenome was identical, so we could infer that the translocations and reverse transcript insertion rarely occurred in the generation of cotton NDA gene family. The distribution of NDA varied greatly among selected plant species, such as 5 in T. cacao, compared with 51 in G. hirsutum, indicating that NDA genes underwent large scale expansion in higher plants. By analyzing the physical properties of GhNDAs, we found that the average MWs of GhNDAs were 66.107 kDa, which were consistent with the situation of the potato and Arabidopsis with the molecular weight of 55–57 kDa [11].

According to phylogenetic characteristics and gene structure, the NDA genes can be divided into 8 clades in four Gossypium species (Fig. 2A), and clade a and clade h had the largest number of NDA genes with 59 and 35, respectively. By analyzing the motif composition of NDA genes in G. hirsutum, it was worth noting that clade a and clade h contained the largest number of motifs, clade a had a specific motif 4 and none of the other clades, while clade h had motif 7 but clade a did not. Gene structure analysis showed that exon number of NDA genes varied greatly from 1 to 22, which might be due to the directional evolution in the function and structure of NDA genes in the process of evolution. There was a strong connection between the intron-exon structure, conserved motifs and phylogenetic tree analysis of the NDA family in G. hirsutum. Therefore, we speculated that the differences in gene structure and motifs led to different branches of the NDA family, and conserved motifs could also reflect the relations of different subgroups. For example, both clade a and f had motif 9, while other clades did not, which may be related that they had acquired some important functions during evolution, and this might be used as an important basis for identifying these two subgroups.

When analyzing the chromosomal location of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, we found that there were 25 NDA genes in GhAt and 27 genes in GbAt. Interestingly, there was no gene distribution on chromosome 8 of GhAt, which proved that chromosome changes may occur a translocation or the gene on the chromosome 8 was lost in the process of evolution. In addition, there were two genes on chromosome 11 of GhAt, but only one gene on chromosome 11 of GbAt, which proved that G. hirsutum had lost a gene or G. barbadense gained a new gene through evolution. Similarly, there were 26 NDA genes in GhDt and 25 genes in GbDt, and the only difference of chromosomal location of GhDt and GbDt was that the GbDt lacked a gene on chromosome 11 than the GhDt, and the same was that they all did not have the chromosome 5. Our results showed the uneven distribution of NDA genes among all the four Gossypium species, which might be due to the addition or gene loss of NDA genes through tandem, segmental, or whole genome duplication events during evolution.

Studies had found that gene duplication was the most commonly evaluated mechanism for the divergence of gene family [36]. To reveal the expansion mechanism of the NDA gene family, duplicated gene pairs of four Gossypium species were identified by MCScanX, we found that only two tandem duplication events existed in both G. arboretum and G. raimondii, GaNDA6/7 and GrNDA17/18, while the rest of duplicated gene pairs was identified as segmental duplication and whole genome duplication. This results revealed that low-tandem and high-segmental duplications were existed in the NDA gene family and segmental duplication and whole genome duplication played a predominant driving force in the evolution of NDA gene family, and it was consistent with the previous research [37].

To elucidate the differences after gene duplication, the ratio of non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) of four Gossypium species was calculated. In general, Ka/Ks < 1 was considered as a purification selection, indicating that natural selection eliminated harmful mutations and kept the protein unchanged, Ka/Ks > 1 was considered as positive selection, indicating natural selection changed the protein, the mutation site was quickly fixed in the population, and the evolution of the gene was accelerated, Ka/Ks = 1 was considered as neutral selection, indicating that natural selection did not affect mutation [38]. We found the Ka/Ks of most duplicated gene pairs in the four Gossypium species was less than 1, indicating that the four Gossypium species had undergone strong purification selection that occurred after tandem, segmental, and whole genome duplication. This was consistent with recent research that most cotton GRX gene family evolved through purifying selection pressure [39]. However, the selection pressure of most gene pairs among Gb-Gr, Gh-Gr, Gh-Ga and Gb-Ga were generally at 0–0.49, indicating that NDA genes tended to be conservative in evolution. Only the Ka/Ks value of Gh-Ga was greater than 1, suggesting that a certain member of GaNDA gene family members were evolved into some GhNDA gene family members through the environmental selection pressure, but whether they brought harmful traits or beneficial traits remains to be further studied.

