Open Access

BRD4 inhibition suppresses cell growth, migration and invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

Biological Research201750:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-017-0124-9

Received: 24 October 2016

Accepted: 18 May 2017

Published: 25 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibition is a new therapeutic strategy for many malignancies. In this study, we aimed to explore the effect of BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 on in vitro cell growth, migration and invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC).

Methods

The human normal epithelial cells and SACC cells (ACC-LM and ACC-83) were treated with JQ1 at concentrations of 0, 0.1, 0.5 or 1 μM. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was performed to evaluate cell proliferation. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution was evaluated by Flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence staining was used to examine the expression of BRD4 in SACC cells. The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay and western blot assay were performed to examine messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels in SACC cells. Wound-healing assay and transwell assay were used to evaluate the activities of migration and invasion of SACC cells.

Results

JQ1 exhibits no adverse effects on proliferation, cell cycle and cell apoptosis of the normal human epithelial cells, while suppressed proliferation and cell cycle, and induced apoptosis of SACC cells, down-regulated the mRNA and protein levels of BRD4 in SACC cells, meanwhile reduced protein expressions of c-myc and BCL-2, two known target genes of BRD4. Moreover, JQ1 inhibited SACC cell migration and invasion by regulating key epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics including E-cadherin, Vimentin and Twist.

Conclusions

BRD4 is an important transcription factor in SACC and BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 may be a new strategy for SACC treatment.

Keywords

Salivary adenoid cystic carcinomaBRD4 inhibitionProliferationMigrationEpithelial–mesenchymal transition

Background

Salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) is a highly malignant carcinoma that most often arises from the secretory epithelial cells of salivary glands [1] and comprises approximately 10% of all salivary tumors [2]. SACC is characterized by several unique properties, such as slow growth; however, high rates of local recurrence, tendency to perineural invasion and distant metastases [1, 3, 4]. Extensive effort has been performed to develop many strategies for management of SACC patients, but the 15-year survival is only 25% [5]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop an efficient therapy against this carcinoma to improve patient outcome.

Recent studies have demonstrated that epigenetic regulators are becoming new therapeutic targets for cancer therapy [6], of which as a member of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins, bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) has been widely investigated. It has been reported that BRD4 is associated with a variety of cancers due to its role in the regulation of cell cycle progression [712]. Studies of yeast and mammalian BET family proteins, including BRD4, indicate that they recognize acetylated chromatin in vivo and regulate the expression of important oncogenes, for example, c-myc and BCL-2 [13]. Besides, BRD4 can also interact with the positive transcription elongation factor b (p-TEFb) to lead to phosphorylation of its unique C-terminal domain (CTD), thus allowing the productive elongation of c-myc and BCL-2 [14]. Further study indicates that BRD4 has a vital role in promoting cell cycle progression from G0 to G1 and entry into S phase. BRD4 knockdown cells are growth impaired and grow more slowly than control cells accompanied by decrease in G1 gene expression [15]. Moreover, the recruitment of BRD4 was requisite in Twist-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [16]. Consequently, BRD4 plays important roles in genesis, development and metastasis of tumors.

BRD4 has been validated as a therapeutic target in many malignant tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leukaemia, osteosarcoma, pancreatic cancer and so on [7, 9, 1726]. The small molecule compound JQ1 first reported by Filippakopoulos and colleagues is of particular interest among the inhibitors of BRD4 and can competitively displace BRD4 from acetylated histones [27]. It has been reported that JQ1 treatment inhibited proliferation of Ewing sarcoma cells in vitro and reduced tumor growth in vivo in a dose dependent manner [25]. Inhibition of BRD4 in thyroid cancer cells by JQ1 has been demonstrated to decrease cell viability in vitro and suppress tumor growth in vivo [8]. Similar inhibitory effect of JQ1 was observed in many other malignant tumors including melanoma, HCC and ovarian cancer [9, 10, 26]. However, the effect of JQ1 on the growth and invasion of SACC has not been well investigated.

In this study, we investigated the effect of BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 on cell growth, migration and invasion of SACC cells in vitro, so as to develop a new therapeutic target for SACC.

