Open Access

Chloroplast localization of Cry1Ac and Cry2A protein- an alternative way of insect control in cotton

  • Adnan Muzaffar1, 2,
  • Sarfraz Kiani1,
  • Muhammad Azmat Ullah Khan1,
  • Abdul Qayyum Rao1Email author,
  • Arfan Ali1,
  • Mudassar Fareed Awan1,
  • Adnan Iqbal1,
  • Idrees Ahmad Nasir1,
  • Ahmad Ali Shahid1 and
  • Tayyab Husnain1
Biological Research201548:14

DOI: 10.1186/s40659-015-0005-z

Received: 23 June 2014

Accepted: 17 February 2015

Published: 13 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Insects have developed resistance against Bt-transgenic plants. A multi-barrier defense system to weaken their resistance development is now necessary. One such approach is to use fusion protein genes to increase resistance in plants by introducing more Bt genes in combination. The locating the target protein at the point of insect attack will be more effective. It will not mean that the non-green parts of the plants are free of toxic proteins, but it will inflict more damage on the insects because they are at maximum activity in the green parts of plants.

Results

Successful cloning was achieved by the amplification of Cry2A, Cry1Ac, and a transit peptide. The appropriate polymerase chain reaction amplification and digested products confirmed that Cry1Ac and Cry2A were successfully cloned in the correct orientation. The appearance of a blue color in sections of infiltrated leaves after 72 hours confirmed the successful expression of the construct in the plant expression system. The overall transformation efficiency was calculated to be 0.7%. The amplification of Cry1Ac-Cry2A and Tp2 showed the successful integration of target genes into the genome of cotton plants. A maximum of 0.673 μg/g tissue of Cry1Ac and 0.568 μg/g tissue of Cry2A was observed in transgenic plants. We obtained 100% mortality in the target insect after 72 hours of feeding the 2nd instar larvae with transgenic plants. The appearance of a yellow color in transgenic cross sections, while absent in the control, through phase contrast microscopy indicated chloroplast localization of the target protein.

Conclusion

Locating the target protein at the point of insect attack increases insect mortality when compared with that of other transgenic plants. The results of this study will also be of great value from a biosafety point of view.

Keywords

Chloroplast transient peptide Cry1Ac Cry2A Bt cTP Cry genes Endotoxins GUS Transgenic plants

Background

The discovery of the insecticidal effects of Bacillus thuringiensis in the early 20th century has allowed for the development of new pest insect control methods. The Cry proteins solubilize in alkaline pH (9–12) following ingestion, and protoxins are then released. The protoxins are activated by specific enzymes in the midgut and bind to specific receptors in the microvilli of columnar cell apical membranes in lepidopteran insects [1]. The effect of Bt proteins is highly specific to certain insect species, and they are nontoxic to beneficial insects and animals [2]. Their relative safety for the environment, animals, humans, fishes, birds, and beneficial entomofauna is of great significance [3].

Transformation of these crystal protein (Bt) genes in plants, especially cotton, has been carried out for many years [4]. This limits the application of environmentally devastating pesticides. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crystal proteins have attracted extensive attention as insecticidal molecules [5]. The reduction in pesticide application, up to 70%, has been documented in Bt cotton fields in India resulting in a saving of up to US$30 per ha in insecticide costs and an 80–87% increase in harvested cotton yield [6].

Cloning and transformation of various Bt genes have been done in higher plants but the resulting transgenic plants show lower insecticidal activity as insects develop Bt resistance in response to the level of gene expression [7]. Low toxin levels are of huge concern nowadays. To overcome this issue, several strategies have been employed by researchers, e.g., inserting the gene into the chloroplast genome [8,9], modifying the coding sequences of the bacterial gene to plant-preferred coding sequences [10], and expressing the genes in the chloroplast using chloroplast transient peptides [11].