Usually, cis-acting elements played an important role when plants were subjected to abiotic stress, and transcription factors (TFs) could bind to cis-acting elements of the promoter to regulate the transcription process and ultimately lead to the expression of genes [26]. In this study, most of the NDA family genes responded to light, which was consistent with the previous light-induced expression of NDA1 [15]. Light was a vital regulator of gene expression in plants, altering the transcription of thousands of genes [40]. However, the vast majority of genes related to light response focused on photosynthesis-associated nuclear genes, little was known about the effects of light on mitochondria and the respiratory chain [41, 42]. In this study, most of the NDA family genes responded to light, therefore, we inferred that NDA family genes in upland cotton actively responded to light and the light could induce gene expression in mitochondria. Electron transport chains are known to produce ROS, which expose cells to oxidative stress. According to our GO annotation analysis (Fig. 8), most biological processes were concentrated in the oxidation-reduction process, which indicated that the NDA family genes were involved in the oxidation-reduction balance in cells to cope with alkaline stress. As cotton NDA genes are predicted to be localized in multiple subcellular compartments including the cytosol, chloroplasts, and mitochondria (Additional file 3: Table S3), it seems logical that its oxidation-reduction system should also be present in these compartments. In addition, a large number of hormone responsive elements (MeJA, ABA) in the promoters of GhNDAs, indicating that plant hormones probably involved in the regulation of GhNDAs in the upstream.

The expression pattern of genes was often used as an indicator of their functions. Therefore, RNA-Seq data was used to detect the possible function of genes in the NDA gene family by expression levels. Heat map analysis showed that most genes could be affected by SAS and AS stress (Fig. 9C), suggesting that NDA family genes play important roles in the response to alkaline stresses. The expression pattern of genes in different clades was different, but all the genes in the clade b were involved in the response of SAS and AS stress, and the cis-acting elements in the clade b were all involved in light-responsiveness, which demonstrated that GhNDAs in clade b had the function in response to light stress. In addition, some genes actively responded to SAS stress, such as GhNDA40, GhNDA14, GhNDA20, GhNDA45, GhNDA11, GhNDA35, GhNDA51, GhNDA25, GhNDA32 and GhNDA5, while GhNDA1, GhNDA14, GhNDA22 and GhNDA48 actively responded to AS stress. Usually, NAD(P)H dehydrogenases generally may be up-regulated under stress, and the results of qRT-PCR analysis showed that most GhNDA genes are up-regulated under AS and SAS stress (Figs. 10, 11). GhNDA25 and GhNDA32 had the highest relative expression levels in roots while not in leaves, showing that these two genes may perform specific functions or participate in important signal pathways in the roots. In summary, the differential expression of several GhNDA genes indicated that they played an important role in alkaline stress response, which provided us with important candidate genes for studying alkaline stress in cotton.

Under alkaline stress, GhNDA32 gene expression was induced in cotton. However, alkaline stress can also destroy the oxidation-reduction balance of plants, resulting in cotton leaves wilted with water loss. In our study, the wilting degree of VIGS plants was higher than that of non-VIGS plants, indicating that the alkaline tolerance of cotton decreased after GhNDA32 gene was silenced. According to GO annotation, the biological process GhNDA32 gene participated in is oxidation-reduction process, with molecular function as oxidoreductase activity. Combining the results of GO annotation, VIGS and the interaction network diagram, we could infer that GhNDA32 gene might interact with AOX1A, AOX1C, AOX2, PUMP1 and CIB22 protein to regulate the activity of NADH dehydrogenase to regulate the redox reaction in the cotton, thereby eliminating the ROS produced in the body and maintaining cotton from the harm of oxidative stress.

Overall, this study will contribute to further understanding of the biological and molecular functions of cotton NDA and their antioxidant effects under alkaline stress. Our analysis provides a framework for further research into the function of this important gene family. The results of this study provide useful information for studying the effect of NDA genes in upland cotton under alkaline stress. These findings not only provide useful information for studying the effects of the NDA genes in G. hirsutum under alkaline stress but also provide valuable information for potential candidate genes related to plant growth and development and adversity stress.

