Open Access

Effects and molecular mechanism of chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes on behavior of dyskinesia rats

  • Xuebing Cao1,
  • Dongzhi Hou2,
  • Lei Wang3,
  • Sai Li4,
  • Shengang Sun1,
  • Qineng Ping4 and
  • Yan Xu1Email author
Biological Research201649:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-016-0093-4

Received: 2 January 2016

Accepted: 20 June 2016

Published: 4 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, is a cationic polyelectrolyte due to the presence of amino groups, one of the few occurring in nature. The use of chitosan in protein and drug delivery systems is being actively researched and reported in the literature.

Results

In this study, we used chitosan-coated levodopa liposomes to investigate the behavioral character and the expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa (DARPP-32) and FosB/ΔFosB in striatum of rat model of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). We found that scores of abnormal involuntary movement (AIM) decreased significantly in liposome group (P < 0.05), compared with levodopa group. Levels of phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 and FosB/ΔFosB in striatum decreased significantly in liposome group lesion side compared with levodopa group (P < 0.05). However, both of two groups above have significantly differences compared with the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Chitosan-coated levodopa liposomes may be useful in reducing dyskinesias inducing for Parkinson disease. The mechanism might be involved the pathway of signaling molecular phospho-ERK1/2, phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 and ΔFosB in striatum.

Keywords

Dyskinesia Levodopa liposomes ERK1/2 DARPP-32 FosB/ΔFosB

Background

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) is difficult to treat, negatively affects quality of life, and increases the treatment costs of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients [1]. Although levodopa currently represents the most effective treatment for PD patients [2], ameliorating cardinal signs such as bradykinesia, akinesia and rigidity [3], these benefits are in some measure overshadowed by the emergence of LID [4]. In the early stages, PD patients usually experience an acceptable quality of life that is impaired in the advanced stages by the emergence of these involuntary movements that frequently occur at the peak of the levodopa effect [5, 6]. In other words, when the patients experience motor complications such as a shortening motor response and the development of dyskinesia, the delivery of levodopa without inducing dyskinesia becomes increasingly difficult [7, 8].

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are critical mediators of activity-dependent plasticity as demonstrated by their role in long-term potentiation [8], classical conditioning [9], and memory formation [10]. Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 reflects a balance between the activities of upstream kinases and inactivating phosphatases [11]. Previous studies reported that selective agonists for D2-type DA receptors enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the DA-denervated striatum [12, 13]. l-DOPA produces pronounced activation of ERK1/2 signaling in the dopamine-denervated striatum through a D1-receptor-dependent mechanism, which was associated with the development of dyskinesia [14]. Phosphorylated ERK1/2 was localized to both dynorphinergic and enkephalinergic striatal neurons, suggesting a general role of ERK1/2 as a plasticity molecule during l-DOPA treatment [14, 15]. In addition, the dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa (DARPP-32) is abundantly expressed in the medium spiny neurons of the striatum. Phosphorylation catalyzed by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) converts DARPP-32 into an inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 [16]. Changes in the state of phosphorylation of DARPP-32 reinforce the behavioral effects produced by stimulation or inhibition of the cAMP pathway [16].

Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, is a cationic polyelectrolyte due to the presence of amino groups, one of the few occurring in nature. This gives chitosan singular chemical and biological characteristics, such as: biocompatibility [17], antibacterial properties, heavy metal ion chelation ability, gel-forming properties and hydrophilicity [17]. Due to its chemical configuration and to features like abundance, low toxicity, hydrophobicity, biodegradability, biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity, chitosan is employed for the preparation of films, gels, microspheres and microcapsules. It has been used in various areas such as biotechnology, cosmetics, food and pharmaceuticals, as a way to release active compounds, among others [18, 19]. The use of chitosan in protein and drug delivery systems is being actively researched and reported in the literature [20].

In this study, we investigated whether the development of LID might be associated with a critical impairment of the expression of p-ERK1/2, p-Thr34 DARPP-32 and FosB/ΔFosB. To examine our hypothesis, 6-OHDA lesioned rat models of PD were set up and administrated separately with chitosan-coated levodopa liposomes/benserazide and levodopa/benserazide.