Results

JQ1 exhibits no adverse effects on proliferation, cell apoptosis and cell cycle of the human normal epithelial cells

Firstly, we investigated the effects of JQ1 at various concentrations on proliferation, cell apoptosis and cell cycle of the human normal epithelial cells. No significant changes were found in cells treated with JQ1 when compared with the control cells (Fig. 1). These data revealed that JQ1 has no adverse effects on the growth of the human normal epithelial cells.
Fig. 1

JQ1 exhibits no adverse effects on proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle of the human normal epithelial cells. a The proliferation of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells after JQ1 treatment for 1–4 days; b apoptosis of the human normal epithelial cells treated with JQ1 at concentration of 1 µM for 48 h; c the cell cycle of the human normal epithelial cells after JQ1 treatment at the concentration of 1 µM for 48 h; d the fractions of the human normal epithelial cells in each phase of the cell cycle after JQ1 treatment at the concentration of 1 µM for 48 h

JQ1 reduces SACC cell proliferation

CCK-8 assay was performed to evaluate the effect of JQ1 on the proliferation of SACC cells. The results showed that JQ1 significantly inhibited proliferation of ACC-LM cells when compared with the control group throughout the duration of the experiment (Fig. 2a). The proliferation of ACC-83 cells at day 1 had no significant change when compared with the control group. However, the proliferation of ACC-83 cells was significantly decreased after JQ1 treatment at day 2–4 (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

JQ1 reduces the growth of SACC cells. a The proliferation of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells after JQ1 treatment for 1–4 days; Macroscopic and microscopic (×100) images of colonies formed by ACC-LM (b) and ACC-83 (c) cells treated with JQ1 for 7 days. *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group)

To confirm above results, colony formation assay was performed to further clarify the antiproliferative effects of JQ1 on SACC cells. As expected, the number and size of colonies of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells decreased sharply in the presence of JQ1 at various concentrations (Fig. 2b, c). In fact, the groups treated by 0.5 and 1 µM of JQ1 had no colony formation. Therefore, the results suggest that inhibition of BRD4 by JQ1 has potent antiproliferation effects on SACC.

JQ1 induces apoptosis and suppresses cell cycle in SACC cells

To identify the mechanism of the antiproliferation effects of JQ1 in SACC cells, the cell cycle and apoptosis status of SACC cells in the presence of JQ1 were analyzed. The results showed that the protein levels of cleaved caspase-3 (cl-C3) were significantly increased in ACC-LM cells treated with JQ1 at various concentrations within 48 h in comparison with the control group (Fig. 3a). JQ1 at concentrations above 0.1 µM significantly up-regulated the levels of cl-C3 in ACC-83 cells (Fig. 3a). The results of flow cytometry showed that JQ1 significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells (Fig. 3b), which was consistent with the protein levels of cl-C3. To further investigate the antiproliferation effects of JQ1 on SACC cells, the cell cycle was detected. We found that JQ1 treatment at various concentrations for 48 h led to a decreased percentage of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells in the S phase (Fig. 3c). Taken together, these results reveal that JQ1 may inhibit the proliferation of SACC cells via inducing apoptosis and suppressing cell cycle.
Fig. 3

JQ1 induces apoptosis and inhibits cell cycle in SACC cells. a The protein levels of cleaved cl-C3 in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at various concentrations for 48 h; b apoptosis of ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at concentration of 1 µM for 48 h; c the fractions of ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells in each phase of the cell cycle are shown after JQ1 treatment at the concentration of 1 µM for 48 h. *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group). cl-C3 cleaved caspase-3

JQ1 inhibits BRD4 expression

We investigated the effect of JQ1 on BRD4 expression in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells. The results of qRT-PCR and western blot assays showed that the expression levels of BRD4 were significantly decreased in cells treated with JQ1 (Fig. 4a, b). In addition, the results of immunofluorescence staining also showed that the expression of BRD4 was inhibited in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells after treated with JQ1 for 24 h (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4

JQ1 inhibits BRD4 expression in SACC cells. a The mRNA levels of BRD4 in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 for 24 and 48 h. b The protein levels of BRD4 in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 for 24 and 48 h; c immunofluorescence staining of BRD4 in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at the concentration of 1 µM for 24 h (×200). *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group)