Conclusions

In this study, phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, chromosomal distribution, collinearity analysis as well as cis-acting elements were conducted, which largely enriched our knowledge of the cotton NDA gene family. In addition, most GhNDAs contained cis-acting elements like light responsiveness. Expression patterns and functional characterization indicated GhNDAs participated in response to alkaline stress, especially NaHCO3 stress. Taken together, all these results were of great significance for the future research on the molecular mechanism of NDA gene family in responding to abiotic stresses.

Materials and methods

Databases

Genome sequences of four Gossypium species (G. hirsutum, NAU; G. barbadense, HAU; G. arboreum, CRI; and G. raimondii, JGI) were used to identify the gene family. Genomic sequences, coding sequences of all of the four species were downloaded from Cotton Functional Genomic Database (CottonFGD) (http://www.cottonfgd.org/) [43]. Protein sequences of other species like A. thaliana (TAIR 10), T. cacao (version 10), S. tuberosum (version 4.03), O. sativa (version 7), P. trichocarpa (version 3.0), V. vinifera Genoscope (version 12), G. max (version 10), Z. mays (version 10) were obtained from Phytozome v12.1 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html).

Identification of NDA family members

To identify the members of the GhNDA gene family, the protein sequence and genome annotation were downloaded from CottonFGD. The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) of PF07992 was downloaded from the Pfam website (https://pfam.xfam.org/). Local blast was used to obtain the protein sequence of PF07992, NCBI Batch Web CD-Search Tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi) was used to further screen the genes [44]. CottonFGD was used to obtain some other features of GhNDA genes like protein length, molecular weights (MWs), isoelectric points (pIs), grand average of hydropathy. Subcellular location of GhNDA proteins were predicted using several websites, such as WOLF-PSORT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/)  and CELLO v.2.5 (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/) [45].

Phylogenetic analysis and sequences alignments

The full-length amino acid sequences of NDA genes for twelve plant species including G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii (downloaded from CottonFGD), A. thaliana (TAIR 10), T. cacao (version 10), S. tuberosum (version 4.03), O. sativa (version 7), P. trichocarpa (version 3.0), V. vinifera (version 12), G. max (version 10), Z. mays (version 10) (downloaded from Phytozome v12.1) were provided in MEGA7 software using ClustalW program for multiple sequence alignment. Subsequently, MEGA 7 software [46] was used to construct phylogenetic tree using neighbor joining (NJ) method with default parameters.

Chromosomal locations of NDA genes from four Gossypium species

The diagrams of the chromosomal locations from four Gossypium species including G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii were drawn with the help of TB Tools software [47] by using the Generic Feature Format (gff) files and gene IDs downloaded from CottonFGD.

Analysis of the conserved protein motifs and gene structure

Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) website (http://meme-suite.org/) was used to identify the conserved protein motifs [48]. TB Tools software was used to map the evolutionary relationship, gene structure, and conserved motifs of GhNDA proteins with mast file from MEME website, nwk file from phylogenetic tree analysis, and gff3 genome file of G. hirsutum.

Collinearity analysis of NDA genes in four Gossypium species

The complete genome sequences of four Gossypium species along with genome annotation files were subjected to MCScanX tool [49] to investigate the collinearity and analyze the syntenic relationship among NDA genes of four Gossypium species. The collinear and homologous chromosomal regions among four Gossypium species were visualized using Advance Circos tool in TB Tools software.

Calculation of selection pressure

Duplicated gene pairs from four Gossypium species including G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii were identified by using MCScanX tool. The nonsynonymous (Ka), the synonymous (Ks), and Ka/Ks were calculated to investigate the selection pressure by using Ka/Ks calculator in TB Tools software.

Gene ontology (GO) annotation analysis of GhNDAs

CottonFGD (https://cottonfgd.org) was used to determine the GO annotation analysis of GhNDAs including biological process, molecular functions and cellular component.

Analysis of cis‑acting element in promoters of GhNDAs

The upstream sequences (2000 bp) of the NDA sequences were retrieved from the genome sequence in G. hirsutum. Then, the retrieved promoter sequences were submitted to PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) [50]. Schematic diagram of phylogenetic tree and cis-acting elements was drawn with the help of TB Tools.