Results

Behavioral characteristics

There were 18 of total 20 rats and 15 of total 20 rats produced abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) in 6-OHDA-lesioned after levodopa and levodopa liposomes group, respectively, whereas no AIMs were observed on the saline control group and sham-operated rats. As expected, sham-operated rats did not show AIMs at any time point (data not shown). Most of the levodopa group were shown in severe axial and fore limb AIMs, which scored more than three. However, most of levodopa liposomes group were shown in slight orofacial AIMs, which scored less than two. On the whole, the appearing time of AIMs of levodopa group was earlier than the levodopa liposomes group. The results of LTD rat’s rigid motion scores and rotating turns every 5 min were shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively.
Fig. 1

The tendency of rigid motion scores of levodopa and levodopa liposomes groups

Fig. 2

The tendency of rotating turns every 5 min of levodopa and levodopa liposomes groups

Chronic levodopa induced FosB/ΔFosB expression in damaged lateral striatum

Levels of FosB/ΔFosB as quantified by western blotting revealed that chronic levodopa (levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group) had significantly induced FosB/ΔFosB expression (Fig. 3) in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. Fluorescence in situ hybridization/immunohistochemistry showed that the increasing FosB/ΔFosB positive cells mostly expressed outside of the striatum (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

The western blotting results of FosB/ΔFosB expression in the four groups (1 = sham-operated, 2 = saline control, 3 = levodopa, 4 = levodopa liposomes). *P < 0.05

Fig. 4

The immunohistochemistry results of FosB/ΔFosB expression in the four groups (a = sham-operated, b = saline control, c = levodopa, d = levodopa liposomes). Magnification: ×200 *P < 0.05

Chronic levodopa induced p-ERK1/2 expression in damaged lateral striatum

Levels of ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 as quantified by western blotting revealed that chronic levodopa (levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group) had significantly induced p-ERK1/2 expression (Fig. 5) but had no effect on ERK1/2 expression in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats (data not shown). Fluorescence in situ hybridization/immunohistochemistry showed that the increasing p-ERK1/2 positive cells had no obvious differences location distribution (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5

The western blotting results of p-ERK1/2 expression in the four groups (from left to right): sham-operated, saline control,  levodopa, and levodopa liposomes. *P < 0.05

Fig. 6

The immunohistochemistry results of p-ERK1/2 expression in the four groups (a = sham-operated, b = saline control, c = levodopa, d = levodopa liposomes). Magnification: ×200 *P < 0.05

Chronic levodopa induced phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 expression in damaged lateral striatum

Levels of DARPP-32 and phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 as quantified by western blotting revealed that chronic levodopa (levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group) had significantly induced phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 expression but had no effect on DARPP-32 expression in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats (Fig. 7). Western blot assay showed that the increasing phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 positive cells had no obvious differences location.
Fig. 7

The western blot results of DARPP-32 and phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 expression in the four groups (sham-operated, saline control, levodopa, levodopa liposomes)

Discussion

LID can be modeled in rats with 6-OHDA unilateral nigro-striatal lesions via chronic administration of low doses of levodopa. In these rats, chronic levodopa induces increasingly severe axial, limb, and orofacial AIMs, which have been extensively characterized by different research groups and validated pharmacologically [2123]. In present study, we used a unilateral 6-OHDA-lesion PD rats model, which is one of the most frequently used for PD animal model. 6-OHDA must be directional injection because of hardly through the blood brain barrier, which was proofed as the most radical way of damaging nigra striatum pathways [24].

In present study, after chronic levodopa treatment, most animals appeared AIMs and had significantly influence on axial, limb, and orofacial motor function induced by 6-OHDA. There was an obvious individual differences of AIMs symptom which was getting heavier and heavier with the extension of levodopa treatment. This results were the same as the report of [25]. Clinical study shown that about 30–80 % of PD patients could appear LID after chronic levodopa treatment. And with the increase of diseases and the extension of treatment time, the degree of movement disorder and the frequency will increase [26]. In this study, the variation tendency of rotating behavior, rigid motion, and the total AIM score were discrepancy, which was the most significantly in the levodopa group.

Seminal studies evaluating metabolic changes in the basal ganglia have suggested that hyperactivity of the direct pathway sustains dyskinesia [27]. Marked abnormalities in neuronal activity and long-lasting molecular mechanisms prime and/or sustain LID [28]. Among them, striatal FosB/ΔFosB accumulates in PD patients [29] and correlates with LID severity both in rat and monkey models of PD [30]. Molecular interference studies further highlighted a causal link between ΔFosB and LID apparition or expression [31]. In PD patients, the presence of LID is inevitably associated with a decreased duration and/or magnitude of the therapeutic benefit of l-DOPA [32]. In previous study, the selective silencing of FosB/ΔFosB-expressing neurons induced a reduction of LID together with an increased rotational behavior in rats and with an increase in good on time period without changes in disability scores in primates [33]. In present study, the FosB/ΔFosB-expressing of levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group were significantly higher than the saline control group and the sham-operated group. However, the FosB/ΔFosB-expressing of levodopa liposomes group was significantly lower than the levodopa group, which suggested that application of chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes may reduces the different movement disorder in PD treatment, compared to ordinary levodopa tablets.