The new trend in transformation for localized transgene expression is chloroplast transformation [11]. This technique is very useful in expressing genes in the green parts of the plants but its application has been limited to the Solanaceae family [12]. Most of the work on chloroplast transformation has concentrated on tobacco because it is easy to regenerate on tissue culture media following biolistic/agrobacterium transformation [13]. However, the recalcitrant nature of cotton plants makes them impossible to regenerate on tissue culture media [14], seriously hindering the application of chloroplast transformation technology in this plant. Though the chloroplast contains its own DNA, it only codes 10% of the required protein. The rest of the proteins are imported from the cytosol to the chloroplast through specific trans-peptide (TP) signals [15] having an N-terminal extension responsible for carrying the proteins to the organelle [16]. Based on this, cotton nuclear transformation might be achieved by tagging TP at the Bt gene N-terminal to transport precursor proteins into the chloroplast [17,18].

Several reports have confirmed that lepidopteran insects develop some resistance to Bt crops with a single Cry gene. Therefore, there is a need to develop new strategies comprising multiple lines of defense to cope with this developing resistance in insects [11]. The present study focused on two aspects; first, developing resistance in plants using two genes, i.e., Cry1Ac and Cry2A, and second, achieving the benefits of chloroplast targeted expression through nuclear transformation in cotton, where tissue culture on media is impossible. A higher production of target proteins can be achieved when the genes are expressed in plant chloroplasts [17,19,20] because when the transgene is stably integrated, plastid transformation accumulates large amounts of foreign proteins (up to 46% of total leaf protein) [21]. The higher expression is the result of thousands of copies of the chloroplast genome in each plant cell, which results in high copy numbers of the functional genes [22]. Other advantages that have been seen in chloroplast transgenic plants include a 169-fold increase in transgene expression compared with nuclear transformation and a lack of transgene silencing [23]. Another advantage of chloroplast targeted engineering includes transgene stacking, i.e. simultaneous expression of multiple transgenes, thus creating multivalent vacancies in a single transformation step [22].

The present study aimed to clone Cry1Ac and Cry2A genes and transit peptides with their fusion protein, which can localize its expression in the chloroplast. This study was designed for the production of modern transgenic cotton plants with minimal biosafety concerns. The transgene is expressed only in the green tissues because the fusion-protein gene attaches to Bt on C-terminal and cTP on N-terminal resulting in higher expression levels, which enhances lepidopteran insect resistance.

Results

Construction of the plant expression vector MUZ_01

The transit peptide was isolated from Petunia (Figure 1). The construct MUX_01 was designed (Figure 2). Successful cloning was obtained by amplifying of 167 bp of Cry2A, 479 bp of Cry1Ac, and 216 bp of the transit peptide (Figure 3). The orientation was confirmed by specific primers, i.e., forward from Cry1Ac and reverse from Cry2A. An appropriate band of 805 bp and a digested product of 4.6 kb confirmed that Cry1Ac and Cry2A were successfully cloned in the correct orientation (Figure 4). The vector construction pattern is shown in a partial map (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Lane 1 and 2 show PCR product of 216 bp with full length primers of cTP while lane 3 is 1 kb ladder.

Figure 2

Construct map (pBI-121-Tp- Cry1Ac - Cry2A -Nos) along with restriction sites.

Figure 3

Confirmation of successful cloning by PCR in Figure A Lane 1: 100 bp Leader Lane 1–6 PCR product of Cry2A Lane 7: Negative Control while in Figure B Lane 1: 100 bp Ladder and Lane 2–4: PCR product of 216 bp and in Figure C Lane 1: 100 bp Ladder, 2–7 Amplified product of Cy1Ac and lane 8 is negative control.

Figure 4

A Lane 1 shows the digested product of 4.6 kb and Lane 2 shows 1 kb ladder whereas in B Lane one is lamda hindi-III ladder lane 2 is negative control, lane 3 is 1 kb ladder and lane 4–6 are PCR product of 805 bp.