Expression patterns under different alkaline stress

RNA-Seq data (GSE165472) was used to analyze the expression level of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under different alkaline stress (pH = 8.5 NaOH, 125 mM NaHCO3). The heat map along with phylogenetic tree and cis-acting elements was generated through TB Tools software by using fragments per kilo base of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM).

Plant materials and alkaline treatments

Gossypium hirsutum cv. Zhong 9807 which is obtained from the Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS was used. Cotton seeds were sown in pots containing the soil under a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle at 25 °C for approximately 30 days. Seedlings with three true leaves and one heart-shaped leaf were washed carefully and transplanted into conical flasks containing 125 mM NaHCO3 solution for 0 and 12 h. Leaves and root samples were collected. Each sample was replicated three times. All these samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at − 80 °C for subsequent analysis.

RNA extraction and quantitative real‑time (qRT‑PCR) analysis

The total RNA of cotton roots and leaves were extracted using EASYspin Plus Plant RNA Kit (Aidlab, Beijing, China). The quantity and quality were determined by a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The cDNA was reverse using the EasyScript® All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (One-Step gDNA Removal). The qRT-PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems@7500 Fast instrument and TransStart Top Green qPCR SuperMix. The Actin gene was used as a control. All the operational procedures followed the manufacturer’s protocols. Statistical analysis was conducted with biological replicates with mean values of three technique replicates. 2−△△CT method was used to calculate the relative FC for each sample [51]. The primers were designed using NCBI Primer-Blast tool, listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Gene interaction network of the GhNDA32 protein

The GhNDA32 protein interaction network was analyzed by the STRING database (https://string-db.org/) based on the homologous gene in Arabidopsis thaliana [52]. Cytoscape software (version 3.7.1) was used to construct a co-expression regulation network of the GhNDA32 protein [53].

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) experiment

To verify the function of the NDA genes, we selected a highly expressed gene GhNDA32, pYL156: GhNDA32 vector was constructed with the restriction enzyme cutting site BamHI and SacI. The sequences of the primer pair were detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The GV3101 strains carrying pYL156, pYL156: GhNDA32, pYL156: PDS, and pYL192 were cultured to OD600 = 1.2–1.5. Each mixture was injected into the underside of cotyledons of upland cotton material Zhong 9807. After injection, the seedlings were placed in the dark overnight, and a 16-h light / 8-h dark cycle was performed at 25 °C. When the plants injected with pYL156: PDS appeared an albino phenotype, it proved that the VIGs experiment was successful.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NDA:

The internal NAD(P)H dehydrogenase

ND:

NAD(P)H dehydrogenase

VIGS:

Virus-induced gene silencing

AP:

Alternative respiratory pathway

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

ETC:

electron transport chain

AOX:

Alternative oxidase

CottonFGD:

Cotton Functional Genomic Database

Ga:

Gossypium arboreum

Gb:

Gossypium barbadense

Gh:

Gossypium hirsutum

Gr:

Gossypium raimondii

HMM:

Hidden Markov Model

MWs:

Molecular weights

pIs:

Isoelectric points

MEME:

Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation

Ka :

The nonsynonymous

Ks :

The synonymous

GO:

Gene ontology

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

FPKM:

Fragments per kilo base of exon per million fragments mapped

qRT‑PCR:

quantitative real‑time PCR

NJ:

Neighbor-joining

ABA:

Abscisic acid

MeJA:

Methyl jasmonate

GA:

Gibberellin

CK:

No infection

SAS:

125 mM NaHCO3

AS:

pH = 8.5 NaOH

References

  1. Fan Y, Lu X, Chen X, Wang J, Wang D, Wang S, et al. Cotton transcriptome analysis reveals novel biological pathways that eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS) under sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) alkaline stress. Genomics. 2021;113(3):1157–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.02.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Ma H, Liu G, Xu C, Zhang D, Ban Q. Analysis of gene expression profile of Limonium bicolor under NaHCO3 stress using cDNA microarray. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2008;26(3):241–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-008-0037-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Millar AH, Whelan J, Soole KL, Day DA. Organization and regulation of mitochondrial respiration in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62(1):79–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103857.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Millar AH, Wiskich JT, Whelan J, Day DA. Organic-acid activation of the alternative oxidase of plant-mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1993;329(3):259–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Purvis AC. Role of the alternative oxidase in limiting superoxide production by plant mitochondria. Physiologia Plantarump. 1997;100:165–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasily N. Popov ACP, Anneke M. Wagner. Stress-induced changes in ubiquinone concentration and alternative oxidase in plant mitochondria. Biosci Rep. 2001;21(3):369–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanlerberghe GC. Alternative oxidase: a mitochondrial respiratory pathway to maintain metabolic and signaling homeostasis during abiotic and biotic stress in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14046805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Clifton R, Millar AH, Whelan J. Alternative oxidases in Arabidopsis: a comparative analysis of differential expression in the gene family provides new insights into function of non-phosphorylating bypasses. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757(7):730–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.03.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanlerberghe GC, Mclntosh L. Signals regulating the expression of the nuclear gene encoding alternative oxidase of plant mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:589–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith C, Barthet M, Melino V, Smith P, Day D, Soole K. Alterations in the mitochondrial alternative NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase NDB4 lead to changes in mitochondrial electron transport chain composition, plant growth and response to oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(7):1222–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr073.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rasmusson AG, Svensson AS, Knoop V, Grohmann L, Brennicke L. Homologues of yeast and bacterial rotenone-insensitive NADH dehydrogenases in higher eukaryotes: two enzymes are present in potato mitochondria. Plant J. 1999;20(1):79–87.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmusson AG, Agius SC. Rotenone-insensitive NAD(P)H dehydrogenases in plants: Immunodetection and distribution of native proteins in mitochondria. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39(12):1057–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elhafez D, Murcha MW, Clifton R, Soole KL, Day DA, Whelan J. Characterization of mitochondrial alternative NAD(P)H dehydrogenases in Arabidopsis: intraorganelle location and expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47(1):43–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pci221.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalecka AM, Svensson AS, Johansson FI, Agius SC, Johanson U, Brennicke A, et al. Arabidopsis genes encoding mitochondrial type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenases have different evolutionary origin and show distinct responses to light. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(2):642–52. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.024208.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Svensson ÅS, Rasmusson AG. Light-dependent gene expression for proteins in the respiratory chain of potato leaves. Plant J. 2001;28(1):73–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Millenaar FF, Lambers H. The alternative oxidase: in vivo regulation and function. Plant biol. 2003;5:2–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallstrom SV, Florez-Sarasa I, Araujo WL, Escobar MA, Geisler DA, Aidemark M, et al. Suppression of NDA-type alternative mitochondrial NAD(P)H dehydrogenases in arabidopsis thaliana modifies growth and metabolism, but not high light stimulation of mitochondrial electron transport. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(5):881–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vijayraghavan V, Soole K. Effect of short- and long-term phosphate stress on the non-phosphorylating pathway of mitochondrial electron transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37:455–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Senchina DS, Alvarez I, Cronn RC, Liu B, Rong J, Noyes RD, et al. Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in Gossypium. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20(4):633–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg065.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grover CE, Kim H, Wing RA, Paterson AH, Wendel JF. Microcolinearity and genome evolution in the AdhA region of diploid and polyploid cotton (Gossypium). Plant J. 2007;50(6):995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03102.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rehman A, Wang N, Peng Z, He S, Zhao Z, Gao Q, et al. Identification of C2H2 subfamily ZAT genes in Gossypium species reveals GhZAT34 and GhZAT79 enhanced salt tolerance in Arabidopsis and cotton. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;184:967–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pant P, Iqbal Z, Pandey BK, Sawant SV. Genome-wide comparative and evolutionary analysis of Calmodulin-binding Transcription Activator (CAMTA) family in Gossypium species. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23846-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S, Leitch IJ. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9020088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu G, Guo C, Shan H, Kong HJ. Divergence of duplicate genes in exon–intron structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(4):1187–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu X, Shu N, Wang D, Wang J, Chen X, Zhang B, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of PUB genes in cotton. BMC Genom. 2020;21(1):213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6638-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Santner A, Estelle M. Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature. 2009;459(7250):1071–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08122.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(4):436–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Salih H, Odongo MR, Gong W, He S, Du X. Genome-wide analysis of cotton C2H2-zinc finger transcription factor family and their expression analysis during fiber development. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2003-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wendel JF, Flagel LE, Adams KL. Jeans, genes, and genomes: cotton as a model for studying polyploidy. polyploidy and genome evolution. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hu Y, Chen J, Fang L, Zhang Z, Ma W, Niu Y, et al. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):739–48.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Du X, Huang G, He S, Yang Z, Sun G, Ma X, et al. Resequencing of 243 diploid cotton accessions based on an updated A genome identifies the genetic basis of key agronomic traits. Nat Genet. 2018;50(6):796–802.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sweetman C, Waterman CD, Rainbird BM, Smith PM, Jenkins CD, Day DA, et al. AtNDB2 is the main external NADH Dehydrogenase in mitochondria and is important for tolerance to environmental stress. Plant Physiol. 2019;181(2):774–88. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00877.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Svensson AS, Johansson FI, Møller IM, Rasmusson AG. Cold stress decreases the capacity for respiratory NADH oxidation in potato leaves. FEBS Lett. 2002;517:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02581-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paterson AH, Wendel JF, Gundlach H, Guo H, Jenkins J, Jin D, et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature. 2012;492(7429):423–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11798.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cannon SB, Mitra A, Baumgarten A, Young ND, May G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei K, Pan S, Li Y. Functional characterization of maize C2H2 zinc-finger gene family. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2016;34(4):761–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hurst LD. The Ka/Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet. 2002;9(18):486–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Malik WA, Wang X, Wang X, Shu N, Cui R, Chen X, et al. Genome-wide expression analysis suggests glutaredoxin genes response to various stresses in cotton. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;153:470–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma L, Li J, Qu L, Hager J, Chen Z, Zhao H, et al. Light control of Arabidopsis development entails coordinated regulation of genome expression and cellular pathways. Plant Cell. 2001;13(12):2589–607. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010229.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Argüello-Astorga G, Herrera-Estrella L. Evolution of light-regulated plant promoters. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49(1):525–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Terzaghi WB, Cashmore AR. Light-regulated transcription. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1995;46(1):445–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.46.060195.002305.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu T, Liang C, Meng Z, Sun G, Meng Z, Guo S, et al. CottonFGD: an integrated functional genomics database for cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D265-D8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz991.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf. 2006;64(3):643–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen C, Chen H, He Y, Xia R. TBtools, a toolkit for biologists integrating various biological data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. BioRxiv. 2018:289660.