In chronically l-DOPA treated rats; the extent of striatal ERK1/2 phosphorylation produced by the last drug dose was positively and strongly correlated with the AIMs scores recorded during the treatment period [33]. Levels of ERK1/2 activation in chronically l-DOPA treated nondyskinetic animals did not differ significantly from baseline values. Thus, the pronounced activation of ERK1/2 in DA-denervated striatal neurons provided a molecular counterpart to the induction of AIMs by l-DOPA [34]. Because an increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was also produced by acute l-DOPA treatment (which does not elicit significant AIMs), previous study suggested that the core signaling alteration associated with dyskinesia consists in an inability to desensitize the phospho-ERK1/2 response with repeated exposure to l-DOPA [35]. In present study, the phospho-ERK1/2 expressing of levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group were significantly higher than the saline control group and the sham-operated group. However, the phospho-ERK1/2 expressing of levodopa liposomes group was significantly lower than the levodopa group, which suggested that application of chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes may reduces the different movement disorder in PD treatment, compared to ordinary levodopa tablets.

Many evidence highlights the importance of DARPP-32 as a critical component of signal integration in striatal projection neurons. Once phosphorylated, the DARPP-32 at Thr-34 inhibits protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1) activity [36], acting as a cAMP-dependent kinase inhibitor [37]. In fact, in the dorsolateral striatum, phosphorylation mechanisms play a physiological role in motor control, and the induction of both long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP), two opposing forms of synaptic plasticity. Both forms of plasticity (LTP/LTD) are also critically linked to the activation of DA receptors, supporting the idea that in the striatum, a close interplay among DA receptors, DARPP-32 state phosphorylated/de-phosphorylated, and glutamatergic transmission might underlie the functional role of this structure in motor control and cognitive activities [38]. In present study, the phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 expressing of levodopa group and levodopa liposomes group were significantly higher than the saline control group and the sham-operated group. However, the phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 expressing of levodopa liposomes group was significantly lower than the levodopa group, which suggested that application of chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes may reduces the different movement disorder in PD treatment, compared to ordinary levodopa tablets.

Conclusion

The molecular adaptations produced by chronic l-DOPA treatment in indirect pathway neurons are poorly understood. Some recent studies performed on rats with 6-OHDA lesions have specifically addressed the relative localization of l-DOPA-induced changes in striatal gene expression to dynorphinergic or enkephalinergic neurons and have consistently found a selective upregulation of transcription factors and plasticity genes in the former population [39]. In present study, it is tempting to propose involvement of FosB/ΔFosB, phospho-ERK1/2, and phospho-Thr34 DARPP-32 in these effects [40]. And compared with ordinary levodopa tablets, chitosan-coated levodopa liposomes may be a more useful agent in reducing dyskinesias inducing for Parkinson disease.

Methods

Animals

Experimental procedures were carried out on 60 adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (Tongji Medical College Laboratory Animal Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) weighting 180–250 g corresponding to ~6 weeks of age. All procedures were performed minimizing animal discomfort and strain. Rats were maintained on a regular light–dark cycle (lights on at 10:00 a.m., lights off at 10:00 p.m.; room temperature 20–22 °C; and maximum three animals per cage) and were given food and water ad libitum before habituation to the behavioral paradigm. We employed a 6-OHDA-based parkinsonian rat model inducing abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) comparable with LID observed in PD patients by chronic treatment with levodopa. The Institute Research Medical Ethics Committee of Huazhong University granted approval for this study.