Transient expression through GUS estimation

A total of 1000 embryos were transformed with MUZ_01 (TP-Cry1Ac + CryIIA) and subjected to transient expression of the GUS gene. The appearance of a blue color in sections of infiltrated leaves after 72 hours confirmed the successful expression of the MUZ_01 construct vector in the plant expression system because Cry1Ac, Cry2A, and GUS gene expression were under the same promoter (Figures 5 and 6). A bluish green color was apparent in transgenic embryos but not in nontransgenic ones (Figure 6). Thirty plants that survived and passed screening were moved to selection free medium. In the end, seven plants survived soil acclimatization and were moved to the field. The overall transformation efficiency was calculated to be 0.7% (Table 1).
Figure 5

Gus Expression in experimental plants. A: transgenic plant leaves having blue-green color B: Non transgenic plant leaves as negative control with no color change.

Figure 6

Transient Gus expression. A: In cotton stem section, B: Leaf midrib, C: In cotton leaf under florescent microscope. The bluish green color indicates the Gus expression.

Table 1

Transformation efficiency of Muz-01 Construct in Cotton

Construct

Germinated embryos used

Survival (3 weeks)

Survival (8 weeks)

Shifted in soil

Transformation efficiency (TE)%

pBI-121

1000

129

36

7

0.7

Molecular analysis of the putative transgenic plants

PCR analysis of putative transgenic plants

The amplification of 805 bp from Cry1Ac-Cry2A and 216 bp from Tp2 showed successful integration of the target genes into the cotton plant genomes Figure 7. A Tp2-Cry1Ac-Cry2A plasmid was used as a positive control, while DNA extracted from untransformed plants was used as a negative control.
Figure 7

Confirmation of Transgenic plants by PCR with orientation ( Cry1Ac+Cry2A ) primers and Tp2 primers. Lane 1: 100 bp Ladder Lane, 2–3 PCR products with orientation primers Lane 4 positive control Lane 5–6 PCR product with Tp2 primers and Lane 7 Negative control.

Qualitative analysis of the Bt protein in transgenic plants

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed transgenic plants were subjected to qualitative analysis through a dipstick assay. The presence or absence of the Bt protein in transgenic plants was confirmed by the presence or absence of bands at the test position along with a control band (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Qualitative analysis of Bt protein in transgenic plants by using Dipstick assay. Left row showing the concentration of Cry2A in μg/g while Cry1Ac in right row.

Confirmation of MUZ_01 (Tp2- Cry1Ac-Cry2A) protein expression by ELISA

Cry1Ac and Cry2A proteins in transgenic plants were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with an Envirologix Kit (Cat # AP051, 500 Riverside Industrial Parkway Portland, Maine 04103–1486 USA). Positive and negative controls were added to the wells along with test samples. ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the endo-toxin (Cry1Ac and Cry2A) values were quantified as μg/g of fresh tissue [24] as shown in Figure 9. A maximum of 0.673 μg/g tissue of Cry1Ac and 0.568 μg/g tissue of Cry2A was observed in transgenic plants, while no Bt protein expression was observed in the nontransgenic control plants.
Figure 9

Quantification of Cry1Ac and Cry2A protein by ELISA.

Insect bioassay

Insect bioassays of transgenic and control plants were carried out in controlled conditions by simply using fresh leaves from transgenic cotton plants, along with nontransgenic control plants. We achieved 100% mortality in the target insect after 72 hours of feeding the 2nd instar insect larvae with transgenic plants, while 100% survival on nontransgenic leaves determined the efficacy of the MUZ_01 gene construct against the target insect pests (Figure 10).
Figure 10

Bioassy with American bollworm.