  48. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl_2):W202-W8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van DP. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yu M, Shen L, Fan B, Zhao D, Zheng Y, Sheng J. The effect of MeJA on ethylene biosynthesis and induced disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;54(3):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.07.001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This project is based on research that was supported by China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology / Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Zhengzhou Research Base, School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University Research Base, Zhengzhou University / Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, MOA, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China

    Yapeng Fan, Yuexin Zhang, Cun Rui, Hong Zhang, Nan Xu, Jing Wang, Mingge Han, Xuke Lu, Xiugui Chen, Delong Wang, Shuai Wang, Lixue Guo, Lanjie Zhao, Hui Huang, Junjuan Wang, Liangqing Sun, Chao Chen & Wuwei Ye

Authors
  1. Yapeng Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuexin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cun Rui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingge Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xuke Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiugui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Delong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lixue Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lanjie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hui Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Junjuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Liangqing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Chao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Wuwei Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YPF, WWY: Conception and design; YPF, YXZ, CR, WWY: methodology; YPF, YXZ, CR, HZ, NX, JW, MGH, XKL, XGC, DLW, SW, LXG, LJZ, HH, JJW, LQS, CC: data analysis; YPF: manuscript writing; YPF, WWY: reviewing and editing. All authors critically revised the manuscript, are fully accountable for its content, and agreed with the submission of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wuwei Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Primer pairs used for qRT-PCR.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Rename of NDA genes in four Gossypium species and other eight species.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Physical properties of the GhNDAs genes.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Calculation of non-synonymous (Ka) to synonymous (Ks) substitution.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Y., Zhang, Y., Rui, C. et al. Molecular structures and functional exploration of NDA family genes respond tolerant to alkaline stress in Gossypium hirsutum L.. Biol Res 55, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00372-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-022-00372-8

Keywords

  • NDA
  • Phylogenetic analysis
  • Cis-elements
  • Expression pattern
  • VIGS
  • Alkaline stress

Biological Research

ISSN: 0717-6287

Contact us