Unilateral 6-OHDA-lesion model of PD

Unilateral (left hemisphere) DA denervation was performed according to a standard protocol [41]. Briefly, rats were anaesthetized with 1.5–2.5 % isoflurane in oxygen and mounted on a stereotaxic instrument (Stoelting Co, Wood Dale, IL, USA). Body temperature was maintained at 37–38 °C with a heating pad (Stoelting Co) placed beneath the animal. After a subcutaneous injection of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, a midline scalp incision was made, and a hole (diameter of ~1.0 mm) was drilled in the skull on the left side. The neurotoxin (30-mM solution of 6-OHDA containing 0.03 % of ascorbic acid) was injected into the medial forebrain bundle (coordinates: 4.0 mm posterior of the bregma, 1.3 mm laterally of the midline, and 7.0 mm beneath the cortical surface). Injections of 3 μL of 6-OHDA were administrated through a 30-gauge cannula connected to a 10 μL Hamilton syringe over a period of 3 min. The injection of neurotoxin was preceded by a bolus of desipramine (25 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) to minimize the uptake of 6-OHDA by noradrenergic neurons. Two weeks later, an apomorphine-induced rotation test (0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneously) was performed to assess the severity of nigral lesions [41]. Animals performing at least 100 rotations opposite to the lesion site within 20 min from the apomorphine treatment were considered successfully lesioned and included in the study [42].

Chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes

We used the chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes as previously described [40].

Drug treatment and behavioral tests

6-OHDA-lesioned rats randomly divided into three groups (saline control group, n = 10; levodopa group, 20 mg/kg levodopa and 5 mg/kg benserazide, n = 20; levodopa liposomes group, 4.7 mL/kg 34.34 % chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes PBS solution and 5 mg/kg benserazide, n = 20) and sham-operated rats (n = 10) intragastric administrated twice a day up to 21 days. Animals were placed individually in a Plexiglas box and their axial, limb, and orofacial AIMs were monitored daily between 10:00 a.m. and 04:00 p.m. for 5 min per animal at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 days after levodopa administration by two trained researchers blind to the treatment. AIMs were scored on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 4 (1 = occasional; 2 = frequent; 3 = continuous but interrupted by sensory distraction; and 4 = continuous, severe, not interrupted by sensory distraction) as previously described [43].

Western blotting

An independent group of rats treated with either rosiglitazone (RGZ) (10 mg/kg) or vehicle (n = 8/group) were anesthetized with isoflurane on day 21 of levodopa treatment, 120 min after the last administration of levodopa, and sacrificed by decapitation. Brains were rapidly removed and frozen in cold 2-methylbutane (−50 °C). Brain coronal sections (1 mm) were cut in an ice-cold stainless steel mold using razor blades and the striatum dissected out and homogenized in a glass Potter–Elvehjem, homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 % Triton X-100, 0.1 % SDS, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, and 1 mM EDTA) and 1 % protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, USA), and centrifuged at 16,000g for 30 min at 4 °C. Equal amounts of protein (20 μg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10 %), transferred onto PVDF membranes (0.2 μm), and incubated for 1 h in 5 % fat-free milk in Tris buffer saline + 0.05 % Tween-20 (TBS-T buffer) at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C using the following primary antibodies: FosB/ΔFosB, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2, p-Thr43 DARPP-32, DARPP-32 (Santa Cruz, 1:1000), and β-actin (Sigma, 1:10, 000). After three 5-min washes in TBS-T, membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary horseradish peroxidase-linked antibodies (Santa Cruz, 1:2000) for 60 min at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using the ECL kit (Amersham, CE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, England) followed by exposure to X-ray film. Band immunoreactivity was quantified by densitometry using NIH image software.

Immunohistochemistry

The FosB/ΔFosB, ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 immunohistochemical analyzed by the ABC-peroxidase method on day 21 of levodopa treatment, 120 min after the last administration. The tissue and cells samples were prepared as frozen sections. After fixation with acetone and washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with a primary FosB/ΔFosB, ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 antibody (1:1000 dilution, Santa Cruz, USA) overnight at 4 °C, then incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody (1:200 dilution) at room temperature for 1 h. After that, the ABC-peroxidase reagent (Vector, USA) was added for an additional 1 h. With the PBS washing and 3, 3-diaminobenzidine (30 mg dissolved in 100 mL Tris buffer containing 0.03 % H2O2) staining for 5 min, the samples rinsed in water and counterstained with hematoxylin. Total ten visual fields were examined randomly in each section under 200× magnification under the light microscope and the positive stained cells were counted in a total number of 500–1000 cells.

Statistical analysis

Behavioral data and group comparison of dyskinesia intensity scores were analyzed by repeated measures (ANOVA) and relevant differences between groups were analyzed pairwise by Bonferroni post hoc test. Global AIMs comparison between two groups was performed by using Student’s t test. The null hypothesis was rejected when P < 0.05.