JQ1 inhibits protein expression of Cyclin D1, c-myc and BCL-2

Cyclin D1 protein is associated with cell cycle and tumor progression. Considering the effect of JQ1 on cell cycle, we then evaluated the protein expression of Cyclin D1 in SACC cells after JQ1 treatment. We found that the protein levels of Cyclin D1 were significantly decreased in ACC-LM cells treated with JQ1 at concentration of 0.5 and 1 µM (Fig. 5a). Similarly, the protein levels of Cyclin D1 were significantly inhibited in ACC-83 cells after 48 h treatment by JQ1 at various concentrations (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 5

JQ1 down-regulates Cyclin D1, c-myc and BCL-2 expressions in SACC cells. a The protein levels of Cyclin D1 and c-myc in ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at various concentrations for 48 h; b the protein levels of BCL-2 in ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at various concentrations for 48 h. *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group)

Protein levels of c-myc and BCL-2, two known targets for BRD4, were also analyzed in SACC cells treated with JQ1. The results showed that the expression of c-myc was significantly decreased in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 at 0.1, 0.5 and 1 µM (Fig. 5a). The protein levels of BCL-2 were also significantly down-regulated in ACC-LM cells treated with JQ1 at various concentrations (Fig. 5b). In ACC-83 cells, the expression levels of BCL-2 were significantly inhibited after treated with JQ1 at 0.5 and 1 µM (Fig. 5b). These data indicated that JQ1 inhibited expressions of targets for BRD4 in SACC cells.

JQ1 inhibits the migration and invasion of SACC cells

The effect of JQ1 on cell migration and invasion was investigated. The results of wound-healing assay showed that the areas covered by migrated ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were significantly reduced after 20 h treatment with JQ1 at various concentrations in comparison with the control group (Fig. 6a). Moreover, transwell invasion assay showed that JQ1 significantly decreased the amount of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells invaded from the upper surface to the lower surface of the transwell insert (Fig. 6b). Therefore, these data indicate that JQ1 inhibits migration and invasion of SACC cells in vitro.
Fig. 6

JQ1 inhibits the migration and invasion of SACC cells. a The migration of ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells treated by JQ1 at various concentrations for 20 h (×100); b the invasion of ACC-LM cells and ACC-83 cells treated by JQ1 at various concentrations for 20 h (×200). *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group)

JQ1 represses the progression of EMT in SACC cells by regulating key EMT characteristics

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition plays pivotal roles in tumor development and invasion, and is a key initiating event in the metastatic cascade. To investigate the molecular mechanism of the inhibition of JQ1 on migration and invasion of SACC cells, the levels of several EMT related proteins were examined. The results showed that the protein level of Twist was significantly repressed in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells (Fig. 7) treated with JQ1 at various concentrations after 24 and 48 h when compared with the control group. Moreover, the protein levels of Vimentin were significantly down-regulated by JQ1 at concentrations of 0.5 and 1 µM in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells (Fig. 7). The protein level of epithelial gene, E-cadherin, was up-regulated in ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells treated with JQ1 (Fig. 7). These results suggest that the inhibition effect of JQ1 on SACC cell migration and invasion may be due to EMT inhibition.
Fig. 7

JQ1 represses several key EMT characteristics in SACC cells. The protein levels of E-cadherin, Vimentin and Twist in ACC-LM (a) and ACC-83 (b) cells treated with JQ1 for 24 and 48 h. *P < 0.05 vs. the control group (the DMSO group)

Discussion

BRD4 inhibition suppresses growth and metastasis of several malignant tumors and BRD4 has been validated as a therapeutic target for tumor treatment [5, 26, 28, 29]. However, the effect of BRD4 inhibition on SACC has not been well investigated. In the present study, we found that the small molecular compound JQ1 had no adverse effects on the human normal epithelial cells, while inhibited SACC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and down-regulated the expressions of BRD4, Cyclin D1, c-myc and BCL-2.