Phase contrast fluorescence microscopy

Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) imaging of transgenic plants expressing Cry1Ac-Cry2A under cTP was taken at 488 nm and Chloroplast red auto-fluorescence at 580 nm excitation. Longitudinal leaf sections were labeled with primary antibody, anti-Cry1Ac/, anti-Cry2A, a secondary antibody, and FITC-conjugated IgG and observed under a phase contrast microscope (OLYMPUS DX61). 4’, 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used to stain the nuclei. Cells stained with DAPI fluoresced blue, while those stained with FITC-conjugated IgG fluoresced green. The chloroplast itself gave off red auto-fluorescence, and the merged image of the transgenic leaves fluoresced yellow. In case of the control leaves, no yellow fluorescence was produced. These results indicate that Cry proteins were integrated into the chloroplast, i.e., transgenic plants under cTP, and in the case of the controls these proteins reside outside the chloroplast as indicated in Figures 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Figure 11

Phase contrast fluorescence microscopy of Cry1Ac transgenic plants without transit peptide. A = DAPI blue fluorescence. B = FITC green fluorescence. C = Chloroplast auto-fluorescence red. D = Merged image of I, II & III. Green red and blue colors do not merge i.e. Cry1Ac is outside the chloroplast.

Figure 12

Phase contrast fluorescence microscopy of Cry1Ac transgenic plants with transit peptide. A = DAPI blue fluorescence. B = FITC green fluorescence. C = Chloroplast auto-fluorescence red. D = Merged image of A, B and C. Yellow color is produced where green and red fluorescence occurred at the same place i.e. Cry1Ac inside chloroplasts.

Figure 13

Phase contrast fluorescence microscopy of Cry2A transgenic plants without transit peptide. A = DAPI blue fluorescence. B = FITC green fluorescence. C = Chloroplast auto-fluorescence red. D = Merged image of I, II & III. Green red and blue colors do not merge i.e. Cry2A is outside the chloroplast.

Figure 14

Phase contrast fluorescence microscopy of Cry2A transgenic plants with transit peptide. A = DAPI blue fluorescence. B = FITC green fluorescence. C = Chloroplast auto-fluorescence red. D = Merged image of A, B and C. Yellow color is produced where green and red fluorescence occurred at the same place i.e. Cry2A inside chloroplasts.

Discussion

Chloroplast targeted expression of the Bt gene holds great potential for incorporating vital agronomic traits into plants. High Bt gene levels in chloroplasts permits plants to generate large quantities of crystal proteins. In the present study, two insecticidal genes, Cry1Ac and Cry2A, along with a chloroplast transit peptide were cloned in a PBI-121 vector and transformed into cotton variety MNH-786. Cry1Ac and Cry2A were selected because of their unique qualities, i.e., high expression levels and lack of competition for receptors among them.

The present study highlights the importance of cloning genes with transit peptides to demonstrate enhanced expression in cotton plants. Cry1Ac and Cry2A genes were cloned along with a chloroplast transient peptide in plant expression vector pBI-121 with the help of Hindi-III restriction sites. Successful cloning was confirmed by gene specific and orientation primers [25]. An agro-infiltration assay was used to check the efficacy of the cloned genes transient expression [11], resulting in a bluish-green color in the infiltrated region. Similar results were obtained by Ashraf, Bakhsh, and Pathi [26-28]. Transformation of the Cry genes with transit peptides not only makes it possible to localize transgene proteins in green parts of the plant, but it is also helpful in overcoming health and biosafety issues. Transgene protein expression was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Appearance of a band on the dipstick along with a control confirmed the presence of the target protein in the transgenic plant; similar results were reported by Dangat [29]. ELISA was performed to quantify the Cry proteins according to Li [30]. Maximum (0.673 ng, 0.454 ng) and minimum (0.306 ng, 0.568 ng) Cry1Ac and Cry2A proteins, respectively, were estimated in Muz-01 transgenic plants compared with control plants, which exhibited no Cry protein expression. Successful integration of Cry proteins into the chloroplast was confirmed by florescence microscopy [31] and FITC. Similar results for AtTrx-h3 expression in chloroplasts have been reported, while [32] used a similar technique for RB-60 protein expression in the cytoplasm and chloroplast. Insect bioassays revealed high mortality in the American boll worm. To check the efficacy of the transgene in the field an insect bioassay was performed. We recorded 100% mortality in the insects after feeding on the transgenic leaves, these results are comparable to those of Kiani [11].