For analysis of WB and IHC quantification data, Student’s t test was used (minimum level of significance P < 0.05) provided by GraphPad PRISM 5 software.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

XC, DH and YX perform the experiments and figures. LW, SL, SS and QP: experimental design and write the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant of  National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700881) and a grant of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171193).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(2)
College of pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
(3)
Department of Neurology, Weifang People’s Hospital
(4)
College of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University

References

  1. Dodel RC, Berger K, Oertel WH. Health-related quality of life and healthcare utilisation in patients with Parkinson’s disease: impact of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19:1013–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Poewe W, Antonini A, Zijlmans JC, Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets F. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: an old drug still going strong. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:229–38.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Katzenschlager R, Lees AJ. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease: levodopa as the first choice. J Neurol. 2002;249(Suppl 2):II19–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jankovic J, Stacy M. Medical management of levodopa-associated motor complications in patients with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs. 2007;21:677–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berthet A, Bezard E. Dopamine receptors and l-dopa-induced dyskinesia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15:S8–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nadjar A, Gerfen CR, Bezard E. Priming for l-dopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: a feature inherent to the treatment or the disease? Prog Neurobiol. 2009;87:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Olanow CW, Obeso JA, Stocchi F. Continuous dopamine-receptor treatment of Parkinson’s disease: scientific rationale and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:677–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mazzucchelli C, Vantaggiato C, Ciamei A, Fasano S, Pakhotin P, Krezel W, Welzl H, Wolfer DP, Pagès G, Valverde O, Marowsky A, Porrazzo A, Orban PC, Maldonado R, Ehrengruber MU, Cestari V, Lipp HP, Chapman PF, Pouysségur J, Brambilla R. Knockout of ERK1 MAP kinase enhances synaptic palsticity in the striatum and facilitates striatal-mediated learning and memory. Neuron. 2002;34:807–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crow T, Xue-Bian JJ, Siddiqi V, Kang Y, Neary JT. Phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by one-trial and multi-trial classical conditioning. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3480–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Atkins CM, Selcher JC, Petraitis JJ, Trzaskos JM, Sweatt JD. The MAPK cascade is required for mammalian associative learning. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:602–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Keyse SM. Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:186–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhen X, Torres C, Cai G, Friedman E. Inhibition of protein tyrosine/mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase activity is associated with D2 dopamine receptor supersensitivity in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:1356–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Westin JE, Vercammen L, Strome EM, Konradi C, Cenci MA. Spatiotemporal pattern of striatal ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a rat model of l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and the role of dopamine D1 receptors. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:800–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fieblinger T, Sebastianutto I, Alcacer C, Bimpisidis Z, Maslava N, Sandberg S, Engblom D, Cenci MA. Mechanisms of dopamine D1 receptor-mediated ERK1/2 activation in the parkinsonian striatum and their modulation by metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5. J Neurosci. 2014;34(13):4728–40.Google Scholar
  15. Berthet A, Bezard E. Dopamine receptors and l-dopa-induced dyskinesia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009;15(4):S8–12.Google Scholar
  16. Hakansson K, Lindskog M, Pozzi L, Usiello A, Fisone G. DARPP-32 and modulation of cAMP signaling: involvement in motor control and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004;10:281–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Santos C, Silva CJSM, Guimarães R, Büttel Z, Tamagnini P, Zille A. Fabrication and characterization of PVA, PVA/chitosan, and PVA/cyanobacterial exopolysaccharide nanofibrous composite nanofiltration membranes prepared by electrospinning. In: Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society. New Orleans, Louisiana: ACS; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Kong M, Chen XG, Xing K, Park HJ. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. J Food Microbiol. 2010;144:51–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruz-Romero MC, Murphy T, Morris M, Cummins E, Kerry JP. Antimicrobial activity of chitosan, organic acids and nano-sized solubilisates for potential use in smart antimicrobially-active packaging for potential food applications. Food Control. 2013;34:393–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen MC, Mi FL, Liao ZX, Hsiao CW, Sonaje K, Chung MF, Hsu LW, Sung HW. Recent advances in chitosan-based nanoparticles for oral delivery of macromolecules. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:865–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moreno S, Farioli-Vecchioli S, Ceru MP. Immunolocalization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and retinoid X receptors in the adult rat CNS. Neuroscience. 