It has been demonstrated that BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 inhibits proliferation of many malignant tumors, including myeloma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma [28, 3032]. Therefore, we hypothesized that SACC cell proliferation might be inhibited by BRD4 inhibitor. As expected, our results showed that JQ1 repressed SACC cell proliferation and colony formation. As for antiproliferation mechanisms of JQ1, it has been reported that the antiproliferation activity of JQ1 in primary osteosarcoma cells was driven by the induction of apoptosis [33]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that BRD4 depletion in Hela cells induced G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and down-regulated the expression of Cyclin D1 [34]. As a patent inhibitor of BRD4, JQ1 may play the similar role as BRD4 depletion. In the present study, we found that JQ1 treatment decreased the percentage of S phase in SACC cells. The protein expression of cleaved caspase-3 and the percentage of apoptosis cells were significantly increased in SACC cells treated by JQ1. In addition, the expression of Cyclin D1 was significantly down-regulated in SACC cells treated with JQ1. Cyclin D1 has been found to be associated with tumor progression in numerous different tumor types [35]. All these data suggest that JQ1 may repress SACC cell proliferation via cell cycle arrest and inducing cell apoptosis.

Compared with the in situ overgrowth, distal metastasis is a more lethal property of malignant tumors [36]. SACC is characterized by strong invasion to peripheral nerves and high tendency to distant metastasis, which is a common cause of mortality in patients with this carcinoma. Therefore, approaches which can limit tumor invasion are urgent to be developed in SACC treatment. BRD4 gene plays an important role in tumor invasion. It has been demonstrated that high level of BRD4 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression [37]. The suppression of BRD4 by a short hairpin RNA resulted in impaired migration and invasion of HCC [38]. In accordance to these reports, the present study showed that BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 significantly inhibited SACC cell migration and invasion. Increasing evidence indicates that epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important mechanism for tumor metastasis [3941]. Cancer cells undergoing EMT is characterized by loss of cell polarity, gain of spindle-shaped morphology and enhanced cell invasion [42]. This process involves down-regulation of epithelial genes such as E-cadherin [43], together with up-regulation of mesenchymal genes such as Vimentin [44]. Various transcription factors, such as Twist, can activate the EMT process [45]. BRD4 inhibition limited distal metastasis of colorectal cancer by regulating several key proteins including E-cadherin and Vimentin in the progression of EMT [29]. BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 has been demonstrated to control EMT and reduce migration and invasion abilities of human non-small cell lung cancer cells [46]. Considering the importance of EMT in tumor metastasis, we evaluated the expression of EMT genes in SACC cells to further identify the underlying mechanisms of the inhibitory effect of JQ1 on SACC cell invasion. The result showed that the protein levels of Vimentin and Twist were significantly down-regulated in SACC cells treated with JQ1, while the protein levels of E-cadherin were significantly up-regulated. These data indicate that JQ1 inhibits SACC cell migration and invasion via repressing the progression of EMT.

As for mechanism of the suppression of BRD4 by JQ1, it is generally agreed that JQ1 competitively bind to acetyl-lysine recognition pockets, displace BRD4 from chromatin, and reduce the expression of oncogenes, leading to cancer cell growth inhibition and apoptosis [47]. Consistent with this statement, Fiskus et al. [13] showed that treatment with JQ1 reduced the BRD4 occupancy at the promoters of c-myc, BCL-2, and CDK6 and attenuated the mRNA and protein expression of these associated genes in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blast progenitor cells (BPC). Consistently, in the present study, we found that the expressions of targets for BRD4, including c-myc and BCL-2, were significantly down-regulated in SACC cells treated with JQ1. However, the effect of JQ1 on BRD4 expression has been seldom studied. Fiskus et al. [13] showed that JQ1 had no effect on BRD4 expression. In contrast, our present experiment found that JQ1 down-regulated expression levels of BRD4 mRNA and protein in SACC cells. Similar result was also found in our previous study on oral squamous cell carcinoma Cal27 cells [48]. The mechanisms of JQ1 induced-BRD4 down-regulation still remains unclear.

In summary, our data show that BRD4 is an important transcription factor in SACC and BRD4 inhibition by JQ1 inhibits SACC cell growth and invasion. Thus, BRD4 may be a new therapeutic target for SACC patients. Further work will be needed to investigated the effect of JQ1 on SACC growth and invasion in vivo. And the clinical translational research about the application of JQ1 on patients with SACC will be a greater challenge for us.