From the above it is clear that the cloning of more than one gene, i.e., fusion genes, with transient peptides to localize the expression of these genes in the chloroplast not only increases the efficacy of the Bt proteins to kill the insects but it is also helpful in solving the biosafety concerns. On the basis of our molecular analysis we conclude that the transgenic plants with double Bt genes and a transit peptide for chloroplast expression was an excellent improvement in lepidopteron insect resistance. Our results suggest that transgenic cotton with transit peptide fusion protein genes is necessary to improve resistance against insects when compared with other genes without transit peptide fusion proteins.

Conclusions

This investigation suggests that insect resistance in cotton by modifying cotton plant genetics with gene transformation is possible. We found that protection against insects was improved by integrating some of the unique features of chloroplast transit peptides into the cotton crop. The present study was designed to produce modern transgenic cotton plants with no biosafety concerns as the transgene is only expressed in green tissues because the fusion protein gene only attaches to Bt in the C-terminal and cTP in the N-terminal. Thus, the new transgenic cotton variety exhibits greater insect resistance and enhanced Bt expression only in the green parts of plants, which will result in reduced biosafety concerns and increased cotton yield.

Methods

Selection of plant materials

The transit peptide was first reported in petunia [Accession no. JF499829], which was locally available. For the isolation of cTP, petunia cultivar, Grandiflora, seeds were grown in the Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology CEMB green house at 25°C. Tobacco and cotton plants were also selected for transient expression and transformation, respectively.

Isolation of the chloroplast transit peptide (cTP)

Total RNA was extracted from petunia leaves. Oligo (dT) 18 primers and the MMLuV-RT enzyme were used for cDNA library synthesis. An NcoI restriction site was used with the forward (TTAGCCATGGATGGCACAAATTAACAACATGG) and reverse primers (TAAGCCATGGCTGTGCTGTAGCCACTGATGC) to amplify a 216 bp fragment of the TP gene from the cDNA library. The amplified PCR product was cloned into a TA-vector PCR 2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States of America). TP Sequencing was carried out with M13 primers on an ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer. Vector sequences were deleted in GeneDoc software.

Plant expression vector construction

The CaMV35S-Cry1Ac-NOS cassette (2476 bp) was excised from a pK2Ac vector. This excised cassette was then purified and cloned into a pTZ57 vector to overcome the NcoI constrain. TP was then digested with NcoI and ligated towards the Cry1Ac N-terminal. A 35S-TP-Cry1Ac-NOS cassette was then cloned into pBI121 using HindIII restriction sites. Cry2A was digested with XhoI and treated with S1 nuclease to remove single-stranded overhangs and was then ligated towards the Cry1Ac C-terminal, which generated TP-Cry1Ac-Cr2A (Muz-01 name given to this vector). The correct Cry2A orientation was confirmed through PCR with orientation primers. The Cry1Ac-Cry2A orientation primers were: forward primer (CAGCAGTGGAAATAACATTCAGA) and reverse primer (AGCCTGTTGAGGAAGAGCTG), to give 805 bp amplification products.

Confirmation of successful cloning

For the confirmation of successful cloning, the construct was checked by orientation PCR and restriction-digestion. A pair of primers was designed for the orientation PCR. The forward primer (CAGCAGTGGAAATAACATTCAGA) was designed from Cry1Ac, while reverse primer (AGCCTGTTGAGGAAGAGCTG) was designed from Cry2A. Following PCR amplification with orientation, successful cloning and the correct orientation were further confirmed by digestion and ligation. The Hindi-III enzyme was used for digestion and ligation. The Hindi-III enzyme digested the complete TP2-Cry1Ac-Cry2A-NOS cassette, thus releasing a 4.6 kb fragment. Therefore, the restriction-digestion and orientation PCR confirmed successful cloning and that the genes were cloned in the correct orientation.