2004;123:131–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dekundy A, Lundblad M, Danysz W, Cenci MA. Modulation of l-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements by clinically tested compounds: further validation of the rat dyskinesia model. Behav Brain Res. 2007;179:76–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinez AA, Morgese MG, Pisanu A, Macheda T, Paquette MA, Seillier A, Cassano T, Carta AR, Giuffrida A. Activation of PPAR gamma receptors reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesias in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;74:295–304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas J, Wang J, Takubo H, Sheng J, de Jesus S, Bankiewicz KS. A 6-hydroxydopamine-induced selective parkinsonian rat model: further biochemical and behavioral characterization. Exp Neurol. 1994;126:159–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee CS, Cenci MA, Schulzer M, Björklund A. Embryonic ventral mesencephalic grafts improve levodopa-induced dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2000;123:1365–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nutt JG. Levodopa induced dyskinesia: review, observation and speculations. Neurology. 1990;40:340–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vila M, Levy R, Herrero MT, Ruberg M, Faucheux B, Obeso JA, Agid Y, Hirsch EC. Consequences of nigrostriatal denervation on the functioning of the basal ganglia in human and nonhuman primates: an in situ hybridization study of cytochrome oxidase subunit I mRNA. J Neurosci. 1997;17:765–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholas AP, Lubin FD, Hallett PJ, Vattem P, Ravenscroft P, Bezard E, Zhou S, Fox SH, Brotchie JM, Sweatt JD, Standaert DG. Striatal histone modifications in models of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. J Neurochem. 2008;106:486–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tekumalla PK, Calon F, Rahman Z, Birdi S, Rajput AH, Hornykiewiz O, Di Paolo T, Bédard PJ, Nestler EJ. Elevated levels of ΔFosB and RGS9 in striatum in Parkinson’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50:813–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Berton O, Guigoni C, Li Q, Bioulac BH, Aubert I, Gross CE, Dileone RJ, Nestler EJ, Bezard E. Striatal overexpression of Delta Jun D resets l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in a primate model of Parkinson disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:554–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Prashanth LK, Fox S, Meissner WG. I-Dopa-induced dyskinesia clinical presentation, genetics, and treatment. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2011;98:31–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Grueter BA, Robison AJ, Neve RL, Nestler EJ, Malenka RC. FosB differentially modulates nucleus accumbens direct and indirect pathway function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1923–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Aubert I, Guigoni C, Hakansson K, Li Q, Dovero S, Barthe N, Bioulac BH, Gross CE, Fisone G, Bloch B, Bezard E. Increased D1 dopamaine receptor signaling in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:17–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Carta M, Lindgren HS, Lundblad M, Stancampiano R, Fadda F, Cenci MA. Role of striatal l-DOPA in the production of dyskinesia in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats. J Neurochem. 2006;96:1718–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunn KL, Espino PS, Drobic B, He S, Davie JR. The Ras-MAPK signal transduction pathway, cancer and chromatin remodeling. Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;83:1–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Svenningsson P, Nishi A, Fisone G, Girault JA, Nairn AC, Greengard P. DARPP-32: an integrator of neurotransmission. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;44:269–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nairn AC, Svenningsson P, Nishi A, Fisone G, Girault JA, Greengard P. The role of DARPP-32 in the actions of drugs of abuse. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47:14–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Calabresi P, Picconi B, Tozzi A, Di Filippo M. Dopamine-mediated regulation of corticostriatal synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:211–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. St-Hilaire M, Landry E, Levesque D, Rouillard C. Denervation and repeated l-DOPA induce complex regulatory changes in neurochemical phenotypes of striatal neurons: implication of a dopamine D1-dependent mechanism. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;20:450–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang L, Yan D, Xiao H, Sun S, Xu Y. Effects of chitosan-coated levodopa nanoliposomes on behaviour and levels of phosphorylated Mr 32 000 dopamine-and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein in rats with dyskinesia. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2012;1.Google Scholar
  41. Galati S, D’angelo V, Scarnati E, Stanzione P, Martorana A, Procopio T, Sancesario G, Stefani A. In vivo electrophysiology of dopamine-denervated striatum: focus on the nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathway. Synapse. 2008;62:409–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Galati S, Salvadè A, Pace M, Sarasso S, Baracchi F, Bassetti CL, Kaelin-Lang A, Städler C, Stanzione P, Möller JC. Evidence of an association between sleep and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(3):1577–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ueno T, Yamada J, Nishijima H, Arai A, Migita K, Baba M, Ueno S, Tomiyama M. Morphological and electrophysiological changes in intratelencephalic-type pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex of a rat model of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;64:142–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016