Methods

Cell culture

The human normal epithelial cells (provided by Prof. Xunwei Wu, School of Stomatology, Shandong University) were cultured in the epithelial conditional medium (Gibico, Grand Island, NY, USA). Two SACC cell lines, ACC-LM and ACC-83 (provided by Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration), were grown in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA), and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen) with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. In this study, cells were cultured in the medium supplemented with JQ1 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX) at the concentrations of 0.1, 0.5 or 1 μM. Cells maintained in medium supplemented with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were used as control.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was used to detect the effect of JQ1 on cell proliferation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the human normal epithelial cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well. ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 3000 cells/well. These cells were maintained with various concentrations of JQ1, respectively. After cultured for 1–4 days, 10 μl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well, and the plates were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. The optical density (OD) levels were measured at 450 nm using the SPECTROstar Nano microplate reader (BMG Labtech Inc., Ortenberg, Germany).

Cell cycle analysis

The Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used to evaluate the influence of JQ1 on cell cycle of the human normal epithelial cells, ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells. The cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well treated by JQ1 at various concentrations, respectively. After cultured for 24 h, cell cycle was measured by a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences).

Annexin V/PI assays for apoptosis

The human normal epithelial cells, ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well. JQ1 at the concentration of 1 μM was added in the medium. After 48 h incubation, the apoptosis of cells was evaluated using an Annexin V-FTIC/propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis detection kit (eBioscience, Vienna, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Colony formation assay

ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1000 cells/well and maintained in the medium with JQ1 at various concentrations. After cultured for 7 days, the cells were stained with crystal violet, photographed and counted.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells were cultured and analyzed by an Olympus immunofluoresecence microscope (Olympus, USA). In brief, ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were cultured in the medium with JQ1 at the concentration of 1 μM. After 24 h, cells were fixed in culture well with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Then cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked with 10% donkey serum for 1 h. And then, cells were stained with 1:200 primary rabbit anti-human BRD4 monoclonal antibody (Abcam, MA, USA) at 4 °C overnight. After washing three times with 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS), cells were incubated with 1:200 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (ZSGB-BIO ORIGENE, Beijing, China). 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at the concentration of 1 mg/ml was used for nuclear visualisation and it was added at the end of the process. Images were collected by fluorescence microscopy.

Wound-healing assay

ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well. After 24 h incubation, a denuded area was created across the diameter of dish by a yellow tip. And then the cells were washed with 1× PBS five times and incubated in a serum free high-glucose DMEM with JQ1 at various concentrations, respectively. Phase-contrast images were taken at a time point of 0 and 20 h of incubation. Images were analyzed with Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. The areas covered by migrated cells (wound recovery) was calculated.

Transwell assay

Transwell assay was performed to evaluate the effects of JQ1 on the in vitro invasion of ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells using a 24-well Transwell plate (8 µm, Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA). A Corning® Matrigel® Basement Membrane Matrix (Becton–Dickinson & Co. Mountain View, CA) was plated on the upper surface of the Transwell plate to mimic the extracellular matrices underlying the cells in vivo. For each group, 5 × 104 cells/insert were seeded on the matrix and incubated in 200 μl of serum free high-glucose DMEM containing JQ1 at various concentrations. The insert was placed on 24-well plate containing 600 μl of high-glucose DMEM complemented with 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. After 24 h incubation, the cells on the upper surface of the insert were removed gently with cotton-tipped swabs and the cells on the lower surface were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min. The number of cells was counted in five randomly selected fields, and the mean number of cells was calculated.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis

ACC-LM and ACC-83 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and then maintained in medium supplement with JQ1 at various concentrations. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol® reagent (TaKaRa Bio-tech, Tokyo, Japan) from cells. A Reverse Transcriptase kit (TaKaRa Bio-tech) was used for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis. qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR® Primix Ex TaqTM kit (TaKaRa Bio–tech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to analyze mRNA expression levels of BRD4. Relative fold levels were determined using the 2−ΔΔCT method, with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) used as housekeeping control. The sequences of the primers for amplification of human BRD4 and GAPDH were as follows: BRD4: 5′-ACCTCCAACCCTAACAAGCC-3′ and 5′-TTTCCATAGTGTCTTGAGCACC-3′; GAPDH: 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′ and 5′-TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA-3′.