GUS leaf infiltration assay

Muz-01 was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (LBA4404 strain) by electroporation. The efficacy of the construct vectors was confirmed by an Agrobacterium-mediated leaf infiltration GUS assay in both tobacco and cotton fresh leaves. The underside of the leaf was gently rubbed to remove the wax cuticle. Agrobacterium samples were taken with 5 mL syringes; the needle was removed, placed on the underside of the leaf, and pressed gently. Liquid diffused into mesophyllar air spaces. The infiltrated area was marked and tagged. These leaves were left for 72 hours under natural conditions and then subjected to a GUS assay.

Detection of GUS activity

GUS activity in the infiltrated leaves was detected histochemically. The infiltrated portion of the leaves was excised and incubated in GUS staining solution (0.08% w/v X-Gluc in 0.1 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate pH 7.0, 0.2 mM 10% Triton, and 20% methanol) at 37°C. After staining with GUS solution these plant tissues were immersed in fixative solution, which consisted of formaldehyde (5%), ethanol (20%), and acetic acid (5%) for 10 minutes. To remove chlorophyll, the leaves were submerged in 70% ethanol for 48 hours. GUS activity was then observed by sight as well as under a florescent microscope (OLYMPUS SZX7).

Cotton construct transformation

Cotton (G. hirsutum) cv. MNH 786 was selected for transformation because of its high yielding potential and susceptibility to lepidopteran insects. Delinted seeds were sterilized with Tween 20 for 4 minutes and then subjected to 0.1% HgCl2 and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. Sterilized seeds were placed in a seed germinator at 30°C overnight in the dark. Germinated seedlings were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as used by [33] and modified by [24,34-36] at CEMB. MS medium [37] was used to culture the inoculated plants. Furthermore, 1 mg/l kinetin and 250 mg/l cefotaxime were used in the MS plates for the first 3 days, and after that the plantlets were subcultured in MS tubes containing 250 mg/l kanamycin, 0.5 mg/l benzylaminopurine, and 1 mg/l a-naphthaleneacetic acid. The putative transgenic plants were then moved to pots containing soil of equal proportions of clay, sand, and peat moss (1:1:1). Finally, the plants were moved to a greenhouse and subjected to various molecular analyses.

Genomic DNA isolation and polymerase chain reaction

Genomic DNA was isolated from the putative transgenic cotton leaves according to the method of Zhang [38]. Successful integration of the genes into the cotton genome was confirmed by PCR amplification with internal Cry1Ac and Cry2A primers.

Whole-leaf protein extraction

Whole-leaf protein was extracted from fresh transgenic cotton leaves. The leaves were crushed in liquid nitrogen. Ground leaves were put in 1.5 mL micro tubes with 400 μL of protein extraction buffer (1X). The samples were vortexed to homogenize and incubated at 4°C for 2 hours. The samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 × g. The supernatant was eluted and stored in new 1.5 mL tubes and Bradford reagent was used to quantify proteins [39].

ELISA

Leaf samples were ground in liquid nitrogen with a pestle and mortar. After grinding, 300 μl of protein extraction buffer was added and it was incubated at 4°C for overnight. The next day the mixture was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was eluted. Fifty microliters of Cry1Ac and Cry2A enzyme conjugate was then added to each well immediately followed by 50 μl extraction buffer, 50 μl Cry1Ac and Cry2A positive control, and 50 μl of the sample extract to the their respective wells. The contents were thoroughly mixed by moving in a rapid circular motion for 20–30 seconds. The wells were then covered with parafilm and incubated at ambient temperature for 2 hours. After incubation the cover was removed and the wells were washed three times with washing buffer. Water was removed and 100 μl of substrate was added to each well. The wells were covered with parafilm and the plate was incubated at ambient temperature for 30 minutes. After incubation, 100 μl of the stop solution was added, turning the well contents yellow. Then wavelength of the spectrophotometer was adjusted to 450 nm and the readings were recorded.

Insect bioassay

Heliothis larvae were employed for the insect bioassay [35,40] to examine whether or not the chloroplast targeted expression of the Cry1Ac and Cry2A fusion gene increased the Heliothis mortality. Larvae were collected from a CEMB field and used under laboratory conditions in a feeding bioassay. Leaves of both the control and transgenic cotton were placed in a petri dish, and larvae were allowed to feed on them. The leaves were examined after 48 hours.

FITCH

For immunohistochemistry, the leaves were washed with 1X PBS twice and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution. The samples were then incubated with primary antibodies, Anti-Cry1Ac and anti-Cry2A in a dilution of 1:100 for 1 hour at 37°C in a humidified chamber. Incubation with primary antibodies was followed by three washes with 1X PBS. The samples were then incubated with secondary antibodies specific to each of the respective primary antibodies and stained with DAPI (Invitrogen™, CA, USA) for 1 hour at 37°C in a humidified chamber. Images were taken for each group from three separate experiments using a phase contrast microscope (OLYMPUS DX61).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are really thankful Higher Education Commission and Punjab Agriculture Research bored for supporting the research project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab
(2)
Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica

References

  1. Kathage J, Qaim M. Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:11652–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bravo A, Gill SS, Soberon M. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon. 2007;49:423–35.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jozani GRS, Komakhin RA, Piruzian ES. Comparative study of the expression of the native, modified, and hybrid cry3a genes of Bacillus thuringiensis in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Russ J Genet. 2005;41:116–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sanahuja G, Banakar R, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P. Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:283–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schnepf HE, Whiteley HR. Cloning and expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:2893–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Qaim M, Zilberman D. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science. 2003;299:900–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhang H, Yin W, Zhao J, Jin L, Yang Y, Wu S, et al. Early Warning of Cotton Bollworm Resistance Associated with Intensive Planting of Bt Cotton in China. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e2274-81.
  8. Kota M, Daniell H, Varma S, Garczynski SF, Gould F, Moar WJ. Overexpression of the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry2Aa2 protein in chloroplasts confers resistance to plants against susceptible and Bt-resistant insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:1840–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu CW, Lin CC, Yiu JC, Chen JJ, Tseng MJ. Expression of a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (cry1Ab) gene in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.) chloroplasts confers high insecticidal efficacy against Plutella xylostella. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:75–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sharma P, Nain V, Lakhanpaul S, Kumar PA. Synergistic activity between Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac toxins against maize stem borer (Chilo partellus Swinhoe). Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51:42–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kiani S, Ali A, Bajwa KS, Muzaffar A, Ashraf MA, Samiullah TR, et al. Cloning and chloroplast-targeted expression studies of insect-resistant gene with ricin fusion-gene under chloroplast transit peptide in cotton. Electron J Biotechnol. 2013;16:13–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lössl AG, Waheed MT. Chloroplast‐derived vaccines against human diseases: achievements, challenges and scopes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:527–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Verma D, Daniell H. Chloroplast Vector Systems for Biotechnology Applications. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:1129–43.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu JF, Zhao CY, Ma J, Zhang GY, Li MG, Yan GJ, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with a fungal phytase gene improves phosphorus acquisition. Euphytica. 2011;181:31–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gatehouse JA. Biotechnological prospects for engineering insect-resistant plants. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:881–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tang L, Kwon S-Y, Kim S-H, Kim J-S, Choi JS, Cho KY, et al. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants expressing both superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in chloroplasts against oxidative stress and high temperature. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:1380–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim EH, Suh SC, Park BS, Shin KS, Kweon SJ, Han EJ, et al. Chloroplast-targeted expression of synthetic cry1Ac in transgenic rice as an alternative strategy for increased pest protection. Planta. 2009;230:397–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rawat P, Singh AK, Ray K, Chaudhary B, Kumar S, Gautam T, et al. Detrimental effect of expression of Bt endotoxin Cry1Ac on in vitro regeneration, in vivo growth and development of tobacco and cotton transgenics. J Biosci. 2011;36:363–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Soria-Guerra RE, Alpuche-Solis AG, Rosales-Mendoza S, Moreno-Fierros L, Bendik EM, Martinez-Gonzalez L, et al. Expression of a multi-epitope DPT fusion protein in transplastomic tobacco plants retains both antigenicity and immunogenicity of all three components of the functional oligomer. Planta. 2009;229:1293–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruiz ON, Alvarez D, Torres C, Roman L, Daniell H. Metallothionein expression in chloroplasts enhances mercury accumulation and phytoremediation capability. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:609–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. De Cosa B, Moar W, Lee SB, Miller M, Daniell H. Overexpression of the Bt cry2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:71–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Verma D, Daniell H. Chloroplast vector systems for biotechnology applications. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:1129–43.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee SW, Hahn TR. Light-regulated differential expression of pea chloroplast and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases. Plant Cell Rep. 2003;21:611–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bakhsh A, Rao AQ, Shahid AA, Husnain T, Riazuddin S. Camv 35S is a Developmental Promoter Being Temporal and Spatial in Expression Pattern of Insecticidal Genes (Cry1ac & Cry2a) in Cotton. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2010;4:37–44.Google Scholar
  25. Akhtar S, Shahid AA, Rao AQ, Bajwa KS, Muzaffar A, Latif A, et al. Genetic effects of Calotropis procera CpTIP1 gene on fiber quality in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Adv Life Sci. 2014;1:223–30.Google Scholar
  26. Ashraf MA, Shahid AA, Rao AQ, Bajwa KS, Husnain T. Functional Characterization of a Bidirectional Plant Promoter from Cotton Leaf Curl Burewala Virus Using an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Assay. Viruses. 2014;6:223–42.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bakhsh A. Expression of two insecticidal genes in Cotton. In: PhD Thesis. Lahore, Pakistan: University of the Punjab; 2010. p. 112–3.Google Scholar
  28. Pathi KM, Tula S, Tuteja N. High frequency regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of tobacco. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8:e24354.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dangat S, Rajput S, Wable K, Jaybhaye A, Patil V. A biolistic approach for transformation and expression of cry 1Ac gene in shoot tips of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Res J Biotechnol. 2007;2:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Y, Romeis J, Wang P, Peng Y, Shelton AM. A comprehensive assessment of the effects of Bt cotton on Coleomegilla maculata demonstrates no detrimental effects by Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22185.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Park SK, Jung YJ, Lee JR, Lee YM, Jang HH, Lee SS, et al. Heat-shock and redox-dependent functional switching of an h-type Arabidopsis thioredoxin from a disulfide reductase to a molecular chaperone. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:552–61.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Levitan A, Trebitsh T, Kiss V, Pereg Y, Dangoor I, Danon A. Dual targeting of the protein disulfide isomerase RB60 to the chloroplast and the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:6225–30.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gould JH, Magallanes-Cedeno M. Adaptation of Cotton Shoot Apex Culture to Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1998;16:283–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bakhsh A, Siddique S, Husnain T. A molecular approach to combat spatio-temporal variation in insecticidal gene (Cry1Ac) expression in cotton. Euphytica. 2012;183:65–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Khan GA, Bakhsh A, Riazuddin S, Husnain T. Introduction of cry1Ab gene into cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) enhances resistance against Lepidopteran pest (Helicoverpa armigera). Span J Agric Res. 2011;9:296–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rao AQ, Husnain T, Shahid AA. Impact of PHY B Gene Transformation in Physiology and Yield of Cotton. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing 2011. [https://www.morebooks.de/store/gb/book/impact-of-phy-b-gene-transformation-in-physiology-and-yield-of-cotton/isbn/978-3-8465-0191-7].
  37. Murashige T, Skoog F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang J, Stewart J, Mac D. Economical and rapid method for extracting cotton genomic DNA. J Cotton Sci. 2000;4:193–201.Google Scholar
  39. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jin S, Zhang X, Daniell H. Pinellia ternata agglutinin expression in chloroplasts confers broad spectrum resistance against aphid, whitefly, lepidopteran insects, bacterial and viral pathogens. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:313-27.

Copyright

© Muzaffar et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.