Western blot analysis

Cells were solubilized in radio-immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA, Beyotime) containing 1% phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF, Beyotime) for 30 min on ice followed by centrifuging for 10 min at 4 °C, 12,000g. The supernatant was run on 12% sodium salt-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, Beyotime) and electrotransferred to 0.45 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for 1 h at 100 V. The PVDF membrane was probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Antibodies used for western blot analysis were as follows: (1) rabbit anti-human Cyclin D1 (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), (2) rabbit anti-human cl-C3 (1:1000, CST, Danvers, MA, USA), (3) rabbit anti-human Twist (1:1000, Abcam), (4) rabbit anti-human E-cadherin (1:1000, Abcam), (5) rabbit anti-human Vimentin (1:1000, Abcam), (6) rabbit anti-human BRD4 (1:1000, Abcam), (7) mouse anti-human c-myc (1:1000, Abcam), (8) mouse anti-human BCL-2 (1:500, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). And then the membranes were incubated in 1:5000 HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (CST) or horse anti-mouse IgG (CST). The proteins were visualized using the Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

Statistical analysis

All results were expressed as mean ± SEM from at least three replicates. One-way ANOVA and Student’s unpaired t test were used to analyze significance using the spss 16.0 software. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations

BRD4: 

bromodomain-containing protein 4

SACC: 

salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma

CCK-8: 

Cell Counting Kit-8

qRT-PCR: 

quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

mRNA: 

messenger RNA

EMT: 

epithelial–mesenchymal transition

BET: 

bromodomain and extraterminal domain

Pol II: 

polymerase II

P-TEFb: 

positive transcription elongation factor complex b

HCC: 

hepatocellular carcinoma

cl-C3: 

cleaved caspase-3

DMEM: 

high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

FBS: 

fetal bovine serum

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulfoxide

PBS: 

phosphate buffered saline

DAPI: 

4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

OD: 

optical density

PI: 

propidium iodide

cDNA: 

complementary DNA

GAPDH: 

glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

RIPA: 

radio-immunoprecipitation assay

PMSF: 

phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium salt-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PVDF: 

polyvinylidene fluoride

VEGF: 

vascular endothelial growth factor

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LW carried out the experiments and figures. XW, RW, CY, ZL and CW participated in the design of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. FZ and PY conceived of the study, participated in its designed, and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271141 to P. Y.).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Periodontology, School of Stomatology, Shandong University
(2)
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration
(3)
Department of Stomatology, Laiwu City People’s Hospital
(4)
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Qilu Hospital, and Institute of Stomatology, Shandong University
(5)
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University
(6)
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Shandong University

References

  1. Chang B, Yang H, Jiao Y, Wang K, Liu Z, Wu P, Li S, Wang A. SOD2 deregulation enhances migration, invasion and has poor prognosis in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25918.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Matsuba HM, Spector GJ, Thawley SE, Simpson JR, Mauney M, Pikul FJ. Adenoid cystic salivary gland carcinoma: a histopathologic review of treatment failure patterns. Cancer. 1986;57(3):519–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett AW, Speight PM. Perineural invasion in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: a valid prognostic indicator? Oral Oncol. 2009;45(11):936–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sung MW, Kim KH, Kim JW, Min YG, Seong WJ, Roh JL, Lee SJ, Kwon TK, Park SW. Clinicopathologic predictors and impact of distant metastasis from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(11):1193–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wu HM, Ren GX, Wang LZ, Zhang CY, Chen WT, Guo W. Expression of podoplanin in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma and its association with distant metastasis and clinical outcomes. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6(2):271–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150(1):12–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong SH, Eun JW, Choi SK, Shen Q, Choi WS, Han JW, Nam SW, You JS. Epigenetic reader BRD4 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to suppress E2F2-cell cycle regulation circuit in liver cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):32628–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao X, Wu X, Zhang X, Hua W, Zhang Y, Maimaiti Y, Gao Z, Zhang Y. Inhibition of BRD4 suppresses tumor growth and enhances iodine uptake in thyroid cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;469(3):679–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li GQ, Guo WZ, Zhang Y, Seng JJ, Zhang HP, Ma XX, Zhang G, Li J, Yan B, Tang HW, et al. Suppression of BRD4 inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma by repressing MYC and enhancing BIM expression. Oncotarget. 2016;7(3):2462–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ambrosini G, Sawle AD, Musi E, Schwartz GK. BRD4-targeted therapy induces Myc-independent cytotoxicity in Gnaq/11-mutatant uveal melanoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6(32):33397–409.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Venkataraman S, Alimova I, Balakrishnan I, Harris P, Birks DK, Griesinger A, Amani V, Cristiano B, Remke M, Taylor MD, et al. Inhibition of BRD4 attenuates tumor cell self-renewal and suppresses stem cell signaling in MYC driven medulloblastoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5(9):2355–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pastori C, Daniel M, Penas C, Volmar CH, Johnstone AL, Brothers SP, Graham RM, Allen B, Sarkaria JN, Komotar RJ, et al. BET bromodomain proteins are required for glioblastoma cell proliferation. Epigenetics. 2014;9(4):611–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiskus W, Sharma S, Qi J, Valenta JA, Schaub LJ, Shah B, Peth K, Portier BP, Rodriguez M, Devaraj SG, et al. Highly active combination of BRD4 antagonist and histone deacetylase inhibitor against human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(5):1142–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang W, Zheng X, Yang Y, Wang X, Shen Z. An overview on small molecule inhibitors of BRD4. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2016;16(17):1403–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mochizuki K, Nishiyama A, Jang MK, Dey A, Ghosh A, Tamura T, Natsume H, Yao H, Ozato K. The bromodomain protein Brd4 stimulates G1 gene transcription and promotes progression to S phase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(14):9040–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Shi J, Cao J, Zhou BP. Twist-BRD4 complex: potential drug target for basal-like breast cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(10):1256–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Asangani IA, Dommeti VL, Wang X, Malik R, Cieslik M, Yang R, Escara-Wilke J, Wilder-Romans K, Dhanireddy S, Engelke C, et al. Therapeutic targeting of BET bromodomain proteins in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2014;510(7504):278–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Roe JS, Mercan F, Rivera K, Pappin DJ, Vakoc CR. BET bromodomain inhibition suppresses the function of hematopoietic transcription factors in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol Cell. 2015;58(6):1028–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Li J, Wang P, Zhou B, Shi J, Liu J, Li X, Fan L, Zheng Y, Ouyang L. Development of 4,5-dihydro-benzodiazepinone derivatives as a new chemical series of BRD4 inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;121:294–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang MK, Mochizuki K, Zhou M, Jeong HS, Brady JN, Ozato K. The bromodomain protein Brd4 is a positive regulatory component of P-TEFb and stimulates RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. Mol Cell. 2005;19(4):523–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shi J, Vakoc CR. The mechanisms behind the therapeutic activity of BET bromodomain inhibition. Mol Cell. 2014;54(5):728–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zuber J, Shi J, Wang E, Rappaport AR, Herrmann H, Sison EA, Magoon D, Qi J, Blatt K, Wunderlich M, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2011;478(7370):524–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee DH, Qi J, Bradner JE, Said JW, Doan NB, Forscher C, Yang H, Koeffler HP. Synergistic effect of JQ1 and rapamycin for treatment of human osteosarcoma. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(9):2055–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahai V, Kumar K, Knab LM, Chow CR, Raza SS, Bentrem DJ, Ebine K, Munshi HG. BET bromodomain inhibitors block growth of pancreatic cancer cells in three-dimensional collagen. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(7):1907–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hensel T, Giorgi C, Schmidt O, Calzada-Wack J, Neff F, Buch T, Niggli FK, Schafer BW, Burdach S, Richter GH. Targeting the EWS-ETS transcriptional program by BET bromodomain inhibition in Ewing sarcoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(2):1451–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang Z, Ma P, Jing Y, Yan Y, Cai MC, Zhang M, Zhang S, Peng H, Ji ZL, Di W, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in ovarian cancer by downregulating FoxM1. Theranostics. 2016;6(2):219–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Filippakopoulos P, Qi J, Picaud S, Shen Y, Smith WB, Fedorov O, Morse EM, Keates T, Hickman TT, Felletar I, et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010;468(7327):1067–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Togel L, Nightingale R, Chueh AC, Jayachandran A, Tran H, Phesse T, Wu R, Sieber OM, Arango D, Dhillon AS, et al. Dual targeting of bromodomain and extraterminal domain proteins, and WNT or MAPK signaling, inhibits c-MYC expression and proliferation of colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(6):1217–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu Y, Zhou J, Ye F, Xiong H, Peng L, Zheng Z, Xu F, Cui M, Wei C, Wang X, et al. BRD4 inhibitor inhibits colorectal cancer growth and metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(1):1928–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Suzuki K, Yamamoto K, Arakawa Y, Yamada H, Aiba K, Kitagawa M. Antimyeloma activity of bromodomain inhibitors on the human myeloma cell line U266 by downregulation of MYCL. Anticancer Drugs. 2016;27(8):756–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Paoluzzi L, Hanniford D, Sokolova E, Osman I, Darvishian F, Wang J, Bradner JE, Hernando E. BET and BRAF inhibitors act synergistically against BRAF-mutant melanoma. Cancer Med. 2016;5(6):1183–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Bid HK, Phelps DA, Xaio L, Guttridge DC, Lin J, London C, Baker LH, Mo X, Houghton PJ. The bromodomain BET inhibitor JQ1 suppresses tumor angiogenesis in models of childhood sarcoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(5):1018–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Baker EK, Taylor S, Gupte A, Sharp PP, Walia M, Walsh NC, Zannettino AC, Chalk AM, Burns CJ, Walkley CR. BET inhibitors induce apoptosis through a MYC independent mechanism and synergise with CDK inhibitors to kill osteosarcoma cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10120.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang Z, He N, Zhou Q. Brd4 recruits P-TEFb to chromosomes at late mitosis to promote G1 gene expression and cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(3):967–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou J, Li LU, Fang LI, Xie H, Yao W, Zhou X, Xiong Z, Wang LI, Li Z, Luo F. Quercetin reduces cyclin D1 activity and induces G1 phase arrest in HepG2 cells. Oncol Lett. 2016;12(1):516–22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(8):563–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Liao YF, Wu YB, Long X, Zhu SQ, Jin C, Xu JJ, Ding JY. High level of BRD4 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression. Oncotarget. 2016;7(8):9491–500.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang YH, Sui XM, Sui YN, Zhu QW, Yan K, Wang LS, Wang F, Zhou JH. BRD4 induces cell migration and invasion in HCC cells through MMP-2 and MMP-9 activation mediated by the Sonic hedgehog signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(4):2227–32.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Polyak K, Haviv I, Campbell IG. Co-evolution of tumor cells and their microenvironment. Trends Genet. 2009;25(1):30–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Z, Tang ZY, Yin Z, Wei YB, Liu LF, Yan B, Zhou KQ, Nian YQ, Gao YL, Yang JR. Metadherin regulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition in carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2429–36.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Cao D, Ding Q, Yu W, Gao M, Wang Y. Long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 promotes malignant development of colorectal cancer by targeting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:5417–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Chen LH, Hsu WL, Tseng YJ, Liu DW, Weng CF. Involvement of DNMT 3B promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and gene expression profile of invasive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:431.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Geiger TR, Peeper DS. Metastasis mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1796(2):293–308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jechlinger M, Grunert S, Tamir IH, Janda E, Ludemann S, Waerner T, Seither P, Weith A, Beug H, Kraut N. Expression profiling of epithelial plasticity in tumor progression. Oncogene. 2003;22(46):7155–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Li R, Wu S, Chen X, Xu H, Teng P, Li W. miR-223/FBW7 axis regulates doxorubicin sensitivity through epithelial mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(6):2512–24.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Chang H, Liu Y, Xue M, Liu H, Du S, Zhang L, Wang P. Synergistic action of master transcription factors controls epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(6):2514–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Shahbazi J, Liu PY, Atmadibrata B, Bradner JE, Marshall GM, Lock RB, Liu T. The bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 and the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat synergistically reduce N-Myc expression and induce anticancer effects. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(10):2534–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang L, Wu X, Huang P, Lv Z, Qi Y, Wei X, Yang P, Zhang F. JQ1, a small molecule inhibitor of BRD4, suppresses cell growth and invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(4):1989–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement